This submission was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @SandHog.

^{Posted automatically (#44045) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

This submission was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @Vindicator.

^{Posted automatically (#43958) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

does any of this have anything to do with pizzagate

no

100% of this post is a sabotage of the efforts of pizzagate researchers

ban @webofslime from this site, mods, thats my recommendation

This submission was linked from this v/pizzagatewhatever comment by @kneo24.

^{Posted automatically (#31654) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

(Interesting that some usernames coincide with usernames on "Zambian Meat," an online cannibal hangout. Antithetical to "the cause," one might say.)

Wait, what?! Who?

/takesdeepbreath

@thewebofslime, are you out of your minds?

You are going around now, claiming the v/pizzagate lead mod hacked your website, and launched a DDOS attack?

I can't believe it.

I read your v/thewebofslime submission, the convo you had with @Vindicator on your v/GreatAwakening submission, and parts of your convo with @Vindicator on your v/pizzagate submission.

I meant to take a break for one or two days, and am just here to check my PMs, so I will say this only here in this one comment:

If you think that someone hacked your computer, and launched a DDOS attack, then present evidence. I mean, actual evidence, with proof that a specific person did it.

Going around, and smearing someone as a potential hacker without any proof is not ok.

You can be pissed off by @Vindicator because he required edits for your recent v/pizzagate post, you don't have to like him, whatever. But smearing him with this accusation is definitely a no-go, both in general, and also regarding his position as a v/pizzagate mod. It smells of a shill attack. (And please note I am trying to stay ladylike regarding my wording.)

You see, I helped you because you did a couple of good posts in the past - these (here, here, and here) come to mind.

I wasn't able to understand why you were not able to adhere to the v/pizzagate submission rules, although you're obviously smart. I don't know who you are, and what you are up to, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

I will tell you what I have told numerous other users who tried the 'muh v/pizzagate is compromised' narrative:

1) v/pizzagate is not compromised. I was a mod for ten months, and nobody offered me any money, ever, or tried to influence the way I modded.

@Vindicator asked me whether I would like to become a mod, although he knew that I am non-partisan, not an ardent Trump supporter, and not a Q follower. He could easily have asked someone else. The same applies to @kevdude, when he sent me a mod invitation some time later, when Millennial_Falcon was demodded, and they were looking for a new M mod.

@Vindicator and me might have had disagreements recently, but he was a good friend. I know him very well. He is 100% legit, and he has worked his ass off the past two+ years for this sub.

Trying to portray him as a compromised operative, and a hacker bangs head on table is mean and malicious.

2) The rules of v/pizzagate were made by the community. Not the mods.

@kevdude wrote them at the time, discussing them with the community, due to the flooding of the sub with cp and shill posts. We had regular rules discussions within the community, and they were adjusted accordingly; the recent major change was the introduction of Rule 6, since the majority of users felt they wanted to have some info before clicking on a link.

If you don't like v/pizzagate and its rules, you are free to post whereever you want. The rules are transparent, they were known by you before you came to the sub, it is your decision whether you want to post there or not, or create your own pizzagate research sub. If you don't like a specific rule, or would like to propose an additional rule, you can always start a discussion on v/pizzagatemods, and invite the community over for a discussion.

@Vindicator is not the villain mod you are trying to paint him as. He actually gave one of your posts the 'Share!' flair recently, and he didn't even flair the post, although it didn't adhere to Rule 2 - you posted pngs and jpgs, but without any links.

A Non Nonsense Summary of Pizzagate

That's what he wrote in his mod comment:

Great summary thread, Web. I'll give it the Share flair. :-)

Here's another recent post submitted by you which he obviously appreciated, see his comments on the thread:

Edible Schoolyard Project. $167,000 Solstice Fundraiser. James Alefantis. Jim Comey's Personal Email. A Serious Woman.

And again, he was lenient, and didn't flair the post, although some of the jpgs would have required links. If you had submitted the post in my modding shift, I would have flaired it.

On a side note, that's a further proof that your recent allegations that your posts were targeted by the mods are definitely not true. Quite to the contrary, @Vindicator was very lenient.

I asked you whether you might want to crosspost your recent v/thewebofslime post to v/pizzagate. I do that frequently (asking for crossposts) when I see good posts on v/pizzagatewhatever, or v/news.

I already found it disingeneous that you wrote that I had asked you to crosspost your post to v/pizzagate, when the v/pizzagate post looked totally different from the original post with the three chan links. But I tried to help you editing it, since I think it was a good post, and I disagree with @Vindicator here; I can see how you took the three chan links as a starting point, and then added content confirming the research in the chan links. Imo the post is totally different from the 'links in links in links' 'Sarah' shill posts we had; your post made sense and is coherent imo, especially since it was meant to be a Pizzagate summary post (see headline).

Now I feel like a total idiot, since I supported you, and now get associated with someone who obviously has malicious intentions by trying to smear the v/pizzagate mods.

Thank you so much.

