You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

@Vindicator @think- @srayzie @EricKaliberhall @kevdude

I trust there are no issues with me posting this given the amount of manipulation of this subverse that has gone one just form what's shown above?

think- ago

Well, we always said that proven shill activity would adhere to Rule 4, so I'm fine with it.

Especially, since I was able to see myself during the last couple days what Esoteric did when I went through his comment histories, and those of his alts.

I have a reputation to uphold of being impartial, but I must say that in this case, I was really shocked to see what this man has done. Unbelievable.

@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock @Kevdude @Srayzie

twistedmac11 ago

I can agree that it was proven that @ESOTERICshade has @rarepeeks as an alt. But how was it proven that I'm an alt? I only have twistedmac11.

Serious question: how would I go about proving that I'm not an alt? Especially when it seems that it's already been decided that I am without any real proof?

think- ago

Edit: 2 hours later and I'm still waiting on an answer.

Mods have real lives, too, @twistedmac. Just in again. I will go through your comment history in the next couple hours, and tell you why I thought that there might be truth to the conclusion @Crensch came to. Maybe you would like to reply then. I noticed that you use different wording than Esoteric in general, but some of your wording seems to have been very similar.

In the meantime, I would like to suggest that users simply go to your comment history, so that they will be able to draw their own conclusions - whatever they might be.

twistedmac11 ago

I'm interested to see what you decide.