Relevancy: Again, this goes to the heart of Pizzagate because it's revealed in that Wikileaks email drop. This proves the MO of The Cannibal Elite of winning through blackmail. All the major players: HRC, Pedosta, etc. were involved.
For all those diehards and conspiracy theorists concocting new theories about Sanders, Julian Assange has made it pretty clear with this tweetful reminder:
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/904355180933734400
This isn't in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some
leverage, would be good to flag this for him.
Sanders was in agreement to lose. He was enlisted to put on a dog and pony show. The old fool got his ego inflated by the numbers and realization that he could win. Does anyone ever win against The Cannibal Queen and her minions? I think not.
It's why this gentle reminder went out to all the major players (original email):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397#efmAAAAB2
From: Christina Reynolds creynolds@hillaryclinton.com
Date: May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM EDT
To: Robby Mook re47@hillaryclinton.com, Kristina Schake <
[email protected]>, Jennifer Palmieri <
[email protected]>, Tony Carrk tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com,
John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com, Oren Shur oshur@hillaryclinton.com,
Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
Subject: FW: Sanders criticism
Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.)
Reynolds plays enforcer here. Sanders went over the line and "criticized" HRC. How dare he? But, again, IT'S WHAT HE AGREED TO. This wasn't a surprise. He was supposed to play ball and paid the penalties. So all his supporters being refused seats? It's what their candidate was in full agreement with.
Sanders is a tool. He was there to pull numbers away from the GOP and pretend to be an antagonist to HRC. At the last minute, he was to throw his support to her, the logic being, his followers would follow orders.
Gee, I wonder what kind of blackmail they could have had?
'nough said.
view the rest of the comments →
Votescam ago
GH --
That's completely untrue.
Sanders united this liberal nation in the understanding that it is immensely liberal -- and that there is HUGE support for the liberal issues which Bernie raised -- from student loans and usary, to National Health Care for All and everything in between.
Not something that the DP nor the GOP would want to see happen, obviously.
Bernie made clear that HILLARY was not qualified to be president because of her support for corporatism and the WEALTH she was receiving from corporations for "speeches."
Nothing could be clearer than that we are being governed by the insane, including those heading up our MIC/NSA.
Capitalism is suicidal.
This_Ruined_Pizza ago
Hillary committed felonies at the expense of the American taxpayer and he was in the best position in the world to truly expose what she did to those with ignorance that blocks reason. But he didn't. Just like Trump, he balked and denounced the server/email investigation. If he wanted her gone, that's the one thing that could have done it.
Instead of denouncing Comey's statement, he consigned it.
Do you simply not understand the gravity of that? Do you not realize that should have nailed her? Read his statements. Look up the statutes.
Votescam ago
If there were known "felonies" then it wasn't up to Sanders, it was up to DOJ, not Sanders. Server/email stuff is also up to FBI/DOJ. Sanders didn't "denounce" them, but he did make clear they were a distraction in the debates/the primary. At that point, not too many Americans really understood what the whole "server/email" stuff was about.
Yes, of course, Sanders is pretty much a G-Man and it was all up to him ... Grab those bracelets, Bernie, and throw Hillary into one of those nice orange jumpsuits.
LOL
This_Ruined_Pizza ago
You're an idiot. If he wanted to win, that was his golden ticket. Review Comey's statement and match the crime to the statute. Felony upon felony. Stop being willfully retarded.