https://voat.co/v/whatever/3432945/20638202
Ask me to answer your questions again.
sigh. here goes nothing.
Okay @Crensch @Vindicator @Heygeorge @Erickaliberhall @kingkongwaswrong
why did Crensch ban me? Can I appeal?
NOMOCHOMO Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 1: Relevance; Description: Causing problems with the removal of things that have not been proven to be pizzagate. Using divisive tactics against the mods. Arguing dishonestly, even after being warned that this was not a joke. Constant pattern of disruptive behavior and supporting users like esoteric Crensch 10.9 hours ago
https://files.catbox.moe/q5grgu.jpg
-Swamp Takedown -> 24 hours Grace Relevancy
I ask for clarification as to why a person Vin calls "swamp" is deemed "irrelevant" by Crazy-Mensch
I thought "swamp" indicated Pizza/Pedos....hence it being a flair in pizzagate...I've also lurked for years as ya'll know....why I was confused as to why "Ed Buck" a name I know I'd read submissions on b4 was getting removed.
TLDR: Why am I banned for "relevance"....for defending a relevant post (edit2: and it's not my post)....
view the rest of the comments →
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20631827
@vindicator @shewhomustbeobeyed @darkknight111
https://www.wehoville.com/2019/01/09/ed-buck-recounting-history/
I found the motherlode that clearly ties Ed Buck to Pizzagate back in 2017
https://www.wehoville.com/2019/01/09/ed-buck-recounting-history/
Switching Parties
In 1988 at a Republican Party conference in Oklahoma City, Buck called for changes in the party’s “intolerant” stand on LGBT rights in Oklahoma, which included opposition to state-mandated sex education programs in schools. Unable to make major changes in his political party, Buck soon switched allegiances. In an online post in 2010, he explained his decision. “I didn’t leave the Republican Party, it left me. I can remember Barry Goldwater saying ‘out of the boardroom and out of the bedroom’ when referring to the role of government. That’s the GOP I was a proud member of … My principals have not changed, but to keep true to them, my political party had to change.”
Vindicator ago
Excellent. This is exactly why we flair posts. You are an excellent digger, Nomo. I wish you had just given DK a hand and posted this instead of creating drama.
NOMOCHOMO ago
The only reason I found it is because I was banned....Not because of either of your flairs.
I asked @Crensch a question. He repeatedly evaded with counter questions.
Ego, bruised from the questioning, He then made my membership dependent on proving another users' post.
Crensch's Unprecedented Whim became a user-specific guideline. A Dangerous Despotic Precedent
Repeating a question to a Mod is "baiting" them?
Different Mods hold different users to different standards?
The reason given for my ban is Rule 1: Relevance.
Even though you edited Rule 1 last night (cut/pasting "NSFW" from Rule 5), you didn't change "relevance" to apply to comments. It is a submission standard.
To ban a user for a comment that doesn't fulfill a submission guideline is comment censorship.
Because Relevance does not apply to comments. You changed Rule 5 from "NSFW" to "Comment Abuse" without notifying the pizzagate community.
I am shining a light on Moderation. Any scrutiny is framed as "drama".
Unban me. I broke no rules.
I wont break your Modified Rule 5, but please announce it.
kestrel9 ago
Show us how exactly that link demonstrates that Ed Buck is a pedophile, or is part of a pedophile ring, or the victim of pedophiles.
@vindicator @crensch
NOMOCHOMO ago
Our reporting on goes mainstream....Published Newspapers with actual PRINTED circulation repeat our reporting.
It's so mainstream Vin gave it a Swamp takedown flair.
kestrel9 ago
@Vindicator explained that when he gave it the flair he'd forgotten that the victim profile was black men in their 20s. Not underage.
Linking the prior links to Ed Buck isn't protesting no. Insisting that they constitute absolute proof of why a post on Ed Buck's arrest belongs on PG instead of PGWE can be construed as protesting in this case. That being said I understand why people might assume there's concrete proof. It takes work to dig around and then not find what one assumes was there.
I disagree with your point on Edit 2. If info cited by a reporter in relation to PG/Voat is enough to constitute absolute proof of something then we are barking up the wrong tree here. That would make the scope of PG limited to a shooter going into Comet Ping Pong Pizza to find babies in the basement.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Prior relevant submissions = justification for updates
...don't misconstrue you Jew.
No. It would not make it "limited to"
it would include all reporting on pizzagate. Edgar Welch was a valid subject of discussion as it was clearly a psy-op meant to delegitimize us...hence the many submissions
https://searchvoat.co/?q=edgar+welch&sub=pizzagate&s=pizzagate&l=true
But because it was related to our investigation it is a legitimate research topic.