You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Well, well, well. Isn't this interesting...

Here, @EsotericShade claims he's so ignorant of technology (a "retard") he had to make all these alts because passwords are too hard to remember.

But eight months ago, here he is having a conversation about how to use VPNs to game the voting system. Doesn't sound too tech ignorant here, now does he?

@Crensch, you might want to add this to the OP.

Incidentally, that thread shows him using multiple alts to try to take over a rule discussion, voting multiple times via different accounts and even bitching when Crensch missed votes that weren't made as top level comments that would be seen in his notifications. Lots of brigading, too. Here are three of them talking to each other, pushing the idea the mod team is run by intelligence operatives.

There are multiple comments by him in that thread as ES, rarepeeks, twistedmac11, dragonkiller and others concern trolling the idea that the rule discussion is some kind of trap created by Crensch to get people's names on a hit list -- he simultaneously votes multiple times and tries to scare other people away from letting their voice be heard. It's rather appalling how glaring it is in this thread, actually.

@think- @EricKaliberhall @kevdude

MadWorld ago

He just keeps on digging this mess deeper...

My apology for coming here late, I was busy with my own stuff and some testing on the preview site. You are a great researcher and should be able to handle with preserving the evidence. If necessary, you could send me a set of usernames, and/or a set of search terms, and an optional time frame to search with. I can keep those comment histories separated by username or have them combined. If you like it raw, I can also dump the pdf file with all comments currently archived. Those comments only go back as far as it was initially viewable, not the complete comment history of the account.

Theoretically, I could go back to find older comments. But it is not nice to Voat's resource. So it should be avoided at all cost.

Vindicator ago

Don't worry, MadWorld. We're having a lot of fun showing ES the working end of the endoscope. ;-) We don't need to tax Voat's servers, especially when the guy's cronies are already trying to shut Voat down. We can do it the old fashioned way.

If you like it raw

Heh. How can I say no to that?