did you guys see now the site has a note that he died? so weird.

or we focus on the children

Lol a Wordpress website with copy pasted material for 12k

Looks like it's no longer for sale - http://pizzagate.com

Maybe an atty that is a skull and bones? How about the image of the victim BELONGS TO THE VICTIM, Fuckface? Who asked you to do the work? Your soul did so bill it, if you still have one! Everytime you peer into the abyss, it peers back into you.

What needs be done is expose them for being every bit as evil and disgusting as the pedos themselves and do everything possible to completely block them from voat. And of course go full lulz on them. What's your name? Who's your momma? What's your number? Where do you bank? Who's your landlord? Join any clubs? Back to ya momma, she got a sister? Remember when your web page would load? heh heh heh

You want to profit off of murdered children?

He ( @pizzagateDOTcom ) stated that he had to buy the domainname for what i can remember something like $1.250,-. Like i said, if he can deliver proof of that and want to keep the domain in our comunity, things can be done i think.

For some it sounds silly that this domain was already taken and if sold that it would be sold for this amount. But to be fair, i think it is not strange. When domain trade is one of your side business the "gate" name can be profitable. For example, what if there came out a scandal from domino pizzas that was given the # #PizzaGate It can be for a business like that with that amount of advertising budget a cheap "protection" to buy that domain before it is getting a company scandal page.

Here https://www.pheenix.com are the current auctions of domain names that were registered but are not extended. Before they come on free market, interests have a opportunity to get it before it gets on open market. I have bought by this way a domain that i wanted/needed for years. There where already bids on it, so i had to bid because it would not get on free market. I gladly won the bid.

But look at the sometimes strangest names people have registered in the past

This is really flattering and all, but @altnewshost, @AngryTurd, @boxingHelenahhh, @breakdancerbb, @communityleader, @concernedMother, @cumwithme, @deltaniner, @dominoesonpizza, @downwithcomet, @fearisnotanoption, @FREESYRIA, @GarlifieldsFriend, @getOFFmyKID, @greatperson, @hitlerdidnothing, @Im-with-him, @JesusWillSaveUs, @OnMyRag, @realjustice, @rodeoclown, @seriousDude, @SGTsteve, @stickit, @suicideWatch, @SweetBBQguy, @WhiteNigger, @wizeman, and possibly more are all accounts just a few hours old, registered exclusively to comment aggressively on this topic, and they seem to all be heavily pushing the agenda of a lawsuit against pizzagateDOTcom. This is most accounts in this comment thread. See my observations of downwithcomet. I'm suspecting that this is both to discourage sharing the results of investigation on the web in the future, and to hijack the focus and resources of the community and make us invest in a lawsuit that has nothing to do with the original investigation, potentially providing grounds for the media to smear us for it.

@RebelSkum, FYI. This might be worth a bold edit in the post. Don't let the community feed the fire shills are trying to start.

I've banned the users from the subverse.

Shill much? With a 9-hour-old account

• commenting obsessively and exclusively on this single submission to keep the focus on a thread that doesn't further the main threads of the investigation;
• encouraging keeping the "links of alefantis abusing children" that "belong to us" to ourselves, repeatedly referring to them as "our research" to stop the spreading of our links;
• encouraging a lawsuit against the user to set a precedent for people spreading links that are results of the research on here;
• trying to hijack the sub with rule-violating trivia;
• trying to disrupt the community.

You're not suspicious at all.

To everyone wanting to use research conducted here somewhere else, please, by all means, do. To further that research, and to raise awareness. Just not to cash in on it.

I 100% disagree. downvoated.

Considering they started using Amazon ads today to generate revenue folks may already be able to take action to remove their content.

Thank you kindly! stay tuned

He has very obviously been compromised. All our stuff is fair use still so tgis is a distraction. Probably from Alefantis himself.

bigotry and violence is not "just trying to help". not buying it, never will.

even our deleted stuff is probably worth something on Etsy. There is some really good work hidden away in there!

"tap dance ; )" is code, right?

RebelSkum is literally the best guy on this forum. >

figurativley too.

It goes without saying many aspects of this undermine the greater community. Not very much is known about the owners of pizzagateDOTcom despite repeated contact for a few weeks, and yet almost all of the Pizzagate research sites have gotten to the point where the admins are coming together to collaborate, and yet pizzagate(dot)com are strangely absent themselves. Conveniently they are trying to make a buck off it all, though, and that could really damage us all.

The gentlemanly powerlevels in this thread of comments! Fffffuuuuuuuu!!!!!!!

if we can get him arrested before 2017 is over then we should have a pizzagate voat party>

Only problem is, there won't be any popcorn left.

stay tuned

Guess they started using Amazon ads today...

lol this is some good, old school high class trolling. Had me going wtf for awhile. hat tip.

um sarcasm, right?

