"Single world currency" comes to mind! I recall the economist magazine cover from ages ago and the icon used resembles crypto currency icons. So all these new crypto sites, and all these mystery owners using and investing.. I think "usurper"!

What a better way to lure self managed slaves to use a single world currency than to let them think its free world currency....

"The commies are coming, the commies are coming" .. "The kikes are here, the kikes are here!"

I cannot automatically detect when submissions have been deleted from Voat. Until Putts provides an enhancement to the API to manage this automatically, I manually delete any specific submissions from SearchVoat which have been deleted on Voat, when someone asks me to.

True. I'd say that's largely covered by the bare basic, fundamental, ideals of no censorship - thought that's pretty much an 'unspoken rule' at this stage. Putting it in writing could be a good step.

Interestingly, what you said does raise the unique situation of v/theunexplained.

Where diesel was able to obtain the subverse after someone else got access and then went inactive after making diesel the owner.

It would be hard for a mechanism to be made that accounts for similar situations, given that it would be hard to code something that verifies the legitimacy/authenticity of a mod/owner being added - save for times where a twit messes up and runs all accounts involved, from the same IP + MAC + whatever other identifiers are taken into account(not an expert here, nor have or would I ever attempt to 'game the system').

Edit: That said, perhaps something could take inactivity into account, where a subverse requester adds an owner then goes awol?

But they are trying to directly influence @puttitout. Although Putt is no fool.

One such brand is Apple who believes that meeting customer’s expectation is only possible via two things. The first one is “Good Quality Product” and the other one is “Customer Support Service Solution”. Contact Apple Customer Care Number

naw, we're teetering on the edge, daring someone to push us off our solid grounding. Sometimes that grounding needs maintenance due to our strong stances, and may need a spotter for unmaintained area notifications.

I see people like you as walking the tightrope, able to use balance to stay right above the edge but are pushed by both sides, but with the ability to, possibly, identify with both. Sometimes you get off the tightrope and make a solid standing when needed, but otherwise watch events and act as the spotter for those of us who need it.

And we’ll always rely on people like you to play fair when we go over the deep end.

Thanks for being “that dude”; we’re not always right and can be difficult to deal with.

He’s implying that he’s the one that should be in charge due to his “experience” and is probably hoping someone will vouch for him.

Next, we’ll have digg posters stating due to their posting experience, they should be the only ones posting.

It read like an interview and “I’m superior to you common peasants”.

Yes, that is fine. Just not nigger.

Is this our dirty little secret? I figured this out for myself. If I can see it, then anyone should be able to. Do we all know this and just don't talk about it?

That's call deflection. Jew 101.

Also, you can't delete your account. Putt has known about the "bug" preventing deletion for over a year. If you've been banned from any sub this will be impossible.

Putt mentioned in this very thread that this particular bug is already fixed.

Again, the owner of the website just demodded someone because they expressed concern about a shadow partner. You can choose to phrase it in whatever misleading way you want Kev, but the way I'm describing it is also 100% correct.

Wow. @Kevdude is now at the top of my list as probable Feds. Good job. Time to put you under the microscope.

I didn't drag you into anything? I disagreed with something you said, and expressed myself.

So was my description technically wrong? I'm not even saying yours is wrong, it just doesn't paint us the full picture.

Are you familiar with the chilling effect? It's a psychological term for silencing people through negative repercussions essentially. Obviously we don't see eye to eye, but I'm not full of shit. I have a basis for everything I've said here.

I made one that auto deletes all my posts after a period of time (or manually if I feel like). I wrote it in Fortran though.

Hey dude, did you see my thread?

And frankly Kev, even if I'm dead wrong, I should be able to express these concerns the way I have without losing 50ccp in less than an hour.

No, the owner of the website removed an M mod because the M mod questioned that the website has a new shadow partner.

That you're trying to consistently downplay this is concerning.

Alright Kev, so when you delete a Facebook account you're not whatsoever concerned that the information might be retained on Facebooks end? I doubt it. In fact I would wager that you 100% believe that Facebook retains that information.

What Bob3333 was wanting to know is whether there's a script that we can use that does not rely on a good faith trust of Voat and its operators to purge our account history.

Honestly, I'm starting to think that if Bob hadn't brought up using a third party script, that he wouldn't have received the response he did, which simply makes me further question whether deleting your account is an effective method of wiping our account history.

What Putt just did is effectively silence all the moderators of major subverses. Because this is all just suspicion, I doubt any of the default mods would be willing to risk their moderator status over unfounded concerns. It's pretty sad though that we're now in a climate where people can't be nervous or make backup plans without risking the hard work they've donated to the site.

Was it even a public callout? Bob3333 was asking a serious and in my opinion legitimate question, and it was all predicated on the partner being malicious. Nothing Bob said is even relevant or going to happen unless something else occurs that forces his hand. He just wanted to be prepared for the worst possible outcome. Maybe it's the prepper in me, but I respect and understand his concern and him wanting to have a plan for if/when shit hits the fan.

