What type of evidence would I require to prove to Voat that users from the /v/Pizzagate subverse are carrying out injection attacks, bash attacks, etc?

What type of evidence would I require to prove to Voat that users from the /v/Pizzagate subverse are carrying out injection attacks, bash attacks, etc? (ProtectVoat)

submitted 6 years ago by thewebofslime

80 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SandHog 6 years ago

(Interesting that some usernames coincide with usernames on "Zambian Meat," an online cannibal hangout. Antithetical to "the cause," one might say.)

Wait, what?! Who?

link

thewebofslime 6 years ago

I hate going to that place to dig up info. I really, really hate it.

Right now, I have a few names. freshmeat is an obvious one.

What I need is a third piece of information that ties the two before I accuse someone of being a cannibal fetishist. But... I really, really hate going there.

That one will take some time. It grosses me out.

link

SandHog 6 years ago

I don't blame you that place sounds fucked up.

link

thewebofslime 6 years ago

Yeah. It's hurtful. Since you are the only one who is seemingly objective... maybe you wouldn't mind taking a look...

Thus far, a summary of what I have is this:

I code that I am setting an honesty trap.

I inform Vindicator I intend to be on my best behavior.

Vindicator reacts, for the first time ever, with hostility.

Minutes later, my site starts being attacked.

The visitor came to my site from the thread. Then did a couple of low level attacks.

The attacks then came from IPs that are more widespread and mostly cloud based services.

The device was a company issued device from CACI, a Defense Intelligence Agency contractor.

In order to rule out Vindicator, I thought maybe it was because of my George Tenet posting, because I had doubts as to whether Vindicator has any tech knowledge, at all, but maybe he knows someone. I don't know. Looking up George Tenet and CACI, I came across this:

https://i.imgur.com/gG3YS35.png

It outlines the Q movement long before the Q movement. There are other even outlines of using "social media as a form of protest" in the wikileaks.

Okay, so maybe not Vindicator, yet. Definitely someone from /v/Pizzagate.

A figure called Q was the "founder and runs the IRC. He is indead in California, as are many of the senior leadership of the group." Another person called Owen is "almost a co-founder, lives in NY with family that are also active in the group, including slenaid and rabbit (nicks)." Finally, CommanderX can "manage some significant firepower." Barr believed he had matched real names to each of these three individuals.

I am already wondering why a high level insider would affiliate themselves with a British Firm lead by a CIA director, George Tenet, who also heads Allen & Co.

Now, my curiosity is really piqued.

So, the first thing I do is archive everyone's social media then run a search... which takes a while per name. I don't have a fancy Google server. It takes time to do search queries.

So, I run everyone's usernames and have to start comparing data with help.

I want to know what I am talking about before I start laying this around because I already know what he response is going to be like.

I find it very curious that Vindicator was also the one who found the completely ignored IamQ post from years ago, now that I have some context.

While I set an honesty trap for shills, I keep stumbling across "Q" stuff. I've never really followed it too closely because I do my own research in my own way. I'm supportive, of the cause, though, and I definitely want justice from the bad actors I identified long before Trump came along.

My initial thought was, Vindicator liked my post previously and marked it "Share This" but the recent one, the same material only better sourced and longer, got a very negative response from what was previously fine. The only difference is that the extra information casts the Q narrative in a questionable light.

So, I am left with, "Hey everyone," what's the best way to prove this without doxing anyone?

Because I have location data that matches the attack with a user.

link

SandHog 6 years ago

I code that I am setting an honesty trap. I inform Vindicator I intend to be on my best behavior. Vindicator reacts, for the first time ever, with hostility. Minutes later, my site starts being attacked. The visitor came to my site from the thread. Then did a couple of low level attacks. The attacks then came from IPs that are more widespread and mostly cloud based services. The device was a company issued device from CACI, a Defense Intelligence Agency contractor. In order to rule out Vindicator, I thought maybe it was because of my George Tenet posting, because I had doubts as to whether Vindicator has any tech knowledge, at all, but maybe he knows someone. I don't know. Looking up George Tenet and CACI, I came across this: https://i.imgur.com/gG3YS35.pngPNG It outlines the Q movement long before the Q movement. There are other even outlines of using "social media as a form of protest" in the wikileaks.

Interesting. I don't really follow the Q stuff much at all aside from when topics that interest me intersect and there is discussion about them. I always shied away from it because I don't like being led around by my nose by anonymous people on the internet. So you thought Vindicator was trying to silence you on v/pizzagate because of the stuff you posted about Tenet and how that might relate to Q? I know that he follows it but why would it be censored on v/pizzagate and not on the Q sub if the attack was related to Q/CACI? There might be something there but that part doesn't make sense to me. I suppose it's possible that I'm missing the bigger picture since I don't follow it.

Okay, so maybe not Vindicator, yet. Definitely someone from /v/Pizzagate.

Or someone who came through v/Pizzagate anyway. Lots of people just lurk, I suspect.

I am already wondering why a high level insider would affiliate themselves with a British Firm lead by a CIA director, George Tenet, who also heads Allen & Co. Now, my curiosity is really piqued.

That is curious. Admittedly I don't have enough background on these people or institutions to say much one way or the other but the obvious reason is usually either money or influence in some form or fashion. And Q is certainly influential.

So, the first thing I do is archive everyone's social media then run a search... which takes a while per name. I don't have a fancy Google server. It takes time to do search queries. So, I run everyone's usernames and have to start comparing data with help.

This is the part I don't get. As far as I am aware you were only flaired on v/pizzagate so who do you mean by everyone? All of the v/pizzagate mods? Some of them? Other people? Did you run my social media? This is the part I have an issue with. It's flirting with doxxing.

I want to know what I am talking about before I start laying this around because I already know what he response is going to be like.

Understandable.

I find it very curious that Vindicator was also the one who found the completely ignored IamQ post from years ago, now that I have some context.

I have no idea what you are referring to here.

While I set an honesty trap for shills, I keep stumbling across "Q" stuff. I've never really followed it too closely because I do my own research in my own way. I'm supportive, of the cause, though, and I definitely want justice from the bad actors I identified long before Trump came along.

Ditto.

My initial thought was, Vindicator liked my post previously and marked it "Share This" but the recent one, the same material only better sourced and longer, got a very negative response from what was previously fine. The only difference is that the extra information casts the Q narrative in a questionable light.

To be fair the recent post was a literal encyclopedia of corruption. A good book but a lot of that stuff isn't directly related to v/pizagate. Again I am not grasping why it is significant that the Q stuff was targeted on v/pizzagate and was unmolested on v/GreatAwakening. I've had a few beers so maybe I'm just missing something here.

So, I am left with, "Hey everyone," what's the best way to prove this without doxing anyone? Because I have location data that matches the attack with a user.

Approach them privately I guess? I dunno. Voat really frowns on doxxing and you've already gone farther than I am comfortable with. I think you have the idea about Vindicator but the Q stuff is somewhat compelling.

Back to the "Zambian Meat" stuff for a second. Is freshmeat a voat user that was involved with v/pizzagate somehow? A former mod or something? I'm not familiar with that name but I then haven't been around for all that long so I'm lacking context here.

link