I am a citizen investigator reporting on a year-long project. My first goal is to expose cover-up activity paid for by illegal slush funds drawn from Media Matters, directed in secret by David Brock, and carried out using "sockpuppet" social media accounts, by the man appearing on the "Tory Smith" YouTube channel. I call this man HLI, based on his most widely known /pol/ alt, HighLevelInsider.
My second goal is to draw attention to the event they have been covering up. On June 12, 2013, Glenn Beck spent several minutes teasing a story that would break the next day, involving a government whistleblower. He said that he had seen documents that would "take down pretty much the whole power structure". Beck did not break the story the next day; he never spoke of it again. I believe that Paul Ryan and Mike Pence were key players in the attempt to get the whistleblower to testify, and that it was about Pedogate.
Day 1 (calling out HLI) is here. Day 2 (on the money trail) here. Day 3 (on HLI's methods) here. Day 4 contains a handy summary of Days 1-3. In the Day 4 comments I expose @Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt, a key HLI "sockpuppet" account.
Day 6 explains how I fooled both HLI and James Alefantis into disclosing important information tying them to each other and to David Brock. Day 7 describes the Tory Smith YouTube channel and the evidence tying it to other HLI activity.
Watch the video first, then check out my notes below.
There are many clues that this is about child trafficking and ritual abuse. At 1:18, cohost Pat Gray says:
It's interesting, because it's over a subject that we have not even paid much attention to, over the past few years. It was a big issue, and hasn't been.
Beck then says something that makes it certain that Paul Ryan is involved. Starting at 3:15:
We have a whistleblower on something that is -- this guy is so afraid for his life that he hasn't talked to me, he has reached out to an ally. ... My people have seen one document, one. This one document would take down pretty much the whole power structure. Pretty much everything. This guy is so afraid, he won't do it unless he is in front of Congress and televised, because he is like, "I am dead, I am absolutely dead. I'm not talking they're going to smear me, they're going to arrest me. I'm dead, and I'm dead from both sides."
Here is why it is certain that Ryan was involved. There would be absolutely no point for Beck to reveal the existence of this whistleblower and his demand to speak in front of Congress, unless that was actually going to happen. He'd be killing the guy, literally. But the only person who could make that happen would be the Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan of Racine, WI. The speaker controls the House schedule. So he was the "ally". Beck was talking off the cuff, and perhaps without meaning to, he gave that fact away.
If you're wondering why Paul Ryan would choose Beck to help him alert the nation, there's a simple answer. Ryan and Beck had a very public intellectual alliance, almost a "bromance," in the spring of 2013. In their own words, Beck was pretty much Ryan's favorite journalist, and Ryan was Beck's favorite politician.
Next puzzle: How do we know that Pence was involved? At the start of the video, Beck says:
This office is going to be extraordinarily busy in the next ten days. The country, I believe, is going to be rocked in the next 24 hours with some things that are going on. ... We are going to be greatly divided in the next ten days, and you are going to witness things in American history that have never been witnessed before.
The problem is that even the Speaker cannot instantly rearrange the House schedule. Beck can talk about the documents tomorrow, but the whistleblower has to stay alive for a week or more before Ryan can get him on TV. Now, as Speaker, Ryan has enormous powers on the legislative side, but none on the executive side. He controls no police force to take the whistleblower into protective custody. Plus, the FBI/CIA/etc. are corrupt, right down to the Capitol Police. Ryan is aware that any random federal marshal can seize his whistleblower and "accidentally" kill him. Ryan has no say in that, no way of knowing who is working for the pedos. So how does he plan to keep the whistleblower alive long enough to speak?
He needs a governmental authority, separate from the Feds, that the pedos have not infiltrated. It doesn't have to be huge, just legally independent. There's one level of government with exactly the right structure. If a state attorney general brought some kind of charge against specific people in the federal government, then those agencies would lose jurisdiction -- at least long enough to launch a messy constitutional argument about separation of powers, and let Ryan execute the plan. In a pinch, the governor could even declare a state of emergency, or call out the National Guard.
And here is Mike Pence, Governor of Indiana, a straight-arrow Christian who won't even have lunch alone with a woman who is not his wife. Ryan knows him very well because Pence was formerly a Congressman. Beck knows him very well because Pence spent six years as a conservative radio host. Assume that Indiana's attorney general Greg Zoellner is also not a pedo, and that there are several senior Indiana state troopers who can be trusted. Now they have a plan with a reasonable chance of success.
