https://voat.co/v/whatever/3432945/20638202
Ask me to answer your questions again.
sigh. here goes nothing.
Okay @Crensch @Vindicator @Heygeorge @Erickaliberhall @kingkongwaswrong
why did Crensch ban me? Can I appeal?
NOMOCHOMO Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 1: Relevance; Description: Causing problems with the removal of things that have not been proven to be pizzagate. Using divisive tactics against the mods. Arguing dishonestly, even after being warned that this was not a joke. Constant pattern of disruptive behavior and supporting users like esoteric Crensch 10.9 hours ago
https://files.catbox.moe/q5grgu.jpg
-Swamp Takedown -> 24 hours Grace Relevancy
I ask for clarification as to why a person Vin calls "swamp" is deemed "irrelevant" by Crazy-Mensch
I thought "swamp" indicated Pizza/Pedos....hence it being a flair in pizzagate...I've also lurked for years as ya'll know....why I was confused as to why "Ed Buck" a name I know I'd read submissions on b4 was getting removed.
TLDR: Why am I banned for "relevance"....for defending a relevant post (edit2: and it's not my post)....
Wqk3 ago
was banned from great awakening for nothing. A post from trumps rally last night regarding Lisa Page. They are reminiscent of youtube, reddit, Twitter and Facebook. Shameful
I've contributed quite a bit the great awakening.. Even had a sticky post recently. I think it's wrong of you to ban a person for as you say "an effortless post". Makes you no better than the corporate media who bans contributors. It's rather Machiavellian. You are no better than those you prevent to distain. Shame on you!
Sorry for hijacking your post. Needed someplace to vent.
Crensch ago
You stated that you were done posting in Great Awakening because your post was removed. Nice try at white-washing history, but I was pinged to it.
@molochhunter
I don't give a fuck if all of you users don't want to pay attention to the meta that is going on under your noses, but if you start acting out when the guys that doxxed the previous owner are busy starting shit, I'm going to assume you are with them.
MolochHunter ago
@Wqk3 "I was banned for nothing"
you posted such a nothing that it was removed as being a post of insifficient substance. Then you did your noodle about that when you had the perfectly acceptable option of just reposting the same post with a bit more effort to get it over the line
but no. You had to go into childish histrionics
expect the same treatment on your next sockpuppet if you do similar
Wqk3 ago
Tyrants you be
Must Obey or else.
MolochHunter ago
histrionic nonsense
the kind that got you banned
Wqk3 ago
Later dude. Peace
NOMOCHOMO ago
hijack away. This is Crensch's death spiral, the more the merrier
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3534023/21491409
he doesn't unban people who disagree with him. Why am I still banned @Vindicator?
Your former mod banned me for a comment, then resigned.
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3535879
https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=&exact_phrase=correct+the+record+&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&order_by=oldest_document_date#results
Wikileaks demonstrates "correct the record" was used by official State Department channels 760 times as early as the 1973 PlusD cables
@shewhomustbeobeyed
Crensch ago
Good for you! I'm sure SWMBO is SO proud of you for finding that put.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I am. Unfortunately, I don't have time to read PG sub today, might check it out tonight.
I do hope that your new submission is better than the last one.
Cuz it was nothing but spiteful nonsense.
Crensch ago
I'm so very glad you think so!
NOMOCHOMO ago
so your claim of "uniqueness" ie: this phrasing "from" the CIA in 1984 and "was used to guide David Brock" = speculation
Given the EXACT same wording, I'd say it's worth looking into; Brock and his CTR could be CIA.
^[bolded statements are declarative] + [italicized statements are speculative]
Rule 2: Empiricism: Avoid baseless speculation
since the term didn't originate from CIA in 1984, your speculation has no base.
I'd be commenting this on your post. But you banned me for a comment.
@heygeorge @shewhomustbeobeyed @vindicator
Crensch ago
Aww, puddin'.
Luckily my post follows ALL the rules perfectly.
NOMOCHOMO ago
that's for @vindicator to decide
-Crensch
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/3464523/20892904
Crensch ago
Not a chance. My two posts are more pizzagate than you've ever been.
ESOTERICshade ago
Newbies are so irritating when they don't know jack shit about the subject matter.
NOMOCHOMO ago
you can't spell pizzagate with Q.
both of your submissions are divination and speculation. Mine are researched and sourced.
Crensch ago
You post bullshit and then hope that you can post hoc Source it once you get called out.
Mine was fully sourced.
NOMOCHOMO ago
"Correct the Record" was established in 2015/2016
This document uses the same phrase in 1984.
therefore?
you have no argument.
Crensch ago
Are you trying to say you have specific evidence that correct the record was not named after the CIA terminology?
NOMOCHOMO ago
If the phrase predates 1984, and has been used by the State Dept since the 1970's, you haven't proven your TITULAR claim that it's "likely source document for David Brock's CTR"
Crensch ago
Are you trying to say that CTR isn't linked to the CIA?
NOMOCHOMO ago
I'm saying you must source your claims
otherwise they break the rules.
Crensch ago
I did.
I sourced them just fine. All of them.
NOMOCHOMO ago
your speculation is speculation until you
PROVE
David Brock was influenced by this CIA doc..
coincidence doesn't prove causation.
you make a causative claim.
Crensch ago
Are you saying it is unlikely?
NOMOCHOMO ago
I don't know. Until one of us can prove it, it is baseless speculation
Crensch ago
Do you realize you're asking of me what you wouldn't provide when I asked it of you when I was a mod?
NOMOCHOMO ago
Your selective memory is false. You remember whatever narrative you try to spin
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20731083
(P.S. You banned me for Rule 1: Relevance not Rule 2 Empiricism: Speculation)
did you really forget or are multiple users running your account?
@shewhomustbeobeyed @heygeorge @vindicator
Crensch ago
What I chose to put down as what I banned you for is immaterial. I was asking you for the same thing you're asking me for.
