What Are the Odds? Google Whistleblower Interviewed by NPR After 2018 Youtube Shooting Event (whatever)

submitted ago by Ag47

We all (should) know NPR is among the purest forms of propaganda.

And that shooting at Youtube HQ was sketchy as hell, definitely seemed like a staged event.

So, what are the odds that Mr. Vorhies was the focal point on relaying the story to NPR?

YouTube Software Engineer Describes Seeing Altercation In Building Courtyard

He was also referenced by NYT, again, marxist propagandists.

YouTube Shooting: Woman Wounds 3 Before Killing Herself, Police Say

He comes right out and says in this video that all of the documents he "leaked" were already publicly available.

Red Pill News - Whistleblower Zach Vorhies Revealed Part 1

Not saying he's a bad guy, but it definitely raises red flags when he is the media point of contact for a possibly agenda driven shooting event, and then is the whistleblower that stands for the people against the corrupt behemoth monopoly is all.

And then there's this shit:

James O’Keefe’s Google ‘Whistleblower’ Loves QAnon, Accused ‘Zionists’ of Running the Government

What O’Keefe’s video leaves out, though, is that his much-hyped insider is not as credible as he claims. On social media, Vorhies is an avid promoter of anti-Semitic accusations that banks, the media, and the United States government are controlled by “Zionists.” He’s also pushed conspiracy theories like QAnon, Pizzagate, and the discredited claim that vaccines cause autism.

On his Twitter account, @Perpetualmaniac, Vorhies repeatedly attacks Jewish people and accuses them of a wide range of crimes. (Both O’Keefe and his group, Project Veritas, promoted Vorhies’s Twitter account in tweets on Monday.)

He even alleges that “Zionists” killed conservative publisher and O’Keefe mentor Andrew Breitbart, who died of heart failure in 2012.

“It’s very simple, either you go along with the zionists or you end up like Andrew Breitbart,” Vorhies wrote in January.

In a May tweet, Vorhies accused Israel of plotting the 9/11 attacks, and encouraged Twitter users to look up 9/11-related conspiracy theory content, providing no evidence of his claims.

It's almost like they're trying too hard to hit every point to ensure "conspiracy theorists" that he's one of the gang.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

julzee2 ago

Looks like you started a damn nother rabbit hole lol

Ag47 ago

Wow, just realized you've had back and forth with him today, still reading though. And you asked him about the symbol, nice!

julzee2 ago

Yeah and you notice he doesn't answer? He says the curls in the hair don't look like the fbi symbols yet doesn't say anything about the pedo symbol that's sitting right there in the middle of the forehead of that creature art thing behind him. You can only get glimpses of it if he moves out of the way in the interview but looks 'exactly' like the fbi symbol if you ask me. Nor does he explain what the creature thing is or what it represents to him which was the original question I asked. I'm beginning to lose patience with the conversation and they way he's answering. https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20432458

Ag47 ago

Just read the Buddha, Labyrinth explanation and while plausible, after scrolling through thousands of Buddha images, there are many with a dot or literal third eye on the forehead but not finding this same one.

In one of the RedPill vids, I believe the second one, he stated he fled San Francisco for Washington DC because Google didn't have the same pull there. Despite the revolving door employment policy with the Obama admin and 425+ Google visits to the Obama Whitehouse?

He specifically said he was in a "safehouse" I believe. Point being, is that even his house? Why post a video interview, especially considering the audience with that in the background, regardless of the location? Who the hell has EVER felt safe in DC, whether they are fleeing the deep state or not?

This is definitely just a tangent, the fact remains he was the sole point of contact (with a cheesy explanation given) during a likely FF event, and then wheeled out as a whistleblower by Koch funded PV. Smells funny.

julzee2 ago

Yes I agree. I too tried to find that specific Buddha with no luck. Would have been nice if he had explained it to me when I asked but nope. The only thing he came back with was 'I lost my long post I had ready to send you' and 'the curls are not the same as the fbi pedo symbol'...ugh I find his explanations lame on most things but I'm open to all possibilities. I'm questioning right? He passes himself off as an innocent, just happened to get caught in the middle of a FF, did the msm interview bc the reporter and he 'caught eye contact' and he's not afraid of cameras. Well then wtf was he doing leaving crumbs then? He himself said to listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim. Why? Was he not simply an innocent yt employee just stating what he saw? How does that rectify?