Especially if it's still up. Now that they're getting revenue from Amazon it's definitely starting to go into a not-so-gray zone.

If anything I just speak my mind and am not afraid to start calling out BS when I see it.

I think some of my earliest comments were pretty harsh of them :P

They honestly do what they can with this pretty monumental task, so don't be afraid to speak up to one of them sometime if you think something's awry. Don't be a jerk, but don't be silent either.

Updated OP by the way. Thanks for the info!

I LOVE IT! best idea ever

i'll try to make it to my local station tomorrow! everyone should find a good lawyer, or we should get together and use one lawyer. up to you really

wtf is wrong with you?

im with you on that! Have an upvoat!

totally. his work is nothing short of perfect.

Oi... it hurts my head.

Sort of inconvenient pizzagateDOTcom archived this thread, eh?

Sure glad I archived the Flippa page too.

+100 for observation

This is actually something more interesting

To be perfectly honest I'm not exactly concerned about any direct action until the site itself sells.

@pizzagateDOTcom could also just as easily learn from the public outrage and might even be a valuable ally to the cause if "they" could channel this energy into some meaningful contributions to the community.

I'll say it now that I personally don't care for money, so as much as I'd like to entertain the legalities with you at this moment public shame seems to be doing the job just fine.

Nothing criminal or severe has been done to warrant legal action until it is proven whether or not the domain has actually been used to generate revenue (which it claims does not), but has also not yet been disproven by pizzagateDOTcom personally either.

I already run my own site, so I don't try to encroach. I do offer my support though, and have reached out to them whenever something major has happened (the Wiki getting DDoS'd, the removal of the post about it, etc.) and have always been able to get in touch with at least some of them in those cases.

Love 'em or hate 'em those mods do read our messages, praise, and complaints.

Agree there! This was by all means not an invitation to threaten someone with violence, only to inform everyone as to the potential dangers and harms of this site.

he stole my work im with you guys

Thank you very kindly, it means a lot. I'm certainly not the only one working hard at the Wiki and the whole team appreciates the support.

pizzagate is disgusting they stole my work too

So far public shaming seems to be working just fine.

By all means I don't want money, but if the site is sold I might be willing to help victims and the like publish their cases.

appreciate everything OP has done. Thank you.

This little thread just blew my mind. Thanks for the support! Accolades don't mean squat to simply having a great community to reach out to.

I'll be discussing new breakthroughs on The Higherside Chats podcast in about a week, by the by. Honestly, I just want folks to start standing up for themselves and recognize abuse in all its forms so they can also help each other.

Keep it real, Pizzagators! And may the Kek be with us!

Thanks! The support from everyone has been inspiring and I hope we can continue to kick this censored mystery's ass!

EDITED Take heart, gallows humor will save us all.

surprised that voat was chosen for this citizen issue>

not surprising when you consider there may well have been ulterior motives.

Word.

We literally have a policy in our site rules about not accepting financial awards of any kind for site material.

I have my contributors hold me to the same standards I hold them to, and that way nobody profits from our already freely-available source materials.

True, but he stated self it was not for profit. And than ask 12.500 is a contradict.

@pizzaGATEdotcom - It is indeed your right to sell it. However, IF you are invested in this project like the rest of us, giving all our free time freely, have you thought that opposition could purchase it all, and do what thou wilt with it? Seriously, what did you come here for? To work for the good or to profit? I do hope you will really think about this and change your mind re selling out

we were trying to sell

we

we

Hmmm, this is the first time you've said "we." Freudian slip? Who is this "we"? The CIA, perhaps?

I will repeat that original works are something else entirely. On top of that the claimed cost of $12,500 would make sense. Neither in this case are true, and to sell another's work as your own for gross profits is the main concern here. This was more or less an attempt to extort the Pizzagate community for cash.

What a solid post.

By submitting user content to Voat, you grant us a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, unrestricted, worldwide license...

Let me spell that out for you:

L-I-C-E-N-S-E

License is not ownership. License means they get to use the content without violating your copyright. They. As in Voat. They can decide to sublicense the content to you, but they need to do that explicitly. Unless you can prove that they had done that before your use of said content, you've been doing it without permission, and it is now clearly proven that you've been doing it for commercial purposes, which makes the violation worse.

And by the way, OP clearly mentions that some of the content you've been using is from pizzagate.wiki, where Voat's policies obviously don't apply. You essentially stole that content and used it for soliciting financial gains.

Not having received a DMCA complaint does not make copyright infringement legal.

Atleast the right information is on the website and is it not a debunk website or a empty one. And for google ranking that including the domainname is a plus for the information we try to spread atm imo.

I think it would be far more helpfull for the anti-pizzagate shills to use that domainname as a debunk website and using it to inform people (with the right) information makes no sense to me as a shill website.

