Yes, WoS, you can't just dump massive piles of links and pics of links into a submission and claim it's a great post. We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes. You need to put together a coherent piece that ties all of it's links together, explaining what each one is and how it connects. That's what the v/pizzagate ruleset is about. There are a million other subverses on Voat you can dump your hoard of data into.
I claim it is the longest and most complete ever posted in the subverse. I would be curious if you had a better example. It still doesn't include everything. Silsby... etc.
I posted it because I was asked to, even though I knew it was going to be a headache.
As far as a "great post" I absolutely didn't want to include triplicate ways to view the same material. For that reason, it is a bit of a headache, but the rules are what make it appear hectic, because I have to explain every single link not just the three times they are all already explained, but again inside the post.
It is an architectural problem.
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
Respect the limitations of the medium. Make focused, individual submissions, and crosslink them where relevant to other focused, individual submissions. How is it that everyone else who posts seems willing and able to do this, except you?
Here's the thing, in the timing surrounding your shitty response, my website was attacked.
What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.
So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight.
Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?
Maybe. Maybe not. You are but one.
Do you understand where I am really coming from?
I've been providing /v/Pizzagate with honesty traps for two years and they always fail.
You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.
Seriously. Do I need to thot audit you? If you don't provide me with some kind of explanation of your behavior, you go straight to the top of the list past the /r/politics mods. I'm not kidding around.
Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.
Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?
It seems that OP has archived @Vindicator's contents on other social media platforms, with the intent of extracting geolocation data and connecting @Vindicator's IRL identity. By extension, he could be doing this same thing to other users that he deemed a threat of some kind. This should be served, as a warning to the PG researchers out there, that you should always scrub your metadata and use VPN/Tor to protect your online anonymity!!
I hope this is not another one of those narratives targeted at the mods of PG.
As the name implies, it is a form of attack by injecting malicious string of data, that somehow gets interpreted as commands of some kind. It is usually designed to steal other private data or credential.
What OP showed in that PV submission is very common. I am 100% nobody, and even I get probed on the daily basis. Sometimes the probes are heavy, sometimes they are legit, from security firm that conducts vulnerability measure. But that does not matter. It is the intent that worries me...
Would you please tell me what an 'injection attack' is?
As the name implies, it is a form of attack by injecting malicious string of data, that somehow gets interpreted as commands of some kind. It is usually designed to steal other private data or credential.
What OP showed in that PV submission is very common. I am 100% nobody, and even I get probed on the daily basis. Sometimes the probes are heavy, sometimes they are legit, from security firm that conducts vulnerability measure. But that does not matter. It is the intent that worries me...
Posted automatically (#31392) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
What OP showed in that PV submission is very common. I am 100% nobody, and even I get probed on the daily basis.
O_O really?
But that does not matter. It is the intent that worries me...
#metoo again
As the name implies, it is a form of attack by injecting malicious string of data, that somehow gets interpreted as commands of some kind. It is usually designed to steal other private data or credential.
Thank you. You do some of the best tech-tard explanations, you spoil me. 💋
I'm hoping it's just an overheated, testosterone injected, chimp-out over how difficult it can be to do his particular kind of multi-forum submissions.
I'm hoping it's just an overheated, testosterone injected, chimp-out over how difficult it can be to do his particular kind of multi-forum submissions.
That is not a good reason to go after someone. I suspect the motive could be personal. Why spend so much energy archiving someone's social content, with the intent of extracting personally identifiable metadata, and then use it against this said person?
Why spend so much energy archiving someone's social content, with the intent of extracting personally identifiable metadata, and then use it against this said person?
I do not know how bad the attacks are. Paranoia is a side effect of what we do at PG.
view the rest of the comments →
thewebofslime ago
They already put a 24 hour warning for deletion due to lack of "clarity" despite being the longest, most well sourced post in the sub's history.