NOMOCHOMO ago
....not if you wanted to be credible, just and forthright. Why obscure the truth?
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632494
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632671
You didn't ask me for anything. you held a gun to my head.
Crensch ago
So you don't deny that you're asking me for the same thing I asked you for?
NOMOCHOMO ago
I categorically deny both claims.
I met your demands. I provided previous submissions to establish Relevancy. The post in question was deflaired.
You still haven't proven empirically proven your titular claim "Likely Source Documentfor brock's CTR"
Your claim is substantiated only by your own baseless speculation
Crensch ago
There was no relevancy to be had in those two posts.
It was a name sandwiched in with other info in submissions that did not in any way prove Buck to be a pedophile.
You didn't hold up shit until you got banned and figured out I wasn't going to back down. Now there's no mod that interprets the rules like I did, so looks like you're shit out of luck.
Happy days!
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20631962
I provided a third original pizzagate submission
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2054740
it includes a Buck Clinton and CIA connection, thus establishing relevancy...by your own gay standards
So you banned me after I established relevancy
Crensch ago
Your first link, @Vindicator responded:
Your second link is simply "young male prostitute" and says nothing of the age, meaning NOT PROVEN PEDOPHILIA.
No. These standards are YOUR standards, and those of your buddy SWMBO who fought tooth and nail to let your brand of horseshit into the sub.
Sorry. The changes in policy are not retroactive. I'm no hypocrite, but you certainly are. Things changed once I banned you, but you made sure you stayed banned because you're either an idiot, or a paid D&C shill.
ESOTERICshade ago
Which means your recent Qanon advertisement you posted to v/pizzagate should have been flaired and deleted. You should change your username to "hypocrite."
Crensch ago
You really should get with the program.
The users rejected my interpretation of the rules. So, thanks to you and your ilk, I can post the stuff and be just fine.
Enjoy the pizzagate you helped create.
ESOTERICshade ago
Seems to be happening to you a lot lately. Maybe its your petty behavior.
Crensch ago
This has been a long time coming. I know I'm going to enjoy the show, are you?
ESOTERICshade ago
Most of us are sitting back sayinnnn dammmmnnnnn..... is this meth binge ever gonna end?
https://voat.co/u/crensch/comments
Crensch ago
Sounds like you should ask your brother.
NOMOCHOMO ago
"NOT PROVEN PEDOPHILIA."
ok if that's the standard. your post is irrelevant.
CTR, David Brock, nor Q are "PROVEN PEDOPHILIA". they are all 1 degree of proof away
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
When the word 'celebrity' can be associated with their name.
Yes.
Yes.
Has been in the past.
Has been before.
no innocent person has ever donated to clintons.
Two points for inclusion of suspects, or two points to establish relevance? Or both?
NOMOCHOMO ago
Two points for inclusion of suspects, or two points to establish relevance of evidence? Or both?
^This discussion should be stickied. Not a disgraced Moderator's violent masturbations.
We should be attacking our ideas and arguments. Honing our message. So we can save more kids..... Instead Mod behavior instigates paranoid infighting, and promotes a Zero trust atmosphere.
Stop worrying about "the community" and giving "colonoscopies to elites" and waiting for Trump.
We got a lot more done when we focused on media exposure, not political machinations.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I'm afraid I might have encouraged his masturbatory fantasies yesterday. I never have been around enough women to get the 'sugar and spice and everything nice' part figured out.
Crensch ago
Except the response to your banning confirmed that posts like mine are exactly relevant. So, thank you, for opening the door for me to post good content that Q people were convinced wouldn't be allowed. You and SWMBO are quite the team!
It already was, old boy! While you remain banned for numerous other cognitive failures, your legacy stands true, showing that my posts are exactly PG material.
I whould post some Q stuff on Epstein and Clinton!
You're fighting a fight that was already won, but sadly, you couldn't conduct yourself properly and now find yourself utterly irrelevant.
You know what? You're right! Let's add those that haven't yet been confirmed to be pedophiles that are within 1 degree of any known pedophile! There's TONS of those! Let's just inundate this sub with 1-degree losers that had the misfortune of rubbing elbows with childfuckers!
I don't think mods would give two shits about your opinions, honestly. But I'm enjoying myself immensely.
NOMOCHOMO ago
..you stepped down..because everybody was afraid to vote....because you ban indiscriminately.....while claiming the rules are "immaterial"
enjoy pizzagate?
you sick freak.
Crensch ago
I stepped down because I found out legit users were scared of me. Sounds like I'm a pretty decent guy! What does that make you?
Immensely now. I feel like I could post all kinds of things here now!
argosciv ago
I remember the last time someone tried to discourage voting by subverse users, by making claims that yourself and/or @Vindicator would ban/target people who didn't vote the way you wanted... pretty damn sure ES got busted voting multiple times and/or manufacturing consensus for the aforementioned narrative using his alts, no?
Why yes, yes he did.
What a coincidence that ES also pushed to redefine the "elite" element, like NOMO above.
@EricKaliberhall @MolochHunter
NOMOCHOMO ago
well you could ping me instead of asking rhetorically.
But you don't actually care. You seek to smear by association
argosciv ago
Only half accurate. You're right, I could ping you – if I was worried about a timely response. You were going to see it anyway and I'm quite content to wait for a response or get none at all (I also wasn't going to get a notification anyway, that I'm even seeing your comment is due to a simple check-in of my own recent comments).
I do actually care enough to genuinely wonder, though, and would be keen to see a fresh, solid rebuke of ES by you; including an explicit and concise condemnation of his fraudulent campaign against v/pizzagate moderators past and present (for which he did and continues to try to solicit support from unsuspecting v/pizzagate users) and his attempt to also use your complaints as a platform for said fraudulent campaign.
That'd at least be a start. If your concerns are legit, it should further concern the ever living fuck out of you when a proven-to-be-subversive user tries to hijack or leech off of your supposedly genuine position.
