Total misdirection.

I believe Trump surprised them. I really think they had the election in the bag. The election of The Cannibal Queen was her prize for doing so much evil. Her masters rewarded their Red Queen.

This.

Nice summation. In a nutshell: yes.

Upvoat for you.

He also made multiple statements denouncing the email investigation. The one thing there is literal evidence of that should have taken his opponent out of the game.

Comey stood in front of America and laid out a case against Clinton, citing felony on top of felony, then said she won't be prosecuted because she is Hillary Clinton. Why every candidate didn't make that their sole talking point, is beyond reason. It's proof to me they are all in it for the same goal. To advance the position of their handlers.... the Global Elite, who even Clinton works for.

What's the saying? The silence is deafening.

All good points. They all point to how HUGE this leverage was. It couldn't have been what his wife did. Those type of infractions, although criminal, only generate sympathy for the spouse of the accused.

And we're leaving out the elephant in the room, Seth Rich's death. Very weird that there wasn't a peep out of him. If nothing else, he's known for shooting his mouth off on subjects, but nothing. Zilch.

has he said why he doesn't fight for his voters? the lawsuit would be a million times more meaningful if Sanders was the plaintiff. this silence says speaks volumes.

He was talking about things that mattered beyond his shit economics.

He was against TPP, against mega-corporation influence on American policy, against Military Industrial Complex, against Mega-bank and Central Bank Fraud, against giant companies like google working with U.S intel to create monopolistic 4th ammendment violating monoliths, against police state and police militarization, against useless wars for globalist ends, against CIA subversion and exacerbation of political movements....

I don't agree with him economically by any means but there is quite a bit of policy overlap between him and someone like Ron Paul... despite the fact that they couldn't be more far apart when it comes to sane economic policy.

Well, we should care because these are the people leading the country ... and that were selling it down the drain.

We need to clean things up and revealing everything, all these scummy secret deals is important to the process of #drainingtheswamp.

Absolutely 100% right.

We were right and here's the proof. So people that say speculation is wrong, no, it's very accurate sometimes.

Hillary committed felonies at the expense of the American taxpayer and he was in the best position in the world to truly expose what she did to those with ignorance that blocks reason. But he didn't. Just like Trump, he balked and denounced the server/email investigation. If he wanted her gone, that's the one thing that could have done it.

Instead of denouncing Comey's statement, he consigned it.

Do you simply not understand the gravity of that? Do you not realize that should have nailed her? Read his statements. Look up the statutes.

You know nothing about jews and are awfully suspicious for shilling for one.

but he certainly criticized HRC during the campaign. AFTER the dinner meeting, things seem to have gotten rougher when it was so obvious that Bernie Sanders could win the election against Trump if he had the DP nomination. Hillary made sure that didn't happen.

The problem is that there's over a year separating this May 2015 email from Reynolds and the June 2016 incident where Sanders face is bruised.

You're really not making a very strong case. Logically, if he had an agreement, and they're calling him out for breaking it, criticizing Killary was one of the stipulated points in said agreement. I mean, Reynolds didn't say, "Damn! We should have included that in the agreement made with him, so let's use that leverage to do it now." Further, if we go by your logic, then Sanders wasn't a puppet. Nonetheless, he shows up with bruises on his face to endorse Killary, and further, doesn't object to his supporters being shut out of the convention. So the leading candidate of the Democratic Party is roughed up and threatened and he doesn't go to the police of FBI or make any kind of reports or statements? He sucks it up? It makes no sense when put in that context. Something huge was hanging over his head for him to shut up and make like a puppet. It's because he was a puppet and the roughing up was to remind him of that.

Yes, its super clear that he was threatened, so the question is what was the threat?

A. death or injury to self and loved ones

OR

B. exposure of damning wrongdoing?

That means this has nothign to do with PG. Thanks for the tip. How are the kids?

Fantastic! Thanks so much.

I lean towards this explanation.

The only thing different is that I'd say "alleged" for legal reasons, but it really would fit the scenario and known facts.

There's no medical procedure named partial birth abortion.

sray --

I'm surprised that there is still anyone supporting the GOP and their lies, but here you are. We have two parties not only war-mongering all over the world but killing living mothers, fathers and children.

Everyone and everything on this planet is threatened by the US terrorist nation and the Congress' support for these endless and illegal wars of aggression.

"Partial Birth Abortion" is a piece of right wing propaganda to hide the reality of LATE TERM ABORTION... which saves the lives of many women who late in their WANTED pregnancies find that they will not survive if the pregnancy continues and/or that the child will not be capable of life and is effecting their health and well-being. ALSO, that if the pregnancy is not terminated by abortion that they will lose their ability to have children in the future.

These abortions are rare-- about one in every county in the US every year.

It is only the compassionless and inhumane who will push for the loss of life of the Mother and/or her future fertility.

And further you have no problem in trying to punish millions and millions of women dependent on Planned Parenthood for gynecological services and birth control, breast exams and other tests.

It is millions of pregnant women, themselves, who make the individual decision about whether or not to have an abortion. And most of those decisions are made when the pregnancy is still in the embryo stage - the first weeks of pregnancy.

