Project VERITAS' Zack Vorhes GOOGLE Whistleblower was crisis actor/witness to 2018 San Bruno Shooting Incident! (QRV)

submitted ago by 3409024?

What do you make of that?! Maybe the shooting event was a catalyst leading up to blowing the whistle?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zgcAs72e5CM&t=0s

UPDATE - adding Zach Vorhes first response to Julzee2 in Thread Header (directly below)

Zach Vorhies

Hey everyone, this is Zach Vorhies who is featured in this video.

I wanted to come here and give you my statement on everything that happened. First off, I considered doing a video response but after talking with some influencers we came to the conclusion that this story would be a distraction from the Google leaks so I'm instead going to talk about this here and maybe a few other places and hopefully this will be sufficient to answer questions. If it's not, you can find me on twitter and send me a message.

Q: Why is Zach the only one on camera?

A: Google has a strict policy on talking on camera about Google and requires employees to have a chat with PR as standard practice. Obviously this situation is out of the ordinary but the Google policy probably was the main reason employees don't want to talk to the media. Also most people don't like the camera to begin with. A group of camera people were located at Traeger Av and Bayhill Dr (94066). Employees walked by and NONE of them would talk to the reporters who were asking questions. I was likely the 200th person that the camera people saw. No joke. As I was walking by I made eye contact with one of the many reporters and they took that as a sign to ask me what happened... and unlike all other 200 people before me I responded. Also I've been on Television before (Americas Greatest Makers, and a Kickstarter) so the camera is something I'm very comfortable with. So you can imagine what happens next when someone finally is willing to talk about what happened on camera. Camera people swarm me and I become the go-to person that everyone world wide is calling.

Q: What about the false flag allegations?

A: Shots WERE fired. So the shooting did in fact happen. My co-worker Jared Gray was eating lunch at the time it happened. He realized it was a shooting situation when the bullets shattered the window near him. He ran out. As far as the shooter... yeah it's weird. Like really really weird. I've already been down the rabbit hole on this and if I make public statements about the situation then it can lead to a distraction... because it's that weird of a story! If one wants to go down that rabbit hole then listen VERY closely to my description of the person who was shot. Then read the msm reports. Then look up the pictures of the shooter Nasim and reconcile.

Please keep focus on the Google Leaks and not make this more of a story than it has to be. I gave up my 260k / year career and risked being black listed so that you can know the truth about what Google is doing to subvert democracy.

Cheers,

~Zach

21 hours ago

28

22

20472444? ago

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV submission.

Posted automatically (#61686) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

20465310? ago

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV submission.

Posted automatically (#61562) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

20441282? ago

Something being a FF does not meaning the shooting was fake. It means it was set up. 5:5 now? He said there is a rabbit hole.

20433313? ago

Possibly just a coincidence, however I swear I saw a masonic handshake between him and James which I thought was odd.

20447117? ago

Seriously? Please link us

20430691? ago

He made a comment on this video addressing it. Seems extremely plausible

20432056? ago

New dialog between Julzee2 and Zach -

julzee2

Thanks for addressing this Zach. I don't think anyone believes no shots were fired. We're all pretty much aware that FF doesn't mean innocents don't get hurt, killed, or unintentionally involved for real or that the shooters aren't real. Some are, some aren't. Some believe you to be one of them unaware of what was going on at the time and working at this place you happened to get caught up in the FF. But you've got to understand given this environment we live in where we've got to question EVERYTHING that it's pretty shocking for us to find out that you were a witness like this. Yet you never once mentioned it in any of the many interviews you've done. Of course it makes us naturally question it.

We see a freeging DS symbol go by in the background (cab w/phone # 333-3333) during your witness interview, the 10 lonely comments on a year and 1/2 old abc7 video and now your interview with redpill with a weird symbol-looking creature in the background? Come on Zach seriously. You've got to at least explain what the heck is that and why have it behind you when you know all this weirdness is going on all around us. What does that art mean that you sit behind you? Do you not see how this would look to us given as you say the 'like really weird' stuff we experience?

And how in the world is addressing it on twitter any different (less distraction)?

I in now way have questioned whether the current info you release re: Google leak is valid or not. It sounds like it totally is. What really has me upset about the whole thing is the fact that we had to find out that you witnessed this FF by accident over a year later..? Imo the silence just made it worse. Now we have to question whether you were privy to this FF and part of the acting team or someone unintentionally caught up in it? Especially now that it seems you are hinting that you know more but don't want to get into it bc it will distract from the leaks part. Given that I don't know what you know that also does not make sense bc you having knowledge of a Google FF I would think would 'add' to the enlightenment of the Google corruption!

Would you be willing to answer our questions here? Seems much more private than twitter.

2 hours ago (edited)

1

Truth Fairy in da house!