NOMOCHOMO ago
DO YOU DISAVOW ?????? DO YOU REBUKE_______????????
Broken Clocks. man.
I disagree with his tactics, behavior, and fakery.
Only thing I agree with him is the ideological premise that Q (as an anonymous person/group) has no place in an empirical investigation of Pizzagate.
(I believe it's a diversionary psy-op to corral users into a unified research pattern instead of blazing their own trails, and unearthing evidence)
I also rebuke you for being a self admitted gay wizard blood-drinker. Creepy.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Unbelievable, this little cuck is so insecure, he hangs on every word someone who might criticize him says, and then tries to make believe like he's unconcerned. Kek.
Who the fuck does this little twerp think he is. He's a SATANIST. He doesn't disavow his Babylonian Religion, but now he thinks he has a right to demand that you disavow ES, repeatedly.
So this is your fault? I don't think he logiks 2 well.
You know what would be a good start. A rope. The problem in dealing with fagos has always been his steadfast insistence that everybody feel his pain and put themselves in his shoes, gotta understand how he's suffered, while inflicting pain on those around him and swimming in his own wet-brained delusions of grandeur.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Now fagos and crunchy are targeting the women on PG, for their Mistress. Have you ever noticed that only effeminate males feel the need to seek out and attack women? Alpha boys would never even think the thought, let alone act on it.
Vindicator would never do it, he's a gentleman. I've never seen you do it, either.
Don't ever, it's very unappealing.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I only bully bullies.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Bullying bullies ought to be an olympics event. Fighting back against a bitch like me, isn't bullying. I call it self-preservation.
NOMOCHOMO ago
@heygeorge @vindicator @shewhomustbeobeyed
Crensch ago
@vindicator
NOMOCHOMO ago
upvoat. I want him to see this too
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Hey nomo, I'm up to my elbows in bread dough, will be all day. My home smells like a swedish bakery. :)
Not reading any submissions until tonight.
If you would like me to post something to PG in your name, I will.
I think you should make an IDENTIFIABLE alt and post it yourself. You were banned under a set of rules that crensch made up for his own subverses. Those rules no longer apply.
You know about the Q stuff, I only know shit when I smell it, doesn't mean I know where it came from. ;p
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
i haven't read that submission yet.
What is it you want from me?
NOMOCHOMO ago
Just Alerting the Militia @heygeorge
NOMOCHOMO ago
It's Crensch doing the same thing as post you just tagged me in.
he's literally sliding the board and legit research with SPEQULATIVE posts.
It's like they're twisting the knife
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
You expected different? He's gonna teach us all a lesson, donchaknow.
How DARE we question his authoritah
NOMOCHOMO ago
why doesn't @vindicator hold Crensch to the same submission standard as us?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I have no clue. Qtards NEVER get held to the same standards, imo.
NOMOCHOMO ago
@shewhomustbeobeyed can't remember if I edited the ping
NOMOCHOMO ago
@vindicator are you gonna let this happen?
Crensch ago
Most migrations had a significant portion of the population flee.
I believed in the filter until I saw what the filter was, and who was left after it was used.
Crensch ago
Entire migrations were rebuffed thanks to your bullshit. My modlog isn't a drop of water in that ovean.
NOMOCHOMO ago
yep. dont feed the trolls
dont start censoring speech
Crensch ago
This makes me so happy.
You ignore the Trolls, but you jump all over the users that are legitimate whenever they do something you don't like.
It makes me so happy to know that this still bothers you so much.
Crensch ago
Victim-blaming.
Keep defending your free speech while so many have been completely silenced by your policies.
Crensch ago
Remember when I destroyed zyklon, and nobody did anything about it, but continued to associate with him and let him do his thing? Remember when an innocent woman was doxxed by you? Remember when you worked with a literal Reddit cabal to change this website with Builder?
@kek
NoBS ago
Making it personal means it is time to walk away and fight another day.
You alone are making moderation into weaponized censorship on a personal level.
I suspect you mean well and thank you for baby sitting us.
Because free speech sucks but is worth getting hostile about.
Crensch ago
Begging the question and telling me what it means is a great start to this conversation.
I don't care about your characterization of my actions.
At this point, I don't believe you are legit.
NoBS ago
I'm just as legit as a bot. Yet a bot's job is to inflame with divide and conquer. I do not wish mods to divide the community. You have though theough actions that speek louder than my words. Even if you are not a bot (just kidding), you have divided this open forum though censorship. Even if justified.
Once again, justified censorship is Child porn that is not evidence and/or doxing citizen investigators for exposing "public" figures.
(important)- Unless the investigator is paid, then they are earning their keep and slander becomes the ONLY reason to censor.
Not to protect the falsely accused public figure, but the professional investigator from OUR liability.
Do you see how you have over stepped moderation into dictatorship?
Crensch ago
Oh, good.
I'm SO interested in your opinion.
Kek.
Crensch ago
Your submissions don't suggest you are pizzagate.
https://searchvoat.co/?st=comments&s=Pizzagate&u=Nobs&p=1
Your comment suggests you are a barely kept up Alt. 8 months ago on the second page of that.
NoBS ago
Pizzagate is a reference to red pilling and sharing open sourced information. Your ownership of an open sourced forum has gone from added value into a control freak having a temper tantrum with no self control.
You have become weaponized with self importance and niggardly of reference material that can save children. Not my children or hopefully not yours.
Are you profiting off this information? Then you are compromised and need a break.
Crensch ago
So emotionally charged!
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Consider yourself counted as a non-issue.
NOMOCHOMO ago
PRIOR VALIANCE =/= DOES NO WRONG
Don't pretend to have the will of the people.
You just have a position of authority. Respect the Proles and enforce the LETTER OF THE LAW.
Crensch ago
You have no power here.
You don't have the will of the people. You have the will of the trolls and Usual Suspects.
