We all (should) know NPR is among the purest forms of propaganda.
And that shooting at Youtube HQ was sketchy as hell, definitely seemed like a staged event.
So, what are the odds that Mr. Vorhies was the focal point on relaying the story to NPR?
YouTube Software Engineer Describes Seeing Altercation In Building Courtyard
He was also referenced by NYT, again, marxist propagandists.
YouTube Shooting: Woman Wounds 3 Before Killing Herself, Police Say
He comes right out and says in this video that all of the documents he "leaked" were already publicly available.
Red Pill News - Whistleblower Zach Vorhies Revealed Part 1
Not saying he's a bad guy, but it definitely raises red flags when he is the media point of contact for a possibly agenda driven shooting event, and then is the whistleblower that stands for the people against the corrupt behemoth monopoly is all.
And then there's this shit:
James O’Keefe’s Google ‘Whistleblower’ Loves QAnon, Accused ‘Zionists’ of Running the Government
What O’Keefe’s video leaves out, though, is that his much-hyped insider is not as credible as he claims. On social media, Vorhies is an avid promoter of anti-Semitic accusations that banks, the media, and the United States government are controlled by “Zionists.” He’s also pushed conspiracy theories like QAnon, Pizzagate, and the discredited claim that vaccines cause autism.
On his Twitter account, @Perpetualmaniac, Vorhies repeatedly attacks Jewish people and accuses them of a wide range of crimes. (Both O’Keefe and his group, Project Veritas, promoted Vorhies’s Twitter account in tweets on Monday.)
He even alleges that “Zionists” killed conservative publisher and O’Keefe mentor Andrew Breitbart, who died of heart failure in 2012.
“It’s very simple, either you go along with the zionists or you end up like Andrew Breitbart,” Vorhies wrote in January.
In a May tweet, Vorhies accused Israel of plotting the 9/11 attacks, and encouraged Twitter users to look up 9/11-related conspiracy theory content, providing no evidence of his claims.
It's almost like they're trying too hard to hit every point to ensure "conspiracy theorists" that he's one of the gang.
SearchVoatBot ago
This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV submission.
Posted automatically (#61688) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Ag47: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
SearchVoatBot ago
This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#61601) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Ag47: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
Ag47 ago
Part two of the video in the OP. Haven't watched yet.
Anyone know what the symbol is on the forehead of the face behind him?
Red Pill News - Whistleblower Zach Vorhies Revealed Part 2
slowcrash101 ago
You don't put your message out there if they don't want it. Even here the message is controlled, I'm sure there are posts that are too risque and glow niggers step in.
heygeorge ago
Maybe you are all just as stupid as you appear
Ag47 ago
Coming from an sbbh faggot, that means a lot, thanks.
heygeorge ago
My pleasure. Although I do apologize for being so harsh. It was uncalled for!
O’Keefe is a sensationalist assclown. Who pays for his ‘journalism’?
Ag47 ago
Quick search showed Andrew Breitbart gave him his first break, and that Koch brothers, William Dunn and the Trump Foundation all are significant contributors to Project Veritas. Not reassuring.
heygeorge ago
Nah, not very good sounding at all! Makes sense why he’s a total hack. I’m not sure we will ever have real journalism back.
Ag47 ago
Apparently I'm not the only one who found this odd today:
Project VERITAS' Zack Vorhes GOOGLE Whistleblower was crisis actor/witness to 2018 San Bruno Shooting Incident!
julzee2 ago
Looks like you started a damn nother rabbit hole lol
Ag47 ago
Wow, just realized you've had back and forth with him today, still reading though. And you asked him about the symbol, nice!
julzee2 ago
Yeah and you notice he doesn't answer? He says the curls in the hair don't look like the fbi symbols yet doesn't say anything about the pedo symbol that's sitting right there in the middle of the forehead of that creature art thing behind him. You can only get glimpses of it if he moves out of the way in the interview but looks 'exactly' like the fbi symbol if you ask me. Nor does he explain what the creature thing is or what it represents to him which was the original question I asked. I'm beginning to lose patience with the conversation and they way he's answering. https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20432458
Ag47 ago
Just read the Buddha, Labyrinth explanation and while plausible, after scrolling through thousands of Buddha images, there are many with a dot or literal third eye on the forehead but not finding this same one.
In one of the RedPill vids, I believe the second one, he stated he fled San Francisco for Washington DC because Google didn't have the same pull there. Despite the revolving door employment policy with the Obama admin and 425+ Google visits to the Obama Whitehouse?
He specifically said he was in a "safehouse" I believe. Point being, is that even his house? Why post a video interview, especially considering the audience with that in the background, regardless of the location? Who the hell has EVER felt safe in DC, whether they are fleeing the deep state or not?
