You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

How they came to the conclusion that you're DeathtoMasonsASAP is beyond me. This seems like it's all about their cult allegiance to Q. I give up. I've already got way more documentation of some stuff I needed from this board regarding the Q psy op that disturbs me highly and it has absolutely nothing to do with being anyone's sock puppet. This is just pathetic. They're really freaking butthurt any time someone says anything bad about the Q psy op, and that's about it. If you go over to Great Awakening you see srazyie tag EVERY MOD in this forum on nearly every new Q post. There are other sock puppets to be exposed but I'm not going to be the one to do it. I already suffered enough for talking to them. I'll just continue gathering my evidence and keeping it to myself. If anyone is interested in it, feel free to PM me.

Deprogram yourselves before it's too late for you, Q followers. Or as they told me at the dawn of Q, "Wake up Alice"

ESOTERICshade ago

I always take up for @srayzie and I support her, because I KNOW she is a genuine good person. I don't believe in the Q thing psyop but @srayzie is solid.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

My point is that every mod here on this forum is pro-Q, nothing personal about srayzie. I've witnessed personal friends of mine go nuts over Q and attack people who disagreed with their opinion about who the best journalists are etc. Then later they come to their own conclusion about that person that they previously attacked people about criticizing. Nothing does it quite like Q. I just can't believe anyone is still following it after everything that's come out regarding that whole psy op, not to mention the 666 Nemos character with the heroin / opium trafficking charge and the pilot's license. You'd have to be completely unaware of all of it not to think something is wrong with the picture. And I'm sick and tired of reading about it and hate to see this board descend into Qtardia.

ESOTERICshade ago

My point is that every mod here on this forum is pro-Q

We still have one mod that does not believe in the Q phenom. That mod is @think- and is also the best mod we have. I praise @think- regularly and get attacked by think for praising her. She seems to think that she is so powerful that I am praising her because she is all powerful.


I don't praise @think- because I think she is powerful and my fate somehow rests in her hands. I praise her because I respect her mind and her judgement.


EffYouJohnPodesta ago

That's what she claims.

srayzie ago

It’s true, @Think- is my friend and is NOT a Q supporter. What is the problem if she were?

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

Apparently you missed the way theme's have spoken to me over the past 6 weeks, all cuz responded to ES and Eric didn't like it.

I tried tagging you on Twitter to ask if you were cool with how they were treating me and you didn't reply. I asked you on here to help with a removed post and you said you don't know submission rules. Think has attacked me a lot and unfairly. If they would post the links that go with the screenshots, you'd see these ES comments are almost ALL in reply to me, but they are also almost ALL anti-Q.

think- ago

Think has attacked me a lot and unfairly.

No, I haven't. Btw., you forgot the links to back up your claim.

@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @srayzie @Crensch @Shizy

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

I'm sorry you feel that way. I already apologized to everyone. You need to read through the thread to see it. I'm not aware of any rule that I have to provide links in every comment to prove my personal opinions. If that's the rule, then you would also have to prove your attacks were not unfair. And I don't think that is the rule. Have a nice night.

Crensch ago

It's not a written or spoken rule. Voat is about evidence, and backing up your claims - that's the culture here. The more you can do that, the more respect you'll get, and the more people will take you seriously.

If i had made this post above with no links, or very few, who would have believed me? And when my mods are accused of wrongdoing, and reported to me, I need evidence. Right there. It's not my job to dig for it and prove the accusation correct.

Generally the way apologies work on forums like this is that when you've been wrong, and people respond to your previous comments, you just tell them your position has changed, that you apologize, and don't really address the attacks on your previous position, as they no longer apply. Just my .02 there.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

Yeah, ok and I agree. And to her, sorry, but I'm not going back to re-apologize to her every time she makes a comment, or dig up old screenshots of mod comments to me, especially not at 10 pm while I'm getting in bed. Have a nice day everyone.