You had every opportunity to make this right, but you seem to think you have some kind of say in what happens here.
Let me give you a little hint: the last time we had a real conversation about rules, almost nobody participated, but certain people voted multiple times on alts.
Vin is right. The users just want to be left alone to do their research. You just seem to want to pick a fight. One of these things is not like the other.
NOMOCHOMO ago
nobody cares about power but you
Crensch ago
Then why did you argue about the flairs? Why did you push a false dichotomy that would be textbook for the kind of people that want to destroy places like pizzagate?
Kek.
NOMOCHOMO ago
"questioned" you about the flair change
accuse. accuse. accuse.
Crensch ago
Why are you a shill?
(Just questioning, right?)
NOMOCHOMO ago
Nope. I'm not. How was my question hostile to you?
Crensch ago
You didn't answer my question.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Nope. I'm not a shill.
Crensch ago
Now figure out how this situation is similar to what you were doing to me and Vin, and you'll finally figure out what your malfunction is.
NOMOCHOMO ago
demanding a straight answer from a mod?
Crensch ago
NOMOCHOMO ago
@shewhomustbeobeyed
NOMOCHOMO ago
I answered with a declaration
you 3vade with endless questions
Crensch ago
Why are you a shill?
NOMOCHOMO ago
I am not.
Crensch ago
Still on this?
Watch nothing happen. Watch nothing continued to happen.
SearchVoatBot ago
This submission was linked from this v/pizzagatemods submission by @Vindicator.
Posted automatically (#64409) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@NOMOCHOMO: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Vindicator)
Crensch ago
Looks like you've gone above and beyond on the Buck research. Well done. Could have solved a lot if you'd just done that and posted to help darkknight get his post in line with the rules. You know, that's the entire point of the 24h flair, right? So users can help bring submissions in line.
No.
You can:
1) Make a public apology to everyone for shitting up darkknight's post with meta BS
2) Make a public apology to me and Vindicator for trying to drive a wedge between us with the false dichotomy of "which one is right" when it was both a swamp takedown AND rule-breaking submission. i.e. this horseshit. Explain how the flairs are not opposing, since one is a celebration of a bad guy going down, and the other is a formatting warning.
3) Make a public apology for pitting mods against previous missed posts that may or may not have violated the rules despite the subject-matter being the same. (Not all posts about the same subject are equal, you know, like how the original post and its current iteration land on different sides of the rules)
3) Remove any and all meta shitstirring crap against the mods, since all you're doing is trying to rabble-rouse those that want to destroy places like PG and GA, and giving them an 'in' to do so, evidenced by your pinging PV and SBBH users.
There will be no arguments. There will be no negotiation. This is your one shot, and it's all you get. Snark will be taken as a repudiation of this offer.
Ball's in your court.
REB_Militia ago
Christ, this guy is the final boss of neckbeards.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/PVTantrums comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#67357) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@REB_Militia: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
85scp 62ccp in 2.8 years.
Nice alt, faggot.
REB_Militia ago
What is lurking?
That is correct for $500
Crensch ago
Why would I believe that?
REB_Militia ago
I don't see the purpose of an alt. Why would someone have two accounts? And why would calling out how cringey you act in regards to your power on an internet forum, rightfully so, be an indicator that this is not my main account?
Crensch ago
And you call yourself a lurker?
15 day old comment you're necrothreading.
Kek. <---
Kek.
Kek.
Crensch ago
@Vindicator see above - it's not showing up, but I have -1 on each of these comments within 36 minutes from an account with 62 ccp in a 15-day-old necrothread.
Vindicator ago
Dead for nine months until 17 days ago
Almost all comments are in the Nomo related threads since then. And what "lurker" browses pizzagatemods?
Crensch ago
Bingo.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/pizzagatemods comment by @NOMOCHOMO.
Posted automatically (#65406) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Crensch: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @NOMOCHOMO)
NoBS ago
What the hell, only two suck ups upvoted this control freak? Spend that pedo profit on older sex slaves next time and you'll get three, perv.
Maybe wash your ass before your victims kiss it. Or do sadist cult members use disposable slaves to lick 'em clean. After shitting on Pizzagate of course.
CantDentTheBrent ago
Grovel filthy goyim, if you want to be in our special psyop
NOMOCHOMO ago
@shewhomustbeobeyed
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/about/rules
I noticed @Vindicator just modified the rules 10 minutes ago @shewhomustbeobeyed. I'm not accusing anybody of anything.
last available archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190331172804/https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/about/rules
Rules 1 and 5 have been changed
5 was NSFW. It is now "comment abuse"
NoBS ago
Yeah. Abusing opinions on an opinion site is grounds to censor opinon.
Red tape, rules and by-laws empower censorship. It's much older than Fascism or Communism.
All dictators must censorship to gain power, let alone keep it.
NOMOCHOMO ago
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.stonewalldems.org/animalpac
Stonewall Dems purged his account.
it verifies the 2016 account of Buck showing black meth porn to a "trans activist" at a stonewall retreat
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20100927055951/https://profile.typepad.com/edbuck
@vindicator @shewhomustbeobeyed @darkknight111
Fundamental to Pizzagate is the belief that a valid government has the authority to say no child rape happens in your bedroom.
Ed Buck is Pizzagate. Period.
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://oklahoman.com/article/2220417/gay-activist-urges-gop-involvement
@darkknight111 @shewhomustbeobeyed @vindicator
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20638498
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20631827
@vindicator @shewhomustbeobeyed @darkknight111
https://www.wehoville.com/2019/01/09/ed-buck-recounting-history/
I found the motherlode that clearly ties Ed Buck to Pizzagate back in 2017
https://www.wehoville.com/2019/01/09/ed-buck-recounting-history/
Switching Parties
In 1988 at a Republican Party conference in Oklahoma City, Buck called for changes in the party’s “intolerant” stand on LGBT rights in Oklahoma, which included opposition to state-mandated sex education programs in schools. Unable to make major changes in his political party, Buck soon switched allegiances. In an online post in 2010, he explained his decision. “I didn’t leave the Republican Party, it left me. I can remember Barry Goldwater saying ‘out of the boardroom and out of the bedroom’ when referring to the role of government. That’s the GOP I was a proud member of … My principals have not changed, but to keep true to them, my political party had to change.”
letsdothis3 ago
Also look at Ed Buck's relationship with Adam Schiff. It's all over Twitter.
