https://voat.co/v/whatever/3432945/20638202
Ask me to answer your questions again.
sigh. here goes nothing.
Okay @Crensch @Vindicator @Heygeorge @Erickaliberhall @kingkongwaswrong
why did Crensch ban me? Can I appeal?
NOMOCHOMO Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 1: Relevance; Description: Causing problems with the removal of things that have not been proven to be pizzagate. Using divisive tactics against the mods. Arguing dishonestly, even after being warned that this was not a joke. Constant pattern of disruptive behavior and supporting users like esoteric Crensch 10.9 hours ago
https://files.catbox.moe/q5grgu.jpg
-Swamp Takedown -> 24 hours Grace Relevancy
I ask for clarification as to why a person Vin calls "swamp" is deemed "irrelevant" by Crazy-Mensch
I thought "swamp" indicated Pizza/Pedos....hence it being a flair in pizzagate...I've also lurked for years as ya'll know....why I was confused as to why "Ed Buck" a name I know I'd read submissions on b4 was getting removed.
TLDR: Why am I banned for "relevance"....for defending a relevant post (edit2: and it's not my post)....
view the rest of the comments →
NOMOCHOMO ago
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/about/rules
I noticed @Vindicator just modified the rules 10 minutes ago @shewhomustbeobeyed. I'm not accusing anybody of anything.
last available archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190331172804/https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/about/rules
Rules 1 and 5 have been changed
5 was NSFW. It is now "comment abuse"
NoBS ago
Yeah. Abusing opinions on an opinion site is grounds to censor opinon.
Red tape, rules and by-laws empower censorship. It's much older than Fascism or Communism.
All dictators must censorship to gain power, let alone keep it.