New shill wave. It'll die. Fake consensus, atm.

That's a good one for when they finally take all my social media down. They just stole my /r/FBIWatch subreddit and made it pro FBI and anti Trump.

Not sure. Fixed.

STFU, kike lover

plz see video i made 4 you watch http://www.lhohq.info/cinema/lhohq_spacegirl_movie.html

piqued is correct.

Sure. Are you able to see this? docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BcC3UBc-uSCcJOqHoh8CUwpb-XasqAbDwiQN-I1_FOs/edit?usp=sharing

At any given moment, I have scripts collecting and pooling data and measuring velocity, so that good information comes to me, rather than me going out to find it. Something with too much velocity is artificial. There is a sweet spot where you can kind of tell that it is getting genuine human interest because it won't blast off within a minute of being posted.

That spreadsheet is the beginning of that process and I have hundreds of them for different things.

So, on any given subject, like when I am responding to someone in r/politics or writing an article, I have the best stuff right at my fingertips and all of the information.

Well, first there is just the outright banning. If you say something in the wrong way, you will get banned. This goes for almost anywhere. If I wanted to show you evidence of Marina Abramovic with naked little kids, there is no place to do that. Even if I doctor the photos and cover up the bad parts. Almost nowhere on the Internet are you allowed to show proof of the Pizzagate people with naked little kids even though it is out there.

I posted a bunch of the Collection #1 stuff to 8chan and it got deleted right away. Places that I don't expect censorship are extra annoying when I've found something important. The shill response to Collection #1 is "there is nothing there, the passwords don't work" which isn't true but also misses the fact that we get to see Black Rock investment employees with Rothschild.com addresses, we get to track down James Alefantis' doings by searching for his alternate email addresses that were just exposed. Collection #1 is full of interesting stuff and #2 - #5 have hit the torrents.

Shilling is obviously another form of censorship, where they have canned and parroted responses to most issues. These are easy to spot, because I pride myself on digging past the Conservative view that liberal shills are trained to argue against. One easy example, "Uranium One was approved by BOTH parties." Yeah, dummy, both parties are corrupt; here is the money trail... where you then show how Russia launders it's money. I can practically do a thesis on money laundering, now, since I've caught people doing it and exposed them in court. That process gave me a lot of understanding on how to look at the problem.

But the shills are there to drown you out and most people in this community know how they work. What I look for are "artificial impressions" and they are really easy to spot on Voat. But. you can practically figure it out with basic arithmetic on a lot of posts. I LIKE when I get a very negative response from shills, because then I can dial up the exposure on the issue. But then you have certain things, like stuff on Laughing Horse, that they won't react to, at all. It will cause them to stop even commenting. They are sophisticated enough to know that even heavy down voting would expose the issue as weird. When you find something good even the shills won't touch, you know you are onto something. Sid Blumenthal's leaked contact list is one such example.

But yeah, then you will eventually get some weird high praise. I was raised by narcissists, so I don't take compliments well... though I do know the proper and polite responses that I am capable of using. But praise to the next level... like how great I am and I should be writing a book and I should be doing this and that, with heavy flirting means you've found someone who is tasked with finding out some information about you. If you ignore the women, they will try with men and attempt to generate personal conversations. I'm sure plenty of people know exactly who I am, by now, but it isn't a concern for me for a number of reasons. With that personal information, they try to harass you. Since I can be such a copy paste monster, I have even been harassed using information about other people. The type of harassment where accounts will just hit you non stop with insults. I once mentioned I was helping my kid with homework and they started going after how stupid my kids were. For days.

