You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@hojuruku, thank you for rewriting this thread in a serious attempt to comply with our submission rules. This is a huge improvement. It's not quite to the point where I am comfortable removing the flair, but because you've been willing to work on it, it seems fair for us not to take it down just yet. Here is what I'm still stumbling over:

  1. Please just chuck the first four paragraphs documenting your prior attempts to submit the story. That's all still Rule 4 crap that belongs in v/pizzagatemods. It clutters up what you are trying to say. If you need to vent about it still at this point, please do it in the appropriate subverse.
  2. You've done a really excellent job embedding the supporting links into your very densely-packed material -- well done. It's a great improvement! However, I am still not seeing a link supporting the premise of your title: that BBBS was operating as a man-boy dating site. That is a pretty serious charge that requires evidence...in the form of screencaps of their chatroom, or a quote from a kid "groomed" there with a link to where it was reported, or evidence presented in the criminal cases. If this is your opinion of how the site was used, that's fine but you need to say so rather than making a definitive statement of fact.
  3. If what you are saying is that McCool used BBBS chat to take advantage of kids and BBBS did not provide sufficient safeguards to protect kids, then say that, and give some linked evidence of their negligence (even if that's just McCool or someone else talking about the lack of oversight). It's not fair or accurate to brand an entire charity because one sick fuck took advantage of the organization to hurt kids (if that's what happened). (Also, that approach also really undermines your credibility as an activist/researcher, as well, so it's not in the best interest of your piece. You want to change minds, right?)
  4. In any case, we need linked support for the "man/boy dating" claim to be able to leave this up. I looked at several of the links from the BBBS pedo search you suggested, and did not see anything that supported your headline claim. You need something directly supporting it. If there is no evidence, then you need to create a different headline.
  5. I was a bit confused about the different people you've mentioned: McCool, Hall, Power and Bowersox. It became very difficult to follow. At first I thought you were saying they were the same person, and then I thought you were saying there were numerous different pedos connected to BBBS as part of your argument that BBBS is being run as a man/boy hookup service. Who's who and why they are in your thread needs to be very clear, so that it's possible to understand what you are asserting and assess the linked support you provide for it. (ProTip: If you have a piece of research you haven't yet gotten the evidence for, drop that down into the comment section as a "P.S. I am still investigating my suspician that...." Comments are free range).
  6. Consider using a less loaded rhetorical style that hits people with facts that make them think what you think they should think, rather than opinions that tell them what you think they should think. No one likes to be told what they should think. Opinions are like assholes, right? Everyone has one. The only people who listen to them are people who agree with you. What's the point of writing for people who agree with you? If you want to change minds, set up a domino chain of facts that lead to an inevitable conclusion. For example, if you want to convince people that Jews or gays are behind the normalization of pedophilia in Australia, it's much more effective to slip in the fact this is a relevant factor -- especially if you can use their own words like you did here -- than if you engage in a bunch of namecalling. It also gives you fewer things you have to source.

Okay...that was a lot. I hope you're willing to edit this a bit more so that we can leave this up.

@think- @Blacksmith21 @kevdude @Crensch Let's give hojuruku another day to work on this. He's put quite a bit of effort into embedded formatting, which he'll lose access to if we remove it. Hojuruku, I've also saved a copy of your source code here in the event other mods don't see this comment of mine.

hojuruku ago

Presses hand against forehead... That it. Gloves off BTW we confirmed you deleted a comment from someone asking if a pedophile was Jewish - and the pedophile based on research from someone you just downvoted is highly suggestive the pedophile Larry Nassr WAS Jewish. And you are even shutting comments down on it.

YOU CAN'T CRITISE ME UNTIL YOU SHOW ME A SCREENSHOT OF YOUR MOD INTERFACE SCREEN and how you can accidentally delete said comment, then accidentally type "SURE" then confirm deletion of the comment. Hey I'll let you delete this comment if you upload a video of the steps you went through it to do it. That's fine by me you have my consent.

https://voat.co/v/OccidentalEnclave/2501438/12501537 I wanted to move onto the next post about BBBS and all the google search results of child abuse in America (here's a snippet: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2500972/12503033) - and American Christians, Womens groups, child safety groups predicted the mass homosexual BBBS gay child rape epidemic could occur - even going as far as to say NAMBLA is Cheering on BBBS back in 2002.

That next thread will honor kevdude by going through all the google search results linking to homosexual pedophiles at big brothers big sisters only stopping when I hit the first heterosexual child abuser - which I haven't yet (bi doesn't count). He wanted it in the OP - he will get his wish seeing it can't fit in this OP.

