Bernie Sanders Was Not Sabotaged by HRC: Assange Makes Clear He Agreed to Lose Because of Blackmail (pizzagate)

submitted ago by quantokitty

Relevancy: Again, this goes to the heart of Pizzagate because it's revealed in that Wikileaks email drop. This proves the MO of The Cannibal Elite of winning through blackmail. All the major players: HRC, Pedosta, etc. were involved.

For all those diehards and conspiracy theorists concocting new theories about Sanders, Julian Assange has made it pretty clear with this tweetful reminder:

https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/904355180933734400

This isn't in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some leverage, would be good to flag this for him.

Sanders was in agreement to lose. He was enlisted to put on a dog and pony show. The old fool got his ego inflated by the numbers and realization that he could win. Does anyone ever win against The Cannibal Queen and her minions? I think not.

It's why this gentle reminder went out to all the major players (original email):

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397#efmAAAAB2

From: Christina Reynolds creynolds@hillaryclinton.com Date: May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM EDT To: Robby Mook re47@hillaryclinton.com, Kristina Schake < [email protected]>, Jennifer Palmieri < [email protected]>, Tony Carrk tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com, John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com, Oren Shur oshur@hillaryclinton.com, Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com Subject: FW: Sanders criticism

Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.)

Reynolds plays enforcer here. Sanders went over the line and "criticized" HRC. How dare he? But, again, IT'S WHAT HE AGREED TO. This wasn't a surprise. He was supposed to play ball and paid the penalties. So all his supporters being refused seats? It's what their candidate was in full agreement with.

Sanders is a tool. He was there to pull numbers away from the GOP and pretend to be an antagonist to HRC. At the last minute, he was to throw his support to her, the logic being, his followers would follow orders.

Gee, I wonder what kind of blackmail they could have had?

'nough said.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Votescam ago

Some postes here are very anxious to try to suggest that ...

Sanders was in agreement to lose. He was enlisted to put on a dog and pony show. The old fool got his ego inflated by the numbers and realization that he could win.<

I think it's likely that Bernie agreed NOT to run an independent campaign, but he certainly criticized HRC during the campaign. AFTER the dinner meeting, things seem to have gotten rougher when it was so obvious that Bernie Sanders could win the election against Trump if he had the DP nomination. Hillary made sure that didn't happen. And the story is that Bernie and Jane had a visit from a few guys and that Bernie got pushed around and bruised (which we see on the video that night), but there also seemed to be a threat to beat up Jane. After than, Bernie dropped his resistance to Hillary (which likely wasn't part of the original agreement) and also dropped his often spoken of promise to "go all the way" at the Convention.

Bernie, of course, turned out to be a much more effective campaigner than Hillary which undoubtedly wasn't something they expected.

And there is no proof of this or anything like it....

Sanders went over the line and "criticized" HRC. How dare he? But, again, IT'S WHAT HE AGREED TO. This wasn't a surprise. He was supposed to play ball and paid the penalties. So all his supporters being refused seats? It's what their candidate was in full agreement with.>

Nor any proof of anything like this ---

Sanders is a tool. He was there to pull numbers away from the GOP and pretend to be an antagonist to HRC. At the last minute, he was to throw his support to her, the logic being, his followers would follow orders.>

Or this --

Gee, I wonder what kind of blackmail they could have had?>

Tallest_Skil ago

You know nothing about jews and are awfully suspicious for shilling for one.

Votescam ago

Sounds like your main problem with Bernie is that he is Jewish which makes you pretty suspicious as a white-supremacist.

Tallest_Skil ago

Sounds like your main problem with Bernie is that he is Jewish

That and the marxism, yeah.

which makes you pretty suspicious as a white-supremacist.

  1. You have absolutely no fucking argument whatsoever.
  2. You have absolutely no comprehension of what judaism is.
  3. You have absolutely no comprehension of what marxism is.
  4. You can’t reply to the discussion with anything of meaning, so you character assassinate and claim to have won.

  5. You have absolutely no comprehension of what race is.

  6. Genetics: https://pastebin.com/Fz5LCmfh

  7. Myths: https://imgur.com/a/YO289
  8. Diversity: https://pastebin.com/zezXUrNg
  9. Genocide: https://pastebin.com/qWFSd330
  10. https://archive.org/details/DefensiveRacismByEdgarJSteele

Read that fucking book.

Votescam ago

Tall --

So first you begin with anti-Semitism ... and actually, anti-African-American sentiments, as well ....

but you're also confused about Democratic Socialism which is practiced in most countries -- National Health Care for All being but one example of it.

Public Education being another example of it.

Communism -- which has basically never been practiced anywhere -- seems to have been an invention of Capitalists in order to create the distraction of an "enemy" system. Rather, Russia was ruled either by the rule of Royalty or later by the rule of dictators - Lenin and Stalin.

