^ Title
The following is a list of accounts which appear connected by suspicious behavior regarding Alex Jones, Jerome Corsi, George Webb & Jem777/Mej777 - before, during and in the aftermath of the alleged murder.
Another common theme between many(emerging only recently for some, particularly in relation to Jem777/Mej777), is anti-Moderator & anti-Q sentiment being used to 'concern-fag' and belittle users here and abroad.
Another common theme is using the hatred of transsexuals, to farm ccp.
Some of this may be wrong, but, I can't ignore the patterns I've seen emerging lately and in the past.
https://voat.co/user/137 (1 | 3 | 7)
1:
https://voat.co/user/1
https://voat.co/user/11 (2 submissions to v/11)
https://voat.co/user/111
https://voat.co/user/1111
https://voat.co/user/11111
https://voat.co/user/111111
https://voat.co/user/1111111
https://voat.co/user/11111111
https://voat.co/user/111111111
https://voat.co/user/1111111111
~
https://voat.co/user/111111111111
~
~
~
~
~
https://voat.co/user/111111111111111111
~
~
~
~
~
~
Seems like that's all...
3:
https://voat.co/user/3
https://voat.co/user/33
https://voat.co/user/333
https://voat.co/user/3333
https://voat.co/user/33333
https://voat.co/user/333333
https://voat.co/user/3333333
https://voat.co/user/33333333
https://voat.co/user/333333333
7:
https://voat.co/user/7
https://voat.co/user/77
https://voat.co/user/777
https://voat.co/user/7777
https://voat.co/user/77777
https://voat.co/user/777777
https://voat.co/user/7777777
https://voat.co/user/77777777
https://voat.co/user/777777777
https://voat.co/user/7777777777
https://voat.co/user/77777777777
https://voat.co/user/Agent999 (has since been banned from v/pizzagate)
https://voat.co/user/ATeam
https://voat.co/user/bb22
https://voat.co/user/BambiBambi
https://voat.co/user/BBhub
https://voat.co/user/Beast-mode-freak (Attempt to equate AWS with Vindicator in Jem777 thread by Dressage2, posted to v/pizzagatewhatever, wherein Dressage2 brings up Millennial_Falcon)
https://voat.co/user/con77 (Strange association with user banned from v/pizzagate: https://voat.co/user/ChristopherPaddock)
https://voat.co/user/dragonkiller (Concern-fagging and harassing multiple users using anti-Q sentiment in severely downvoted thread posted by themselves to v/GreatAwakening)
https://voat.co/user/Dressage2
https://voat.co/user/DownvoaterSquirrel (New member of ~45 minutes at time of being added to list - first comment(reply) went straight to ESOTERICshade)
https://voat.co/user/EllenPaosHouseNigger
https://voat.co/user/ESOTERICshade
https://voat.co/user/FICTIONLREALITY (Raising unrelated subject RE: Wisconsin in srayzie's Jem777 sticky linked at bottom of list)
https://voat.co/user/fogdryer
https://voat.co/user/hojuruku (banned from pizzagate subverses, but, included here anyway due to relevance)
https://voat.co/user/jesspietre
https://voat.co/user/mobbA1115 AMALEK!
https://voat.co/user/noskerdycatusa
https://voat.co/user/NotHereForPizza
https://voat.co/user/PedoStomperReturns
https://voat.co/user/Piscina
https://voat.co/user/PutItOut
https://voat.co/user/realityisinsanity
https://voat.co/user/RIPJem
https://voat.co/user/SpeakSoft
https://voat.co/user/truth_s33ker
https://voat.co/user/Yokoke
Other names likely belong here, some of which have already been passed on to mods - keen eyes will spot them, though.
https://voat.co/user/Z1
https://voat.co/user/Z2
https://voat.co/user/Z3
https://voat.co/user/Z4
https://voat.co/user/Z5
https://voat.co/user/Z6
https://voat.co/user/Z7
https://voat.co/user/Z8
https://voat.co/user/Z9
~
https://voat.co/user/Z11
~
~
https://voat.co/user/Z14
~
~
~
~
~
https://voat.co/user/Z20
https://voat.co/user/Z21
Seems to stop at Z21.
