I already addressed the trucking company stuff, and you pretty much debunked it yourself with the followup tweet. Way to debunk yourself. Congrats, I guess?

Great, you now know of two jews with Simonsen as the last name. Since you can't prove any sort of familial ties to Lauren, it's irrelevant at the moment. If you've got something, why blow your wad this early? It's wasted effort, not unless you're narrative driving and trying to assassinate someone's character.

It counts severely against her and the image she seeks to present, and is deceptive, and it adds up. And the term is accurate. It is very weird to focus on that term.

Everything women do is deceptive. From the way they shape their eyebrows, to how they pluck hair from their bodies, to the makeup they use, to wearing clothing that shape their bodies different ways. If we go past aesthetics, we see that in how they try play hypergamy too and the little games they play to get there. Women need a strong hand to guide them. Implying that because she's deceptive, it might make her a jew is retarded.

Furthermore, it's always been the vampires who push nigger culture onto white people. Using the terms they want pushed on us does a disservice to whites.

coal burner;

Yes, that's highly likely given her past, but it doesn't make her a jew.

It counts very much against her, and it adds up, for it fits well with liberal Jews.

Again, being a coal burner doesn't make her a jew. It doesn't add up to anything other than her being a coal burner. All types of women are coal burners.

Why do you think I wrote "partial or full Jewish descendance"? The Jews have spread their heritage considerably more than merely those who are officially Jewish or purely Jewish by blood. And even for extremely Christian people in Scandinavia (such as arch-bishops) it was and is very common not to take a Christian surname but to keep the existing ones. Yes, there are people of non-Jewish or very little Jewish descendance that have that surname; but it is as far as I can tell much more prevalent among Jews. A very notable example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Simonsen.

From what I can find online, there are about two thousand more Simonsen's than there are vampires in Denmark. There are a lot of surnames that mean "son of" in the country with much higher numbers. (Just squashing the "son of" means "jew" argument here.) You're claiming it's prevalent among Jews due to ONE notable person who was a vampire, having that surname. You're jumping the shark here.

Oh no, someone wants to milk money from pathetic beta orbiters [emphasized]. That doesn't make them jewish.

Hmmm... seeking to shame and humiliate, seeking to defend wretched exploitation, typical roastie talking point, etc....

A fool and their money are easily departed. Many of those who give her money are doing so because she's pretty and she'll pay them attention if they give her enough money for it. It's beta orbiter mindset. People allow themselves to be exploited every day. Many people who are wage slaves and then complain about how little they make, are being exploited by their own actions.

I feel no sympathy for these people. I shouldn't need to or have to. They bring this upon themselves and do little to change it. There will always be people who are there, ready to take their money. That doesn't make them a jew, it just means they have some business acumen.

her grandparents fled from the natsoc occupation of Denmark to Canada (she claims it has something with their claimed company supposedly being seized);

It's interesting how you choose to believe what parts of what she states. You believe her when she says her parents grandparents fled Denmark, but you don't believe the part about the company being seized. If she's such a crypto jew, why believe any of it? It's also interesting how you ignore that history, that Nazi's targeted people besides jews.

I am getting a strong impression that you are not being the slightest bit sincere. And you use several tactics and tricks here.

Look at you, using shady tricks to not address the point I made. You have no refutation, so now you're trying to impugn my character. You can't even attempt to do both, which would at least not call into question your sincerity.

she seemingly tweeted in support of nazbol (https://mobile.twitter.com/lauren_southern/status/879390263617224705).

Context is needed here. It could be a joke, it could be her support.

Downtalking and diluting? Really?

And she has spoken in the defense of (((Spencer))), who doubtlessly is controlled opposition, and whom himself has promoted nazbol if I recall correctly (there used to be tweets of those I recall, but if they were there, they seem to have been deleted...).

You're not addressing the lack of context. You're saying she's doing the same thing that Richard Spencer did. That's not a real argument. I don't know the term for it, but you're merely shifting it around trying to conflate a bunch of separate instances as the same thing. Context is always key in these matters. Address the context, or drop it.

And she smells from miles away of controlled opposition.

It's possible, but you haven't give any strong proof that she is. For the record, you're claiming things like dying her hair, and fucking niggers, makes her a jew. If that makes someone jewish, well, there's a lot more jews around you than you've realized.

And now you are misrepresenting my claims and arguments on purpose and using other tricks and tactics.

I haven't misrepresented your claims at all. You're trying to say that fucking niggers, and being a woman who manages her looks in ways that many women do, implies that she's a vampire. "It adds up" is a phrase you've often used.

Irrelevant wall of text

That's nice. It adds nothing to the discussion.

The only reason I am not convinced that you are not a shill

Don't worry, I'm convinced you're one, I'm just not sure which side or sides you're representing. There's too many of you here on Voat, but you never change your tactics.

is that it is true there is no clear proof of her being Jewish or partially Jewish that I am aware of, despite the very many indications of it and things pointing in that direction,

Like dying her hair, fucking niggers, and taking advantage of lonely men who seek attention from attractive women. That would make a lot more people jewish than you realize if we were to use these as suspicious tools to go jew hunting. Even if we remove the nigger fucking part, it's a great way to drive a wedge between white people. "Oh no girl, you died your hair, and you run a business, are you sure you aren't jewish?"

I am uncertain why you require proof of her being Jewish or partially Jewish instead of acknowledging that there are several things pointing in that direction. Why not talk in probability? Requiring proof whenever there's suspicion instead of acknowledging any genuinely suspicious aspects hinders investigation and makes it more difficult and slower to react and defend against various threats.

There was at least a years long smear campaign against her, concocted by the JIDF, against her on half chan /pol/. All of the evidence you used against her to say point out that she's jewish, or now that you've shifted goal posts completely, possibly jewish, is the same shit they used. There were, at any given moment, 3 threads against her. It was annoying to say the least because these topics were always at the top.

So, shill, you need better information than hair dying, nigger fucking, and business running, to indicate that someone is jewish. Everyone conveniently forgets her DNA test that shows no jewish DNA.

I don't care if requiring proof slows down research into a person. What if it was you that was having their character publicly assassinated? Better yet, what if you were being investigated for a real crime? Wouldn't you rather they have more concrete proof than the flimsy at best evidence you've provided? Requiring something more concrete doesn't stop you from doing what you're already doing, all it does is open you to more public ridicule if you publish too early. That's entirely on you.

And while I can respect rejecting claims with "I have not seen any proof of it", that is very different from seemingly seeking to strongly discourage even investigation and suspicion of her being Jewish, partially Jewish or greatly favouring Jews and their ways.

There you go again, conflating one idea with another, to drive into the readers mind that I'm somehow trying to derail investigations by requiring substantial evidence.

For the suspecting reading looking upon this, keep in mind every bit of evidence the shill provided, is the same evidence that the JIDF has long used to assassinate her character and claim she is a vampire. All he's doing is changing the script slightly to say, "partial jewish" (which still makes her jewish), or a zionist supporter. All this is, is a slight change to the script to include a more broad scope.