Crensch banned me for "Relevance" (pizzagatemods)

submitted ago by NOMOCHOMO

https://voat.co/v/whatever/3432945/20638202

Ask me to answer your questions again.

sigh. here goes nothing.

Okay @Crensch @Vindicator @Heygeorge @Erickaliberhall @kingkongwaswrong

why did Crensch ban me? Can I appeal?

NOMOCHOMO Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 1: Relevance; Description: Causing problems with the removal of things that have not been proven to be pizzagate. Using divisive tactics against the mods. Arguing dishonestly, even after being warned that this was not a joke. Constant pattern of disruptive behavior and supporting users like esoteric Crensch 10.9 hours ago

https://files.catbox.moe/q5grgu.jpg

-Swamp Takedown -> 24 hours Grace Relevancy

I ask for clarification as to why a person Vin calls "swamp" is deemed "irrelevant" by Crazy-Mensch

I thought "swamp" indicated Pizza/Pedos....hence it being a flair in pizzagate...I've also lurked for years as ya'll know....why I was confused as to why "Ed Buck" a name I know I'd read submissions on b4 was getting removed.

TLDR: Why am I banned for "relevance"....for defending a relevant post (edit2: and it's not my post)....

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

Remember when I destroyed zyklon, and nobody did anything about it, but continued to associate with him and let him do his thing? Remember when an innocent woman was doxxed by you? Remember when you worked with a literal Reddit cabal to change this website with Builder?

@kek

NoBS ago

Making it personal means it is time to walk away and fight another day.

You alone are making moderation into weaponized censorship on a personal level.

I suspect you mean well and thank you for baby sitting us.

Because free speech sucks but is worth getting hostile about.

Crensch ago

Begging the question and telling me what it means is a great start to this conversation.

I don't care about your characterization of my actions.

At this point, I don't believe you are legit.

NoBS ago

I'm just as legit as a bot. Yet a bot's job is to inflame with divide and conquer. I do not wish mods to divide the community. You have though theough actions that speek louder than my words. Even if you are not a bot (just kidding), you have divided this open forum though censorship. Even if justified.

Once again, justified censorship is Child porn that is not evidence and/or doxing citizen investigators for exposing "public" figures.

(important)- Unless the investigator is paid, then they are earning their keep and slander becomes the ONLY reason to censor.

Not to protect the falsely accused public figure, but the professional investigator from OUR liability.

Do you see how you have over stepped moderation into dictatorship?

Crensch ago

I'm just as legit as a bot. Yet a bot's job is to inflame with divide and conquer. I do not wish mods to divide the community. You have through actions that speak louder than words. Even if you are not a bot (just kidding), you have divided this open forum though censorship. Even if justified.

Oh, good.

Once again, justified censorship is Child porn that is not evidence and/or doxing citizen investigators for exposing "public" figures.

I'm SO interested in your opinion.

Do you see how you have over stepped moderation into dictatorship?

Kek.