You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

@Vindicator @think- @srayzie @EricKaliberhall @kevdude

I trust there are no issues with me posting this given the amount of manipulation of this subverse that has gone one just form what's shown above?

think- ago

Well, we always said that proven shill activity would adhere to Rule 4, so I'm fine with it.

Especially, since I was able to see myself during the last couple days what Esoteric did when I went through his comment histories, and those of his alts.

I have a reputation to uphold of being impartial, but I must say that in this case, I was really shocked to see what this man has done. Unbelievable.

@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock @Kevdude @Srayzie

EricKaliberhall ago

This submission should be stickied for a long time... Maybe a 'important' flair as well.

think- ago

Thanks for the suggestion, done. ;-)

auralsects ago

At least for me (idgaf about Esoteric) This is blatant defamation of character with no basis, i.e. slander.

I've never even done any shill activity; I simply have unpopular opinions. My alts were literally the same name.

Great shame on you, vile slut

think- ago

Great shame on you, vile slut

Getting called 'vile slut' by you is definitely a badge of honour, Donkey. :-)

@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @Crensch @ben_matlock @srayzie

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

Why can't you guys argue with facts and class. Slinging around curse names at each other is lame.

Vindicator ago

Really? Donkey claims no evidence, after dozens of links of evidence nailed his ((ass)) to the wall, and you repeat his bullshit claim of no facts and bitch at think- because he called her a slut? Your account needs to hire a better writer.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

I don't have a hired writer Vindictor. I'm myself. Are you claiming that Donkey is ES? I'm a little lost there.

Are you serious that your claim he's DeathToMasonsASAP is credible with the evidence you posted? "Replied to a deep thread" is not proof.

Vindicator ago

Are you serious that your claim he's DeathToMasonsASAP is credible with the evidence you posted? "Replied to a deep thread" is not proof.

Hmm...where did Crensch or I claim this? I pointed out suspicious behavior to Crensch, and asked D2M if he was an alt, which he didn't have the gonads to respond to, btw.

So now I have a question for you: Why are pushing the idea that I made a "serious" "credible" claim with "proof"? Why are you attempting to shift the meaning of the conversation?

ESOTERIC is a malicious, manipulative, dishonest user trying to hurt this subverse -- a fact I appraised you of months ago privately. We have proved this beyond a shadow of a doubt. Yet you are one of the accounts who has participated by both commentary and voting in advancing his agenda, and despite all the evidence we have presented, you are still doing it.

If you really are who you say you are -- a mother, a victim, someone who cares about the kids, an investigator trying to uncover the truth -- how can you defend his efforts to astroturf this sub and dismantle it? That is simply not believable behavior for someone who is trying to stop the Cabal from preying on kids.

ESOTERICshade ago

ESOTERIC is a malicious, manipulative, dishonest user trying to hurt this subverse

My submission history would paint a different picture from your picture. But whatever. Some folks need to get a real life

think- ago

ESOTERIC is a malicious, manipulative, dishonest user trying to hurt this subverse

That's pretty accurate, actually. Thanks @Vindicator for summing this up nicely.

@EricKaliberhall

Vindicator ago

His submission history is carefully curated to support his Grandpa Truther character. His comment history is the guano mine, LOL. :-)

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

Your opinion on him is one thing but you haven't proved anything in this thread regarding his alleged dishonesty. That is my point. i understand there may be private things you cannot share. But accusing the DeathToMasons of being him, after that account gaslighted me - is rather important. I would tend to believe you about him if you proved that one thing.

Your new opinion and mistaken claims regarding me tends to invalidate my former feelings about your opinion of him. I might hold private reservations that I don't mention but that's not for public eyes. In fact, I have private reservations about many people here. I'm not going to air all of them for the public to see.

As I told you before, it's too dangerous to start discussing things like that.