I really really really can't wrap my head around how this is even remotely controversial on a website like Voat. We should all be concerned. I'm not saying we should all delete our accounts, but we should watch this unfold carefully.

Maaaaate, Merry Christmas :)

Why would he demod you from v/sports you're being a good boy, not questioning this new partner, and denouncing and ridiculing those that are cautious and nervous. You're the perfect lapdog.

Can you explain why any of us should blindly trust eachother. Honestly man. My reading comprehension is fine. Maybe instead of assuming that people can't grasp basic English, you listen to the words they're saying and give them an actual response to what they're saying -- not what you're assuming they don't understand.

Look ya faggot there is no gaurentee that they aren’t soft deleting everything just to make you happy

You seriously think I'm SaneGoat? That's disappointing Kev, you're smarter than that.

Anyways, you've done absolutely nothing to downplay what Putt did by demodding someone for zero reason.

That's such a fucking nonresponse.

Explain why you said "Yeah because that's all he said." when you're not even telling me what more he said.

You're being a fucking kike right now, and you know it.

How is Putt within his rights to demod random users that have never broken any rules simply because they're nervous? I mean he's the owner of the website, he is "within his rights" to demod anyone for any reason at any time, but you're not explaining how it's merited. Spez was within his rights to edit peoples comments on them. That was still horrendously wrong of him to do.

Alright Kev, let's dissect exactly what he said.

The news that voat has a new "partner" has me nervous.

Is he not allowed to be concerned about a major partner being included to Voat? If not, why?

I'm making contingency plans in the event that the partner turns out to insist on some sort of "curation," or if it seems like they're here to use voat as some sort of honeypot.

Is he not allowed to make contingency plans in the case that the partner enforces curation or even worse uses Voat as a honeypot? Are you not even the slightest bit concerned? Let's just assume that Putt is everything he tells us he is, are you not concerned that someone might be either taking advantage of him or pulling a quick one on him?

If that happens I would like to remove every trace of everything I've ever posted to voat, but before writing my own script I wanted to check and see if this is work that has already been done.

And in the however slim chances that the partner does negatively influence Voat, he wants to make sure he can remove everything he's ever posted to Voat. Which is 100% in line with what Voat advertises you can do when you delete your account.

So how is any of this controversial whatsoever. It's all reliant on the Partner actually being malicious.

I'll wait for the inevitable "humor" that will be used to make me look like I'm being irrational. You guys play the jester role very well. I won't expect an actual response, as you clearly have already made up your mind.

Start panic? He was expressing that he's nervous about the partner, and wanting to make plans incase things go poorly.

Are you trying to say we shouldn't be able to delete our accounts? If not, why does it matter that buddy wanted to understand the process better?

He just stripped moderator status from someone who is nervous and wanting to make sure he can properly delete his submissions/content if the new partner isn't what we're being told...

Oh ya. Everything is fine. I love how half the fucking comments in this thread supporting Putt seem to be PV or SBBH. Keep on creating that narrative, if you fucking kikes honestly think no one else is watching and observing your behavior, you're dead wrong.

just delete your account goy!

Here: https://voat.co/v/programming/2876991

that's literally all it was

Please dont say the word nigger anymore.

Merry Christmas, glorious goat!

He did go after DI though.

That makes me think it IS DI.

He used himself as an example, basically parroting out his resume to do the job; I'm not sure how else to interpret that.

And there should be a process in place to demod problems from (M) positions in system subs and reverse subverse transfers when a mod hijacks a community.

I fully agree, but his idea was laced with Reddit-nigger 'gibsmedat' speak.

I agree with this

reddit mods make everyone nervous.

Well of course and rightfully so, but if there's nothing to hide, why would one hide anything? I'm not ashamed. I left there over 3 years ago for the very reasons that brought me here and kept me here. Everyone on voat came here from somewhere. Some stayed, others left.

Subverserequest still works but from people I've talked to, it takes a very very long time. Upwards of 2 years for some people. Now, whether that's due to too many other things to do or not enough time to do it, I don't know. The system in place for removal has been brought up before and one that I think has been talked about a lot. I don't want to beat a dead horse. I just brought another idea to the table which is better then no ideas lol that's all

@crensch shoots first and asks questions later.

And I'm not wrong often.

reddit mods make everyone nervous.

It's not even that he was a Reddit mod, it's that he doesn't know this fact.

I'll give him one thing:

I needed that laugh, and he delivered.

That was fixed a while ago.

You sound like a senior dev to me.

OP, why are your being a tremendous faggot?

Just delete your account.

We wipe all your data, including content replacement, when a user deletes their account (make sure you pay attention to the options as you can leave content or anonymize it too).

It makes me nervous that you are a janitor on a system sub and are posting submissions like this.

I am also a massive tinfoil cowardly faggot and would like to have that script. Cause im scared and a chicken shit coward with guns but no balls to use them.