It wouldn't absolutely have to be Mike Pence. Any non-pedo governor who was personally known by and trusted by both Ryan and Beck would do. But how many of those do you suppose there are? And keep in mind Tory Smith, who is neither an idiot nor mentally ill, making videos nearly every day, from October 2013 onward, that attack Mike Pence, state attorney general Greg Zoellner, and various Indiana state troopers as child rapists. Really makes you think!
Unfortunately, the plan fell apart. Something went wrong, we don't know what. Possibly the whistleblower was killed. Possibly the pedos came up with some overwhelming form of extortion against Ryan. Possibly Obama himself intervened. Anyway, it failed. I urge you to go back to my post from April, and read what I wrote about Beck's subsequent actions. He became a broken man, who cried and blamed himself for trying to "change the world". Ryan's life took a turn for the worse as well. His 2013 budget was well received, but after that, he got less cooperation in his role as Speaker. I suppose the miracle is that he remained Speaker at all.
Now I want to sum up, and explain why I did things this way. I could have simply posted this whole argument right at the start. Months ago, in fact. That would have been easier. The video is sufficient all by itself to prove that Ryan and Pence were involved. There's just no other way to interpret what Beck says.
But as compelling as the video is, it becomes more so if you can also show specifically how the bad guys are trying to isolate Ryan and Pence, and cover the story up. That is a much harder task. It is hard because going after HLI means having a messy and divisive sockpuppet hunt here on /v/pizzagate. It is hard because the clues linking one social media account to another are often subtle and stylistic. And it is hard because certain aspects are basically unprovable. How can you know if, for example, @polwarrior1030's account is really an HLI sockpuppet, or my sockpuppet, or neither? I know for certain which it is, but you have to weigh the probabilities. I concede all these problems. If you're still skeptical about the cover-up, or about certain accounts being sockpuppets, that's fine.
The one thing that I hope we can agree on, is this. Exposing the coverup is what we are here to do. Showing the involvement of Brock and HLI is not just nice-to-have, it is essential. Yes, it gets people mad, and produces long and head-scratching arguments. But if we want to free our country from the pedosadists, we have to do the hard things.
Exposing the cover-up changes how we see the rest of the problem. HLI and Senate Anon keep telling us that our enemies are supremely powerful. They have blackmailed everyone, they know everything, Trump is totally isolated and incompetent. We'd be better off chasing the smaller fish, the local cops or the mayor, the Royal Order of Jesters or SOBIB, because every federal judge is blackmailed. And so on. But that's all a lie. It's misdirection. A handful of brave men nearly brought the whole thing crashing down in June of 2013. The Clinton gang has made blunder after blunder since then. They're overworked and vulnerable. And stupid. (I'm looking at you, Jimmy.)
Meanwhile, Trump isn't isolated or incompetent. This story shows that there are dimensions to his plan that we haven't understood. Mike Pence is the most powerful kind of "life insurance" imaginable for Trump. It's a good bet that Pence kept copies of whatever documents the whistleblower managed to hand over. He certainly would have read and absorbed the key facts in them. So if they were to kill Trump, Pence would instantly unleash hell on the pedos, and the country would back him. Their choices right now are both bad: Either the slow ratchet of "draining the swamp," or something much faster and more violent.
So that's it, that's my report. I said it would change how you view Pizzagate. I hope it has. Question period is now open.
view the rest of the comments →
Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt ago
We bet our lives and our souls that Paul Ryan is the real sockpuppet working for his global masters and that your theory is absolutely wrong.
Paul Ryan is to DC as Ashton (Chris) Kutcher is to Hollywood. They are the corrupt boy scout front men covering up the true Evil going on behind the curtain.
Paul Ryan is a traitor who was given information by his own constituents who were victims and witnesses to extreme corruption and abuse involving his donors and the most powerful people in his district. He obstructed RICO investigations along with Jim Comey, Loretta Lynch and others that linked to the Clinton Foundation and other elite groips.
The real swamp is in Paul Ryan's backyard - Racine, Wisconsin.
srayzie ago
I agree with you here and if anything, all of this has made me believe more in what you are saying about Racine.
Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt ago
Thank you and anyone can see from our history that we have never tried to discredit anyone else, and support anyone seeking the real Truth. Our only motive is the Truth and our message has been consistent the entire time we've been posting here and elsewhere.
If you read our entire history of comments and the escalating attacks against us you will see they are very afraid of the real truth being exposed and Racine, Wisconsin is the weakest link to the entire system.
4_InquiringMinds ago
@Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt
Can you elaborate on why you say this? Would they not have hubs all over the US, Europe and elsewhere? Would they risk it all by having one place that can take it all down? It doesn't seem logical but I'm willing to listen to a logical explanation of how this would be so. Shining the light on racine just doesn't seem logical. Lots of places that are mired in corruption have the light shined on them and nothing happens.