Zach: i just wsnt to say that i am a believer and u can see, given you work at Google, not an unlikely reason for you to be there, that you were interviewed. Was the google shooting a FF? Yes likely imo but it's not like i think you are behind it. Just there, at your job. The other crisis actors are hired by ad (listen to today's x22 btw for NY and Nevada) and have appeared at seversl FF events or even mimic each other's lines for God's sake.

But i am also incredibly intuitive. Heck one can say as a counselor, and business and financial consultant, is part of the job and i think not only is he not lying, the way he want about the google whistle-blower sutch, he was brilliant about how he went about it. But many people would do what he did. Keep in mind two questions

1. Who is he up against? Deep State and the MSM

2. What did he gain, lose? He lost a lot... And for what? Nothing. He is hanging on to money, which has other ramifications plus integrity... Who do you think is going to hire him now? Income? Friends? He just became a social pariah ... Sorry to be so glib about this Zach.

Ps, i would love to talk to you offline but i have my iwn concerns about safety and i, too, have been targeted.

1 hour ago

julzee2

Ask him what the damn image is behind him during the redpill interviews. Pretty stupid thing to have there with a bunch of anons looking at ds symbolism 24/7 the past 2 1/2 years...lol Does it not look like hair made of pedo symbols? And Egyptian-looking stone-face weirdo with eyes shut..? Wtf seriously? Look, I'm not saying that I don't believe him on the google dumps. Obviously google f#cks with us and does all that Zach says they do. And with veritas behind him it's almost silly 'to' question his authenticity. But why make things worse by interviewing in front of such an odd thing that's sure to make people uncomfortable and force paranoia that need not be there?

1 hour ago

Zach Vorhies

@julzee2

I just lost my entire comment so I'll just be brief:

I have talked about this shooting briefly in another video interview recently. I didn't talk about weird aspects of the shooting because in the grand scheme of things it doesn't matter in comparison to the leaks which affects literally everyone. The normies won't respond well to it, hence I won't state it here but I've given enough crumbs to get the sleuths started. The main lie that the msm told is staring you right in the face.

As far as the number 333-3333, have you searched for this number on the internet? It maps to YellowCabSf.

As far as the symbol you mention. Go check the FBI database and see how different their symbol is from what you think you see.

~Z~

1 hour ago

julzee2

@Zach Vorhies Ugh I hate when that happens. Could you please link me to that video where you talked about the shooting? Maybe hearing what you had to say about it will give me/us better understanding.

And yes, another sub said he looked for the number and did not find it as a valid in the US but apparently he was wrong..?

Can you please explain what the thing behind you is or is supposed to represent to you? I hope you understand why I have the attitude that I have. Given what we've all been through and have discovered these past few years it's almost as though you are inviting it! All this weird symbolism from crazy people who like to harm children and pull off FF's full of 3's, 6's, shoes etc, can you not see how positioning yourself in front of that thing would possibly produce such a response? If you want people to trust you and hear your intended message about Google then please try to be cognizant about other unintended messages that you may be sending in the future by 'not' having weird ds looking stuff in view so we can focus on your interview rather than wonder wth is behind you...lol

Look, I hope that you are a real whistleblower and 90% of me believes you are. I can't imagine how difficult it must be for you and the dramatic change to your life because of it. I do not intend to degrade your heroism AT ALL but you've got to admit things are a bit weird for all of us in these times. We can't trust ANYONE or ANYTHING anymore. It's prudent for us to question and that's what I have to do until things make sense to me.

It doesn't make sense how exposing Google's corruption is more important than alerting the public to FF's and unnecessary deaths is. Especially when Trump/Q already have Google under control for our future via EOs and IBofRights etc yet people are being harmed in FF's and policies enacted to take our guns away are in progress..? Seems like both issues could be addressed simultaneously. But I understand that you and 'influencers' have discussed this and determined that FF's are not as important to alert the public to. I get it. But it's odd how you and your influencers are now acting like Q giving crumbs instead of just coming out with it. Wow. Why not have your influencers give the info out instead of you if deviating from your focus of censorship is more important? They're already deemed conspiracy theorists anyway and them giving the info out won't interfere with your mission right? Seriously just doesn't make sense.

12 minutes ago (11:15PM EST)

20441038? ago

** DIALOG FROM YT COMMENT SECTION, PART 3 (as of Tuesday 6pm EST) **

Q Revere

Dude... KEEP DROPPING THEM CRUMBS! MIND BLOWN! Godspeed, Patriot!

17 hours ago

Q Revere

Space Reserved For Morgan Freeman.

