You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

@Vindicator @think- @srayzie @EricKaliberhall @kevdude

I trust there are no issues with me posting this given the amount of manipulation of this subverse that has gone one just form what's shown above?

think- ago

Well, we always said that proven shill activity would adhere to Rule 4, so I'm fine with it.

Especially, since I was able to see myself during the last couple days what Esoteric did when I went through his comment histories, and those of his alts.

I have a reputation to uphold of being impartial, but I must say that in this case, I was really shocked to see what this man has done. Unbelievable.

@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock @Kevdude @Srayzie

twistedmac11 ago

I can agree that it was proven that @ESOTERICshade has @rarepeeks as an alt. But how was it proven that I'm an alt? I only have twistedmac11.

Serious question: how would I go about proving that I'm not an alt? Especially when it seems that it's already been decided that I am without any real proof?

Shizy ago

No there's not any way to prove it. What's shitty is mods get accused of the same thing, and there's no way for them to prove it either. Esoteric has admitted to using rarepeeks, so unless a person admits it, there may always be speculation and no way to prove innocence if you are.

Angelis_Solaris ago

And that's damning for Eso's credibility, it would seem. Although it's impossible to say at this point how many people here use such practices