Hitler -- who was being recruited by and supported financially by international Elites -- took over a LIBERAL organization (NAZI Party) which stood for women's rights, LABOR, labor unions, public education, public health care ... and turned it upside down. Hitler's dictatorship had nothing to do with social welfare or social programs, nor democracy. It was a dictatorship.

As for the other mess you deliver to try to suggest you're not a "White supremacist" ....

IF you are at all human, you will find that in the end HATRED will only destroy you.

Tallest_Skil ago

So first you begin with religious bigotry --

Nope.

but you’re also confused about Democratic Socialism which is practiced in most countries

No, marxism isn’t practiced in most countries.

National Health Care for All being but one example of it.

Failing everywhere it is implemented, yes.

Public Education being another example of it.

Nope, try harder.

Communism -- which has basically never been practiced anywhere

Reported for not even fucking trying.

seems to have been an invention of Capitalists in order to create the distraction of an “enemy” system.

Holy mother of god, kill yourself. Literally all literature on the topic proves you wrong.

a LIBERAL organization

lol

Hitler's dictatorship had nothing to do with social welfare or social programs. It was a dictatorship.

K. And?

As for the other mess you deliver to try to suggest you’re not a "White supremacist"

Refute the content or you accept its factuality.

IF you are at all human, you will find that in the end HATRED will only destroy you.

Nope, hatred is necessary and good. Kill yourself, you mentally defective pile of science-denying shit.

Votescam ago

Tall -

Reported your post -- not that I think they'll do anything about you, but if anyone gets a chance to read it they feel a bit ashamed about having you as a member.

The thing about "White supremacists" is that they so fear the intelligence of the African that they have done all they can to bar them from education since the days of Slavery.

And the only tool they have to work with is VIOLENCE -- that's always been true and it's still true today.

Yet, in return, the African has risen here by PEACEFUL means against White Supremacist violence.

They are also 15% larger physically that "whites" - stronger which the "white" man has always feared. They are powerful athletes, talented musicians and artists. And, as educational opportunities have been opened up for them, they are becoming our scientists and our scholars.

My advice is to check your skin color against a sheet of white paper ... There is no such thing as "white."

Tallest_Skil ago

Reported your post

For what, exactly?

they feel a bit ashamed about having you as a member.

How about you have an actual argument, kiddo?

The thing about “White supremacists" is that they so fear the intelligence of the African

Uh… no. You know absolutely nothing whatsoever about any of the topics you’re failing to discuss and cannot reply to or refute any of the points I have brought up. Do not speak on a topic when you know nothing about it, but ask any questions you need TO learn about said topic.

Bone up. Start with those.

that they have done all they can to bar them from education

Complete falsehood in every capacity. You have no evidence for this claim or any other. It is definitively proven false here.

since the days of Slavery.

You mean white slavery? You know, the thing that continues to this day and was always larger in volume than black slavery? Or do you mean black on black slavery, which also continues to this day? Speak up. We need clarification.

And the only tool they have to work with is VIOLENCE

Objective universal scientific truth works, too.

that’s always been true and it’s still true today.

Not really, no.

the African has risen here by PEACEFUL means

In no way, shape, or form is that accurate, and your sheer divorce from reality draws you into considerable suspect.

White Supremacist violence.

Which doesn’t exist, statistically, and is nonexistent compared to black on white violence.

They are also 15% larger physically that “whites"

This is also scientifically false.

stronger

Except no black will ever win a weightlifting competition, as white muscle and bone are denser than that of blacks.

They are powerful athletes

They run quickly. Only those who run quickly can escape predators on the savannah. They have large lungs and flared nostrils because they need more oxygen to run quickly. They can’t handle being far above sea level, though, which is interesting.

talented musicians

No.

artists

No.

And, as educational opportunities have been opened up for them, they are becoming our scientists and our scholars.

No.

My advice is to check your skin color against a sheet of white paper

My advice is to have an actual argument, you racist sack of shit.

There is no such thing as “white.”

There is such a thing as people of color, though.

Gee. What ELSE have you been lied to about…?

Votescam ago

Again, thank you for your posts which reveal your obsessions as a "White Supremacist" ...

Keep at it -- !!

Yes, there is such a thing as "people of color" -- and they are not "white."

ROFL

Tallest_Skil ago

Reported for admitting to supporting the genocide of an entire race and for openly undermining pizza gate and its purpose.

your obsessions as a “White Supremacist"

Prove your claim or don’t make it.

Yes, there is such a thing as “people of color" -- and they are not "white."

Prove your claim or don’t make it. You have been proven wrong.

Votescam ago

You're now on ignore--

Tallest_Skil ago

  1. Cry harder, bitch.
  2. YOU HAVE NO REFUTATION TO ANYTHING THAT I STATED.
  3. YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY OF YOUR CLAIMS.
  4. Thanks for admitting I am right.