What type of evidence would I require to prove to Voat that users from the /v/Pizzagate subverse are carrying out injection attacks, bash attacks, etc? (ProtectVoat)

submitted ago by thewebofslime

I have oodles of logs showing attacks that happened which correlate to interactions on /v/Pizzagate.

[Wed Mar 27 17:31:14.865020 2019] [:error] [pid -] [client 100.7.8.13:58437] [client 100.7.8.13] ModSecurity. Pattern match "^\\(\\) {" at REQUEST_HEADERS:Referer. [] [] ["] [CVE-2014-6271 - Bash Attack] [hostname "webofslime.com"] [uri "/"] [unique_id "XJwV0tzfyIaIPx1rvxtZXgAAAAs"], referer: () { :; }; printf 'Content-Type: text/json\r\n\r\n%s vulnerable %s' 'VEGA123' 'VEGA123'

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Memorexem ago

After reading this, I would say you need any proof because this is not proof of anything specific. This is just someone, somewhere. Unless you've got screenshots or logs of them saying 'I bash injected the hell outta this guy' you don't have any proof. It could be, literally, anyone.

So what else ya got?

thewebofslime ago

I'm just showing that I have logs...

I'm not trying to prove anything to Voat, just yet. I need to prove it to someone else, first.

Mostly curious what your standard of evidence would be.

Ty.

Memorexem ago

Well, that's the thing. You can't meet a standard if you have nothing. Standards for stuff like this are really variable. If you have like, 1 concrete thing, the bar could be really low. If you have 19 circumstantial things, the bar might be set higher.

Do you see where I'm going?

thewebofslime ago

I guess I am just looking for some precedent. Anything come to mind?