And this : https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2643401
NOMOCHOMO ago
Yep. I linked your post yesterday trying to establish relevancy with @Crensch
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20631827
he banned me for asking why Buck isn't "relevant" if Vin considers him "Swamp" and there are multiple prior posts.
plz help get me unbanned. It's a farce
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/3436360
NoBS ago
It seems the Pedo-Blackmailers have singled you out. Thank you for identifying the control freaks.
Who the hell is does this Crensch think he is, Mussolini? Hard to connect censorship to the Vatican, they have MI6 and CIA assets for that.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Please spread this info far and wide, people need to know what chambers are censored so research thrives
Vindicator ago
Excellent. This is exactly why we flair posts. You are an excellent digger, Nomo. I wish you had just given DK a hand and posted this instead of creating drama.
NOMOCHOMO ago
The only reason I found it is because I was banned....Not because of either of your flairs.
I asked @Crensch a question. He repeatedly evaded with counter questions.
Ego, bruised from the questioning, He then made my membership dependent on proving another users' post.
Crensch's Unprecedented Whim became a user-specific guideline. A Dangerous Despotic Precedent
Repeating a question to a Mod is "baiting" them?
Different Mods hold different users to different standards?
The reason given for my ban is Rule 1: Relevance.
Even though you edited Rule 1 last night (cut/pasting "NSFW" from Rule 5), you didn't change "relevance" to apply to comments. It is a submission standard.
To ban a user for a comment that doesn't fulfill a submission guideline is comment censorship.
Because Relevance does not apply to comments. You changed Rule 5 from "NSFW" to "Comment Abuse" without notifying the pizzagate community.
I am shining a light on Moderation. Any scrutiny is framed as "drama".
Unban me. I broke no rules.
I wont break your Modified Rule 5, but please announce it.
kestrel9 ago
Show us how exactly that link demonstrates that Ed Buck is a pedophile, or is part of a pedophile ring, or the victim of pedophiles.
@vindicator @crensch
NOMOCHOMO ago
Our reporting on goes mainstream....Published Newspapers with actual PRINTED circulation repeat our reporting.
It's so mainstream Vin gave it a Swamp takedown flair.
kestrel9 ago
@Vindicator explained that when he gave it the flair he'd forgotten that the victim profile was black men in their 20s. Not underage.
Linking the prior links to Ed Buck isn't protesting no. Insisting that they constitute absolute proof of why a post on Ed Buck's arrest belongs on PG instead of PGWE can be construed as protesting in this case. That being said I understand why people might assume there's concrete proof. It takes work to dig around and then not find what one assumes was there.
I disagree with your point on Edit 2. If info cited by a reporter in relation to PG/Voat is enough to constitute absolute proof of something then we are barking up the wrong tree here. That would make the scope of PG limited to a shooter going into Comet Ping Pong Pizza to find babies in the basement.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Prior relevant submissions = justification for updates
...don't misconstrue you Jew.
No. It would not make it "limited to"
it would include all reporting on pizzagate. Edgar Welch was a valid subject of discussion as it was clearly a psy-op meant to delegitimize us...hence the many submissions
https://searchvoat.co/?q=edgar+welch&sub=pizzagate&s=pizzagate&l=true
But because it was related to our investigation it is a legitimate research topic.
NOMOCHOMO ago
state-mandated sex education programs in schools.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3400765/20341107
ties to sex ed in school and pizza code:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2581515
Mandated Sex Ed in schools is by definition, State Sponsored Sexualization of Children. Siecus is now pushing "pedophilia" as an orientation
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3171546
kestrel9 ago
Show how Ed Buck is involved supporting NAMBLA philosophy being taught in school or other 'love is love' and age doesn't matter philosophy. He has been shown to be a gay serial killer targeting black gay men in their 20s. Period.
All gays support teaching gay sex ed in school, doesn't mean they are pedophiles. He's a serial killer. Not giving him ah pass. But not giving you a pass on insisting that you make your own case if you think he's a pedophile or if you have connections showing him being connected to Adam Schiff beyond making campaign contributions, most all Democrats donate to Democrat politicians. The Ed Buck arrest post belonged in PGWE, not PG.
Sex ed teachers may include pedophiles, not all sex ed teachers are pedophiles, and this particular has not been shown to be connected to Ed Buck.
To my knowledge, State Sponsored sex Ed has yet to push for pedophilia as a current acceptable social policy, (that kids should be okay with having sex with adults 'if they want'), they may cover it in some historical context as a gateway towards that goal (we know pedos do push for expanded assess to kids through education and any other venue they can think up). That much is true. Is that connection enough to confirm that Ed Buck is a pedophile? I don't think so.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I ALREADY DID: https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/3433526/20647245
false. You don't speak for gays.
"sex education" is a NAMBLA philosophy being taught in schools. Sex Ed was started by Mary Calderone and SIECUS in the 60's it was connected to Dr John Money (Pedophile) and other prominent Psychologists and Sexologists
kestrel9 ago
How do you know whether Ed Buck telling Republicans to go for NAMBLA philosophy in the schools in 1988?
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/3433526/20648130
He was pushing for gay rights and AIDS awareness. I realize that pederasty is associated with some gay men. Are you assuming they are all pederasts now? Do you just 'know' which gays support pedophilia and pederasty based on who wants sex ed about homosexuality and AIDS awareness in the schools?