See also:
New category:
Showing signs of redemption and/or willingness to walk away from suspicious behavior:
Or otherwise changing behavior as a "hide in plain sigh" defense, in light of new developments:
https://voat.co/user/carmencita
https://voat.co/user/Cc1914
https://voat.co/user/Gothamgirl (mild association with Amalek subverse owned by https://voat.co/user/mobbA1115)
cc: @kingkongwaswrong @Vindicator @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @Camulos
No doubt I'll cop many downvotes for this, but, that's fine - this had to be done.
view the rest of the comments →
Camulos ago
Very interesting. You've done an excellent job at cataloging suspicious users, many whom I've seen myself spreading their laughable shit. As far was questioning Q however, I think that's a good thing. I believe Q to be nothing but an elaborate larp and not worthy of the attention it's received thus far. Especially by any free and critical thinking person.
Users like @RIPJem are clearly either easily manipulated fools or part of a disinfo campaign perhaps associated with the one that I brought to light that you graciously linked in the OP. It's clear to me (and obviously you too) that there are those that are working very hard to subvert multiple communities here on voat. I guess that just means we're on the right track :)
Accounts like @PutItOut seem to be troll accounts, @SweetChicken just seems to have wandered into /v/fatpeoplehate which is run by reddit faggots that like to choke themselves on tranny cock. @SpeakSoft just seems to be a bit of a religious nut, nothing too much wrong with that lol and @truth_s33ker just likes Alex Jones, I mean some people think that because I listen to David Alan Coe that means I'm a piece of shit. They're wrong, but they're entitled to be wrong if they so chose haha
Great job @argosciv you've certainly done your due diligence in collecting and presenting much of this info.
Anyway, that's my 2 cents, I know it might not fall in line with the rest of the Pizzagate folks but honestly, I don't give a shit. God bless and keep your damn eyes open. There is far too much disinfo that's made its way into this community and the damage has already been done. Just stay vigilant.
think- ago
@RIPJem777 is certainly part of the disinfo campaign. @SpeakSoft is a shill imo, although maybe not connected to the network we are talking about here.
And OP @argosciv is a shill who is pushing satanism and blood drinking (on the anti-Satanism v/pizzagate sub not less), and bootlicking mods, trying to make them forget that he himself is a shill.
Although he is of course not connected to above network but he has his own agenda,. He has been on the mod shill watch list for a long time, and recently both mod @srayzie and I have started to call him out in public.
think- ago
@Crensch @Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock: please see parent.
Vindicator ago
@Camulos, @Crensch, I do not agree that argosciv is a shill. Think- 's statement that "He has been on the mod shill watch list for a long time" is not accurate. As far as I know, she is the only mod who thinks he is a shill.
Over the past several days, I have tried to get @argosciv, think-, @srayzie and @shizy to stop attacking each other since we have enough drama at the moment already and this is all a distraction.
srayzie ago
@Vindicator I DO think he’s a shill. But I’m willing to back off for you. I don’t want the added drama to cause more stress for you, or anyone. But I definitely do not like him or his Satanic talk. I think he says a lot of disinfo too.
@Think- @Shizy @Crensch
Vindicator ago
Fair enough. I stand corrected.
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
argosciv has been a troll from day one.
srayzie ago
Fair enough about what? GothamGirl?
Crensch ago
He is most certainly on my shit list as somebody who Writes a lot of claims and supports none of them. His comments are a massive waste of time and I've yet to see evidence to the contrary.
He might not be part of the new wildfire but he's certainly an ember that continues to cause problems.
If we're talking about these users attacking each other in comments, I don't much see the point of trying to get them to stop. As long as the mod Powers aren't being abused, and sub verse rules aren't being broken, I'm not sure there's much that can be done.
Argo has been a thorn in my side for a long time, but he didn't seem to cause too many problems with the mods or sub verse so I let it go. I assumed his posts follow the rules and we're left up despite only ever seeing his comments be complete horseshit.
As for think-'s statement, at least two other mods are not fond of so it's not entirely inaccurate. I caution against the use use of the mods as a collective group that has a static unchanging list between us of who is who and how bad each user is.
I'll be sure to make a post about Argo in a few hours when I am able.
Crensch ago
@think- @srayzie @shizy
think- ago
I better don't comment on this.
SoberSecondThought ago
We Need An Investigation Here
@argosciv @Vindicator
Camulos, over in v/ProtectVoat, you posted this long list on the 2nd of August. At the very top of the list, you had an extra-long entry regarding this person: Jem777/Mej777, which read:
Now, first of all, you've misgendered Jem, which is a common mistake around here. It is a bit sloppy if you're going to accuse that person of leading an army of trolls and sockpuppets, but whatever.
