I am a citizen investigator reporting on a year-long project. My first goal is to expose cover-up activity paid for by illegal slush funds drawn from Media Matters, directed in secret by David Brock, and carried out using "sockpuppet" social media accounts, by the man appearing on the "Tory Smith" YouTube channel. I call this man HLI, based on his most widely known /pol/ alt, HighLevelInsider.
My second goal is to draw attention to the event they have been covering up. On June 12, 2013, Glenn Beck spent several minutes teasing a story that would break the next day, involving a government whistleblower. He said that he had seen documents that would "take down pretty much the whole power structure". Beck did not break the story the next day; he never spoke of it again. I believe that Paul Ryan and Mike Pence were key players in the attempt to get the whistleblower to testify, and that it was about Pedogate.
Day 1 (calling out HLI) is here. Day 2 (on the money trail) here. Day 3 (on HLI's methods) here. Day 4 contains a handy summary of Days 1-3. In the Day 4 comments I expose @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt, a key HLI "sockpuppet" account.
Day 6 explains how I fooled both HLI and James Alefantis into disclosing important information tying them to each other and to David Brock. Day 7 describes the Tory Smith YouTube channel and the evidence tying it to other HLI activity.
Watch the video first, then check out my notes below.
There are many clues that this is about child trafficking and ritual abuse. At 1:18, cohost Pat Gray says:
It's interesting, because it's over a subject that we have not even paid much attention to, over the past few years. It was a big issue, and hasn't been.
Beck then says something that makes it certain that Paul Ryan is involved. Starting at 3:15:
We have a whistleblower on something that is -- this guy is so afraid for his life that he hasn't talked to me, he has reached out to an ally. ... My people have seen one document, one. This one document would take down pretty much the whole power structure. Pretty much everything. This guy is so afraid, he won't do it unless he is in front of Congress and televised, because he is like, "I am dead, I am absolutely dead. I'm not talking they're going to smear me, they're going to arrest me. I'm dead, and I'm dead from both sides."
Here is why it is certain that Ryan was involved. There would be absolutely no point for Beck to reveal the existence of this whistleblower and his demand to speak in front of Congress, unless that was actually going to happen. He'd be killing the guy, literally. But the only person who could make that happen would be the Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan of Racine, WI. The speaker controls the House schedule. So he was the "ally". Beck was talking off the cuff, and perhaps without meaning to, he gave that fact away.
If you're wondering why Paul Ryan would choose Beck to help him alert the nation, there's a simple answer. Ryan and Beck had a very public intellectual alliance, almost a "bromance," in the spring of 2013. In their own words, Beck was pretty much Ryan's favorite journalist, and Ryan was Beck's favorite politician.
Next puzzle: How do we know that Pence was involved? At the start of the video, Beck says:
This office is going to be extraordinarily busy in the next ten days. The country, I believe, is going to be rocked in the next 24 hours with some things that are going on. ... We are going to be greatly divided in the next ten days, and you are going to witness things in American history that have never been witnessed before.
The problem is that even the Speaker cannot instantly rearrange the House schedule. Beck can talk about the documents tomorrow, but the whistleblower has to stay alive for a week or more before Ryan can get him on TV. Now, as Speaker, Ryan has enormous powers on the legislative side, but none on the executive side. He controls no police force to take the whistleblower into protective custody. Plus, the FBI/CIA/etc. are corrupt, right down to the Capitol Police. Ryan is aware that any random federal marshal can seize his whistleblower and "accidentally" kill him. Ryan has no say in that, no way of knowing who is working for the pedos. So how does he plan to keep the whistleblower alive long enough to speak?
He needs a governmental authority, separate from the Feds, that the pedos have not infiltrated. It doesn't have to be huge, just legally independent. There's one level of government with exactly the right structure. If a state attorney general brought some kind of charge against specific people in the federal government, then those agencies would lose jurisdiction -- at least long enough to launch a messy constitutional argument about separation of powers, and let Ryan execute the plan. In a pinch, the governor could even declare a state of emergency, or call out the National Guard.
And here is Mike Pence, Governor of Indiana, a straight-arrow Christian who won't even have lunch alone with a woman who is not his wife. Ryan knows him very well because Pence was formerly a Congressman. Beck knows him very well because Pence spent six years as a conservative radio host. Assume that Indiana's attorney general Greg Zoellner is also not a pedo, and that there are several senior Indiana state troopers who can be trusted. Now they have a plan with a reasonable chance of success.
It wouldn't absolutely have to be Mike Pence. Any non-pedo governor who was personally known by and trusted by both Ryan and Beck would do. But how many of those do you suppose there are? And keep in mind Tory Smith, who is neither an idiot nor mentally ill, making videos nearly every day, from October 2013 onward, that attack Mike Pence, state attorney general Greg Zoellner, and various Indiana state troopers as child rapists. Really makes you think!