So the Oklahoma politicians in 1988 who faced the issues Ed Buck brings up (homosexuality and AIDS) are pederasts? (maybe they are, did you check on any?)
Is Surgeon General Dr. C. Everett Koop a pederast by your criteria? (maybe he is? who knows but the point is this alone doesn't prove it).
There were plenty of Republican pederast in 1988, so why didn't Ed Buck stick with the party?
If anything, maybe Ed Buck was covering for them by saying they were too 'moral'. That's an intriguing line of thought.
If he was a pederast seems he'd want Republicans to stay in power.
He may belong in PGWE, still have not seen enough close connections to show that he is a pederast/pedophile or a victim of such or specifically knew that any of his friends were. Or even any incidence of people talking about him liking teenage boys or having pics of them, or subscribing Nambla material or even having CP on his computer.
NOMOCHOMO ago
The Sex Ed agenda is Pizzagate.
Children don't need THE STATE which mandates their attendance in public schools to teach them about sex.
it is the role of the parent.
Ed Buck wants the "government out of his bedroom"
but he also wants the government to enforce kindergarten education about his bedroom.
I dont disagree that he could be covering up for Franklin scandal.
But his advocacy of sex education is a part of the elite propogation and normalization of child sexuality. The history of this strategy has been well documented and found "relevant" to the pizzagate investigation.
Vindicator ago
Wrong. I already explained this. I screwed up and failed to flair for Rule 1, because I forgot Buck's victims were all adults. Because we removed almost all of the Buck posts previously, @think- who knew I was away from the computer all day, pinged Crensch to change the flair. You keep spinning events to fit the narrative of unfair flairing, and you continue to ignore the fact that Crensch was right, you were wrong to argue with him about darkknight's post breaking Rule 1, and you abused the Comment section for your own egotistical ends.
I didn't edit Rule 1 -- I appended the NSFW rule to it without changing either one in any way so as to keep the number of rules the same. We have never used Rule 5 anyway. It was wasted space.
So you think you should have free rein to shit up other people's submissions with your rants about how bad you think moderation is, when we have an entire subverse for that because the whole community agreed they didn't want that stuff on the main board, because you know you'll get banned if you submit a shitpost to assuage your ego?
Illogical.
You are tearing down the community when you could have built it up -- as you just demonstrated in this submission. You were fully capable of helping DK fix his post, but instead of doing so, you got into a fight. Why did it take a ban to get you to do the right thing? You do realize, this argues in support of banning shitty behavior, right?
I haven't had time to write up an discussion post yet, due to the same real life responsibilities that have kept me away from the board of late. But this has actually been in place for several months under the Sitewide Rules. If you check the banlog, you will see that Putt added the Voat User Agreement to the rule violations list moderators can cite some time ago, and Donkey was banned for comment abuse under that -- at the request of multiple users -- after he impersonated another user to discredit her research. @Crensch could have done the same in your case, though he chose to ban you for undermining the prime submission rule. There is not an option to click more than one rule in the ban interface.
We discussed the matter and agreed there should be a subverse rule that reflected the User Agreement requirement to Respect Other Users, since this has come up now several times recently, and the UA also tells mods "When you receive notice that there is content that violates this user agreement on subverses you moderate, you agree to remove it."
You broke at least two. Crensch was pretty clear about what you need to do to have your posting privileges restored. It's up to you.
We have a subverse full of people who either are survivors or who are family or friends of people subjected to elite child rape. They have been here for years, contributing. It's a dick move to turn their hard work into your off-topic soapbox.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/pizzagatemods comment by @NOMOCHOMO.
Posted automatically (#64497) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Vindicator: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @NOMOCHOMO)
CantDentTheBrent ago
You're not fucking special dude.
You have not accomplished shit besides acquiring an army of retarded facebook boomers.
You and that faggot @Crensch glow like fucking kikes.
@nomochomo
All you need to do is find a fat jewess to send @Crensch some flappy tit pics and you're in.
NOMOCHOMO ago
you previously said:
this time, it's
"User" to "users". Your story is changing. Why would @think private message Crensch to moderate, rather than comment and tag him publically. You are proving that ya'll do hold different users to different standards. Apparently some have back channel influence.
QUIT MISCHARACTERIZING MY COMMENTS
"baiting" has become a "rant".
I merely QUESTIONED him
A. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20631962.
B. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632100
C. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632406
D.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632582
E. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632802
F. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632873
Cite the user agreement rule I broke.
What users have asked for me to be banned? Who have I impersonated?
think- ago
I will make this brief, Nomochomo:
I indeed PMed, since sometimes users who are pinged don't get the ping, and writing a PM is to make sure they actually get a message.
Everyone is free to PM the mods at any given time, either by mod mail, or by PMing them.
That's not a special privilege I have.
And unlike you, I'm not keen on starting a 'muh the mods were wrong!!' shitshow on public threads.
I knew that @Vindicator was busy in rl, so I also PMed the other two PG mods.
@Crensch was the one who changed the flair, but as you can see from @Vindicator's replies, he would have done the same if he had been in.
On a side note, trying to paint my PM as something shady, or accusing @Vindicator of lying is one of your usual asshole moves, and I'm really tired of them.
Please note that I have blocked you, and don't get pings when you reply, so you don't have to make the effort to write a response. Bye.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Why didn't you comment your concerns on the post if you thought it was "rule-breaking" ?
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20629167
Instead of going to the user, you went above them, and didn't share your concerns with us pizzagate researchers.
Vin said "users" PM'd him. That shrank to just you. Unless there are other shady snitches?
Crensch ago
Now that users of the sub are shady snitches for messaging the mods?
@vindicator
NOMOCHOMO ago
I changed it to secret police...I agree snitch has the wrong connotation
Vindicator ago
You haven't been around long, so I wouldn't expect you to know that throughout the first entire year of this subverse, when we had 40 posts a day, we regularly asked users to please message the moderators whenever they saw a submission that needed to be removed, or one that could use a flair (positive or negative). In the past year since we started giving the 24 Hour Grace period, we've also encouraged people to help each other fix rule-breaking submissions if and when they have time to help research them.