This is definitely just a tangent, the fact remains he was the sole point of contact (with a cheesy explanation given) during a likely FF event, and then wheeled out as a whistleblower by Koch funded PV. Smells funny.
julzee2 ago
Yes I agree. I too tried to find that specific Buddha with no luck. Would have been nice if he had explained it to me when I asked but nope. The only thing he came back with was 'I lost my long post I had ready to send you' and 'the curls are not the same as the fbi pedo symbol'...ugh I find his explanations lame on most things but I'm open to all possibilities. I'm questioning right? He passes himself off as an innocent, just happened to get caught in the middle of a FF, did the msm interview bc the reporter and he 'caught eye contact' and he's not afraid of cameras. Well then wtf was he doing leaving crumbs then? He himself said to listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim. Why? Was he not simply an innocent yt employee just stating what he saw? How does that rectify?
Ag47 ago
Yes, you are questioning, and for good reason.
A couple other things strike me as odd:
"After talking with some influencers..." You and I believe others already addressed this in the other thread, so will leave it at that.
Big red flag realization I just had. He is supposedly on the run, even fearing for his life, from Google/Youtube, right? His former employer, we are told. Yet, he comments on your video on a YOUTUBE account with his real name. The account appears to be at least three years old as far as I can tell.
YT deletes accounts all day, every day, just for wrongthink. But a supposed insider whistleblower gets to keep spreading info through his real name account? Having a real hard time swallowing that.
I mentioned the Snowden 2/Reverse Snowden earlier, which is still a mind bending possibility, but who knows. It is very odd that he just happened to be the face of Google during the shooting event, and now the face of whistleblowers against google. I know which way my instincts are leaning but will just keep an eye on it and let things play out for now.
It still bothers me that Daily Beast article in OP went overboard to paint him with everything normies think is bad to ensure conspiracy theorist types that he is "one of us."
This is very relevant, though may not seem so at a glance: http://www.bestpokerrooms.com/no-limit-holdem-strategy/levelling/
julzee2 ago
So yeah..I've gotten comments from some who seem to think that him using his real name to comment on my channel equates to evidence that he is legit..lol Uh..really? Like you it almost seems the opposite for the very reason you state above. Look, I really hate to disparage the guy in case he really is legit but gosh darn it, I just am not getting the feedback from him and yes I too hate this 'influencer' decision crap..um..if he's in a safe house (gotta continue to watch those two redpill interviews to the end which I haven't done yet) but if he is then why is he taking advise from 'influencers'? My interpretation of influencers are Qtubers with large followings like redpill78 or prayingmedic etc. I don't think Veritas would be considered an influencer nor the fbi (if that's who's housing him..?). I may be wrong but my experience is that the term influencer is a Qtuber term, not an abc/fbi term.
Ag47 ago
I agree, and am not out to attack the guy either just have pretty much the same questions as you and we apparently both started having those red flags raised totally separately but at nearly the same time.
Influencer is a social media term in general, usually used in kind of a douchebaggy way, lol. I've heard it used in other genre's on YT as well as other platforms like twitter, facebook, instagram, etc. even though I use none of those.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=social+media+influencers&t=lm&ia=web
Basically the people with large followings like you mentioned. So if that's how he was using the word, it is very odd that "influencers" are deciding on what they think anons are allowed to know. Dangerous game to play imo, seeing as the 8ch autists are bored at the moment.
If this would be a distraction from the Google leaks, are the Google leaks a distraction from something else?
julzee2 ago
Knowing what we know now with Tulsi catapulted into the news via HRC, do you see how prophetic your last sentence is here?
Looks to me like the Google leaks was setting the stage for Tulsi's arrival into the spotlight. While we 'thought' the leaks were to educate us/bring proof to light into the censoring of Conservatives/DS opposition, it was really designed to gain sympathy for Tulsi as victim at the same time enable her to be viewed as a hero championing the fight against Google and now HRC.
Ag47 ago
I wouldn't say prophetic, just years of watching how they operate. MO never seems to change, "These people are stupid."
I view her as just a distraction, and have enjoyed seeing her sling mud at the old guard, even if it is all theater. The normies are way behind still, so it could be helping them along.
"Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing."
julzee2 ago
That right there is why I actually wonder if she isn't working 'for' Trump..lol Which..would make Vorhies a good guy (cept the Q text he supposedly got from Q says otherwise) but would fit right into my theory that Q always knows the future bc they control the events.
julzee2 ago
I agree that it's not right to keep info to themselves like this. Think about all the info 'they' got from 8chan to make their videos! It's ok to take bread from the anons but not reciprocate? That's seriously messed up. Everyone has put their digs out there and let 'everyone' do their magic with it each contributing to the final product. What if the 8chan anons had decided that they were going to pow wow and decide on their own what to share and what to keep hidden these past years? We'd never have gotten anything done. It's the entire concept that Q developed by posting on the chan boards in the first place! And then later leading us to voat as anon precisely TO SHARE information! And that's precisely what we've all done this entire time. Now a few 'influencers' are going to decide that they are too intelligent and going to change the process? Wow. A thousand minds are so much better than a few. See, this is what I mean. This whole thing just irks me to no end. Something is not right about ANY of this.
I see the leveling was it you called it? concept you've got going here re: 'if this would be a distraction from Google leaks then are the Google leaks a distraction from something else'? It is seriously refreshing having these conversations with you. I am on the same page here with your thinking. Do we know wtf is up? Hell no...lol But at least we're THINKING!
