I'm not sure what's up with the sudden rash of posts about supposed pedo logos and codes:
Spurring researchers into witch-hunting companies and organizations based on logo shapes alone is a disinfo tactic we've seen used to delegitimize the pizzagate investigation in the past. It has been used as an excuse to label us "extremists", to justify account suspensions, and to bury legit research with much more suspicious evidence of pedo-friendliness than a mere logo or potential coded language.
This is why a logo by itself is not enough to satisfy Rule 1.
Given the truther purges on YouTube and Twitter recently,
this trend should be raising the hair on people's necks. Stay frosty, people!
@think- @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @blacksmith21
view the rest of the comments →
sunajAeon ago
I agree, logo alone is a flag, but not reaching threshold of evidence, many may have adopted it without intending to associate it with pedo
YogSoggoth ago
Some few maybe, but what about Unilever. Do you think the CEO just let his pedo advertisers make up some strange stuff as his logo and then signed off on it, then never bothered to replace it? This whole conversation is actually distracting from what we were doing before, which is trying to destroy these inhumans.