You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

wecanhelp ago

I've said this before, but I really feel that instead of fragmenting this effort, you and @RebelSkum of pizzagate.wiki (and possibly others as well) should cooperate to build the mother of all summaries that can then be kept updated by more than a single person, and shared as the "canonical" link of Pizzagate evidence everywhere. A wiki is inherently a better platform to build such a collaborative summary (with its peer reviews, versioning history, easy reverts, and familiarity to regular internet users), and the resulting summary could be posted and stickied here as a Link post so that the Voat community can still vet and discuss it, which is pretty much the best of both worlds, I think. Just my two cents, but I would certainly like to see an "official" site for all this that is not pizzagate.com (here's why). The only downside I see to this is putting all the eggs in one basket, but to my knowledge RebelSkum has made sure that there are robust backups of the wiki, and the summary article can (and should) also be backed up by independent users for redundancy.

RebelSkum ago

Fantastic idea and you mentioned just about all the reasons Wikis can help with that. I could set up an Executive Summary page and include bits or all of it to the front page as well so it's all compartmentalized.

wecanhelp ago

@Millennial_Falcon, how do you feel about this? Could you guys set up a small working group of trusted editors, and maintain the summary collaboratively on the wiki?

Millennial_Falcon ago

Not a bad idea. I don't think I personally have the time for the deliberation/discussion that would be involved in a fully collaborative effort right now, but I would be glad to include a link to a good wiki at the top of my summary.