17 hours ago

Q Revere

Space Reserved for Mic Drop

17 hours ago

julzee2

He's not going to drop any more crumbs don't you understand? He gave enough he said for the sleuths to go at it. It's now your turn to pick up the ball and dig into what he and his influencers already know but aren't willing to share with us bc it will take focus away from his censorship message. Why his influencers can't put the info out there for us leaving him personally out of the loop I'll never know. They could easily report what they know as they do with all the other non-normie-understanding stuff they already report on but nope. For some reason this ty shooting is off limits apparently. I guess they feel like being Q and dropping us a bone and then leaving....sigh

17 hours ago

Craziest Info Out There

You are so courageous Zach, idk if i would've been as strong as you! Especially making so much money & the risk of being blackballed w no more career, my fam would kill me lol. I have such respect for you, and the ceo of overstock. Not only have you both given up a shit load of money & career risk - but you are both prolly targets now?! Omg, please stay safe! Being in your position after being at Google position must be seriously dangerous buddy!! You are a hero in my book!! I'm glad you didn't get hurt - God, hope you weren't their target! If they already knew you were whistleblowing such serious allegations.... God this world is scary as FUCKashima (hehe)! God bless brave PATRIOT!!💞💞

13 hours ago

Source Awry

@julzee2 ffs, how much effort did you put in to identify the image? It is a standard buddha, with the forehead mark being a standard labyrinth.

Wisdom is like a beacon of light shining in the distant dark. Against the light of day, it gets washed out, but against the dark it lights the way. It always looks closer than it is, and the journey is what proves us worthy of knowing it. The truth has always been there beckoning to whosoever should seek it.

The forehead placement is standard third eye, and the labyrinth must be solved in order to access what is behind it. The square spiral is often depicted as both puzzle and key, a ramp on a pyramid or right angled structure. Angles allow passage between, and circles protect and contain. Open squares like a spiral square depict a charge or current, live electricity, a force applied. A round spiral is waves and pulses of a natural origin. Also tunnels across time and space, funnels, cyclones, a force that draws up.

10 hours ago

1

julzee2

Thanks for explaining it to me. My mother was into buddhas for awhile and collected them and I never saw one that looked like this one. Btw no need to begin with what looks to be insult via 'how much effort did I put into identifying the image'. Sounds like you know more about Zach's prop than he does. Why couldn't he have answered this when I asked him? He simply said the symbol does NOT look like the fbi symbol when in fact the one in the center of the forehead exactly looks like the fbi symbol. And why choose that particular buddha to showcase behind you when the third eye, the 'maze' pedo symbol are symbols found on Epstein Island etc that we've all been sensitized to? Look, if you can't seem to understand the validity of my questions then I'm sorry but to me everything I've questioned is clearly valid considering all we've been through these past few years. I happen to continue to follow Q's STAY AWAKE, be careful who you follow and see something say something advise. I do not trust anyone and will not succumb to stopping questioning bc like some here 'like' and believe Zach. It doesn't seem wise to let down our guards. I would think would actually understand this. And I would think that Zach would be a bit more aware of and careful about what might logically be taken out of context when adding props behind his interviews.

Btw, he actually does seem to be confirming that he WAS a crisis actor in that witness interview if you bother to think about it. He basically told me to listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim as he described in that witness interview. Why listen carefully to what he said unless he specifically said something to leave crumbs..? If that is what he was doing then he was not simply telling his witnessing of events. He was acting was he not? It would better explain why he chose to do the interview in the first place while others chose not to compared to the lame explanation that he was camera friendly. A whistleblower white hat giving clues as a witness is 'acting' is it not? If..that was what he was doing.

9 hours ago

2

vedicastrol

Zach, Hi I sent a DM to you on twitter asking you to verify your birth time, as I have included you in a book I am writing "Q ANON: The Reluctant warrior" (Part 9) https:// www. amazon .com /s?k=Dr.+Bobbi+anne+White

I used 5/5/1980 West Linn, Portland 14:00 so I'm guessing. Would you be kind enough to clarify. ThanQ

9 hours ago

Truth Fairy in da house!

@vedicastrol your doing his chart for your book? Interesting. i have been into the Q movement since 2017, i am very curious as to why you would think this would be relevant to have knowledge of vedic astrology? Do you have a specific audience? What is your motivation?

Ok the more i think about this the more concerned i feel. This is personal to Zach and CAN be used against him, people can steal his identity. Google IS coming after him, yes they have the info but let's not hand it over to the world...

Plus re: Q movement.... It's impossible to even use astrology for these purposes because you don't know who Q is, 1 person? many people? If an event, you don't have an inception date/time.

If it were me, i would NIT be handing my info over to someone because they say, hey i am writing a book and adding you in it. WTH?

7 hours ago (edited)

vedicastrol

All my books are on Amazon https:// www. amazon .com/s?k=Dr.+Bobbi+anne+White

I believe that we are in the midst of the Second American Revolution, and those participating have certain roles.

