A moderator of /v/Pizzagate accused me of being a David Brock shill, yesterday. I feel like I have been able to provide plenty of evidence to the contrary. AMA. (thewebofslime)

submitted ago by thewebofslime

But I can provide more.

Do you care to address the false accusation @Vindicator? Maybe explain your line of reasoning? If not, I would be willing to accept an apology for the insults and the false accusation.

I'm happy to have a conversation about it that would seek to alleviate anyone's concerns.

I operate completely transparent where my research is totally public and I post all rough drafts in many places so that everyone can see the logical evolution of my conclusions.

In fact, I even offered up a suggestion on how a small group of people could completely decimate David Brock's operation while driving up shill costs here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3106114

This is far from the first time I have published such ideas and materials, but they never get traction because I do not employ artificial impressions.

I have also been a staunch critic of David Brock since long before Pizzagate. Again, my posting history, going years back, speaks for itself.

I am the best example of an "anti-shill" that I am aware of. I would, of course, be curious in other examples, because I would like to learn more.

The best way to catch liars is to set honesty traps. The funny thing about honesty traps is that honest people don't fall for them. What say you @Vindicator, do you stand by your accusation?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

A moderator of /v/Pizzagate accused me of being a David Brock shill, yesterday.

Oh, really? Where did that happen?

I notice you don't provide any links. Nor any quotes. This isn't really surprising, since I never said it.

Now, why would you say I said something I never said? That doesn't seem like someone who just wants to help the investigation, WoS.

thewebofslime ago

You did.

Take a step back... because you did.

Vindicator ago

No, I most certainly did not. If you are going to make a claim, you'd better be prepared to prove it.

thewebofslime ago

I'll get there.

SandHog ago

Either he did or he didn't and I don't see any deleted posts in that v/pizzagate thread where he might have. Seems like an easy thing to prove if it what you claim is true. Everyone can see the mod logs here. No comments have been removed for the last two months.

thewebofslime ago

I included that information in my post, you can search the exact text for yourself.

SandHog ago

Which post? there are like four of them.

thewebofslime ago

I edited the OP.

SandHog ago

A moderator of /v/Pizzagate accused me of being a David Brock shill, yesterday.

I still don't see any evidence of that. Why don't you just link to the comment where he said it? Or was that just something you inferred based on your interpretation of a comment he made? I gotta say I'm entertaining the idea that you are over-reacting to a perceived slight here.

I'm trying to stay as neutral as I possibly can in all of this but you've made some serious accusations and I've not seen any real evidence that backs them up. There is evidence that you attracted someone's attention but that's to be expected when dealing with this subject. There are only 24 hours in a day and a lot of interested parties. I dunno man. From what I have seen thus far I think you are barking up the wrong tree and doing a disservice to yourself on account of it. Unless you have something more I'm really starting to question your logic here.

thewebofslime ago

"useless self aggrandizing baffle with bullshit like david brock shills do to send peopel down rabbit holes." but again... that isn't my primary concern. Just the timing of it.

SandHog ago

I can see his point in that the behavior seems similar. I know Vindicator isn't a shill and I don't think you are either to be perfectly honest. So eh...

thewebofslime ago

It would be a clever frame job, indeed. Before I got into this, I sent a message hoping to communicate that I wanted to have a polite conversation about it and that I would be on my best behavior. Hopefully, we can work around to that. I think I've successfully uncovered what is going on, but it took some serious help to figure it out. Serious help.

SandHog ago

I am interested to see what you came up with. I'm assuming you are making a post about it somewhere?

thewebofslime ago

Slowly. I am going to lose 99% of the people who follow me when I lay this out.

https://i.imgur.com/gG3YS35.png

Worth it.

SandHog ago

Are you implying Q is a british intelligence op? Or am I missing something? I'm not up to speed on Tenet.

thewebofslime ago

I will walk this one out slowly, and not today.

It is going to be challenged ad nauseum, so I need to have my ducks in a row.

But go ahead and think about what you just read, because you are the one with the most level head, right now, of everyone who has been watching all this.

srayzie ago

https://archive.fo/q1S7X

How have you been ThisIsTotallyNotMe?

@Vindicator @Shizy @MolochHunter @Kevdude @Crensch

thewebofslime ago

Talk about a false accusation. I don't even know who that is.

Because I disagree with something you believe in, I'm automatically this person? If that's what you want to believe okay.

I stated I was going to set an honesty trap, then I messaged Vindicator that I was going to be on my nest behavior while I did because I had help.

I was looking for shills.

Someone who was on my thread, went to my site, then started attacking.

They used a company device from CACI, which is a DIA contractor.

I couldn't tell if it was because I started talking about George Tenet, or not, so I was trying to rule out Vindicator, when I found THIS:

https://i.imgur.com/gG3YS35.png

So, CACI, attacked my site that has had like 200 visitors ever, is connected to a DIA intelligence group QinetiQ, who calls themselves Q and had for years.

It seems strange that Q would pick this name, if he was a high level insider and didn't want to be associated with George Tenet and the Mockingbird apparatus.

When you emotions settle down, consider looking at what I am telling you.

What I am showing you is factually a money trail between Allen & CO, who managed the merger between Fox & Disney and is slowly building a pyramidic monopoly on media, tech and politics, where people like Pelosi and Schumer are going to the "retreats."

The money trail is factual.

The social circles are factual.

The name "Q" is factual.

I am totally ready to entertain other theories, but then Vindicator happened to be the one who found the ignored Q post from years ago.

So, think for a second about my point of view, where I have my cousin, a professor of computer science, and his father, a lawyer, telling me that what I am looking at is real and to not say anything. I still feel an obligation to explain this because I have always been transparent in my research.

You, on the other hand, just jumped to a wild conclusion that I have an alt I've never heard of.

So, I hope you can get past the insults, which I have not been participating in, and think about what I am really telling you.

think- ago

It seems strange that Q would pick this name, if he was a high level insider and didn't want to be associated with George Tenet and the Mockingbird apparatus.

It doesn't make any sense that Q is connected to George Tenet, you even said yourself Tenet was someone pushing the globalist narrative, and opposed to the political faction that backs Trump.

Imo Q was created by Trump's PR department.

There are several old contexts where someone called 'Q' played a role - the James Bond movies, but then there also was a novel someone wrote about a 'Q' (which had some eering similarities to the present Q anon character from what I remember).

Q is also a Star Trek: Next Generation character.

@srayzie @SandHog @Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall

thewebofslime ago

I am hoping to present the proof in the smartest way. I keep asking and no one has weighed in... at all.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever/3129367