Relevancy: Again, this goes to the heart of Pizzagate because it's revealed in that Wikileaks email drop. This proves the MO of The Cannibal Elite of winning through blackmail. All the major players: HRC, Pedosta, etc. were involved.
For all those diehards and conspiracy theorists concocting new theories about Sanders, Julian Assange has made it pretty clear with this tweetful reminder:
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/904355180933734400
This isn't in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some
leverage, would be good to flag this for him.
Sanders was in agreement to lose. He was enlisted to put on a dog and pony show. The old fool got his ego inflated by the numbers and realization that he could win. Does anyone ever win against The Cannibal Queen and her minions? I think not.
It's why this gentle reminder went out to all the major players (original email):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397#efmAAAAB2
From: Christina Reynolds creynolds@hillaryclinton.com
Date: May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM EDT
To: Robby Mook re47@hillaryclinton.com, Kristina Schake <
[email protected]>, Jennifer Palmieri <
[email protected]>, Tony Carrk tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com,
John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com, Oren Shur oshur@hillaryclinton.com,
Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
Subject: FW: Sanders criticism
Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.)
Reynolds plays enforcer here. Sanders went over the line and "criticized" HRC. How dare he? But, again, IT'S WHAT HE AGREED TO. This wasn't a surprise. He was supposed to play ball and paid the penalties. So all his supporters being refused seats? It's what their candidate was in full agreement with.
Sanders is a tool. He was there to pull numbers away from the GOP and pretend to be an antagonist to HRC. At the last minute, he was to throw his support to her, the logic being, his followers would follow orders.
Gee, I wonder what kind of blackmail they could have had?
'nough said.
view the rest of the comments →
srayzie ago
I'm sure that Bernie Sanders was aware that even if they had nothing on him, they would create a scandal. This is what they do. If you guys were Bernie Sanders, and you knew that the deep state already had their mind made up and tell you what role you are going to play, would you try to fight? We already know what happens to people that do not cooperate.
I just posted a comment here about an investigation him and his wife are going thru. Bernie Sanders knowing how the deep state could sway the outcome of that investigation, as well knowing that they can construct anything they want, as long as it means that they get their desired outcome, I can see why he would cooperate.
This_Ruined_Pizza ago
So the very best case, he is a pussy who refused to stand up for himself. Yet you think he would stand up for you and The rest of the country as a leader? At best he gave up when he should have stood up stronger. He literally could have ushered a revolution, but he refused. He played ball and that is disgraceful. The best place to fight the deep state is when all eyes are on you. They have a harder time getting people in the light. They're a shadow organization.
srayzie ago
No. I posted a long post on this thread about why I do not like him and do NOT support him. I'm just saying that when it comes to giving up, I guess you could say he's a pussy. If you want to use that term. But, if I had the deep state after me, I wouldn't want to mess around. That's why I would never put myself in that situation in the first place.