Second, it's easy to check the account histories and see that the last activity by Jem777 was in November 2017, while the last activity by Mej777 was on 16 December 2017. So what are you referring to when you claim that "there's always one of the other bots welcoming him back whenever he posts in a thread". When was anyone welcoming either of these accounts back? Back from where?
My third point is going to be uncomfortable for everyone, but there's no getting around it. Go and do a search on Google for "Voat Jem777" and restrict the date range to Dec 16 through August 3rd (that is, from the last time she posted on Voat to just after you called her out.). You'll find absolutely nothing (except for some spurious links to the True Pundit report of her death 11 days later).
There has only been one time that anyone has mentioned Jem777 on Voat since she left. That was when you denounced her two weeks ago as leading an army of trolls and sockpuppets. And then she died.
My Theory At This Point
I suppose some people might argue that we don't know for sure that she died, or even that Jem777 was Jenny Moore. But if you look at the screenshots provided by srayzie, you'll see that she corresponded privately with Jem777 and that Jem not only confirmed that she was working with George Webb under the working name "TaskForce," but even shared pictures from the time she went with Webb to Comet Pizza to taunt and intimidate Jimmy Comet.
So I'm strongly inclined to believe that Jem777 was Jenny Moore / TaskForce. And while the police investigation into her death has only just begun, and it may yet prove to have been from natural causes, I find two things very, very strange and disturbing indeed.
The first strange thing is that on the 2nd of August, Camulos attacked her as an enemy of Voat, with absolutely no supporting evidence, indeed totally out of the blue given that there had been no activity by her in eight months. And then she was found dead August 14th.
The second strange thing is that she went back to Comet Pizza on July 6th (see this video she made), which is the same day that True Pundit says that she filed documents with Homeland Security alleging that Bill Clinton molested a young boy.
Could it be that the young boy was provided by the child trafficking organization run by James Alefantis? Could this have been sufficient provocation for the Clinton criminal organization to decide to kill her? Obviously that's speculation on my part. But what is not speculation is that absolutely nobody was talking about this woman on Voat, until Camulos decided to attack her reputation two weeks ago.
So let's say for argument's sake that my long-standing theory is true, namely that David Brock pays a guy to come here every day and spread disinfo using a huge variety of sockpuppets. And let's suppose that the decision was made by the Clinton gang to kill Jenny Moore. Word was sent down to this guy, not necessarily that she was going to be killed, but that her reputation needed to be attacked because she was going to come out with some damaging claims. So he pulled out one of his sockpuppets, Camulos, and did as he was told. Only because he was in a hurry, and because he's a lazy stoner, and especially because he quite likely didn't know what a big deal Jenny Moore was soon going to become, he didn't bother to back up his claims with any actual evidence. In keeping with his usual practice as Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt or HighLevelInsider, he just made vague accusations.
Would you care to comment on all this, @Camulos? I think you should.
Vindicator ago
Sorry, SST. You are wrong. Jem has been on that bot list since long before @Camulos started maintaining it: https://voat.co/v/news/2191196/10794152. There is no correlation between his posting of the list and Jem's alleged death, timingwise. His recent posting of the list was an update adding new names to the bottom of the list. I stickied it in v/pizzagate because we were getting a rash of shitposts from a number of the users on the list, in the same style as the bot net posters. He did not submit it to v/pizzagate himself, and had no idea there was any connection to Jenny Moore prior to last weekend (nor did I). I took down the bot sticky several days before any posts were made about her, in fact.
I find it very interesting that the only time you make a post, it is to associate or conflate yet another Voater to your own shill list.
SoberSecondThought ago
Just to respond to this: I would say I've raised this particular question in a very responsible way. I didn't go into either of the two big Jem threads, I raised it here where maybe a dozen people have seen it in total. And my policy in general has been just to keep my mouth shut since my theories are unpopular. So short of simply going away and ceasing to advocate for my theory altogether, I don't think I could tone it down a lot more.
SoberSecondThought ago
Okay, fair enough. I did not see the earlier reference to Jem. My mistake, and I'll admit that. Sorry to @Camulos for not understanding his more limited role in generating the list.
