You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

kneo24 ago

It is a FACT that this was within minutes of Vindicator having a break in his usual demeanor, despite me being cooperative.

Just because you state something as a fact doesn't make it true. I have yet to see any substantiation of him being "mad" about your "thread". Are you claiming he's "mad" because you broke the subverse rules? I just don't understand where you're getting this "he mad, he mad" thing from.

It is important to note my site has never been attacked and it basically has no visitors. I just use it as my own automated news reel to make sure I don't miss anything.

I don't believe that for a second. For starters, you freely advertise your website all over. You spam posts here on Voat, I've seen it on notabug.io, and if my memory serves me correctly, you've complained it about it being banned from Reddit. It's even linked in your user profile. That's not the mark of someone using it as an automated news reel.

My only problem is that I've been politely poking and prodding at Vindicator and he just doesn't seem that smart. He indicated that if VOAT ATTACKED YOUR SITE THEN BLABLAHBLAH. Of course VOAT DID NOT ATTACK MY SITE. None of that is in my explanation. Someone who CAME FROM VOAT attacked my site.

There's been nothing polite about what you've been doing. You outright made an accusation, that more or less, vindicator, has been attacking your website. You did this days ago. You continued on with it. For someone who is just "trying to get to the truth", you sure as shit start a lot of dumb drama over purposely making yourself noticed, to only further propagate making yourself further noticed. Not that I expect any sort of honest answer here, but what is your intent with this?

He is also spreading fear that I am out to dox people.

Your actions are questionable, and you more or less state yourself you've been connecting usernames across social media platforms and digging into people. It's not an unfounded accusation like you pretend it is even if that ends up not being your intent.

At this stage, since I dont think that I've got an answer... Vindicator; "Did you, or did you not enter those strings into your browser bar? If not, do you know who did?"

It's a dumb question to ask. If you get "no's" to these, which I imagine you will, you're going to call them a liar anyway and post more long winded bullshit and never actually make the link between vindicator and what you saw.

It's all bullshit though. I've seen you claim a few times now, "I don't have much time for this right now", so you create shells of posts to later go back and edit them, or find time to continue on regardless in the comments sections. If you didn't have time for this right now, you'd wait till you did. How hard would it be to create a rough draft in a notepad file?

1.5 days ago when I told you:

What you are, is a fucking useless piece of spamming shit. I see your game quite clearly. You create the drama and then play the victim.

You've done absolutely zero to change my mind.

thewebofslime ago

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3130351

I am going to present facts in a manner that you can check for yourself, where you do not have to take my word for it.

I am trying to get an understanding of the best way to do that, but I find it curious that 5 people are really upset about this and most others are being encouraging.

Either way... I'm not going to ask you to take my word for anything.

You can double check these are real, for yourself, in the haveibeenpwned database or by downloading the torrent and searching it, yourself on your own computer. You do not have to take my word for it.

[email protected] 34db7ed52753394de58d0f72a8c49bd7

[email protected] curtis999

[email protected] geujVdbWf

[email protected] angel1

[email protected] pk3x7w9W

Tell me if you have an understanding on how to check the validity of these emails, yourself, per my instructions.

kneo24 ago

Again, for someone who claims to not have a lot of time right now, you sure are investing it in carrying on multiple threads. Notice how you didn't respond to a single thing I wrote? I know I did.

thewebofslime ago

I don't have a lot of time.

I am asking if this is an appropriate way to share evidence.

I will fill in the blanks in a manner in which everyone can confirm for themselves.

My question to you is, is this format sufficient for proof? and are you able to confirm email addresses and passwords in the leaked collection?

I'm politely trying to help other people understand who don't have technical knowledge.

You are attacking evidence that hasn't been presented, yet. I find that strange. Just stick to what I am trying to accomplish... unless what I am presenting scares you.

kneo24 ago

Once again, you're not actually addressing anything I wrote.

I don't buy this, "I don't have a lot of time". You keep using said time you don't have not actually addressing anything.