Vindicator ago
Yes, WoS, you can't just dump massive piles of links and pics of links into a submission and claim it's a great post. We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes. You need to put together a coherent piece that ties all of it's links together, explaining what each one is and how it connects. That's what the v/pizzagate ruleset is about. There are a million other subverses on Voat you can dump your hoard of data into.
thewebofslime ago
I don't claim it is great.
I claim it is the longest and most complete ever posted in the subverse. I would be curious if you had a better example. It still doesn't include everything. Silsby... etc.
I posted it because I was asked to, even though I knew it was going to be a headache.
As far as a "great post" I absolutely didn't want to include triplicate ways to view the same material. For that reason, it is a bit of a headache, but the rules are what make it appear hectic, because I have to explain every single link not just the three times they are all already explained, but again inside the post.
It is an architectural problem.
So, if I wanted to put something nice together, what would you recommend?
Vindicator ago
Respect the limitations of the medium. Make focused, individual submissions, and crosslink them where relevant to other focused, individual submissions. How is it that everyone else who posts seems willing and able to do this, except you?
thewebofslime ago
I edited the post three times. I'm trying.
Here's the thing, in the timing surrounding your shitty response, my website was attacked.
What do you really think I am after? I am after determining if /v/Pizzagate is operating as a limited hangout. The format is designed intentionally to operate as such and you may just be a pawn, but your recent interactions have raised some serious concerns. Because you raise the possibility you are a shill covering for a criminal conspiracy, I have archived everything I could on you on the Internet and I will be comparing it to my logs.
So, you accused me of being a shill, but I have a little mini RICO database of shills that I will "thot audit." I have a couple of lawyers going over what I've got and a computer science professor from the UC system to provide expert insight.
Am I going to find an IP in my logs that connects your Twitter geolocation tags?
Maybe. Maybe not. You are but one.
Do you understand where I am really coming from?
I've been providing /v/Pizzagate with honesty traps for two years and they always fail.
You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.
Seriously. Do I need to thot audit you? If you don't provide me with some kind of explanation of your behavior, you go straight to the top of the list past the /r/politics mods. I'm not kidding around.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
WTF is going on. Are you the one who has 'botted' me?
I know you've had trouble submitting, but do you really think that @Vindicator is responsible for the tech problems you are experiencing?
@MadWorld
MadWorld ago
It seems that OP has archived @Vindicator's contents on other social media platforms, with the intent of extracting geolocation data and connecting @Vindicator's IRL identity. By extension, he could be doing this same thing to other users that he deemed a threat of some kind. This should be served, as a warning to the PG researchers out there, that you should always scrub your metadata and use VPN/Tor to protect your online anonymity!!
I hope this is not another one of those narratives targeted at the mods of PG.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
#metoo
@thewebofslime has also made a post to v/ProtectVoat:
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3126226
Would you please tell me what an 'injection attack' is?
@Vindicator
Vindicator ago
I have no idea what that is. Sounds LARPy to me.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
@MadWorld told me this:
MadWorld ago
As the name implies, it is a form of attack by injecting malicious string of data, that somehow gets interpreted as commands of some kind. It is usually designed to steal other private data or credential.
What OP showed in that PV submission is very common. I am 100% nobody, and even I get probed on the daily basis. Sometimes the probes are heavy, sometimes they are legit, from security firm that conducts vulnerability measure. But that does not matter. It is the intent that worries me...
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @shewhomustbeobeyed.
Posted automatically (#31392) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
O_O really?
#metoo again
Thank you. You do some of the best tech-tard explanations, you spoil me. 💋
MadWorld ago
I am worried that OP is showing bad intention, of potentially doxxing attempt, over the argument of submission rules. Normal users do not do that!
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I'm hoping it's just an overheated, testosterone injected, chimp-out over how difficult it can be to do his particular kind of multi-forum submissions.
A girls gotta dream.
@Vindicator
MadWorld ago
That is not a good reason to go after someone. I suspect the motive could be personal. Why spend so much energy archiving someone's social content, with the intent of extracting personally identifiable metadata, and then use it against this said person?
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
No it isn't.
I do not know how bad the attacks are. Paranoia is a side effect of what we do at PG.