@MadWorld, @Vindicator, @Crensch, @kevdude. @srayzie

I have read all the information on the cross thread... quite a read and quite a back and forward.

My tech knowledge is very basic so I will not weigh in on that particular subject as it seems that other users with more knowledge than mine have called out the OP in a lot of baseless claims, accusations and most importantly threats of doxxing. At least on the tech part.

When I first read the introduction of the OP on v/introductions I actually did not like what I read. https://voat.co/v/introductions/3048705 - the post seemed to me as a preaching to the choir style. Looking for his prey on the vacuum of distrust to use the emotion of despair as a way into the hearts and minds of those that can easily be deceived. With decent rhetoric not like the one we see from the shills that are here posing to be white nationalists that care about the replacement and exposing the (((jew in the letter))), but as the type of rhetoric that user virge uses when he posts and debates (until he gets caught in the bs and starts throwing tantrums like the childish drunk he is - and then deletes his posts and comments to avoid the embarrassment).

Now the OP does have way more restraint than the previous user but still seems kind of sketchy to me seeing one that tends to describe himself as a pursuer of the truth and the exposure of corruption yet he works from the shadows himself. Now this is not to say that I don't defend anonymity, but the user posted all of the links to his own sites/pages and then complains about attacks he is getting on his particular site.

I first came here because of v/Pizzagate and I value the sub because I do believe in the criminal conspiracy of luciferian elitists that enjoy child abuse besides the other corrupt activities they engaged on. I truly believe that there is a satanic and obscure force surrounding them and I know, because of my faith that they will be exposed for the scum they are. I also know that justice will prevail in the end for it was forewriten by the Word of God. That is were I place my trust and love. In Jesus Christ.

I distrust anyone that works from the shadows bragging that they are fighting against the same forces I distrust but applying the same tactics they do. I simply see it as hypocritical and disingenuous.

v/Pizzagate is to me a channel of information, as most of the subs that I have interest on. But I know as well that they are constantly under attack by desinformation. The most concerning part is the preaching to the choir one because it is harder to detect and can easily infiltrate the movement through the weak links among it's community. This is why I distrust Anonymous "We are legion", I distrust Q with their slogans WWG1WGA or "in one we are many". As interesting as their topics may be to me, these slogans are simply paraphrasing and symbolism of what the possessed man told Jesus: Mark 5:8 - KJV: "And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many."

That said, my major concern goes to the OP's intent to doxx users that have crossed his path just because of asking him to edit his submissions and to show proof of his accusations. When a user shows this behavior then I definitely will be against it because you do not simply go ahead and throw accusations to other users that they are attacking you without giving proof of that (which he never did) and then threatens to doxx them if they continue asking for proof of his claims or call him out on his, what appears to be, well created LARP.

Vindicator showed proofs of his defense on this thread and the others I read, hence the OP's actions appear to be unjustified because he is simply threatening to doxx someone, a sub mod, because they had a difference of opinion as a way to shut down opposition by intimidation.

The only two scenarios in which I would accept doxxing are:

• The users doxx themselves by their own choice with no fear of repercussions.
• The users engage in criminal activity or show criminal intent that needs to be shared with the authorities as long as that criminal intent conflicts with the idea of freedom of speech established by the SCOTUS.

If the user engages in intimidation just because he got called out and because he brags (because he did on his threat) that he has the means to hurt others if he so wills it, though he prefers not to - as per his own claim, that simply shows how unworthy of our trust he is and shows as well how he can try to bully others that disagree with him that have not the means to defend themselves.