Ag47 ago
What you're saying about the alleged influencers is another area the leveling comes into play, imo.
Who really controls his YT account?
Which side is he really on?
Did he really discuss with influencers or is somebody trying to turn the community against itself?
So many variables at play, and so subtle and convoluted. And at the end of the day, where do we get even if we figure it all out? Lol.
I wouldn't put too much stock into what the YT influencers may or may not be up to, as they can't stop the truth from coming out. Too many anons out here who only want the truth wherever it may lead for that to work.
The fact that he/they commented directly to your video speaks volumes. 3.7k subs and 1.8k views on that vid, yet it's worth addressing to whoever controls that account? It either goes to show how closely QRV is being watched, or how close to home your vid hit, imo. Or both.
If it were nothing, why not ignore it? Did he publicly contact Daily Beast about their article? Serious question, maybe he did.
It's good talking to you here too, the entire internet is full of shills these days, it's nice to actually be able to discuss ideas without constantly fending them off, lol. Though I do enjoy trolling them.
And I don't pretend to know wtf is up with this guy either, it is interesting to say the least. But if they are up to no good, they'll be found out.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#61317) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Ag47: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
julzee2 ago
"Who really controls his YT account?" (don't know how to quote you)
Well I guess it's possible that yt feels pressure NOT to touch his yt account given he's so high profile. That would only add fuel to his fire were they to delete or mess with him. I won't be surprised though if they take mine down. They've done it twice to me already so in case my channel disappears all of a sudden you might find me here https: //www. youtube. com/channel/UCpueYsBxyrsaSGwmeQx6E6A (U2b s-cks...;)
Oh and I almost forgot. Near the end of that abc7 witness video https://youtu.be/IO9m6wZc-ps?t=124 he mentioned that he live-streamed on his FB page during the event..? I haven't had time to see if I can find it. Gotta work and make that follow-up video. He also said that 'I have an interview on my phone of someone who actually witnessed the shooting' and just as he was about to show her, the video cuts off. Now that too is strange bc wouldn't that interview have been blasted all over msm if it really existed? Maybe it was and I missed it.
It also begs the question, while he was talking to the reporter, knowing he had the info from a witness who saw the actual shooting on his phone, did this witness not say that the shooter was female? If so then why would he tell the reporter that the shooter was male? He supposedly thought the shooter was the heavy set male he was describing. Until he corrected it in the NPR interview.
CORNISH: Did you see the shooter?
VORHIES: I thought that I had because I thought that it was a guy that was the shooter but, you know, never saw a gun on him. And now it turns out that there was a woman who was - who's the shooter. And so what I believe that I saw was the man arguing with the shooter, who was a woman. http://archive.fo/0ciaT#selection-2097.0-2103.286
Just nothing he says makes sense to me. Why would he think the guy he saw was the shooter if he had an interview from someone who actually saw the shooter on his phone who would have most likely let it be known that it was a she? Did he interview this witness himself? How did he get that interview on his phone?
Aaand here we go full circle back around to it being he was dropping crumbs...ugh He 'purposely' told the reporter that the shooter was a man, when he knew it was a female bc he was dropping the crumb that Nasim was a tranny. So back full circle again, if he's dropping crumbs then he's not just an innocent yt tech that happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. He had an agenda. And is why he stopped to talk to the reporter while 200 others ahead of him did not.
Now, what was/is that agenda? Is he black hat controlled opposition? Or white hat inside plant? Damn..nowhere further to knowing which.
julzee2 ago
Wow ok still reading your poker link but this seems to coincide with a game theory voat thread I was just reading. https://voat.co/v/QRV/3410832. Damn. This is getting extremely interesting.
Ag47 ago
Just the general concept of leveling is what I was getting at fyi. There's nothing specific about poker itself it's just the best way to describe what I think is going on by controlled opposition across the board, not just this particular incident.
Another thing regarding his YT acct... Two possibilities. Either that is his account, under his control and they allow him to use it, despite everything going on. Google/YT now control that account and are using it for damage control.
Ag47 ago
I did notice his non answer and understand your irritation. He seemed to intentionally move out of the way quite a few times in the Redpill #2 video (below) to expose that symbol/face quite a few times as well. His mannerisms and answers in these videos are what led me to dig to begin with.
However, I'm not finding that particular square symbol to match up to the listed FBI pedo symbols, as I am only seeing the heart, the triangle and the rounded triangle. Is there a more complete list that includes the squared symbol?
Ag47 ago
Lol, I'm still not sure what to think of this guy. Kind of tripped me out to start digging last night and post here then find that QRV thread on practically the same stuff though.
reason247 ago
Wait is this NASIM? of shes pretty fame? God I hope so.
julzee2 ago
Seems so. But I'm not exactly privy to what her fame was on 8chan. A sub on my yt channel gave me a brief run down. That 8chan was memeing her all over the place saying that she was a he..? I never saw those posts and was unaware of this chan history on her. Would be great if I could see some of what the chans were saying about her.