Whether Q is a larp or a psy op can be disputed. What can't be disputed any longer is that Qanon is joined at the hip with the president.
Last night about midnight Q posted the following two phrases. Catch & Release, and Safety & Security, in quotation marks.
After which Q said, Coincidence? Have you learned how to read the message? Q
Subsequently, at 4AM in the morning (Saturday morning the 27th) POTUS released the following tweet.
"Thank you to Brandon Judd of the National Border Patrol Council for his strong statement on @foxandfriends that we very badly NEED THE WALL. Must also end loophole of “catch & release” and clean up the legal and other procedures at the border NOW for Safety & Security reasons." Bold emphasis mine. These are the EXACT same phrases that Q posted.
Trump's tweet (twitter link). https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/957220637705109505
Q link. https://qcodefag.github.io/ (Scroll down just a tad.)
For more details, or if you're more "visually" oriented, watch this short clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaZf5Iazczo&feature=youtu.be
There can be no doubt any longer whether Q is a high level POTUS insider or not. For those who sill maintain that Q is a larp, what is the endgame? Again, there can no longer be any doubt he knows what Trump will tweet beforehand, and has proven so over and over again. This example is probably the most "blatant," or obvious, so far.
view the rest of the comments →
SoberSecondThought ago
Sorry, but that doesn't qualify as proof to me. I wonder if you've confused the timestamps on two messages.
At midnight, Q posted his "nobody is sleeping" message (#618 in the github archive). But his "Coincidence?" message (#621) is timestamped at 9:09 in the morning. That's five hours after Trump. I'm not 100 percent clear on how the timestamps are created, so these might not be the actual times that things happened. However, so far these messages certainly don't prove what you want them to prove.
If anyone is curious about my explanation for who Q actually is, you can start here and work back through my 12-part series on the subject. Basically, he's the same guy I've been chasing and exposing since October. He works for David Brock, and he is engaged in a frantic, last-minute cover-up for the June 2012 Glenn Beck whistleblower episode. I have offered details on his finances, who he reports to, and why they want to cover up what happened in 2012. I've already exposed his other "insider" sockpuppets -- Senate Anon / HighLevelInsider, Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt, and Tory Smith
I realize that people feel insulted and incredulous when I say this. I try not to make a constant nuisance of myself in Q threads. But it's the simple truth. Q is just a variation on the same trick he's been pulling for several years now. He's not even using new language. For example, his recent reference to the Council on Foreign Relations goes back to when he pretended to be a Senate staffer (the "Senate Anon" LARP). It's all old, recycled BS.
The Q LARP was a desperate move, and it is going to backfire on them, which is why I don't come into Q threads every day to try and debunk them all. I'm content to let this play out. What you all should really be interested in, is why they're so scared of having the Glenn Beck whistleblower story get traction on social media. Because they are really, really scared of that.
ESOTERICshade ago
Your explanation on who Q is, is also bullshit, because you included me in the people you think are Q, and about 15 other forum posters you claim are all the same people and a troll named highlevelinsider. I don't know exactly what your game is but i'm on solid record believing that Q is a fraud from the very beginning.
I disagreed with you about Wisconsin Is Corrupt and you have been bombing me every since. I am not Q, do not believe in Q, and I never have.
SoberSecondThought ago
Anyone who is curious about why I think this particular sockpuppet is part of the network of sockpuppets can go here, where I gave a detailed and up-to-date assessment of your bizarre behavior. You didn't just "disagree" with me about WIC. You accepted his utterly bogus claims without any evidence, including having top-level inside info on FBI investigations, and speaking for God. You had also previously accepted the bogus claims of HighLevelInsider. You were called out as a shill by the mods long before I came on the scene. And when I showed WIC was lying, you dodged all the evidence.
You're trying to salvage this particular sockpuppet so as to have at least one long-term ID to play around with that has a reputation for being skeptical. And I haven't been "bombing you every," I've gone very easy on you because I don't really care how many people you take in with this Q nonsense. The last time I openly challenged you was 23 days ago. But you're Q / Senate Anon / HighLevelInsider / Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt / Tory Smith.
ESOTERICshade ago
By the way don't think I don't realize that the only reason you dropped your bullshit with my name in here was to bait me and try sew discord in the forum. You are transparent.