@Crensch is a Moral Relatavist (whatever)

submitted ago by NOMOCHOMO

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20633074

Both mods can be right and can see different things because they are different people.

@Crensch is clearly a (((moral relatavist)))

And fuck the fags who will say I'm stirring up drama. The faggot banned me from pizzagate (only reason I joined voat), then replied to my comments so I couldn't defend myself.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

I gave you plenty of reasonable warnings and you continued to be a shady little fuck.

I take it you couldn't actually link Ed Buck to pedophilia?

No, of course you couldn't, but you wanted him to stay there for ~SOME~ reason.

NOMOCHOMO ago

I wanted you to provide the fucking clarification you finnnalllllyyyy provided

they can both be a swamp take down and not Elite pedophilia

You could have fucking answered my honest question. Instead you banned me...then you answered it.

Crensch ago

I asked for a linked to pedophilia, and I got sarcasm and Shady fucking divisive bullshit.

NOMOCHOMO ago

quote it back to me. Where was my sarcasm "divisive"

Crensch ago

quote it back to me. Where was my sarcasm "divisive"

And this is why you aren't getting unbanned. I never said your sarcasm was divisive.

But, hey, quote it back to me where I said it was.

NOMOCHOMO ago

If it wasn't my sarcasm....then what was divisive?

Crensch ago

A supposed "researcher" could figure that one out, but I can tell you're just being deliberately obtuse.

NOMOCHOMO ago

Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 1: Relevance; Description: Causing problems with the removal of things that have not been proven to be pizzagate. Using divisive tactics against the mods. Arguing dishonestly, even after being warned that this was not a joke. Constant pattern of disruptive behavior and supporting users like esoteric

I got banned 4 relevancy....but now the post is deemed relevant.

therefore there is no valid reason 4 a ban.

Crensch ago

https://voat.co/v/whatever/3432945/20633968

Quote it back to me and I'll consider unbanning you, Jewish liar.

NOMOCHOMO ago

what rule did I break?

Repeatedly asking for clarification in the comment section of a flagged post?

You can't point to a rule violation. Thus your ban is arbitrary

Vindicator ago

You can't point to a rule violation. Thus your ban is arbitrary

@Crensch's ban is not arbitrary.

I screwed up and should not have given Darkknight's submission the Swamp Takedown flair prior to him stating clearly how Buck is likely connected to pizzagate. The only reason Crensch got involved to correct the matter was because while I was AFK, users DMed him that we had deleted most previous posts about Buck (a fact you were well aware of, since you had to scan through multiple deleted submissions to find one that was missed to use against him), so he changed the flair. @Darkknight111 fixed his submission and Crensch changed the flair back. This is the normal ins and outs of modding v/pizzagate.

However, you decided to interfere in this process, capitalizing on my mistake and using it to undermine Crensch's request that Darkknight fix his submission. You then proceeded to shit up another user's submission by arguing with Crensch, instead of helping DK demonstrate the pizzagate relevance, which is the whole purpose of the 24 Hour Grace flair.

Both of these behaviors are hallmarks of dishonest, consensus-cracking forum disruptors we've seen attack v/pizzagate numerous times in the past, most notably @EsotericShade, who has waged a long campaign against v/pizzagate moderation.

Crensch was correct in his assessment of Darkknight's original submission. Crensch gave you a clear warning to stop, yet you persisted in baiting him. Therefore, I put the odds at more than even you did all this deliberately so that you would be banned and could make this post to fuel the Crensch bashing club.

NOMOCHOMO ago

I put the odds at more than even you did all this deliberately so that you would be banned and could make this post to fuel the Crensch bashing club....

I somehow knew the post would be deemed relevant later, making my ban for Relevance even more glaringly hypocritical?

persisted in baiting him...by asking him to clarify 2 Mods visibly disagreeing in comments next to each other.

Vindicator ago

Which means you saw the many others that were deleted.

Which means your repeated claims that you didn't understand why Buck might not satisfy Rule 1 are disingenuous.

Why are you campaigning against moderation of v/pizzagate?

NOMOCHOMO ago

Which means you saw the many others that were deleted

Did I use searchvoat? Or are you just assuming that?

Which means your repeated claims that you didn't understand why Buck might not satisfy Rule 1 are disingenuous.

he clearly does satisfy rule 1 as 3 prior posts were allowed. and the current post is now allowed.

Why are you campaigning against moderation of v/pizzagate?

I'm not. I was banned and am seeking unbanning...by appealing to mods in the appropriate forum.

quit framing me as an enemy.

NOMOCHOMO ago

@shewhomustbeobeyed I think this is bye bye.

I'll pop up soon somewhere else that's public facing

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Bye, thank you for the help with my submission.

💔

NOMOCHOMO ago

Onward and Upward!