@shewhomustbeobeyed @Crensch

@MadWorld, @Vindicator, @Crensch, @kevdude. @srayzie

I have read all the information on the cross thread... quite a read and quite a back and forward.

My tech knowledge is very basic so I will not weigh in on that particular subject as it seems that other users with more knowledge than mine have called out the OP in a lot of baseless claims, accusations and most importantly threats of doxxing. At least on the tech part.

When I first read the introduction of the OP on v/introductions I actually did not like what I read. https://voat.co/v/introductions/3048705 - the post seemed to me as a preaching to the choir style. Looking for his prey on the vacuum of distrust to use the emotion of despair as a way into the hearts and minds of those that can easily be deceived. With decent rhetoric not like the one we see from the shills that are here posing to be white nationalists that care about the replacement and exposing the (((jew in the letter))), but as the type of rhetoric that user virge uses when he posts and debates (until he gets caught in the bs and starts throwing tantrums like the childish drunk he is - and then deletes his posts and comments to avoid the embarrassment).

Now the OP does have way more restraint than the previous user but still seems kind of sketchy to me seeing one that tends to describe himself as a pursuer of the truth and the exposure of corruption yet he works from the shadows himself. Now this is not to say that I don't defend anonymity, but the user posted all of the links to his own sites/pages and then complains about attacks he is getting on his particular site.

I first came here because of v/Pizzagate and I value the sub because I do believe in the criminal conspiracy of luciferian elitists that enjoy child abuse besides the other corrupt activities they engaged on. I truly believe that there is a satanic and obscure force surrounding them and I know, because of my faith that they will be exposed for the scum they are. I also know that justice will prevail in the end for it was forewriten by the Word of God. That is were I place my trust and love. In Jesus Christ.

I distrust anyone that works from the shadows bragging that they are fighting against the same forces I distrust but applying the same tactics they do. I simply see it as hypocritical and disingenuous.

v/Pizzagate is to me a channel of information, as most of the subs that I have interest on. But I know as well that they are constantly under attack by desinformation. The most concerning part is the preaching to the choir one because it is harder to detect and can easily infiltrate the movement through the weak links among it's community. This is why I distrust Anonymous "We are legion", I distrust Q with their slogans WWG1WGA or "in one we are many". As interesting as their topics may be to me, these slogans are simply paraphrasing and symbolism of what the possessed man told Jesus: Mark 5:8 - KJV: "And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many."

That said, my major concern goes to the OP's intent to doxx users that have crossed his path just because of asking him to edit his submissions and to show proof of his accusations. When a user shows this behavior then I definitely will be against it because you do not simply go ahead and throw accusations to other users that they are attacking you without giving proof of that (which he never did) and then threatens to doxx them if they continue asking for proof of his claims or call him out on his, what appears to be, well created LARP.

Vindicator showed proofs of his defense on this thread and the others I read, hence the OP's actions appear to be unjustified because he is simply threatening to doxx someone, a sub mod, because they had a difference of opinion as a way to shut down opposition by intimidation.

The only two scenarios in which I would accept doxxing are:

• The users doxx themselves by their own choice with no fear of repercussions.
• The users engage in criminal activity or show criminal intent that needs to be shared with the authorities as long as that criminal intent conflicts with the idea of freedom of speech established by the SCOTUS.

If the user engages in intimidation just because he got called out and because he brags (because he did on his threat) that he has the means to hurt others if he so wills it, though he prefers not to - as per his own claim, that simply shows how unworthy of our trust he is and shows as well how he can try to bully others that disagree with him that have not the means to defend themselves.

This submission was linked from this v/thewebofslime comment by @Vindicator.

^{Posted automatically (#31404) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

I’ve never even dealt with you other than offering for you to post in v/GreatAwakening. So why are you saying pizzagate mods as in plural?

It should be noted this is a disgruntled user who does not like the submission rules established by v/pizzagate, which probably interfere with his automated submission routine and machine generated articles.

When I asked him to edit his post yesterday, he went on the offense, leaving comments implying pizzagate moderators have ill intent, and creating this submission in his private subverse falsely claiming that I said he worked for David Brock.

He also sent me this cryptic DM.

Now he admits actively trying to dox me on Twitter, justifying it because he thinks I'm "a shill covering a criminal conspiracy."

"What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.

So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight."

Sounds uber legit!

@Crensch @kevdude @srayzie @MadWorld @Sandhog

This submission was linked from this v/GreatAwakening comment by @shewhomustbeobeyed.

^{Posted automatically (#31383) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

Blaming v/Pizzagate for this won't win you any points. That community is under attack constantly by outside force. How do you know it wasn't one of them?

After reading this, I would say you need any proof because this is not proof of anything specific. This is just someone, somewhere. Unless you've got screenshots or logs of them saying 'I bash injected the hell outta this guy' you don't have any proof. It could be, literally, anyone.

So what else ya got?

I don't understand what this means. What is happening to you? What is an 'injection attack'?

Bot IP China 103.215.82.68

Is this the culprit?

You could just explain it to us in laymans terms