Relevancy: Again, this goes to the heart of Pizzagate because it's revealed in that Wikileaks email drop. This proves the MO of The Cannibal Elite of winning through blackmail. All the major players: HRC, Pedosta, etc. were involved.
For all those diehards and conspiracy theorists concocting new theories about Sanders, Julian Assange has made it pretty clear with this tweetful reminder:
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/904355180933734400
This isn't in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some
leverage, would be good to flag this for him.
Sanders was in agreement to lose. He was enlisted to put on a dog and pony show. The old fool got his ego inflated by the numbers and realization that he could win. Does anyone ever win against The Cannibal Queen and her minions? I think not.
It's why this gentle reminder went out to all the major players (original email):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397#efmAAAAB2
From: Christina Reynolds creynolds@hillaryclinton.com
Date: May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM EDT
To: Robby Mook re47@hillaryclinton.com, Kristina Schake <
[email protected]>, Jennifer Palmieri <
[email protected]>, Tony Carrk tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com,
John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com, Oren Shur oshur@hillaryclinton.com,
Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
Subject: FW: Sanders criticism
Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.)
Reynolds plays enforcer here. Sanders went over the line and "criticized" HRC. How dare he? But, again, IT'S WHAT HE AGREED TO. This wasn't a surprise. He was supposed to play ball and paid the penalties. So all his supporters being refused seats? It's what their candidate was in full agreement with.
Sanders is a tool. He was there to pull numbers away from the GOP and pretend to be an antagonist to HRC. At the last minute, he was to throw his support to her, the logic being, his followers would follow orders.
Gee, I wonder what kind of blackmail they could have had?
'nough said.
view the rest of the comments →
srayzie ago
I'm surprised that there are so many supporters here that support Bernie Sanders, considering the fact that we are against the torture of children. This isn't about politics. This is about children. Bernie Sanders supports partial birth abortion.
How can anyone be ok with partial birth abortion? For those of you who do not know what that is, I am providing a description. This procedure is done when a fetus is 5 months along all the way up until 9 months along. A baby that would be viable outside of the womb is murdered. There is no other way to describe it.
I'm sure there will be a lot of people that disagree with me. I already know that Hillary was for the same thing. But, this discussion is about Bernie Sanders. I could never support somebody that is ok with this procedure. If a baby is viable outside of the womb, then the woman's health doesn't even play a part because either way, the baby is delivered. A baby that is stabbed in the back of the neck and has their spinal cord cut sounds like pure torture to me. Especially as the baby gets closer to maturity.
Description of Partial Birth Abortion
Bernie Sanders on Abortion
Abortion in all nine months of pregnancy
Supporting and expanding Planned Parenthood
Letting babies suffer during and after abortion
https://archive.is/vignd
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Bernie_Sanders.htm
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/partial+birth+abortion
RweSure ago
There's no medical procedure named partial birth abortion.
Tallest_Skil ago
Shill for murderous kikes harder, please.
srayzie ago
Is late term abortion better for you? If not, then how about we just call it murder. Because that's what it is.