  1. NO. Just no. Must posts on v/pizzagatemods don't get answered and downvoted into oblivion - like my peace offering to you guys there. If you actually answered anything there, rather than sending it as a place where criticism goes to die I'd honor your request. @heygeorge appears to have been caught running the gang stalking operation against me if you see /v/protectvoat thread - or at at lest whipping them up. You had 1.5-2 days to reply to that post mentioned in the OP and you didn't. SO NO.

  2. 10,000 Characters you can barely make a story or give more than one link to back up a claim.

A dating site is where two people meet online for FRIENDSHIP or more. Have I not proven that? Have I not proven gay men are given access to it? Haven't I proven boys use it. Journalists have had a creative license to make entirely true headlines that trigger for centuries. You want to put an end to that tradition because penis in other mans shit rubbers before it come out may be offended. Sorry - they are peverts - scatalogical and disgusting and MOST DECENT PEOPLE don't care for their feelings and hope they seek help.

  1. I have clearly shown gay men have given access to the website. I've clearly shown boys are using it. I've clearly shown BBBS's advisory council in Australia had a gay pedophile / BBBS boss / boy counselor patrick power. BBBS undermine child safety by allowing a demographic that is more likely to rape kids to access their children. READ THE OP AGAIN.

So the needs of the gay men to feel good about playing with little boys and being given access to children is more important than the benefit of less children actually being raped if a demographic that is more likely to abuse children is given access? Did you not read this that's going in the next post? https://concernedwomen.org/images/content/fc2002-09-19.pdf

I counter attacked this argument by citing 2x government and 1x NGO source - and anyone knows that stats about child abuse. Let me spell it out for you? Is a boy male? Yes? Is a Man Male? Yes. Definition of a Homosexual: A person who engages in same sex sex acts. 35% of all children abused are boys - see bravehearts fact sheet (actually 37% - I reducted it to 35% because 98% of child abusers male - so we had to account for some lesbian little girl action). So when they are raped by gay men is not an act of homosexual pedophilia - or more medically correct term is in fact HOMOSEXUAL ANDROPHILE doing it? Now when you tie that in with the fact 1% of the population is GAY AND MALE (1.7% gay) from the point of view of keeping a child safe a homosexual is 3500% more likely to rape children. Including that minority group in the BBBS big brothers and allowing them to interface on Disney's webserver (actually Amazon's leased by Disney Pixar) and meet them - is giving more opportunities for grooming and child abuse that could have been prevented. Statistically speaking BBBS's 2002 increases child abuse.

  1. All their relevance was explained. Re Bowersox: I have only seen one thing more disgusting that a pedophile done for child porn saying GO EASY ON ME JUDGE I'M A GOOD GUY I VOLUNTEERED ALL MY FREE TIME TALKING TO VULNERABLE TROUBLED LITTLE BOYS AS A BBBS COUNCILOR (WHO LOVES CHILD PORN) - AND THAT WAS BOWERSOX TESTIFYING IN COURT THAT DOG ON CHILD BOY PORN ISN'T DEPRAVED (he said in court he only became depraved in 2006 after seeing a hand grenade explosion aftermath involving two children - I found he joined beastforum.com where it is believed he got the CP by tracking his email address etc exposed in the videos, and I proved he joined in 2005 - proving he testified in court as a Bakersfield PD gay cop that dog on boy anal porn isn't depraved. So we all agree bowersox played the system even more that Crown Prosecutor Patrick Power.

6.) No! Children come first! Not the LGBTI+ Jewish Pedophile mafia feelings - that's what my threads are exposing. We don't need to be PC if PC is getting children raped. Haven't you seen what's going on yet? See my profile tag line. Deal with it. Please don't get in my way and let me move on with this thread to expose a lot more stuff about BBBS i dug up and stop running interference. I've seen whole threads hijacked with interference when we need to be sharing links and research about the true targets - not protecting the interests of the LGBTI+ Jewish Pedophile mafia.

Government agencies are reading my posts and are probably cheering you on in the SHUT IT DOWN ATTEMPTS.

CC @Dfens @auralsects @MadWorld @CheeseboogersGhost @Cuckbot

And I thought this interference was over. This post got mirrored on /v/pedogate because i would expect this kind of shit to happen. Quit it and let me focus on my real enemy the pedophiles. If I have to make a crypto-bounty driven pedophile doxxing website hosted in Russia to steal your user-base if that's what is required to get the job done I will - but right now I prefer to be at the coal face fighting pedophilia and exposing injustice to children without having to work around your interference.

NO MODIFICATIONS WILL BE DONE - especially the first request as the /v/pizzagatemods post wasn't answered - the questions in it - and downvoted so nobody who goes to that subverse can even see it without clicking on the new tab that nobody does. https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2499289