However, since I have you here, I need to ask: Have you now concluded that Jem was indeed Jenny? I was unsure myself when the news first broke, as I remarked to you. But I was persuaded by srayzie's evidence, such as the screenshot of her asking, "Are you Taskforce?" and Jem answering "Yes." So is your only remaining puzzle the question of whether she is actually dead?
Vindicator ago
No, I have yet to see definitive evidence that Jenny admitted to being Jem. I've seen a lot of evidence that Jem said she was Jenny on both Voat and Twitter. One user has said he spoke to her on Voat and then met her in person, but he could not provide anything more than his own personal testimony to that effect.
SoberSecondThought ago
Right, I saw that exchange, but then doesn't Occam's Razor kind of narrow it down here? Srayzie has a picture that she got from Jem of George Webb standing in the doorway of the Little Red Fox, just next door to Comet Pizza. She has long private texts from Jem saying that they went there together in December to intimidate Jimmy Comet after they started working together. And in George Webb's "Epilogue" regarding Jenny, he specifically says that he and Jenny/Taskforce had been working together for "eight or nine months" (For context, start listening at about 8:15, he says it at 8:40.)
Seems like there's not much room here for alternative hypotheses. I admit that Jem telling srayzie in December that she was Taskforce, and had just started working with Webb, when taken by itself could be a lie. But how did Jem manage to get a picture of George Webb at the Little Red Fox, on her own phone, dated Dec 15th, if she wasn't Jenny/Taskforce?
I realize that you and I have recently been developing a kind of a negative dynamic where I propose ideas to you, and you don't buy them -- but this is srayzie's story that I'm just repeating to you. I obviously disagree with srayzie on some things but I really can't argue with that photograph.
Vindicator ago
I saw pictures of Webb. Did I miss a picture of Jenny and Webb? If Webb and Jem are working to subvert Jenny (and Webb today doxed the victim guy Jenny was supposedly helping out Bill Clinton as a boy rapist and claimed the guy was a sting operation implying he killed her), Jem providing pics of Webb doesn't prove anything.
On the other hand, from the sounds of the interview with Gritz, who told OAN she neither knew Jenny's identity nor saw any of her research, it may well be that Webb/Jenn/Jem were running a multiplatform psyop on Gritz herself. I find it fishy that the only place Jem/Jenny was held accountable for her claims -- v/pizzagate -- is the place she left when challenged, after of course making all kinds of claims of being victimized and attempting to round up a posse in retaliation.
I really don't know what is/was going on.
SoberSecondThought ago
Okay, so I agree that the sheer volume of stuff that George Webb puts out does render the story harder to follow. That has always been a problem with him, and I intend to come back to that. But again, in that same OAN piece, we have the anchor saying that the Prince George county police "released a statement" that they found a dead woman. Later in the story we have Robyn Gritz saying that she was contacted by a Prince George county detective using info found in the woman's effects, and that was when she found out her friend's full name was Jenny Moore. Right? So that's pretty strong evidence that a woman has died and her name was Jenny Moore. The same OAN clip shows a picture of Jenny Moore, and unless you want to argue that OAN is part of the scam, I think we have to take it as given that this is the woman who was found at the scene.
I think maybe you did. Aug 18th in Webb's Twitter timeline is a picture of him standing with the dead woman from the OAN broadcast, calling her Jenny Moore. So from George Webb's side of the story, I think we have to conclude that he did indeed work with a woman named Jenny Moore, who is now dead. And then given that minimum, I go back to Jem's photo of George Webb in December, vouched for by srayzie, and I also see no alternative to Jem being Jenny.
I hope to say more on the victim guy and general George Webb / Jem credibility problems in a separate note, maybe tomorrow. But just to ensure we're on the same page, I agree that Jem made a lot of unsupported claims, got into some pointless fights, and was quite rightly banned under the rules. Also, not that it really matters, but Jem didn't like my theories and was suspicious of me on the rare occasions we interacted. I'm not defending an ally here, just trying to get at the truth.
I don't know if her research into the Newport yacht case was sound, and I don't know if Webb's posthumous take on it is sound either. I'm not claiming she was a good researcher, just that she worked hard at it and clearly cared about it. Right now I'm just trying to establish whether Jenny Moore is dead (I think she is) and whether she was Jem (which I think she was). With those facts established, we might start to find our way out of this forest of confusion.