Unfortunately, the plan fell apart. Something went wrong, we don't know what. Possibly the whistleblower was killed. Possibly the pedos came up with some overwhelming form of extortion against Ryan. Possibly Obama himself intervened. Anyway, it failed. I urge you to go back to my post from April, and read what I wrote about Beck's subsequent actions. He became a broken man, who cried and blamed himself for trying to "change the world". Ryan's life took a turn for the worse as well. His 2013 budget was well received, but after that, he got less cooperation in his role as Speaker. I suppose the miracle is that he remained Speaker at all.
Now I want to sum up, and explain why I did things this way. I could have simply posted this whole argument right at the start. Months ago, in fact. That would have been easier. The video is sufficient all by itself to prove that Ryan and Pence were involved. There's just no other way to interpret what Beck says.
But as compelling as the video is, it becomes more so if you can also show specifically how the bad guys are trying to isolate Ryan and Pence, and cover the story up. That is a much harder task. It is hard because going after HLI means having a messy and divisive sockpuppet hunt here on /v/pizzagate. It is hard because the clues linking one social media account to another are often subtle and stylistic. And it is hard because certain aspects are basically unprovable. How can you know if, for example, @polwarrior1030's account is really an HLI sockpuppet, or my sockpuppet, or neither? I know for certain which it is, but you have to weigh the probabilities. I concede all these problems. If you're still skeptical about the cover-up, or about certain accounts being sockpuppets, that's fine.
The one thing that I hope we can agree on, is this. Exposing the coverup is what we are here to do. Showing the involvement of Brock and HLI is not just nice-to-have, it is essential. Yes, it gets people mad, and produces long and head-scratching arguments. But if we want to free our country from the pedosadists, we have to do the hard things.
Exposing the cover-up changes how we see the rest of the problem. HLI and Senate Anon keep telling us that our enemies are supremely powerful. They have blackmailed everyone, they know everything, Trump is totally isolated and incompetent. We'd be better off chasing the smaller fish, the local cops or the mayor, the Royal Order of Jesters or SOBIB, because every federal judge is blackmailed. And so on. But that's all a lie. It's misdirection. A handful of brave men nearly brought the whole thing crashing down in June of 2013. The Clinton gang has made blunder after blunder since then. They're overworked and vulnerable. And stupid. (I'm looking at you, Jimmy.)
Meanwhile, Trump isn't isolated or incompetent. This story shows that there are dimensions to his plan that we haven't understood. Mike Pence is the most powerful kind of "life insurance" imaginable for Trump. It's a good bet that Pence kept copies of whatever documents the whistleblower managed to hand over. He certainly would have read and absorbed the key facts in them. So if they were to kill Trump, Pence would instantly unleash hell on the pedos, and the country would back him. Their choices right now are both bad: Either the slow ratchet of "draining the swamp," or something much faster and more violent.
So that's it, that's my report. I said it would change how you view Pizzagate. I hope it has. Question period is now open.
view the rest of the comments →
ESOTERICshade ago
For starters there are so many enormous holes in this story I can hardly decide where to begin. The only thing I can probably agree with you on is that Highlevelinsider has some sort of agenda or is just an intelligent kook larper.
In order for your theory to hold water Paul Ryan would have to be one of the good guys and Glenn Beck would have to have not be a lying lunatic.
Glenn Beck is a lying lunatic. Have you seen this off camera footage with Glenn Beck rubbing Vicks Vapor Rub under his eyes to generate tears for the camera, and laughing because it is burning his eyes? Yes, the lunatic lying Glenn Beck rubs Vicks under his eyes so that he can pretend to cry for the camera.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmMsTkc9ms
SoberSecondThought ago
Yep. That's what is necessary for my theory to hold water. I never said Glenn Beck was a perfect human being. He's a showman, a carnival barker, an agent of persuasion. So is Trump. So are most politicians. We don't get the luxury of only dealing with sober, quiet, bland people who never lie or even appear to lie. We have to decide who is more believable among the choices available: Trump or Hillary? Jim Comey or Jeff Sessions?
If you set your standard of proof sufficiently high, you not only won't finish an investigation, you'll never start one. That's my take on the subject.
ESOTERICshade ago
I don't believe Paul Ryan is one of the good guys. There is a possibility that Ryan thought he saw an avenue to blackmail the pedos into a situation he could take advantage of. That might be the extent of his "goodness" in my eyes.
I don't know if Ryan is in the pedo clique or not but I wouldn't put it past him to attempt to blackmail them if he isn't. These days a person can't have Paul Ryan's job without being a blackmailable piece of shit themselves.
SoberSecondThought ago
If I could accomplish just one thing, it would be to persuade you that you don't actually know this. That is the whole point of what I am saying. All these "insiders" agree with you. @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt agrees with you. Consider the possibility that the pedosadists are weaker than all these people are saying. They have never blackmailed everyone. They have bribed and bullied far more than they have brownstoned.