I do agree that this "suspicion" @pizzagateDOTcom has brought on to himself and only he is to blame for that. If he spend money to purchase the domain and would stop working on it, he could just have done it here. Including the proof of the $ he spend to buy the domain. And if that was lets say $ 2.000,-. i think we as comunity would have raised that money within a day to release the person from the website/stress and keep it as a tool for the community.

to conclude, i do not send people to that website (do to the auction, did before that), but as long the right info is on it and keeps being updated i also do not classify it as a shill website.

I hope @pizzagateDOTcom will provide the proof of his expenses and we as community can and will take it over as a tool. I for one are for sure willing to contribute $2,- to $5,- for that. But @pizzagateDOTcom has to show solid proof of his expenses first so profit can be ruled out imo.

These aren't mods they're people that can't stand fucking dirty people like you.

I doubt making money is the point, though.

Just like Comet Ping Pong's GoFundMe campaign. Money wasn't really the goal, if you get what I mean.

This guy is full of shit.

Man you're an absolutely irritating person. You're a lost soul.

upvoat

"and to AUTHORIZE OTHERS to do so. You agree that you have the right to submit anything you post, and that your user content does not violate the copyright, trademark, trade secret or any other personal or proprietary right of any other party. "

Didn't really help the case.

Still not answering why your site cost you "$12,500", eh?

Im not associated with voat & i think your a wortless pos for trying to make a quick buck, sell your crap for cost or donate the proceeds.

People put a lot of time into their work and to have some jackass copy and paste all their work to make a DIME off this investigation is taking advantage the situation. It's just a scumbag type of move.

Let me answer a couple questions below you made last week...

" The goal was to spread pizzagate and now it's trending hard. isn't that what you wanted? "

The goal is to spread awareness not to be a snake and sell it for 10k more than you paid for especially since you plagiarized researchers work.

"What would you do? It is similar to trying to sell a haunted house, basically. It's uncomfortable either way. thanks for labeling me as an outright capitalist pig though.. that's a great way to work together"

I would sell it back for what you paid for it. The goal was to spread awareness. Also, you're putting the jeopardy of giving it to someone with a bad motive by auctioning it. Just like the shooter at CPP we don't control his actions so you using the death threat excuse is absolutely ridiculous. You're trying to say if the death threats from whoever is allegedly sending them (we have no proof) don't stop then I will sell the website that has been plagiarized for 10k dollars higher? What kind of logic is that? Just know people don't forget and lost respect for you.

Anti-capitalist? Maybe. Liberal? Not in this lifetime

Assets worth $12,500 of what, pray tell?

thanks for archiving thread with evidence of you infringing copyright -_-

Never answers question

Okay, then they can be upset I asked nothing of them to look at information they can find themselves.

Speaking of corrupt way to never explain why you were selling the site for $12,500?

Lawl, literally have only ADDED material. Backpedal?

I'm not even a mod and did this of my own accord. It literally would not exist if it didn't actually happen.

ah...and we come to a solution. Sweet.

Maybe if the mods marked anything else important around here, we could get to some more solutions.

Easily explained by it being true, well documented, and completely sourced.

Wherever there's clicks there's a jerk

It's not exactly my job to protect you from getting sued and what YOU did, but maybe start by asking the individuals in this thread: Millenial_Falcon for one, and Sliceoflife himself if you would actually lift a finger.

Maybe you should think about these things before you sell them.

No, those would be original works. You selling a t-shirt designed by someone else as your own, however, is wrong.

This is just how copyright law works. We all hate it, but it stops works from being misused without the author's consent.

Maybe people agree profiting from Pizzagate sucks

Because my mission is to help the community. Some may be hurt by this and deserve to know. I said I have no issue with use of Wiki public domain content, but when you try to make money from OTHERS' works you run into trouble (hence why I opted not to solicit donations even on our site). If you had or ARE selling the site others would be entitled to credit, compensation, or redaction of their material.

The CIA has so many side projects, it probably is media matters, working for the CIA, but only one guy at media matters knows they are a sidearm of the CIA.

Thanks again, and I appreciate your cooperation. That still doesn't explain how you arrived at your dollar figures, though. Those were pretty steep, and at the time of sale you certainly evaded any cooperation with the larger community, which I can't explain either.

Your dodging the question, you claim the proceeds of the sale are only to cover costs but cant account for $12,500 in expenses, your dealing with an educated audience here.

You are dodging the main point, which is that you have the site up for auction, with a $12,500 starting bid, no less. This completely contradicts your previous narrative that you were only trying to recover costs (the alleged $2500 you spent for the domain, a claim for which you never provided evidence, which should be available in the form of some kind of receipt). And you call US suspicious?

word.

I believe I have specified the images in question in the post, and in particular the posters you list.

I figured it pertinent to the community to know that their contributions as well might be part of any possible sale, as well as social media information which you do not own.

