First off, @ESOTERICshade is @rarepeeks. This is not a joke. Yes, there are loads of archives and image backups that will never be deleted, should he disappear or delete.
Why is this a problem? Manufacturing consensus and vote manipulation. Other users never seem to push ESOTERIC's narrative, just his alts.
Here he is lying about his intentions in order to make his main username seem reasonable while his alts attack Vindicator.
How about voting on major changes to the subverse? His main username was ALL OVER that thread, and made THAT vote in some Crensched nest, but here's his alt's vote.
You know how the pedophiles we all want dead mock those around them by hinting at what they're really doing by admitting to something smaller?
Here he is admitting to being @smurfy69, innocently UPVOTING comments not because they were good, admitting to upvoting himself, where he has upvoted 422 times and downvoted 127 times on ONE account. Does anyone REALLY think he isn't brigading? Oh wait, Here's RAREPEEKS (ALSO ESOTERIC) numbers at 725 upvoted and 354 downvoted
@Puttitout, please see the above paragraph.
You'll also notice BOTH Esoteric and his smurfy69 account commenting in this concern troll thread by @ArtificalDuality -- both claiming to have suffered torture from directed energy weapons. Exactly the kind of LARPy concern troll bullshit known liar and drama queen @Jem777 was posting before Vindicator banned her - and she's also helping push it in this thread. You'll also find twistedmac11 joining in there.
@twistedmac11 seems more than a little invested in ESOTERICshade keeping his good name. And he always, always, always, always, JFC always, fuck... shows up to defend or agree with ESOTERIC. No, that's not everything. That's a very, VERY small fraction, yes, it's all archived and saved.
How much of what you see here has been shaped by him? Does any legitimate user really agree with him, or does he just groom new users into being his cheerleaders when he and his alts do their dirty work?
Here's @DeathtoMasonsASAP somehow finding a deeply-nested comment to respond to, and has that typical ESOTERIC-style Vindicator hate found on a verified alt here, here, and here.
Here's ES lying again about him thinking the rest of the mods are "cool" while attacking one. It's usually either that, or thinking all the mods are awful except one. Never really seems to commit one way or the other. Always has to pretend to be on the side of one of the mods, like this cringey shit where he tries to brown-nose kevdude.
I'm sure everyone now knows that the colloquially known "Donkey" is also @auralsects. What do you make of this where @auralsects responds where @ESOTERICshade should have? No, ES did NOT respond to that on the correct username at all, even after the fact. And who in their right mind would say this? Here he is talking about Donkey's JOB; who in their right minds would say THAT?
There are more usernames being researched, but what do you all see in these links?
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2608242/13143338?=20
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2767239 (notice the difference in votes, and how useless his comment really is - somebody got a new toy and wanted to play with it)
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2490837 (10? 17? really?)
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2591260/13026383 (organic?)
https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2569662
Feel free to ping all those users you know that are friendly to this pedophile-protecting D&C shill. I fully intend to put every single one of them under the microscope, along with anyone that attacks my mods.
This is why you have a MASSIVE asshole as an [O] mod. THIS is why I'm not nice to you. THIS is why I don't do daily mod duties here. THIS is why your mods want me where I am. THIS is the avalanche I created just by picking a fight with your loudest blowhard member that almost none of you called out. THIS IS WHAT I DO. And to all of you that even look at my goddamned mods sideways without a VERY good reason:
No more Mr. Nice Crensch.
EDIT
@twistedmac11 got flustered and lied about never supporting anyone trying to destroy the subverse, prompting @Vindicator to dig this one up.
EDIT 2
@Vindicator made the comment below about ESOTERIC's bullshit:
Here, @EsotericShade claims he's so ignorant of technology (a "retard") he had to make all these alts because passwords are too hard to remember.
But eight months ago, here he is having a conversation about how to use VPNs to game the voting system. Doesn't sound too tech ignorant here, now does he?
Incidentally, that thread shows him using multiple alts to try to take over a rule discussion, voting multiple times via different accounts and even bitching when Crensch missed votes that weren't made as top level comments that would be seen in his notifications. Lots of brigading, too. Here are three of them talking to each other, pushing the idea the mod team is run by intelligence operatives.