I'm bringing you evidence that we have a chance to beat them. You're pissed off at me and calling me crazy. Just consider the possibility that this is something they wanted and worked very hard to achieve.
Vindicator ago
So, SST, how do you see knowing we have a chance to beat them via your expose changing the situation? What do you hope people will do differently, if they start looking at these players differently?
I used to enjoy Beck's history lessons back when he was on Fox, but the guy has been a nut from the getgo and went off the deep end over Trump. Ryan's body language screams "lying slimeball" to me. Both are clearly pussies who would only expose pizzagate if they had very powerful protectors. That said, I saw what the deep state disinfo machine did to Sarah Palin, so I keep an open mind and realize not much of what meets the eye in the media is what it seems.
I personally couldn't give two shits if pedocrats are few or many; I am going to keep at this until they are exposed and purged. One thing I know is true: they are definitely weak -- because that's what vice does. It enslaves, stupifies and weakens. Corruption is it's own downfall, ultimately. They won't prevail.
But how do you see your expose changing things? What are we not doing that we should be?
SoberSecondThought ago
Okay, so I am planning to spend a whole day just on ways for activists and researchers to exploit this, and a day just on ways for journalists to do so. I'm too tired to dig up all the links and such tonight. But let's do some highlights.
First, it seems clear to me that the people trying to attack Brock's two Media Matters slush funds don't realize what he is using the money for. If they did, I think they could use that fact to get more support for their petition, raise money for a lawsuit, things like that. That attacks the Clinton machine in a very direct way. Now Brock will waste still more time and money in responding to lawyers' letters, discovery hearings, and so on. Plus it's one more thing that the establishment media will have to cover, if only on the bottom of page 23.
Second, the Milwaukee part of the Wisconsin recount is a time bomb for them. They admitted it was when they brought in the HLI sockpuppet to /v/pizzagate to steer us all away from it. It isn't a coincidence that Mike Pence is heading up that voter fraud commission. I don't know why they haven't moved to investigate Milwaukee yet, but it can only strengthen their hand and speed things up if activists and journalists start pushing on that front. There was a non-partisan commission headed by a former president of the American Statistical Association that looked at the Democratic primary and concluded it was rigged -- Election Justice USA. It would be fantastic if they started working on Milwaukee. Also, there are a couple of firebrand lefty journalists who see through all the Democrat Party corruption, Lee Camp of Redacted Tonight, and Jimmy Dore of the Young Turks. Point them to Milwaukee. They will be a nightmare for the Clinton camp because they aren't Pizzagaters and they aren't alt-right or New Right or whatever. They're sincere progressives who are really pissed off. Give them a weapon, they'll use it.
(Also, you may remember that a staff member of Pence's voter fraud commission was "caught" with child porn by NCMEC a little while ago. We know NCMEC is dirty because they employ Brian Podesta. So why is NCMEC ratting on a government pedo (if indeed it wasn't some kind of setup)? Could it be to cast doubt on whatever Pence's voter fraud commission does in future? Plus of course it takes a little bit of the heat off NCMEC if they put out a press release publicly highlighting their role in the takedown. My project puts that story in a whole new light, doesn't it?)
There are a bunch of other points along these same lines that I intend to make, but I'm just plain bagged. I've been going nonstop all week. So I'll close with this, about Ryan and Beck and Pence. I personally disliked all these guys when I started this project. I couldn't understand why Trump picked Pence, I didn't trust Ryan, and as you say, Beck is just so weird. But something FBI Anon said has haunted me. He said that Hillary planned to launch full-scale war on Russia within two years of taking office, and he said that he and his wife had a suicide pact if Hillary did win. This was before we had proof of FBI Anon's bona fides from the FBI archives, so I believe he did write that. (Later FBI Anon posts I don't find convincing.)
I think whatever it was that they told Beck shattered him. Like maybe the document he saw only talked about the pedosadist network in Congress, and he didn't understand that pedosadists run most Western governments now. Like maybe he didn't realize the true scope of what would come crashing down. He treated it like a big news story, not what it will eventually be, a popular revolution against an entire form of government. Take a look at his interview with Tucker Carlson, on Tucker's first day in the new time slot at Fox. He's apologetic, talking about how he learned that he can't change the world. Tucker is almost gentle with him, like he doesn't care about the last few years of weirdness, and he knows that Beck has been through something terrible. Why was Beck his very first guest in his new Fox gig? What does Tucker know?
There's a whole lot of stuff like this to get through. Tomorrow I'll set up an FAQ/timeline post, and we'll see what new evasions HLI has cooked up. Thanks for asking the questions.
4_InquiringMinds ago
For the record you are a psychopath and I am your partner~according to wic. Just thought to let you know how evil we are :)
This is the result of my asking sincere questions in a civil manner. Now why would someone want to stifle inquiry? Why indeed?