I am a citizen investigator reporting on a year-long project. My first goal is to expose cover-up activity paid for by illegal slush funds drawn from Media Matters, directed in secret by David Brock, and carried out using "sockpuppet" social media accounts, by the man appearing on the "Tory Smith" YouTube channel. I call this man HLI, based on his most widely known /pol/ alt, HighLevelInsider.

My second goal is to draw attention to the event they have been covering up. On June 12, 2013, Glenn Beck spent several minutes teasing a story that would break the next day, involving a government whistleblower. He said that he had seen documents that would "take down pretty much the whole power structure". Beck did not break the story the next day; he never spoke of it again. I believe that Paul Ryan and Mike Pence were key players in the attempt to get the whistleblower to testify, and that it was about Pedogate.

Day 1 (calling out HLI) is here. Day 2 (on the money trail) here. Day 3 (on HLI's methods) here. Day 4 contains a handy summary of Days 1-3. In the Day 4 comments I expose @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt, a key HLI "sockpuppet" account.

Day 6 explains how I fooled both HLI and James Alefantis into disclosing important information tying them to each other and to David Brock. Day 7 describes the Tory Smith YouTube channel and the evidence tying it to other HLI activity.

Day 8 describes the Glenn Beck whistleblower episode, and shows why Ryan and Pence had to have been involved. Day 11 was a recap of evidence against @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt.

So I've used up my two weeks' vacation, and I'm going to have to scale back my visits. Back to my day job and my family. I'll be gone at least a week, but the pedosadists are not rid of me completely. I didn't get around to a few topics, but I'm pleased with what I've accomplished. I learned quite a bit, and it all went more or less as expected.

If there was one thing that I hoped to implant in everyone's mind with this series, it's something incredibly simple. It isn't a question of whether David Brock pays a guy to come here every day and post disinfo using sockpuppets. Of course he does. If Pizzagate gets taken seriously, it all comes down in blood and flames. They got rid of the Pizzagate sub-Reddit. They got rid of the Pizzagate wiki. They hammered Voat with a DDOS for weeks. Paying a guy to sit around in his bathrobe and pretend to be 8 or 10 different people (or 15 or 20) is just common sense. So there will be a guy here actively posting disinfo every day until we destroy the Clinton gang, or they destroy Voat.

Once you accept that, once you know that the enemy is watching every word you type, that any other poster can be one of "them," then understanding what you're seeing, and spotting their various moves, becomes much easier. I'm not going to keep on about that here. Just go through my comment history and my submission history. Read everything, see what replies I got. See what subjects they perpetually avoided. Be methodical and patient. It will show you the problem we have here, and the results I got in turning it against itself.

In particular, you should realize why I never wanted @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt banned. When you go on an extended raid into enemy territory you want quite the opposite: To make them burn as many sockpuppets as possible, and be stuck with them. It takes months to build up a sockpuppet to the point where Voaters won't yell "shill" at it. The step-by-step reveal drew out most of HLI's inventory. But of course the bigger victory isn't exposing sockpuppets. It's demonstrating how panicked they are about certain topics.

Fellow goats, we established three points of vulnerability during these past two weeks: the Milwaukee recount, the Glenn Beck whistleblower episode, and the Ryan/Pence smear campaign. Suppressing talk about these subjects is absolutely critical to these guys. Just keep hammering those things!

I want to say a special word of thanks to @Vindicator, and basically to Putt and all the mods, for keeping Voat standing under the battering of the DDOS, and keeping order in our little sockpuppet mystery theater. This would have been impossible without you.

I'm going to mention one more brief episode here, before I go binge on Netflix and chill out: Jimmy Comet's most recent visit a couple of days ago. He made two posts, and even though this is just another case of I-can't-prove-it, I'm going to share my interpretation of them.

First he posted calling me a "shitizen". This, I think, was meant to draw my attention to a post on /pol/ where he posed as a random anti-masonic anon, and twice called me a "shithead" for thinking he was James Alefantis. That's a fairly standard bit of Jimmy Comet cuteness. He likes puns and word games.

Then right after that, he posted this longer bit, first quoting me, then quoting Noam Chomsky's book The Common Good. :

I know for certain which it is, but you have to weigh the probabilities. I concede all these problems. If you're still skeptical about the cover-up, or about certain accounts being sockpuppets, that's fine.

The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow a very lively debate within that spectrum – even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people a sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of debate. Choam Nomsky

Now, this has a more subtle, sober message than we've seen from Jimmy in the past. The pun "Choam Nomsky" has a fairly long history. Chomsky has a really solid reputation among his fellow scientists as a linguist, but his political books (for which he is much better known) are regarded by most as just paranoid ranting. So the idea here is that there is a parallel-universe equivalent, Choam Nomsky, whose scientific talents are mediocre, but whose paranoid political writings are completely correct. Oooh, so ironic! So witty in a degenerate-death-cult-elitist sort of way!

There's no good reason, operationally, for them to send Jimmy in again. He did enough damage the last time. Any sensible plan would send Jimmy off to Siberia with no wi-fi. But with Jimmy, it's more about his own drives than any sense of what the team needs him to do. (Lack of discipline is a big reason why it's a crap team. But what can you do with pedosadist freaks who love torturing children.) Jimmy craves respect. He needs to have the last word, to hold the stronger hand. And he really wants me to stop calling him stupid!

So this time, he went with a creepy Invasion-of-the-Body Snatchers-style warning, delivered with an academic haughtiness. The fact that he feels confident enough to do this is the main giveaway, much as his amused condescension was the last time. He's hinting that the pedosadists control and manipulate reality to such a degree, that even now, having exposed and humiliated them for days on end, I'm still not seeing the truth. I've missed clues everywhere. "You didn't really beat us," he's saying. "I'm still on the winning side."

Suuure Jimmy. I had no clue about any of that other stuff that was going on. I won't be coming back to talk about it at some inconvenient moment in the future. And you're still really, really stupid.