For example, although I don't have Zach's specific time of birth, his Moon Nakshatra is very similar to that of George Washington's

You might remember that Washington was working for the British in the French and Indian War and that he became disenchanted with them, similar to what happened with Zach.

7 hours ago

Q Revere

@julzee2 I get a notification that you replied, not knowing if it was to me or not, and I see you saying, "what looks to be an insult" and then...THEN I see you replying to ME with a "don't you understand?".... oh the irony.

6 hours ago

1

Q Revere

@julzee2 If you've been watching ALL of his interviews, you'll see that different tidbits are discussed on occasion. THOSE tidbits are sparking my interest on topics I wouldn't have researched. To me, THEY ARE CRUMBS. Considering he'll keep doing interviews to stay alive, there's a chance I'll get more of them if I keep watching those interviews. "-sigh"

6 hours ago

1

Craziest Info Out There

@julzee2 Hey Julzee, idk about the symbolizm n stuff bc i didnt watch x22 or redpill interviews. But, it doesnt make sense zach would apply 2b a crisis actor - he was making 260k a year - which he did apparently give up to whisleblow for us. And his point to not elaborate further 2 keep focus & narrative on google papers vs possible ff makes sense.

Pppl also think the overstock ceo is acting, possibly lying, too - some1 who also gave up huge mega buxx to speak (wo involving overstock - not really bc he had a 'russian' gf thats currently in jail - he has proof he was setup to be used/including her.

Honestly dont know how i would seem to others if i just went thru [zachs] situation esp being in his position. Plus its not obvious to me the reason(s) he lie/be a crisis actor, etc. And as far as i know, he hadnt been targeted/mentioned by Q. My degrees & secret clearance & decades doing investigative research for the military and other gov contracts makes me question everything, at see things in 360 - every angle. Granted we dont a hellof a lot in this case, but with what we do know, i just cant find a reason for him to lie rn, or What benefit or advantage he'd gain by doing so. One day we will know, probably, lol. 💞

2 hours ago

julzee2

@Craziest Info Out There I didn't say he applied to be a crisis actor like someone off the streets to earn 250. But it sure is starting to look like he 'could' be part of a Q team op as possibly an 'insider' at Google turned whistleblower..? A white hat crisis actor..? Still doesn't explain wth he would place a buddha behind him during the redpill interviews. I would think that should have been an obvious no no given all this crazy symbolism we've been trained to spot which could easily be mistaken for DS signs. But imo he basically confirmed in my eyes that he 'was' an actor during that interview and not simply someone at the wrong place at the wrong time. He leads us to 'crumbs' he left during that interview by telling us to "listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim". So what was an innocent, unconnected to this stuff, normal every day guy just so happening to work at yt and getting accidentally out of the blue, caught up in the FF giving crumbs..? I thought he was just expressing what he witnessed. Turns out he actually had an agenda during that interview. Idk just what it looks like to me so far.

2 hours ago

1

20441573? ago

Julzee2 here...Lol thanks OP. I'm having trouble keeping up with the various comments myself. You listing them all here makes it a little easier...;) I'm about done with the subject personally unless/until something new comes to my attention. I may make a video to update my subs who are unable to access voat but other than that I believe I've probably gotten all the answers I'm going to get from Zach or his 'influencers'. He's made it clear that they're not willing to discuss or share the inside info he's got about the yt FF due to it detracting from what they feel a more important topic of Google censorship so..moving on to attempt to keep up on current news re: Hurricane Dorian, Comey FISA abuse (which looks to be ready to drop soon) and all the other stuff I'm missing out on by talking to a brick wall re: this FF. If I find any new info I'll be sure to share it and I hope visa versa with all you anons out here....;)

20442154? ago

Hi Julzee2. Great job! You got everything he would give up and have developed a relationship with him. He should remember you when he is ready to give up more info on San Bruno. If he feels it would seriously detract from the Google/Veritas exposé, it must be a pretty darned big deal! Something normies might find more outrageous than Google's shenanigans! The social media issues will resolved soon (3-6mos?), no doubt Trump has formulated a plan. I would guess that sometime around then Zach may be able to say more about San Bruno.

If you do decide to make another video on Zach this week, I'll make a new post, link your new video and can repost the running dialog captured from your last video or whatever seems most organized and effective. A 2nd iteration will create a more readable thread for anons. Zach may be the only "opening" to get inside info to understand these mass shooter productions. Great working with you! :o)

20444047? ago

I doubt he'll ever contact me again. I have a feeling he and his 'influencers' had their pow wow and said 'stay away from that witch..lol I'm really sorry if he's totally innocent and I opened this can of worms up for nothing but damn it, everything he says sticks in my craw! But it's his own fault for not coming out with the fact that he was a witness until now (he never did link me to the video where he says he mentioned it recently). But the damn influencers thing is so weird to me. Like I said, my understanding of influencer is Qtuber. Or Qtwatter. A Q follower who has big following. I can't understand why he's being handled by (taking advice from) Qtubers..when he's got Veritas and possibly FBI protecting him..? I would think he would take 'their' advice not Qtubers. Or maybe his definition of influencer is not the same as mine...? But what else could an influencer be? Just a really strange word to use imo.