I have searched online for other racine posts and all that came up was one from last spring on lunatic outpost which simply commented on a racine post you made here. Why is this not being discussed on all the major conspiracy sites...there are so many where it would 'seem' to be of major importance if one is focused on shinning the light.
Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt ago
Our posts on Reddit pizzagate were part of the reason why it was shut down. That is also why we do not post submissions here in order to keep voat alive for as long as possible. We do not trust Reddit and we do not trust you either, Rose.
We don't take this lightly. You betrayed our trust and are now joining in the hit job on us. Congratulations I hope you feel proud of yourself for working for the criminal corrupt Elite planning to enslave the world.
Is it because we didn't respond to all of your nonsense emails? Or were you trying to infiltrate and become our friend from the beginning only two joints on the year-long planned attack against us?
You should be ashamed of yourself Rose but we're positive that you aren't.
4_InquiringMinds ago
Even tho I never post my name in comments, only in pm's, you have taken it upon yourself to 'out' me. This crosses a forum line and you know that.
I'm fine with that~but what does it say about you? Is this how you respond when someone questions your information? I have always been very civil in questioning and sincere in my inquiries.
Your actions speak volumes~now who is it really that betrays trust?
4_InquiringMinds ago
I've decided to ping this so some ppl can see your response to an honest inquiry. One member saw this, one who gave you support, and said your response was scary. Indeed it might be a veiled threat to dox me. I don't really care, nothing to hide~but you crossed a line, a line that any forum member knows about. As the member said to me it doesn't matter if there is disagreement with another member/would never divulge personal information. It's um, an honor code.
@carmencita, @srayzie, @ESOTERICshade, @mooteensy
srayzie ago
I can see why that would come off scary. This is the first time I've ever ever seen WIC appear angry. I don't know the whole back story. I can't really talk because I did that to my enemies Equineluvr and Donkeyhote after they threatened me.
I'll just be the go between and tell WIC that could scare someone. So don't use names. I'd say to you that I would be pissed too. But don't worry because it's on your first name.
4_InquiringMinds ago
Very kind of you srayzie. The only backstory is I questioned his information. In my comment history one can see I was always civil. It started when I questioned the logic of getting a 500 dollar non computer car and hit the road going to racine if the grid went down and basically apocalyptic conditions ensued. I suggested sheltering in place, staying centered, uniting with neighbors and helping others. I also pointed out that there would be no gas stations, only gas would be siphoned and anyone on the road would face roving gangs risking torture, rape and murder or at the very least being stranded with nothing in a sea of rotting corpses. That was the first time I challenged his information and from his response my suspicions were aroused. It is not betrayal to question information is it? He's been angry at my questioning quite a few times of late.
I'm quite sure he knows what he was doing posting my name. He knows a lot more about me bc in pm's I'm very open (and don't intend to change). Some of us are open in pm's, some of us are guarded. Whatever happens in pm's is supposed to not be posted in open forum and anyone who has been on forums knows that/it's an honor code. I take what he did as a direct threat to shut my mouth or he would leak more personal information/which is no worries, have nothing to hide/but it is just not done ya know?
Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt ago
It was us being honest offering and honest solution. We said if you prefer to meditate go ahead, we just don't think that's going to help you survive. It's not just about dying, we don't want others to be tortured or abused, and more specifically see any children suffering.
You can disagree without targeting and attacking us or partnering with someone for our murder. You completely betrayed us so we don't owe you anything.
srayzie ago
I agree with you on both things. I don't think it's a good idea for people to all panic and race over to Racine if something happened. I was tripping out on that advice as well. I think it was him just trying to help. It's something he's passionate about.
I am more open in PM too and I agree. One should never out someone's name publicly like that. Sometimes we just have to agree to disagree and move on you guys.
4_InquiringMinds ago
Thanks srayzie, he will probably listen to you. Our pm's were always very cordial. There was only 2 times he ignored questions, once when I asked if there was anything going on in my area that I needed to be aware of/shine the light on and recently a question I had about ancient history that I had only looked at for 2 days/was mystified/and since I respected his opinion wondered what he thought. The other parts of the pm's both times he replied /but those specific parts for whatever reason he chose not to comment on/which is of course personal choice. Up until the roadtrip to racine we got along just fine.
Now I'm working on the side of evil, support depopulation and global enslavement lol. Well that makes a helluva lot of sense doesn't it? At my age I'd be one of the first to hit the ovens.
srayzie ago
Don't say that lol 😄 He's not gonna listen to me. I'm nobody special. We've barely communicated. But hopefully the group effort will help.