Vindicator ago
I agree, it sounds like Jenny is dead and she was working with Webb. I'm not positive that Jem is Jenny.
SoberSecondThought ago
Okay. But then apart from the other questions I've already raised, what was the objective when Jem told two people in private eight months ago that she was Jenny? Somehow she managed to go to Comet with George Webb and mess with Alefantis, making it possible for her to pose as Taskforce, who according to Webb was working with him starting at about that same time. Somehow George Webb never mentions this second woman who he went to Comet with, he only mentions Taskforce. But this other woman, Jem, realizes that it is possible for her to pretend to BE Taskforce using her photo of Webb, and she has some motive for doing that. And then the only person she uses the photo on is srayzie? And then she never, ever does anything more with that information but just leaves Voat, abandons the Jem/Mej identity, and leaves it up to srayzie's sole discretion to share the photo with us when Jenny dies? Who is she scamming by doing that? Srayzie? What does she get from doing that? Where does she get leverage or credibility if the photo just sits in srayzie's inbox?
You made a remark a while back about me getting too wrapped up in my theory and needing to just go take a walk or something. I took that in the helpful spirit it was intended. Let me return the favor. You've been criticized very heavily, and unfairly, over the past few days. People openly asking if you should be removed as mod has to suck. Apart from defending your own actions, you also want to maintain solidarity with the other mods, which I understand. And I'm sure you, just like me, are heartily sick of taking a stand and then having it proved wrong a day later.
But if you just step back from this whole mess, I think you'll see that THIS part of it is pretty straightforward. Jem may have been a malicious, disruptive, forum-wrecking idiot with no redeeming values. I think that's excessive, but for argument's sake grant that. Or we might grant the opposite, take RIPJem's point of view, and see her as a saint and a hero who was murdered by the Clintons. Again, we're a long way from proving that theory too. My point is motive doesn't matter here. What matters is that she gave those photos to srayzie in private and they stayed private until now. She didn't tell srayzie she was Jenny Moore, she told her she was Taskforce. And srayzie didn't tell anyone else. You can't build an identity scam on that, or a long con. There's no nefarious plan that can be constructed on that foundation. It just is what it is.
Vindicator ago
Sorry. I guess I missed where Jenny said she was in control of the Taskforce Twitter.
Not sure what "stand" "proved wrong" you are referring to, here. ?
SoberSecondThought ago
No stand in particular. I was speaking in general terms.
Camulos ago
Well said.
argosciv ago
Can't say I disagree with what you're saying there.
The whole situation is beyond messy and I'm also wanting clarity on the central & peripheral events/persons. The point of my particular list here is to keep track of accounts which have demonstrated some amount of suspicious activity in regards to the timing of the Jem777/Mej777 situation and a few other names such as those mentioned in the thread title. (Some accounts listed have a long history of suspicious behavior, increasing in activity during the time-frame in question)
At the same time as the Jem777/Mej77 + George Webb rumblings, chatter about Jones and/or Corsi seemed to ramp up again, alongside other behaviors and topics which are repeated ad nauseum over in v/pizzagate. I have chosen to omit a few of the cues I look out for when it comes to determining suspicious behavior, so as to allow those who would present as suspicious, to continue doing so without being aware that they're on my proverbial radar.
As said in the opening statement of the main post and in a comment reply, I am not infallible and some of the accounts listed may not deserve to be - as such, I look out for not only continued suspicious behavior, but also, behaviors which pacify my concerns and thus warrant the account in question to be removed or re-categorized.
A statement on Jem777/Mej777/Jenny Moore specifically:
While keeping an eye on the relevant developments, I have arrived at the opinion(won't call it a conclusion per se, as the situation is still unfolding and I certainly don't have all the facts at hand) that Jem777 is quite likely Jenny Moore indeed & that one way or another, she is no longer on voat to weigh in on what is being said - apparent also is that much of Jem777/Jenny's posted work here, is indeed of value.
Do I know if she's been killed or otherwise died? No, I cannot be certain of that at this time.
I do have suspicions about George Webb and thus share concerns about Jenny's involvement with him - whether she was at all misleading people intentionally or otherwise. I'm not necessarily sold on the thought that she was intentionally misleading anyone, as it is possible that she was herself, being mislead by George. Equally possible, though, is that neither of them were maliciously being misleading; they are human and fallible like the rest of us.