And honestly? Just the fact that this whole story is bothering me makes me wonder why. I've spend my entire yt life making videos totally following my gut. I've explained this to my subs before here and there that I've been being led this entire time in determining what videos I create. Don't ask me what/who is leading me. I call it my gut. But I am drawn to the subjects that I make my videos on. It's like instinct. I leaf through multitudes of news/subjects but particular ones just grab me and it's like bam, that's the video I HAVE to do. I've tried to create videos on my own using subjects that I think people would want to see but it never works. I've learned to just go with it. And for some reason this energy or whatever it is will not let me let this one go! Why? I really do just want to move on and forget I even mentioned this darn Vorhies ya know? I'd rather be focusing on Comey Inc. But something just isn't right. Anyway, I hope to just make a final video reading of the voat posts about it and then force myself to move on. It just feels like something is not right. But I can't figure out what or explain it or shake it off!...ugh Thank you for all you've done through this...:) Btw, do I know you from my channel? Not sure who you even are..lol

20445458? ago

Your successful dialogue with Zach answered some questions and created more, to the point of his polite resistance. Thats more info than we had and the concept that he might be a white hat is exciting. If pressing on at this time might jeopardize an unknown white hat operation later, I'd put it on the shelf for a while. Like you said, doesn't feel right. Zach seems like a Patriot but the unanswered questions are concerning. The truth will be revealed in time, but not today.

I keep an ultra low profile across the web, avoiding Google as much as possible starting many years ago. I'm a news junkie that reads a lot of articles daily and comments on none. Same with YT, I never comment. In the long run it saves me a lot of time by not dealing with liberals, nuts and shills! I've opened up on VOAT though. Nice forum. More knowledgeable, fact based discussion in an anonymous format leading to real truth and insight.

20447007? ago

Damn, I'm conversing on two different threads on the same topic. Any way to combine us all into one?...lol

https://voat.co/v/whatever/3409092/20445456

20446872? ago

Yep. I guess it's possible but how the heck could info on that shooting mess up a white hat operation? We've been digging into and putting info re: these FF's this entire time. Don't see why this one would be different. We're all out here reporting that Dorian is being controlled by Trump for crump's sake!...lol Yet that doesn't seem to mess up that white hat op. I don't believe that there is ANYTHING that Trump/Q team deems off limits to dig into given they're the ones who initially went to 8chan anons in the first place. It doesn't have to be 'him' that puts the info out there. Could be one of his influencers or anon on here that could drop the sauce. You could be right but I don't buy it.

I see that he's really ramping up his rounds on all the main channels. Every major Qtuber seems to be interviewing him. And in every one he's got that damn buddha behind him...ugh Yet no one mentions a peep about him witnessing that FF. I just can't shake the something's not right feeling off. But..will bite the bullet and sit back and wait. Future should prove the past..;)

20440424? ago

For context maybe you could add Zach's original comment to the top of thie..? https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20430672

20465437? ago

Hi Julzee2! OP here again. I didn't get a YT notification though I am subscribed, but I saw your summary video p1 on Zach. Its posted in QRV now...

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3413738

20466804? ago

Thanks OP..:) This should keep things a bit more organized. I still can't find the 8chan hearing...ugh But I'm looking in between real life distractions so not on my game at the moment.

20440626? ago

Done. Its a part of the header. Thanks!

20440534? ago

I hit the 10,000 char limit per post when I tried to include it last night. I could reply to my own thread but lack of points would drive the post to the bottom. I'll work on it. Other alternative is edit the thread and embed it in the header.

20432458? ago

Julzee2 here. Thank you whoever did this recap. I'm sorry but I'm irritated by this conversation with Vorhes. Maybe I need a break or maybe I have valid reason to be irritated. All I know is that I'm irritated. The explanations I am getting are so...just don't make sense to me. It feels like he and his 'influencers' are sitting on major information that 'they' determined must be kept from us all bc 'they' are making judgements that the normies won't accept it? Seriously? Since when did accommodating normies' comfort level become part of the Qtuber montra? Have we not been reporting on all kinds of subjects that our families and other normies look at us like we're whacko nut jobs for discussing but we stride ahead anyway?