This is a liberal nation which supports reproductive freedom, including abortion by simple majority. And supports PPH and the work they do and the funding of those services by our government.

Come back when your life is threatened by a pregnancy and you have other children, a husband and family to care for

Hey, thanks for the info.

Upvoat for you.

So the very best case, he is a pussy who refused to stand up for himself. Yet you think he would stand up for you and The rest of the country as a leader? At best he gave up when he should have stood up stronger. He literally could have ushered a revolution, but he refused. He played ball and that is disgraceful. The best place to fight the deep state is when all eyes are on you. They have a harder time getting people in the light. They're a shadow organization.

This is "the least possible red pill narrative". You still get to think Bernie is that great guy, but the facts don't line up. Here's your quote:

I'm sure that Bernie Sanders was aware that even if they had nothing on him, they would create a scandal. This is what they do. If you guys were Bernie Sanders, and you knew that the deep state already had their mind made up and tell you what role you are going to play, would you try to fight?

The problem is that this email is dated May 2015, and the day he showed up with bruises on his face was June 2016. So t was a over a year later that he did try to "fight". Fight over what, we don't know that, do we? Just like we don't know what they were "leveraging". Logically, all we know from the email is that the he had an agreement that he breached. But mind you, according to the email which means according to the facts of what we know, what Sanders did was criticize HRC about wealth, so the agreement had to have stipulated "no criticism". So according to you, why did he break the agreement if they could just arrange all these things? Why fight? And why fight again a year later?

What you say makes no sense. Running at all would make no sense. Why would he lead people to believe he had a snowball's chance in hell when he ddn't?

Berne is a self-serving sick man. He's not the man you thought you were voting for, but there's no way you're going to believe me. He struck a deal with The Devil and paid the price.

Look, if that's what you think, then that's what you believe.

No way is Assange CIA. Some people overcome outrageous beginnings, and he seems to be one of them. In other words, there are lots of people I know that suffered sexual molestation when young who didn't grow up to be molesters.

We owe Assange a lot. Think about it, he changed the landscape. No way any of us would know what went on and that they were throwing kids in pools and exchanging coded messages about pizza. So to me, he really is a hero. Heroes to me are people that go beyond their frailties and do the right thing ... whatever that is, and I feel Assange has done that. He's earned my loyalty. I know loyalty is big with Trump, too, and I agree. Stay loyal to those that do things for you. We tend to get madder at them then the scumbags molesting kids.

A lot of us are in that camp. Just tell us what happened.

This is really unraveling.

That's sedition. Treason involves foreign parties. Yes, Israel was involved and yes, Bernie is technically a foreign combatant, so YES, this specific instance was treason, but it's sedition 9 times out of 10. Know the difference and use it correctly because people will dismiss you offhand if you don't.

The point is the DNC cheated the American public out of a fairly elected candidate,

The guy who lost by 12 percentage points?

What they are also trying to imply is that he is a pedophile. That he has been brownstoned. That they got to him because they had something nefarious to blackmail him with. This is a Warlock Hunt, imo.

The point is the DNC cheated the American public out of a fairly elected candidate, which in the eyes of many amounts to treason.

This is a fair point, but the rest is not accurate nor laying blame on his doorstep.

According to the email (and I think we should stick to the wording for the purposes of figuring out what went on), even "CRITICIZING" HRC was out of bounds and not in keeping with "the agreement". Think about it.

When did you know a political candidate to be restrained from talking ill about an opponent? Isn't that the whole point of running against someone? But even bringing up the subject of wealth was not in accordance with this mysterious "agreement" that Sanders had with the DNC.

Bernie is dirty. He was working in cahoots with HRC. I really think the power went to his head when he started seeing those numbers. Hence, the email, the physical beatdown, and the reminding him of the blackmail.

I know this disillusions many, but this is about facing truth, not continuing to idolize someone that doesn't deserve it.

It says she was a former communications staffer, but she was just as good as an altenate personality.

