I will crosspost my reply from your v/whatever hit piece:

You can't point to a rule violation. Thus your ban is arbitrary

@Crensch's ban is not arbitrary.

I screwed up and should not have given Darkknight's submission the Swamp Takedown flair prior to him stating clearly how Buck is likely connected to pizzagate. The only reason Crensch got involved to correct the matter was because while I was AFK, users DMed him that we had deleted most previous posts about Buck ^{(a fact you were well aware of, since you had to scan through multiple deleted submissions to find one that was missed to use against him)}, so he changed the flair. @Darkknight111 fixed his submission and Crensch changed the flair back. This is the normal ins and outs of modding v/pizzagate.

However, you decided to interfere in this process, capitalizing on my mistake and using it to undermine Crensch's request that Darkknight fix his submission. You then proceeded to shit up another user's submission by arguing with Crensch, instead of helping DK demonstrate the pizzagate relevance, which is the whole purpose of the 24 Hour Grace flair.

Both of these behaviors are hallmarks of dishonest, consensus-cracking forum disruptors we've seen attack v/pizzagate numerous times in the past, most notably @EsotericShade, who has waged a long campaign against v/pizzagate moderation.

Crensch was correct in his assessment of Darkknight's original submission. Crensch gave you a clear warning to stop, yet you persisted in baiting him. Therefore, I put the odds at more than even you did all this deliberately so that you would be banned and could make this post to fuel the Crensch bashing club.

I thought "swamp" indicated Pizza/Pedos....hence it being a flair in pizzagate...I've also lurked for years as ya'll know....why I was confused as to why "Ed Buck" a name I know I'd read submissions on b4 was getting removed.

As you know from searching to find an Ed Buck submission that got left up that you could quote, most Buck submissions were removed. You are playing games.

TLDR: Why am I banned for "relevance"....for defending a relevant post....

Because the post violated Rule 1 the way it was originally submitted. By defending it, you are undermining Rule 1, which opens the board to forum sliding. You also attempted to pit one mod against another.

Why should someone who behaves in this manner be allowed to continue as part of v/pizzagate?

You have contributed a lot of good research, but you also only seem to be able to go a few weeks without shitstirring in a manner that looks an awful lot like a part of the real and ongoing campaign against v/pg moderation. I am genuinely on the fence about whether you should be unbanned.