I understood in a way the first reasoning. That 'he' didn't want to take focus away from his apparently 'more important' message of getting out that Google censors and fucks with us. No shit Dick Tracy. Do we all not already know this? I guess normies still don't know..? And I'm sure the documentational proof is great as far as pushing the masses forward in supporting IBofRights. But if people really are getting hurt & killed in these FF's would saving future deaths not be as important (if not more) than alerting the masses to Google censorship? Maybe not. Maybe they know that no one really does get hurt ergo why it's so easy for them to make a judgment call like that..?

Is Trump/Q team not already on the ball to correcting the censorship problem with EO's and Internet Bill of Rights on the way? So the 'more important' thing I guess initially ticked me off bc more important to who? Probably not the people getting killed or maimed. Meanwhile the Left is in full gear making legislation deemed at taking our guns away, terrorizing the normies into supporting these measures, with you can be sure more FF's on the way. Especially with what's about to drop re: Comey and Crossfire Hurricane etc.

Is there a reason why BOTH issues cannot be addressed simultaneously? I get why Vorhes himself might not want to do it because yes, it does make sense that it would muddy his message. But do his influencers not have enough backbone to take on the challenge keeping Vorhes out of it? Could they not drop the info here on voat as anon if they're too chicken to drop a video on their channels?

I don't know. Just seems egotistical to me that they feel it righteous to sit on info shared only among themselves (whoever these influencers are) bc they have determined that sharing might take away from their overall plan? They're acting like they're Q. Drop us a few crumbs and let the sleuths go at it when they already have the answers they could easily drop either here or in a video. I get why Q does it. It's part of the process of us thinking for ourselves. It's what got us this far, so far. They have the full picture. But us little folk researchers? We now have a full picture plan that requires us to censor what info we put out there and what info we keep to ourselves bc it might ruin the bigger plan we've got going?

Idk, It just doesn't make sense to me. I thought we anons all passed our sauces on to the rest of us so that whoever is able to make bread out of it, makes the bread and we all eat for the day.

20434170? ago

This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @julzee2.

Posted automatically (#61165) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

20432678? ago

Hi Julzee2! OP here. Its been incredible following along with your dialog with Zach! You've been pushing hard for a couple days, probably time to give it a break and get some rest. I agree with your concerns and frustrations. Sometimes it will come together after a good nights sleep and a large covfefe. That's my plan!

20432930? ago

Ok will do but first will you give me your opinion on this line of thinking? I'm starting to wonder if Zach really was a crisis actor except a white hat crisis actor not black hat. So... say he really is a legit whistleblower right? He says in his interviews that he became alarmed to Google shit in 2016 right after the election. Yet this shooter event happened 1 1/2 years later in 2018. So he was already aware of and not on Google's side by the time of the shooting right? Was probably already grabbing docs from Google without their knowledge..? And now in his comments to me he's basically admitting that he dropped crumbs in his witness interview...? He says listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot person. Still not exactly sure what he means by that other than instead of saying that the guy was bleeding he said that there was a red blotch on his abdomen or something similar. Then in his comment to me he said 'then listen to how msm described it' which I think the reporter said the guy was shot in the chest 'and' abdoment. And then Vorhes says to me look into the shooter and reconcile.So wtf? Is he saying that back in that 2018 interview he was dropping crumbs? You know what I mean?

Why does he go into explanation to me that his reasoning why 200 other yt employees ahead of him did not stop for the reporter bc yt policy of no interviews without pr auth first. Yet he can break protocol bc he's used to the camera? How the hell does that make sense? A policy is a policy whether you like cameras or not. And now these crumbs dropped 'during' the interview? So why 'did' he describe the shot person like that? Sounds to me like that at the time he did the witness interview he 'knew' he was describing it like that on purpose (crumbs) Starting to sound to me like he may be a white hat plant inside google..? A white hat crisis actor? Is there such a thing...lol

Ppl can hate on me bc I called him a crisis actor but I still think it's possible that my gut feeling about him being one might actually be correct...;)

20438411? ago

Is it possible he is some type of Snowden 2.0? Or reverse Snowden?

Remember back when Greenwald broke Snowden story, he seemed like a white hat? And actually did expose some things that needed to be exposed?

After following Q for nearly two years now, is/was Snowden a white hat? Gray hat at best?

So here we have Vorhies, involved in a potential FF as a crisis actor, who appears to expose damning evidence about GOOG. But all info was already publicly available? And things we already instinctively knew regardless of documentation?

20439207? ago

I think seriously possible yes. You described it perfectly. Is he a white hat or not? Who knows? Sure 'looks' like one but at the same time so did Snowden. My impression from the Q posts is that Snowden is NOT a white hat but again who knows? It's all too murky.

Q said "STAY AWAKE" right? Imo all these people who have just automatically taken sides one way or the other are allowing themselves to drop their guards. How many initially thought Corsi was a good guy. Or any of the many others who 'looked' like good guys turned out to be clowns ? I think what we are doing in questioning the facts around Vorhies is what we are 'supposed' to be doing. Thank you for this.

