Relevancy: Again, this goes to the heart of Pizzagate because it's revealed in that Wikileaks email drop. This proves the MO of The Cannibal Elite of winning through blackmail. All the major players: HRC, Pedosta, etc. were involved.
For all those diehards and conspiracy theorists concocting new theories about Sanders, Julian Assange has made it pretty clear with this tweetful reminder:
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/904355180933734400
This isn't in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some
leverage, would be good to flag this for him.
Sanders was in agreement to lose. He was enlisted to put on a dog and pony show. The old fool got his ego inflated by the numbers and realization that he could win. Does anyone ever win against The Cannibal Queen and her minions? I think not.
It's why this gentle reminder went out to all the major players (original email):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397#efmAAAAB2
From: Christina Reynolds creynolds@hillaryclinton.com
Date: May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM EDT
To: Robby Mook re47@hillaryclinton.com, Kristina Schake <
[email protected]>, Jennifer Palmieri <
[email protected]>, Tony Carrk tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com,
John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com, Oren Shur oshur@hillaryclinton.com,
Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
Subject: FW: Sanders criticism
Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.)
Reynolds plays enforcer here. Sanders went over the line and "criticized" HRC. How dare he? But, again, IT'S WHAT HE AGREED TO. This wasn't a surprise. He was supposed to play ball and paid the penalties. So all his supporters being refused seats? It's what their candidate was in full agreement with.
Sanders is a tool. He was there to pull numbers away from the GOP and pretend to be an antagonist to HRC. At the last minute, he was to throw his support to her, the logic being, his followers would follow orders.
Gee, I wonder what kind of blackmail they could have had?
'nough said.
view the rest of the comments →
R34p_Th3_Wh0r1w1nd ago
Doesn't mean the DNC didn't cheat him. They did. He may not have put up a fight over the cheating because of the blackmail. That is beside the point.
The point is the DNC cheated the American public out of a fairly elected candidate, which in the eyes of many amounts to treason.
quantokitty ago
This is a fair point, but the rest is not accurate nor laying blame on his doorstep.
According to the email (and I think we should stick to the wording for the purposes of figuring out what went on), even "CRITICIZING" HRC was out of bounds and not in keeping with "the agreement". Think about it.
When did you know a political candidate to be restrained from talking ill about an opponent? Isn't that the whole point of running against someone? But even bringing up the subject of wealth was not in accordance with this mysterious "agreement" that Sanders had with the DNC.
Bernie is dirty. He was working in cahoots with HRC. I really think the power went to his head when he started seeing those numbers. Hence, the email, the physical beatdown, and the reminding him of the blackmail.
I know this disillusions many, but this is about facing truth, not continuing to idolize someone that doesn't deserve it.
Votescam ago
NOTE that it was especially in regard to the WEALTH of Hill/Bill that the objection was made.
That WEALTH raises many questions about Hill/Bill -- not about Bernie Sanders.
quantokitty ago
That's the entire point.