Ag47 ago

Yes, you are questioning, and for good reason.

A couple other things strike me as odd:

"After talking with some influencers..." You and I believe others already addressed this in the other thread, so will leave it at that.

Big red flag realization I just had. He is supposedly on the run, even fearing for his life, from Google/Youtube, right? His former employer, we are told. Yet, he comments on your video on a YOUTUBE account with his real name. The account appears to be at least three years old as far as I can tell.

YT deletes accounts all day, every day, just for wrongthink. But a supposed insider whistleblower gets to keep spreading info through his real name account? Having a real hard time swallowing that.

I mentioned the Snowden 2/Reverse Snowden earlier, which is still a mind bending possibility, but who knows. It is very odd that he just happened to be the face of Google during the shooting event, and now the face of whistleblowers against google. I know which way my instincts are leaning but will just keep an eye on it and let things play out for now.

It still bothers me that Daily Beast article in OP went overboard to paint him with everything normies think is bad to ensure conspiracy theorist types that he is "one of us."

This is very relevant, though may not seem so at a glance: http://www.bestpokerrooms.com/no-limit-holdem-strategy/levelling/

julzee2 ago

So yeah..I've gotten comments from some who seem to think that him using his real name to comment on my channel equates to evidence that he is legit..lol Uh..really? Like you it almost seems the opposite for the very reason you state above. Look, I really hate to disparage the guy in case he really is legit but gosh darn it, I just am not getting the feedback from him and yes I too hate this 'influencer' decision crap..um..if he's in a safe house (gotta continue to watch those two redpill interviews to the end which I haven't done yet) but if he is then why is he taking advise from 'influencers'? My interpretation of influencers are Qtubers with large followings like redpill78 or prayingmedic etc. I don't think Veritas would be considered an influencer nor the fbi (if that's who's housing him..?). I may be wrong but my experience is that the term influencer is a Qtuber term, not an abc/fbi term.

Ag47 ago

I agree, and am not out to attack the guy either just have pretty much the same questions as you and we apparently both started having those red flags raised totally separately but at nearly the same time.

Influencer is a social media term in general, usually used in kind of a douchebaggy way, lol. I've heard it used in other genre's on YT as well as other platforms like twitter, facebook, instagram, etc. even though I use none of those.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=social+media+influencers&t=lm&ia=web

Basically the people with large followings like you mentioned. So if that's how he was using the word, it is very odd that "influencers" are deciding on what they think anons are allowed to know. Dangerous game to play imo, seeing as the 8ch autists are bored at the moment.

First off, I considered doing a video response but after talking with some influencers we came to the conclusion that this story would be a distraction from the Google leaks so I'm instead going to talk about this here and maybe a few other places and hopefully this will be sufficient to answer questions.

If this would be a distraction from the Google leaks, are the Google leaks a distraction from something else?

julzee2 ago

Knowing what we know now with Tulsi catapulted into the news via HRC, do you see how prophetic your last sentence is here?

If this would be a distraction from the Google leaks, are the Google leaks a distraction from something else?

Looks to me like the Google leaks was setting the stage for Tulsi's arrival into the spotlight. While we 'thought' the leaks were to educate us/bring proof to light into the censoring of Conservatives/DS opposition, it was really designed to gain sympathy for Tulsi as victim at the same time enable her to be viewed as a hero championing the fight against Google and now HRC.

Ag47 ago

I wouldn't say prophetic, just years of watching how they operate. MO never seems to change, "These people are stupid."

I view her as just a distraction, and have enjoyed seeing her sling mud at the old guard, even if it is all theater. The normies are way behind still, so it could be helping them along.

"Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing."

julzee2 ago

so it could be helping them along.

That right there is why I actually wonder if she isn't working 'for' Trump..lol Which..would make Vorhies a good guy (cept the Q text he supposedly got from Q says otherwise) but would fit right into my theory that Q always knows the future bc they control the events.