Also could it be that he's been a white hat implant into Google all along specifically placed 'to' whistleblow at the right time? Seriously, I don't understand why some, after all we've been taught by Q to question and to be careful who we follow, why do some seem to get offended because we do?...lol Are they emotionally attached to Vorhies? Or are they Q soldiers? Seriously people need to STAY AWAKE!

20434254? ago

Sorry, I was out like a light after my last email (was almost 1am on the East Coast!). It was a very long day and my mind was turning into a useless blob. I blundered on the taxi cab phone lookup, thought I saw 333 area code (which does not exist), not a 333 local exchange. 333-333-3333 vs 333-3333. That's how burnt I was getting. Was past time to hang it up for the night.

I follow your logic and agree. Strange that Zach gets the interview, prior familiarity in front of a camera shouldn't preempt Corporate Policy regarding interviews. Was it an impulsive act now, beg forgiveness later moment for Zach? I don't have high confidence in any one answer yet, FWIW.

I need to re-review crumbs to be familiar with all the nuanced details about Zach. You are way ahead of me in that, you are doing a great job! I'm just a novice digger, came from a geopolitical news junkie background before VOAT. I'm not a super sleuth but am pretty solid with logical thinking.

The haters gonna hate, they seldom help move the ball forward and most will just consume your energy if you try to convince them. I know the Patriots on VOAT truly appreciate the work you are doing and look forward to unearthing the Truth. Trust your instincts!

20434646? ago

Did you see the latest I got from one of who looks to be coming to his defense and answering 'for' him?

Awry 37 minutes ago

@julzee2 ffs, how much effort did you put in to identify the image? It is a standard buddha, with the forehead mark being a standard labyrinth.

Wisdom is like a beacon of light shining in the distant dark. Against the light of day, it gets washed out, but against the dark it lights the way. It always looks closer than it is, and the journey is what proves us worthy of knowing it. The truth has always been there beckoning to whosoever should seek it.

The forehead placement is standard third eye, and the labyrinth must be solved in order to access what is behind it. The square spiral is often depicted as both puzzle and key, a ramp on a pyramid or right angled structure. Angles allow passage between, and circles protect and contain. Open squares like a spiral square depict a charge or current, live electricity, a force applied. A round spiral is waves and pulses of a natural origin. Also tunnels across time and space, funnels, cyclones, a force that draws up.

▼

julzee2 1 second ago

Thanks for explaining it to me. My mother was into buddhas for awhile and collected them and I never saw one that looked like this one. Btw no need to begin with what looks to be insult via 'how much effort did I put into identifying the image'. Sounds like you know more about Zach's prop than he does. Why couldn't he have answered this when I asked him? He simply said the symbol does NOT look like the fbi symbol when in fact the one in the center of the forehead exactly looks like the fbi symbol. And why choose that particular buddha to showcase behind you when the third eye, the 'maze' pedo symbol are symbols found on Epstein Island etc that we've all been sensitized to? Look, if you can't seem to understand the validity of my questions then I'm sorry but to me everything I've questioned is clearly valid considering all we've been through these past few years. I happen to continue to follow Q's STAY AWAKE, be careful who you follow and see something say something advise. I do not trust anyone and will not succumb to stopping questioning bc like some here 'like' and believe Zach. It doesn't seem wise to let down our guards. I would think would actually understand this. And I would think that Zach would be a bit more aware of and careful about what might logically be taken out of context when adding props behind his interviews.

Btw, he actually does seem to be confirming that he WAS a crisis actor in that witness interview if you bother to think about it. He basically told me to listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim as he described in that witness interview. Why listen carefully to what he said unless he specifically said something to leave crumbs..? If that is what he was doing then he was not simply telling his witnessing of events. He was acting was he not? It would better explain why he chose to do the interview in the first place while others chose not to compared to the lame explanation that he was camera friendly. A whistleblower white hat giving clues as a witness is 'acting' is it not? If..that was what he was doing.

20434816? ago

Awry response seems to be a brain twister. If he's Zach's handler, is he laying smoke and chaff to confound and delay or is he providing insight to help us get to the truth without simply spelling it out? Seems like the former to me but then again the symbols, dark arts, Buddhism, are not my forte. FYI - I'll occasionally be off line today but will monitor this thread when I return. Trust your intuition, it brought you this far, apparently at a point of increased resistance. You must be getting closer to the truth!

