This submission was linked from this v/ProtectVoat comment by @SandHog.

^{Posted automatically (#44046) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

This submission was linked from this v/GreatAwakening comment by @Vindicator.

^{Posted automatically (#31406) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

@Peaceseeker @Cynabuns you might want to take a look at this submission and comments.

And there's more, here: https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3126226

This guy uses bots to make submissions across Voat to content on his sites. He ran afoul of pizzagate's submission rules, and is now claiming we're hacking his website. He's using this as an excuse to try to intimidate users by collecting Voat user data and cross referencing it to look for passwords and other information so he can dox people...or so he says.

My next step is to confirm any location data I can find from people who came to my site. That merely means running all of your usernames through my database which is huge.

So, let me get this straight...

You posted this thread on v/pizzagate and v/GreatAwakening, containing 46 links to your own sites...basically as a honeypot so you can collect data on anyone from Voat who visited it?

And then you stirred up a bunch of fake drama to drive more traffic to your site, and justify your actions tracking and attempting to dox me and others?

This sounds like an attempt to scare people investigating pizzagate, not help the investigation.

You then said:

We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes.

Indeed. I was explaining the reason why we have the submission rules that we do, and why you need to present a focused thesis without ten dozen links and a bunch of jpg's that people can't easily vet. Here's my actual comment, NOT taken out of context to try to make it look like I was referring to you personally:

Vindicator 1 points (+3|-2) 1.1 days ago

Yes, WoS, you can't just dump massive piles of links and pics of links into a submission and claim it's a great post. We've been spammed with similar long, link-riddled posts from the earliest days of the sub compliments of David Brock, designed to lead researchers down dead end rabbit holes. You need to put together a coherent piece that ties all of it's links together, explaining what each one is and how it connects. That's what the v/pizzagate ruleset is about. There are a million other subverses on Voat you can dump your hoard of data into.

I was explaining what submitting to v/pizzagate requires, just like I do to every user who tries to post massive rambling tomes. If you were a part of our community or had any respect for the users who created the ruleset, you wouldn't have taken it personally.

/v/Pizzagate DOES NOT ALLOW LINK POSTS

What does that have to do with you spamming by linking more than 50% to your own content across multiple sites? I explained it clearly here:

You made up a completely false interpretation of the spam rules to target my content. That doesn't sit well with me.

I most certainly did not. Voat's very liberal anti-spam rule requires 5 of every 10 links you post to be NOT to content you control. More than 50% is considered spam. Before you edited this monstrosity of a submission, 45 of the 88 links in it were to your own material. That doesn't even count the links contained within those links.

You said my post was/included:

Useless self-aggrandizement.

massive, baffle-with-bullshit posts.

Nope. You were whining about having to follow the submission rules that require descriptions of each link, saying you didn't have enough room. So I pointed out this paragraph added nothing to the submission and could be deleted to free space:

Despite what I present here, know that this is a tiny fraction of the evidence. We don't need anymore to justify demanding action from government. Stop falling for the gas lighting. Save some kids. Their lives are in your hands.

Useless self-aggrandizement. Delete to make room for link descriptions.

And here, I explained WHY you have to work within a limited medium:

I only have so many characters to work with.

Yes. Voat does that by design -- so submitters have to work with a focused thesis and not swamp readers with massive, baffle-with-bullshit posts. That's how we do things, here.

I've told the same thing to hundreds of submitters. So far, you're the only one to claim this is evidence I'm part of a criminal conspiracy which would justify you doxing me. It's nothing but a trumped up excuse.

Post updated: See top. That's all I've got in me tonight. Tell me your thoughts.

@Vindicator @srayzie @think- @shewhomustbeobeyed @Memorexem

Wow. 🙄 If @Vindicator did say that, what is the big deal? I’ve been called everything under the sun. If you can’t handle it, maybe Voat isn’t for you.

A moderator of /v/Pizzagate accused me of being a David Brock shill, yesterday.

Oh, really? Where did that happen?

I notice you don't provide any links. Nor any quotes. This isn't really surprising, since I never said it.

Now, why would you say I said something I never said? That doesn't seem like someone who just wants to help the investigation, WoS.