Right now, I'm playing with very basic essay writing scripts to respond back to shills to trigger their key words to call them. It takes one hot key for me to respond, but it creates work for them and other shills, especially if it is always original. It just has to ALMOST make sense and the shill is forced to engage, wasting time and money. Here is an example:

The leaders of the Resistance are women and people of color. In politics, we have Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Lieu, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Cory Booker, John Lewis, to name a few. In media, we have Joy Reid, Charles Blow, Rachel Maddow, and other smaller publications and podcasts like those by Marcus Johnson, James Holder, Sarah Lerner, for example. And you have a whole army of women and people of color who are protesting, calling legislators, and speaking out in other ways to resist, including by simply using their voices to speak out on social media. You also have thousands of women who have now decided to run for office. In my town of Portland, Oregon, even the school board races were exciting, with women who had never been involved in politics winning races by running campaigns based on protecting students of color, immigrants, and Muslims.

Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi (born March 26, 1940) is a minority leader in the United States House of Representatives and is an American politician representing most of San Francisco in California, USA. Previously, she was the 52nd President of the Parliament in 2007-2011, and she was the only woman who was alone. For journalists, he has the highest political position among women politicians in American history. (Click on Read more. WhoRunsGov.com. )

Still others want to tell Hilary Clinton to leave. Who wants to remove Nancy Pelosi? Who is thinking that Donna Brazile should be quiet. Three of Kirsten Gillibrand, Maxine Waters, Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, Kamala Harris, John Lewis, Elijah Cummings, Ted Lieu and Joaquin Castro have not made sufficient progress to guarantee our support.

Obama may leave but their dream of socialism in the European-style America continues. | just did not talk about the socialist Bernie Sanders. Nancy Pelosi, Kamalou Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Bill de Blassie, Andrew Kwomo, Cory number, Kate Ellison and Christopher Murphy. If that happens, you will know what will happen next. They may cut President Donald Trump's knee and release him from his office. They may make a second amendment to make the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and a few liberal judges may appeal to the court to eliminate their judicial independence.

Time gating is annoying for me, personally, because I like to do the news for an hour in the morning and an hour in the evening and a little but while I work. I would like to pump out the top ten or so most reliable articles in the morning, update with anything big that develops, then go over the propaganda opinions about it all. That way, I have a chance to kind of research what isn't being talked about.

The more nuanced censorship is the most annoying., of all. Twitter is the #1 culprit. In this instance, you can see where showing how fake the Jussie Smollett affair was resulted in a shadowban.

http://magaimg.net/img/7boc.png

They are banning people from even being able to search for you. What Twitter is doing is throttling truthful narratives. They aren't targeting conservatives as much as they are targeting information that exposes "the game" which mainly involves protecting the perceived legitimacy of entities like the FBI, whether that perceived legitimacy is deserved, or not. Obviously, I feel like they are a bunch of frauds at the FBI who have been prosecuting selectively since day 1.

You can be banned from showing up for certain people, too. Essentially, you fall into a groove where you and your followers are in an echo chamber, so if you start posting about Kamala Harris and her secret police, liberals won't see it, even if you were first to post.

The most annoying type of censorship on Twitter is the type you don't see.

I was the first to post on Kamala Harris' tweet just before she announced. Some music video. I was at the top for about five minutes, then they outright deleted my tweet, so I responded with a similar one to the new "approved" top comment, where they moved it way down the list, later. I can and do write scripts that make sure I'm the first to post on someone. If it is not controversial, the post will stay at the top. If it exposes something good, they will move it down or outright delete it without telling you.

Then, Twitter does things that are pretty in your face. Arun Rao of the DoJ was exposed as being friends with Alefantis. Twitter forced me to delete the Tweet before re-activating the account. In fact, they lock my account all the time.

The result is that there is a chilling effect on what I am or am not allowed to talk about it and I have to talk about things in s very specific way to get around their hoops. It is worse than 1984. They are forcing everyone's thoughts into a "groove" so that they can manipulate the voting chattle into 50/50 results every time in order to be able to sway elections with some last minute ballots.

As a result, I posit two primary missions for the American people. The first is to be actively pro-transparency. The second is to be actively anti-war. The best way to support our troops is to bring them home and not force them to fight in pointless wars. I don't have a problem with being heavy handed, when warranted, but we have unmanned and long range weaponry for that. We can kill anyone, anywhere, without putting troops there.

Whatever you do, keep engaging and drowning out the false narratives and keep asking questions.