You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

tossyokeys ago

I began to suspect that freshmeat and various alts have been embedded in Pizzagate all along.

Have you considered that pizzagate (the thing, not the sub) is a hoax designed to distract from actual pedo activity going on in government, and is designed to discredit future investigations?

Vindicator ago

Have you considered that pizzagate (the thing, not the sub) is a hoax

What are you, the New York Times?

I've been a mod there for over a year, read the vast majority of every post that has come through. There is a mountain of evidence that the elite use child sex abuse to consolidate their power, trafficking kids from Haiti, the U.S. foster care system and numerous other places. There is also evidence CP was found on the Comet Ping Pong server, was reported to DC Metro Police, and they refused to investigate. Shortly afterward, a second hacker reported a similar story which Infowars failed to fully vet and got themselves sideways with Alefantis' lawyers. This little psyop effectively made the first guy's story untouchable by the media who were afraid to be sued. We've documented it all.

tossyokeys ago

I only dispute the evidence related to the Podesta emails and Comet Ping Pong. I am skeptical about Alefantis, but not sure. In other words, I only disbelieve the "pizza" part of pizzagate.

DC police are certainly corrupt. The stuff about Haiti, and the foster care system are very likely legitimate. I remain convinced, as you and I have both said before, that the elites practice and document pedophile activity as a control mechanism.

The real problem I have with the pizzagate investigation are the claims from hackers and anons that can't be verified. See, it would be fine to investigate based on these tips, but all too many of your fellows at PG have based their conclusions on them. If PG always worded their statements as theories, I'd have absolutely no issue with spreading them far and wide. Theories never hurt anyone.

You may also notice that while I don't believe PG is legitimate, I've never spammed your sub, or even criticized the handful of users that I believe are purposely spreading lies. I think you guys are mostly harmless, and I believe in free speech. I also believe in the investigative process though, and that requires hard facts before I'll buy in. To convince me, it will take more than double hearsay and anecdotes.

So keep doing your thing, I won't give you trouble in your sub. But outside of the subs devoted to the PG theory, you might hear some criticism. Hopefully that doesn't make us rivals. I'd much prefer that we all get along.

Vindicator ago

I can certainly respect that. We work pretty hard to get people to source every claim. It's one of our submission rules.