Your insistence in casting shade on this practice does not put you in a good light.
Why exactly to you feel entitled to dictate how this subverse should operate?
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @NOMOCHOMO.
Posted automatically (#64577) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Vindicator: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @NOMOCHOMO)
NOMOCHOMO ago
If that's true, prove it with a link.
I'm a shining a light at secret moderation.
I think its shady to tattle on a user to a mod in private, without addressing the issue in your public comment on their post.
2 words. Free Speech.
NOMOCHOMO ago
@shewhomustbeobeyed @heygeorge @kevdude
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Nomo, there is nothing wrong with users PMing the mods with requests or questions. If Vindicator hadn't helped me in private I never would have been able to post anything that meets sub rules. Hell, if you hadn't helped me with the last one I wouldn't have posted it.
I wouldn't have talked to the submitter of that post either. If he isn't a theoldones alt then he is friends with him, and that makes him potentially volatile and unreasonable to deal with.
You're never going to get anywhere with this. These people will not admit their most egregious mistakes. Ever.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I completely agree with you. I have no issues with PMing anyone....As long as Mods are honest about the PM's they receive. @Vindicator lied about the volume of complaints he recieved.
DarkKnight111? Think- did talk to the submitter by commenting on the post....but made no mention of relevancy
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20629167
So instead report his post in secret? I appreciate your input, but respectfully disagree.
I usually jump into the mud pit.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I tried that, reported tOO to the mods, one thinks I'm crazy for my opinions, and the other one accused me of lying. So I handled it myself, tried on my first internet spurge-out (amateurish attempt, at best). Lost my only 'female internet friend' as a final result. Learned much, like user opinions don't matter, especially when there are imaginary interweb wars to be won. It's okay though, nothing can stop what's happening.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Nothing can stop what's happening
take refuge in God :)
I totally hear you and understand your position/strat.
I prefer to martyr my account, so to speak, to preserve transparency. If I'm banned, I'm not contributing my energy/research to this forum, as it can be better used other places.
If Mods still deem my intentions pure, and allow me to contribute. I will give them the same courtesy.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
That's the problem, nomo. Some crazy fucker told them that you were ES, all the boogiemen on PG are either ES or donqi. Now the only way for you to prove your intentions are pure is to get down on your hands and knees, grovel and beg for forgiveness, and then hope that cren doesn't move the goalpost yet again. Like I said, I don't blame you, or anyone else for leaving.
heygeorge ago
One can demonstrate by looking at your 11 month account. Just sayin’.
@shewhomustbeobeyed I watched some actual bonafide network TV last night. I saw an ad for Depend undergarments. It made me think of you and hope you are doing well.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
That's funny, I think of you when I see those ads, too. I wonder what Pavlov would say? Now that school is back, work on the project has slowed.
And I am good, thank you. Hope you and yours are as well.
Did you get the squirrels?
heygeorge ago
They LEFT!
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
How did you make that happen?
heygeorge ago
Squirrel 1: Remove rotten section of wood in soffit. About two 5 gallon buckets worth of debris including branches and leaves falls out. Whoops, I trashed his home. He came back very confused, up there reeing and trying to fathom it, but left by the end of the next day.
Squirrel 2: I guess squirrels don’t like power washers.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I got desert chipmunks that burrow under my brick front porch, thinking about drowning them out this year.
Power Washer you say? wonder if it will work for burrow holes?
heygeorge ago
If it won’t work, at the very least you can undermine your foundation! And that is exciting, too!
*I do not think you would undermine your foundation. You know it is so crazy it just might work, tho. I can’t imagine those creatures have a natural defense instinct against water-based trauma
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I asked the boys to fill the holes with concrete. They won't do it, and they won't tell me why they think it won't work. I am really good at shooting the little critters off my fence and feeding them to the coyotes.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I excerpted that poorly. please see edit for relevant portion
heygeorge ago
Cool
Crensch ago
@think-
Vindicator ago
Users private message moderators about rule breaking submissions all the time. Your attempt to characterize this as nefarious shows a keen lack of understanding of the community.
The main job of moderators in v/pizzagate is specifically to be the designated asshole who takes the heat for keeping the subverse on topic so users don't have to. It's why the subscriber base has voted repeatedly for both moderators and Rule 1. Your behavior is a perfect example of why they want it this way. People want to focus on research, not deal with constant attacks and smear campaigns. For nearly three years I've done my best to carry out this task in the manner the subscribers desired.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Not according to your fellow Moderator @heygeorge and Moderator @Crensch a year ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/3433526/20662816
Mods are not gods here, we have janitorial functions, and that's all.
fucking check yourself dude. Look at the downvoats on your NEW RULE. You're power tripping.
Crensch ago
That looks like exactly the number of downvotes as the number of sbbh trolls that are supporting you.
Also, heyGeorge was never a mod.
You don't seem to understand much of anything about this website with a claim like that.
NOMOCHOMO ago
15 downvoats and counting.
named the accused
Crensch ago
NOMOCHOMO ago
accusations and assumptions...unless you have access to user info which would prove your claim?
heygeorge is still a mod
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3436140/20661708
You're a sad, despotic liar Crensch.
but idgaf if you Unban me and follow the rules.
Crensch ago
Count the number of faggots not from pizzagate that have stood up for you.
Looks about right.
NOMOCHOMO ago
are deceiving
Crensch ago
Look at the letter next to his name you absolute fucking idiot
heygeorge ago
I lel’d
Crensch ago
He's still at it. Doesn't know what [S] is, either.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Then why is he listed under Moderators?
Crensch ago
What is his function?
NOMOCHOMO ago
Thanks for asking...Idk. it's very confusing....considering he's listed as a Mod.