I simply object to the principle of making money off of Pizzagate, and the community seems to as well. Could you at least better justify the pricing and how your expenses influenced this?

Thanks for replying, but I believe there are several members of the community at large deserving of answers.

This sounds like CIA. Read the playbook

Wrong guy.

WTF is wrong with people. WHO THE FUCK would be trying to profit from this. They're almost as bad as the pedophiles themselves.

A good portion of the value (if it does sell) should be attributed to the domain. In fact the fact that it is non-original content available on open sites, that are crawlable, and predate the copy means that the content is essentially useless. I doubt anyone will pay that much on flippa.

One reason alternate reason to post on flippa is essentially to pay $17 for a site valuation. Set the minimum high and let people bid. The site is a little strange in that the poster can't see the bids.. but bidders can so you just create two accounts to see what people bid.

Sellers often drop the price when buyers bid less so buyers won't be put off by the excessive reserve and they will get the information they want.

Sounds more like someone wanting to make some quick cash.

From personal experience I can tell you this site is shady AF and not to be trusted.

Not as far as I'm aware.

Yes, it's clear that you have the moral highground.

I'm not surprised. Anytime there is money to be made, the hucksters will come. It doesn't sound like the case, but a lot of registrars run algorithms which detect search terms and rapidly escalate the price of domains for the hot ones.

Thanks for the warning

It ended without a winner. That's what it says. By the way, the advertisement on this page is strange and about butt plugs 🤔

you pinged IsThisGameOfThrones? Not sure I understand what you are saying.

What a POS. This is some really scummy shit.

So, pizzagate is now being monetized?

bronwynne, you can ask him by putting an @ in front of his name - it goes to the persons PM (private messages) @isthisgameofthrones - could you please deny, or confirm, that you had anything do to with this. Heads up to keep possible false rumors from starting.

Stay critical. Every bit helps.

Seems like a genuine enough and decent guy. You can listen to an interview with him on the Higherside Chats, and if anything he is a bit alarming, but I feel he is honest and stands to lose more by supporting pizzagate than he would have gained by toeing the line.

No no no. Ryan where are you?

I couldn't believe it when i saw it was for sale, what a snake. Copyright infringement class action suit for sure.

Stay frosty, faekitty!

upvoated this lonely post because I think it smells really fishy... I noticed the site had many, many broken links about a few weeks ago, but I didnt think anything of it.

Makes sense now.

I made a post about this on the 19th, but it was deleted by mods: http://imgur.com/a/5O0EE

I'm flairing this as IMPORTANT because pizzagate.com has essentially been acting as an official page for raising awareness of Pizzagate, and has enjoyed many users' trust, especially right before the inauguration, before caught in the demonstrated profiteering effort.

I'd also like to add a few sources of interest to the story.

@pizzagateDOTcom, the owner of pizzagate.com

• admittedly based pizzagate.com on @Millennial_Falcon's summary sticky;
• claimed that they don't trust anybody for owning the domain other than Donald J. Trump, then proceeded with the auction hoping to sell to the highest bidder whomever that may be;
• claimed that their sole purpose was to get their initial investment of $2500 back and abandon ship as fast as possible, before they specified $12,500 as the smallest bid increment on the domain auction;
• deleted each and every comment on the auction page.

Pizzagate.com is not considered trusted on this subverse anymore, and will be marked as a security risk whenever it comes up. Please ping me or another mod if you see the link posted somewhere.

Edit: @altnewshost, @AngryTurd, @boxingHelenahhh, @breakdancerbb, @communityleader, @concernedMother, @cumwithme, @deltaniner, @dominoesonpizza, @downwithcomet, @fearisnotanoption, @FREESYRIA, @GarlifieldsFriend, @getOFFmyKID, @greatperson, @hitlerdidnothing, @Im-with-him, @JesusWillSaveUs, @OnMyRag, @realjustice, @rodeoclown, @seriousDude, @SGTsteve, @stickit, @suicideWatch, @SweetBBQguy, @WhiteNigger, @wizeman, and possibly more are all accounts just a few hours old, registered exclusively to comment aggressively on this topic, and they seem to all be heavily pushing the agenda of a lawsuit against pizzagateDOTcom. This is most accounts in this comment thread. See my observations of downwithcomet. I'm suspecting that this is both to discourage sharing the results of investigation on the web in the future, and to hijack the focus and resources of the community and make us invest in a lawsuit that has nothing to do with the original investigation, potentially providing grounds for the media to smear us for it.

I've banned the users from the subverse.

He also took most of his material directly from my summary without attribution.

Edit: Also, whereas he previously claimed he was motivated by death threats, the fact that he's selling the site to the highest bidder, with a minimum bid of $12,500, proves that his motive is money. Who has that kind of money to dish out for a website? Well, James Alefantis, John Podesta, and Hillary Clinton, for starters.