https://voat.co/v/whatever/3432945/20638202
Ask me to answer your questions again.
sigh. here goes nothing.
Okay @Crensch @Vindicator @Heygeorge @Erickaliberhall @kingkongwaswrong
why did Crensch ban me? Can I appeal?
NOMOCHOMO Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 1: Relevance; Description: Causing problems with the removal of things that have not been proven to be pizzagate. Using divisive tactics against the mods. Arguing dishonestly, even after being warned that this was not a joke. Constant pattern of disruptive behavior and supporting users like esoteric Crensch 10.9 hours ago
https://files.catbox.moe/q5grgu.jpg
-Swamp Takedown -> 24 hours Grace Relevancy
I ask for clarification as to why a person Vin calls "swamp" is deemed "irrelevant" by Crazy-Mensch
I thought "swamp" indicated Pizza/Pedos....hence it being a flair in pizzagate...I've also lurked for years as ya'll know....why I was confused as to why "Ed Buck" a name I know I'd read submissions on b4 was getting removed.
TLDR: Why am I banned for "relevance"....for defending a relevant post (edit2: and it's not my post)....
view the rest of the comments →
Crensch ago
Looks like you've gone above and beyond on the Buck research. Well done. Could have solved a lot if you'd just done that and posted to help darkknight get his post in line with the rules. You know, that's the entire point of the 24h flair, right? So users can help bring submissions in line.
No.
You can:
1) Make a public apology to everyone for shitting up darkknight's post with meta BS
2) Make a public apology to me and Vindicator for trying to drive a wedge between us with the false dichotomy of "which one is right" when it was both a swamp takedown AND rule-breaking submission. i.e. this horseshit. Explain how the flairs are not opposing, since one is a celebration of a bad guy going down, and the other is a formatting warning.
3) Make a public apology for pitting mods against previous missed posts that may or may not have violated the rules despite the subject-matter being the same. (Not all posts about the same subject are equal, you know, like how the original post and its current iteration land on different sides of the rules)
3) Remove any and all meta shitstirring crap against the mods, since all you're doing is trying to rabble-rouse those that want to destroy places like PG and GA, and giving them an 'in' to do so, evidenced by your pinging PV and SBBH users.
There will be no arguments. There will be no negotiation. This is your one shot, and it's all you get. Snark will be taken as a repudiation of this offer.
Ball's in your court.
REB_Militia ago
Christ, this guy is the final boss of neckbeards.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/PVTantrums comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#67357) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@REB_Militia: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Crensch ago
85scp 62ccp in 2.8 years.
Nice alt, faggot.
REB_Militia ago
What is lurking?
That is correct for $500
Crensch ago
Why would I believe that?
REB_Militia ago
I don't see the purpose of an alt. Why would someone have two accounts? And why would calling out how cringey you act in regards to your power on an internet forum, rightfully so, be an indicator that this is not my main account?
Crensch ago
And you call yourself a lurker?
15 day old comment you're necrothreading.
Kek. <---
Kek.
Kek.
Crensch ago
@Vindicator see above - it's not showing up, but I have -1 on each of these comments within 36 minutes from an account with 62 ccp in a 15-day-old necrothread.
Vindicator ago
Dead for nine months until 17 days ago
Almost all comments are in the Nomo related threads since then. And what "lurker" browses pizzagatemods?
Crensch ago
Bingo.