There is no Mod page that explains these roles. Like there is for "Rules"
It's probably more confusing even than conflicting flairs.
As I understand it, he has been granted mod priveliges, he just chooses to only work on CSS.
but he expects you to ban him because he's already been banned from greatawakening
NOMOCHOMO ago
found the explanation: it ought to be linked in sidebar
https://voat.co/v/announcements/1322376
according to @puttitout
He's a designer..... A class of Moderator and a valid person to tag for input.
Crensch ago
He designs shit.
There is also a submitter designation that would go in that list. Are they mods?
Retard.
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/announcements/1322376
Roles
L1 / OwnerJPG: Unrestricted access.
L2 / ModeratorPNG: Nearly unrestricted access. Can't add new Owners, can't Anon a sub, can't remove other L2 mods.
L3 / JanitorJPG: Able to remove posts / comments, flair posts, ban users and distinguish content only.
L4 / DesignerJPG: Able to access stylesheet and modify flairs only.
"would go"? you're making up shit.
Crensch ago
You dumbfuck.
https://voat.co/v/shitlist
What is that?
What is that S?
Explain to me what that S is next to his name, you absolute fucking idiot.
NOMOCHOMO ago
not clicking that. please excerpt or explain.
Crensch ago
HAHAHAHA
Change your user preferences, you fucking kike.
The mod list has a user there with [S] next to his name. What is it? He can't mod. He can't remove things. Just like D can't, but somehow D is a mod?
Is S a mod, too?
NOMOCHOMO ago
I guess in that forum. Is it one in v/pizzagate?
no.
Crensch ago
Not the point, but something tells me you know that and you're paid to pretend you don't.
NOMOCHOMO ago
(((allegations)))
NOMOCHOMO ago
@heygeorge @shewhomustbeobeyed
Crensch ago
@vindicator
Despite his work on this, it seems like there's not anyone that cares to weigh in here save the types that pushed for and supported the doxxing of a pizzagate researcher.
In fact, he has pinged no less than two of them.
And I guess I'm supposed to take his continued association with them as a repudiation of my offer.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Are you referring to me with this statement? It's not true, I never wanted anyone doxxed.
NOMOCHOMO ago
@shewhomustbeobeyed @heygeorge
heygeorge ago
We’ve fallen so far.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1541871/7748288
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20633241/10#20633241
Crensch removed 2 days ago on 9/18/2019 11:05:52 PM
"Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 4: Indirectly Relevant / Meta"
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/about/log/comment
@vindicator @heygeorge @shewhomustbeobeyed
Rule 4
"Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods."
this is the first comment ever removed for Rule 4
another dangerous precedent.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I appreciate that
NOMOCHOMO ago
Vindicator ago
I will crosspost my reply from your v/whatever hit piece:
As you know from searching to find an Ed Buck submission that got left up that you could quote, most Buck submissions were removed. You are playing games.
Because the post violated Rule 1 the way it was originally submitted. By defending it, you are undermining Rule 1, which opens the board to forum sliding. You also attempted to pit one mod against another.
Why should someone who behaves in this manner be allowed to continue as part of v/pizzagate?
You have contributed a lot of good research, but you also only seem to be able to go a few weeks without shitstirring in a manner that looks an awful lot like a part of the real and ongoing campaign against v/pg moderation. I am genuinely on the fence about whether you should be unbanned.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @AbrahamGoldowitz.
Posted automatically (#64576) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Vindicator: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @AbrahamGoldowitz)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @NOMOCHOMO.
Posted automatically (#64421) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Vindicator: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @NOMOCHOMO)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/pizzagatemods comment by @NOMOCHOMO.
Posted automatically (#64413) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Vindicator: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @NOMOCHOMO)
NOMOCHOMO ago
get the stick out of your ass, and unban me.
NOMOCHOMO ago
my response from my "hit piece" ***rolls eyes
https://voat.co/v/whatever/3432945/20641916
Ok, I'm Nostradamus and I somehow knew the post would be deemed relevant later, making my ban for Relevance even more glaringly hypocritical?
by asking which Mod was wrong?and which flair was right?
https://files.catbox.moe/e1nj3r.jpg
I'm being divisive by pointing out ya'll flair posts without vetting them properly? (edit: I didn't Pit anyone against anyone. Ya'll took directly opposing stances. Not me.)
I provided THREE supporting Buck posts that weren't deleted (including by well respected users @letsdothis3 and @cantsleepawink)
edit: My first comment sought to prove relevance....I was contributing as a networker of prior submissions. Simultaneously I asked for clarification re: the conflicting flairs...
Edit....Therefore....I am opening the board up to sliding. by attempting to prove relevance, on a post that's being questioned for relevance, and is now proven to be relevant?
ESOTERICshade ago
I waged a long campaign against larper mother fucker Qanon. I was right about that shit. NOTHING came from the Qanon bullshit. Qanon is Coleman Rogers from the Patriot Soapbox and he probably made a million dollars in T Shirt sales. So go fuck yourself. I will step in here again if you get ignorant.
i_scream_trucks ago
pretty much every ban crensch gives out boils down to 'because i fucking can'
ASolo ago
lol, so true. The guy is a real cunt.
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/3436360/20726951
probably permabanned. If I'm kicked out of pizzagate, I will be leaving the platform. Until next time
Crensch ago
NOMOCHOMO ago
dude thanks for speaking out. hope you're well/still digging
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://www.wehoville.com/2019/07/03/new-court-filing-accuses-ed-buck-of-human-trafficking-and-d-a-jackie-lacey-of-bias-against-black-people/
(Ed Buck is accused of trafficking 21-30 john does as far as NY...And LA is getting sued for covering up the original investigation...)
https://patch.com/california/westhollywood/ev--lgbt-reception-for-lausd-boardmember-steve-zimmer
I'd have contributed these on the post, if @Crensch hadn't given me a retarded, unprecedented ultimatum, then banned me
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20632612 @darkknight111