What is clear, is that the both of them do/did put a lot of time and effort into their mission, for better or worse.
This thread/list of mine is not at all meant to be an accusation that Jem777/Jenny was a bad person, merely that I have observed suspicious behavior from some, during the time-frame in question.
Forgive me for saying it, but, mostly I don't want to have to spend much more time on the situation - I have a lot of writing to get back to on other much larger topics. An underlying concern of mine in relation to this, is that regardless of what has happened/will happen, a lot of time is being wasted on it and much division is being generated by it - I'm not proud of any part in that which I may have played in said division, but, I couldn't ignore the suspicious patterns I was noticing.
SoberSecondThought ago
I just want to point out that you and I agree on ESOTERICshade and fogdryer being very suspicious. I called them both out months ago. Here's a link to fogdryer denying he's a sockpuppet.
Ironically, if you scroll a bit further down in that same thread, you'll find a fairly lengthy post by Mej777 expressing suspicion that I'm a shill. She believed Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt's complicated and empty allegations about Racine being a center of Luciferianism. This was one of the very few occasions when Jenny and I interacted. While I was disappointed that she didn't see through WIC's empty talk, that doesn't mean she was a bad person. She was a tenacious investigator and worked very hard.
Anyway, I just wanted to make the point that yes, this whole situation is very complex, and that I certainly don't blame you for struggling to figure it out. Thanks for agreeing that I might be right.
argosciv ago
Well, not to start an argument with you here, but, as an aside:
The ironic part here, is that WIC's mention of Racine is not as far off-point as you may think. Indeed, my own research snowballed thanks to WIC asking me to look at Racine - I openly disagreed with some aspects of what WIC said, however, the prompt to look closer proved invaluable as it connects up with long-running theories/suspicions which I held for years before pizzagate even broke - not necessarily with respect to Racine specifically, but, through exploring my own theories, I have come to realize what WIC was pointing us to does have connections to trafficking(humans and 'black market' resource trading) and Political/Hollywood corruption...
My research is hard for most to follow and the earliest entries are incredibly messy, but, WIC definitely provided solid prompts, mixed with what I suspect was deliberate jibber-jabber so as to maintain plausible deniability.
The WIC stuff is a topic for another thread though, really.
SoberSecondThought ago
I can't comment on your theories, obviously. But WIC was attacking Paul Ryan for reasons of his own, relating to the Glenn Beck whistleblower incident of June 2013. Continually bringing up Racine was just a way of hitting Ryan a little more indirectly, as that is his district.
But as you say, another thread.
argosciv ago
Clever ducky!
You just baited out a shill over in srayzie's Jem777 sticky.
SweetChicken ago
Yeah, I’m just a middle aged dude who luckily found Voat. When I joined I subbed everything I came across and since I was never on Reddit I had no idea of the depths of depravity I would find. My internet usage was primarily confined to message boards with no experience of the chans and stuff like that.
argosciv ago
Thanks for popping in to respond.
I freely admit to being fallible and am indeed willing to remove names if it becomes apparent that they do not belong on the list.
May take me a bit to do so, but, I very much acknowledge your response and that you aren't showing what would otherwise be warranted hostility.
SweetChicken ago
Thanks, dude. I’m open about who and what I don’t like but otherwise I’m harmless
argosciv ago
For what it's worth, it was a particular exchange you had with another far-more-suspicious person, which grabbed my attention. I'm reasonably sure about that person, but, looking through your comments, I'm very much feeling like it was a mistake to list you here. :)
SweetChicken ago
Thanks. If needed, I could provide you a few people that would vouch for me who mod a sub (theredpill).
argosciv ago
Truly not necessary, I'm happy to say that I should have taken a second or even thrid look before including you.
argosciv ago
Yeah questioning Q isn't necessarily a problem at all, it's healthy to do so. I certainly don't encourage blindly following everything Q has said and even disagree with at least some of it.
Elaborate is definitely apt, LARP or otherwise.
Thanks for the reply, I know you're not much for Q or pizzagate, figured you'd want to see this anyway - common ground and all that. Seems that there's a brigade here that utilize many areas of voat to spread disinfo and otherwise monitor/derail genuine efforts, regardless of differences between us all.
Camulos ago
You're precisely right. Divide and conquer is as old as the hills yet it stays as relevant as ever.