As for the case, yes, please reopen it! Find out WTH went on and what this "leverage" was.

~~~ Seems that Jane's college deal wouldn't be coming up even now if that was the "leverage". Lets see what Sanders does now that this is out there. They were going after him pretty hard for a complicit pedo. if he is, this means that they are ALL pedo and that we may be too late.

I believe it doesn't prove or disprove he's a pedo. The Jane's college might be something that was used by the authorities as an opening salvo to dig deeper into what was going on. It may be that in investigating what went on, there might be a crumb, or it could be that the DOJ could "leverage" Sanders with something they find out.

I can't say definitively I believe Sanders is guilty of being a pedo. My opinion is that he's in bed with pedos, and being "leveraged" by something that has to be HUGE. But wait a minute, didn't a member just post something about pedos and Vermont? Or am I misremembering? Something about a little girl on the beach? Anyway, my faulty, spotty memory is that the article had something to do with Sanders, but it could only be that it happened in his state. But another member did bring up his FB page being spammed with CP. Now that is freakin' weird. Perhaps someone does know something.

He's always struck me as the pervy, impulsive type. Even if he never committed such acts before, I'm sure the DS figured out a way to capture some high def video doing something bad.

Absolutely! I think porn is one of those things that cultivates ideas you wouldn't organically have. Then there's the "passive" perv who looks the other way and allows human trafficking through his/her state for a few million dollars passed under the table. Or for favors. Or to keep his senate seat.

It would really help to know how dirty he is. I had the same non-opinion of him, but others didn't share my low ... very low ... view of him.

What we see constantly is that the push to make something of this comes from the GOP ....

Yet, the Catholic Church DENIES what the GOP is saying -- !!

Holy shit, would you be so kind as to link me to this email? This would help me redpill many Berniecrats that I know.

Where was that quote taken from? I would like to see the source, since you have it in quotes. Who said that? I am interested in reading it.

I fully believe that there was blackmail involved. He gave in too easily.

Oh, the blackmail is proven. It's irrefutable that they had something. But even before he ran, he knew made that deal. Remember, they called him on merely "criticizing" HRC. That's a pretty restrictive agreement when a candidate isn't allowed to criticize an opponent.

I tend to believe Clinton made a deal that she would make his wife's illegal financial transactions at the college she ran go away in return for bending the knee.

No way would he capitulate for such a minor offense. It wouldn't ruin his career, and this type of crime illicits sympathy.

Nope, something HUGE.

This is what you believe. Do you have proof and sources for your beliefs? You tend to believe, We know she lost. But how does that make him a pedo? Where is the proof where it says that? We all can believe this or that, but on what credible information and source. We can come to conclusions because we believe after reading certain things. But whether or not they are true, where is the real proof.

You can't threaten a jew's family. You can, however, hire a jew to be a patsy to try to get your shabbos into the White House.

Any notion of sanders Bering blackmailed with PG stuff is entirely conjured by the "everything relates to pizza gang."

Yes and no. Even if you aren't part of the "everything relates to pizza gang", he took orders from the "pizza gang" or my preferred term "The Cannibal Elite".

there is simply no proof whatsoever involving him in that although he obviously bowed to their authority in september and october. they simply could have threatened his family.

True. There is no proof and the assertion is speculative. But again, you yourself say he genuflected to The Pizzagate Elite. And it was way earlier than September and October. The date of the email is:

May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM

That means that whatever "agreement" Sanders had with The Cannibal Elite was previous to May 2015. And look at what he's being called on the carpet for: he criticize HRC! Political opponents are supposed to do that! It's what campaigns are all about, so this "agreement" was restrictive. Again, not conjecture. Truth.

The "threatening his family" excuse is getting tired. Plus, it is entirely speculative, something you're complaining about. If you're dealing with factual evidence, there is no factual evidence his family was threatened. Moreover, the conditions that Sanders were brought in on were termed "agreement". So he formed an agreement with people that you describe as "killers and rapists." What's the saying? Birds of a feather?

The problem here is that you're negating speculation on what this "leverage" by you yourself speculating. And since this cabal is speculated to be in the human trafficking business, then it's not unfair to speculate that the people they had dealings with were like-minded and also involved ... to some eoxtent. Someone could have been paid money to look the other way. Is that the same as being a pedo? Not to me. I wouldn't give them high marks for morality, but it's not as depraved as serving kids up on platters.

I tend to think the leverage HUGE. It don't believe it was a threat against his family because if it was then why would he be surprised by them calling him on breaking this agreement? Remember it's over a full year later July 29, 2016, that he appears with the facial bruising.

http://theconspiracyblog.com/conspiracies/current-politics/bernie-sanders/1162-was-bernie-sanders-roughed-up-by-clintons-goons-at-the-dnc

So if we're going to stick with facts, those are the facts. The in May of 2015, he has an agreement, and is being controlled by "leverage" that you say is a threat to his family. And yet, he overrides a threat to his family by killers and rapists, and has to be roughed up a full year later?

Makes no sense when we rely on facts and reason.

I've read that they threatened him with losing all of his committee spots.

The oldcuck fucks and kills kids

Same!

No one wants to hear this, even now.

The emails made it very clear that Bernie was being blackmailed. Some may argue that it had to deal with the loan deal under investigation now, but I highly doubt it, as he seems to be shrugging the whole thing off. It must be much, much worse, to make him bow out, as he had a better shot at the seat than Killary.

Know that major pushback signals you're right. I learned that the hard way. Silly me for thinking that when I posted something and got called horrendous names that the post was tantamount to a "shit post". Slowly, the lightbulb went on when I saw really great posters being attacked with the same tactics.

While it's conjecture as to what the blackmail could be, yours is the logical conclusion. If not, it had to be pretty big stuff for a viable candidate to agree to the farce. Could be he was profiting from sordid criminal activities. Again, speculation. There is no proof except for this. And, yes, the FB postings are telling. It's all evidence and you wonder when the actual charges will be filed.

Thanks so much for your comments.

I don't believe Assange is 100%; I believe the emails because these are The Cannibal Elite's own words. No false narrative here. How do you think #pizzagate got started?

And the fixing of a presidential election through blackmail is never petty.

No. Assange tweeted it.

It's tantamount to telling us, "Hello! Everything you need to know is buried in those emails if you'd only read them and reading them is why we put them up!"

Thanks for the comment.