There are multiple comments by him in that thread as ES, rarepeeks, twistedmac11, dragonkiller and others concern trolling the idea that the rule discussion is some kind of trap created by Crensch to get people's names on a hit list -- he simultaneously votes multiple times and tries to scare other people away from letting their voice be heard. It's rather appalling how glaring it is in this thread, actually.
view the rest of the comments →
Crensch ago
@Vindicator @think- @srayzie @EricKaliberhall @kevdude
I trust there are no issues with me posting this given the amount of manipulation of this subverse that has gone one just form what's shown above?
think- ago
Well, we always said that proven shill activity would adhere to Rule 4, so I'm fine with it.
Especially, since I was able to see myself during the last couple days what Esoteric did when I went through his comment histories, and those of his alts.
I have a reputation to uphold of being impartial, but I must say that in this case, I was really shocked to see what this man has done. Unbelievable.
@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock @Kevdude @Srayzie
EricKaliberhall ago
This submission should be stickied for a long time... Maybe a 'important' flair as well.
think- ago
Thanks for the suggestion, done. ;-)
auralsects ago
At least for me (idgaf about Esoteric) This is blatant defamation of character with no basis, i.e. slander.
I've never even done any shill activity; I simply have unpopular opinions. My alts were literally the same name.
Great shame on you, vile slut
Vindicator ago
In your dreams Donkey. Too bad you forgot to log out of your "oral sex" account when replying in the first person here. You've been running your little joke on folks in here long enough. It's over.
auralsects ago
Are you retarded?
If you accuse 2 people of being just 1 based on an allegedly shared behavior you can FULLY EXPECT one of them to point out they don't actually share that behavior. That's NOT a suspicious 'doth protest too much.'
You're employing the exact same illogical bullshit that @srayzie did in accusing me of being Equineluvr:
Unlike her you're not merely a stupid overconfident woman; you are a literal kike and shill, which is why YOU show up out of nowhere to defend JEWS every single time.
Talk about exposing yourself, faggot, LMAO!
You don't even believe that bullshit; you're just gaslighting the other dumb cunts who infest this sub. You are transparent, KIKE!
Vindicator ago
Nice attempt to muddle the facts, "Donkey". I didn't base anything on "shared behavior." :-) Unfortunately for you, I based it on your very own words:
You were replying to an accusation made to ESOTERIC. In the first person.
Now why would Donkey try to defend himself against a claim made about Esoteric, unless they are the same person?
Y'all done fucked up, as liars and fakes are wont to do. :-)
@Crensch @think- @srayzie @EricKaliberhall
srayzie ago
I’m curious too. What’s really confusing tho is that he replied with the personality of donkey. Not the personality of ESO.
ESOTERICshade ago
Of all people on this planet, you should know that i'm not the Donkey.
srayzie ago
I don’t think you are Donkey. I’ve said that.
ESOTERICshade ago
You are correct. I am not the Donk.
Vindicator ago
Interesting how ES refers to Donkey with the definitive article, here and further above...almost as if he were a character in a script...
@kevdude @Crensch @think- @srayzie
Crensch ago
Can't say I could see myself using "the" when referring to someone I wasn't.
"I am not the Putt"
And his shortening of "donkey" to "donk" is also a little strange. Two letters, why? Something I would maybe do to a buddy's name IRL just to fuck around, but in almost any other setting I can think of? Nah.
If I were a low-IQ faggot, I might refer to my own alt account in such a way.
Vindicator ago
If I were a shitty novelist writing a pulp fiction thriller, it's the kind of thing I'd have my alcoholic, cocky-but-despairing Spook obstacle character brag about to his buddies in a bar after work: "I unleashed the Donk on srayzie and had her typing all afternoon..." Next scene would be him staring at the ceiling fan in his shitty DC apartment, looking at her Twitter pic and wondering if she wears a translucent peignoir when she tucks in her kids.
"...the Donk." LMAO.