Relevancy: Again, this goes to the heart of Pizzagate because it's revealed in that Wikileaks email drop. This proves the MO of The Cannibal Elite of winning through blackmail. All the major players: HRC, Pedosta, etc. were involved.
For all those diehards and conspiracy theorists concocting new theories about Sanders, Julian Assange has made it pretty clear with this tweetful reminder:
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/904355180933734400
This isn't in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some
leverage, would be good to flag this for him.
Sanders was in agreement to lose. He was enlisted to put on a dog and pony show. The old fool got his ego inflated by the numbers and realization that he could win. Does anyone ever win against The Cannibal Queen and her minions? I think not.
It's why this gentle reminder went out to all the major players (original email):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397#efmAAAAB2
From: Christina Reynolds creynolds@hillaryclinton.com
Date: May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM EDT
To: Robby Mook re47@hillaryclinton.com, Kristina Schake <
[email protected]>, Jennifer Palmieri <
[email protected]>, Tony Carrk tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com,
John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com, Oren Shur oshur@hillaryclinton.com,
Brian Fallon bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
Subject: FW: Sanders criticism
Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.)
Reynolds plays enforcer here. Sanders went over the line and "criticized" HRC. How dare he? But, again, IT'S WHAT HE AGREED TO. This wasn't a surprise. He was supposed to play ball and paid the penalties. So all his supporters being refused seats? It's what their candidate was in full agreement with.
Sanders is a tool. He was there to pull numbers away from the GOP and pretend to be an antagonist to HRC. At the last minute, he was to throw his support to her, the logic being, his followers would follow orders.
Gee, I wonder what kind of blackmail they could have had?
'nough said.
view the rest of the comments →
Jobew1 ago
This is petty stuff. Pg goes beyond the phony left right paradigm. Btw ur assuming a lot to think assange is 100%
quantokitty ago
Thanks so much for your comments.
I don't believe Assange is 100%; I believe the emails because these are The Cannibal Elite's own words. No false narrative here. How do you think #pizzagate got started?
And the fixing of a presidential election through blackmail is never petty.
carmencita ago
There is a difference between a blackmail and a threat. There seems to be a vendetta going on here. I have been very fair regarding Trump. There have been many shills on here posting about his rape of a girl and his associations with Epstein. I have not posted anything in regards to him being guilty of such because I know that there is much out there in the media that will try to take down anyone that has run or will run as a candidate. I have always said he is our President and I am willing to give him a chance. This is the second posting insinuating that Bernie Sanders has reason to be branded as a pedophile. I also think it is pretty obvious that the upvoats are from Trump supporters and some Shills from Brock that will try to take Bernie down, for they know that he may be running again next time around. I will continue being fair but am disappointed at those that have joined in this pummeling and rock throwing and also such a nasty accusation and insinuation of pedophilia. I am sorry I have even had to write this.
quantokitty ago
Where is the email on Trump? Where is the DNC calling out Trump during the election and discussing he needs to be pulled back in line because he broke an agreement and that they need to remind him by using "leverage".
You can believe what you want. Bernie is dirty. He's dirty to have formed this agreement with the DNC, and dirty for duping people into believing they had a choice.
Your opinion is always welcome even when you don't agree.