First off, @ESOTERICshade is @rarepeeks. This is not a joke. Yes, there are loads of archives and image backups that will never be deleted, should he disappear or delete.
Why is this a problem? Manufacturing consensus and vote manipulation. Other users never seem to push ESOTERIC's narrative, just his alts.
Here he is lying about his intentions in order to make his main username seem reasonable while his alts attack Vindicator.
How about voting on major changes to the subverse? His main username was ALL OVER that thread, and made THAT vote in some Crensched nest, but here's his alt's vote.
You know how the pedophiles we all want dead mock those around them by hinting at what they're really doing by admitting to something smaller?
Here he is admitting to being @smurfy69, innocently UPVOTING comments not because they were good, admitting to upvoting himself, where he has upvoted 422 times and downvoted 127 times on ONE account. Does anyone REALLY think he isn't brigading? Oh wait, Here's RAREPEEKS (ALSO ESOTERIC) numbers at 725 upvoted and 354 downvoted
@Puttitout, please see the above paragraph.
You'll also notice BOTH Esoteric and his smurfy69 account commenting in this concern troll thread by @ArtificalDuality -- both claiming to have suffered torture from directed energy weapons. Exactly the kind of LARPy concern troll bullshit known liar and drama queen @Jem777 was posting before Vindicator banned her - and she's also helping push it in this thread. You'll also find twistedmac11 joining in there.
@twistedmac11 seems more than a little invested in ESOTERICshade keeping his good name. And he always, always, always, always, JFC always, fuck... shows up to defend or agree with ESOTERIC. No, that's not everything. That's a very, VERY small fraction, yes, it's all archived and saved.
How much of what you see here has been shaped by him? Does any legitimate user really agree with him, or does he just groom new users into being his cheerleaders when he and his alts do their dirty work?
Here's @DeathtoMasonsASAP somehow finding a deeply-nested comment to respond to, and has that typical ESOTERIC-style Vindicator hate found on a verified alt here, here, and here.
Here's ES lying again about him thinking the rest of the mods are "cool" while attacking one. It's usually either that, or thinking all the mods are awful except one. Never really seems to commit one way or the other. Always has to pretend to be on the side of one of the mods, like this cringey shit where he tries to brown-nose kevdude.
I'm sure everyone now knows that the colloquially known "Donkey" is also @auralsects. What do you make of this where @auralsects responds where @ESOTERICshade should have? No, ES did NOT respond to that on the correct username at all, even after the fact. And who in their right mind would say this? Here he is talking about Donkey's JOB; who in their right minds would say THAT?
There are more usernames being researched, but what do you all see in these links?
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2608242/13143338?=20
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2767239 (notice the difference in votes, and how useless his comment really is - somebody got a new toy and wanted to play with it)
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2490837 (10? 17? really?)
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2591260/13026383 (organic?)
https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2569662
Feel free to ping all those users you know that are friendly to this pedophile-protecting D&C shill. I fully intend to put every single one of them under the microscope, along with anyone that attacks my mods.
This is why you have a MASSIVE asshole as an [O] mod. THIS is why I'm not nice to you. THIS is why I don't do daily mod duties here. THIS is why your mods want me where I am. THIS is the avalanche I created just by picking a fight with your loudest blowhard member that almost none of you called out. THIS IS WHAT I DO. And to all of you that even look at my goddamned mods sideways without a VERY good reason:
No more Mr. Nice Crensch.
EDIT
@twistedmac11 got flustered and lied about never supporting anyone trying to destroy the subverse, prompting @Vindicator to dig this one up.
EDIT 2
@Vindicator made the comment below about ESOTERIC's bullshit:
Here, @EsotericShade claims he's so ignorant of technology (a "retard") he had to make all these alts because passwords are too hard to remember.
But eight months ago, here he is having a conversation about how to use VPNs to game the voting system. Doesn't sound too tech ignorant here, now does he?
Incidentally, that thread shows him using multiple alts to try to take over a rule discussion, voting multiple times via different accounts and even bitching when Crensch missed votes that weren't made as top level comments that would be seen in his notifications. Lots of brigading, too. Here are three of them talking to each other, pushing the idea the mod team is run by intelligence operatives.
There are multiple comments by him in that thread as ES, rarepeeks, twistedmac11, dragonkiller and others concern trolling the idea that the rule discussion is some kind of trap created by Crensch to get people's names on a hit list -- he simultaneously votes multiple times and tries to scare other people away from letting their voice be heard. It's rather appalling how glaring it is in this thread, actually.
view the rest of the comments →
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I've never seen smurfy69 before. Where is he posting? Where is the thread about the I Pet Goat II film? Do you have a link for that? Thanks
Crensch ago
Are you really this stupid?
He upvoted his own alt account and now that alt account has click the up voat button some 400 + times.
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
that's fine but who cares? smurfy doesn't post here from what I can tell. You guys got mad that he had 10 upvotes on an anti-q comment and 17 on another. Where is the link to the discussion on the I Pet Goat II comment? just curious to see what that was about for my own research, nothing to do with him.
Crensch ago
He. Votes.
ESOTERIC HAS VOTED HUNDREDS OF TIMES ON THAT ALT
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I see you guys got mad about 10 and 17. If he has one proven alt, he could at most have one extra point per comment. So how many alts do you think he actually uses? I have like 4 or 5 but only mostly log into one. I created the alts so I could make comments one day on the phone and got bored, there is a 10 comment limit.
I don't have time to vote brigade for myself, but I'll go upvote someone I like every time I log on. That is why this site is called Voat. It's an upvote. Not a big deal.
Crensch ago
Are you not pissed that esoteric just delegitimized virtually every complaint against the mods? He also showed that the anti Q group on pizzagate might be mostly his alts.
If I were you and I truly held those positions, I would be pissed at him.
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I don't know I only saw the rarepeeks and ESOTERIC proof. I will have to catch up with Vindicator claiming he's DeathToMasons. If he is then yes, I'd be pretty pissed off about that. About Q, I don't care as much. A lot of people are with me there on the internet at the moment which is one of the only reasons why people get so mad about that on this forum. If it was just him and me, nobody would give a crap.
Crensch ago
That's your line? If he happens to have one more shitty Alt? Did one of your ancestors breed with a nigger or something? You are mind-bogglingly stupid
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I do have an Indian "princess" in my bloodline and a bunch of people who came over on the Mayflower and signed the Declaration as well as kings and queens, no idea about "niggers" but definitely a few Freemason assholes. I am just looking for real evidence presented, which it seems Vindicator just gave me regarding D2M, but it seems he just showed me where aural sects may be the same person as ESOTERICshade. So I may stand corrected. I didn't see that originally and I tried to comb through all the comments before.
Crensch ago
It's a big deal when you start up voting yourself multiple times or down voting people you don't like multiple times. He's already proved that he does this.
If you have alts and you log into them and you comment on them and you don't upvote or downvote people multiple times, there's not really a problem until you start trying to manufacture consensus. Making it seem like your voice is many voices.