20434869? ago

Thank you for your feedback. I really do appreciate it bc you sound like someone interested in like I feel I am doing. Questioning and thinking logically about what we are hearing/seeing regardless of who's feet we might step on. Too many I think are being lazy and letting their guards down bc they seem to 'like' the guy. But we've been there, done that already with known clowns already (Corsi, AntiSchool, etc). There are many I have trusted just to find out I was wrong to do so. I will not let that happen again. I'm just trying to make sense out of it all. And I can't let go of the fact of how stupid it seems to me to use that buddha for a back drop. Stupid bc you'd HAVE to know that we'd misinterpret it given the dark symbols it's got. So now I'm to be ridiculed bc I'm not an expert on buddhas?...lol How about Zach being ridiculed for using one of the worst props he could find as a back drop which imo 'invites' my type of response...ugh

20430672? ago

Ok this is getting weirder. Zach replied to me in my comment section on this video. Here is what he said.

Hey everyone, this is Zach Vorhies who is featured in this video.

I wanted to come here and give you my statement on everything that happened. First off, I considered doing a video response but after talking with some influencers we came to the conclusion that this story would be a distraction from the Google leaks so I'm instead going to talk about this here and maybe a few other places and hopefully this will be sufficient to answer questions. If it's not, you can find me on twitter and send me a message.

Q: Why is Zach the only one on camera?

A: Google has a strict policy on talking on camera about Google and requires employees to have a chat with PR as standard practice. Obviously this situation is out of the ordinary but the Google policy probably was the main reason employees don't want to talk to the media. Also most people don't like the camera to begin with. A group of camera people were located at Traeger Av and Bayhill Dr (94066). Employees walked by and NONE of them would talk to the reporters who were asking questions. I was likely the 200th person that the camera people saw. No joke. As I was walking by I made eye contact with one of the many reporters and they took that as a sign to ask me what happened... and unlike all other 200 people before me I responded. Also I've been on Television before (Americas Greatest Makers, and a Kickstarter) so the camera is something I'm very comfortable with. So you can imagine what happens next when someone finally is willing to talk about what happened on camera. Camera people swarm me and I become the go-to person that everyone world wide is calling.

Q: What about the false flag allegations?

A: Shots WERE fired. So the shooting did in fact happen. My co-worker Jared Gray was eating lunch at the time it happened. He realized it was a shooting situation when the bullets shattered the window near him. He ran out. As far as the shooter... yeah it's weird. Like really really weird. I've already been down the rabbit hole on this and if I make public statements about the situation then it can lead to a distraction... because it's that weird of a story! If one wants to go down that rabbit hole then listen VERY closely to my description of the person who was shot. Then read the msm reports. Then look up the pictures of the shooter Nasim and reconcile.

Please keep focus on the Google Leaks and not make this more of a story than it has to be. I gave up my 260k / year career and risked being black listed so that you can know the truth about what Google is doing to subvert democracy.

Cheers,

~Zach

I am not satisfied with his explanation but will give myself time before sharing my thoughts on why.

20429407? ago

Did you all notice the phone number on the cab that makes a u-turn right behind vorhes as he's being interviewed at approx 2:25ts? 333-3333

Now either this guy happen stance witnessed the shooting, ended up in that particular spot being interviewed as witness and what? DS said 'hurry guys, grab the 333 cab and have it turn around in the background of that interview. Or..it was staged, [they] knew vorhes was going to be at that particular spot and planned for the cab to show up all along.

Which makes more sense to you?

20443462? ago

It’s a cab company.

https://files.catbox.moe/w26cpd.png

https://files.catbox.moe/w6q986.png

415-333-3333 Yellow Cab San Francisco

20443694? ago

wow what a coincidence huh? Seriously messed up. DS should hire them for all their FF's right?

20444672? ago

Omg wth? I guess all 3's is an easy number for the public to remember and why they would choose that? Wow just crazy huh? I never knew this. Thanks for the head's up...:)

20445105? ago

You’re welcome. Honestly I didn’t know either. I’m always learning stuff through this movement. Everyday I’m learning all sorts of stuff. Some is useful and some is not really that useful but just interesting. Haha

20429479? ago

Good Eye! I didnt see that before. I checked area code 333, it does not exist in North America! There was a search item that came up saying Google had been assigned a few 333 numbers by accident.

20429527? ago

It's just one more 'coincidence' that makes me think he 'is' a crisis actor. Of course I can't know for sure but if you've ever watched that Body Language Ghost channel you notice that she mentions many times how when people are accessing their brains for a 'memory' their eyes will look to the side a bit. Like they're 'remembering' an event. Like playing it back in their mind. This guy does none of that. His eyes are on the reporter the entire time which makes me think he's touting a script, not accessing real memory of an event he just witnessed.

20429625? ago

I think Bombard's said in a previous body language analysis video people tend to look to the right to recall memory details, look to the left to manufacture a story and look you in the eye or at least straight ahead if they are honestly recalling a full vivid memory.

20431120? ago

really? Ok then he would be recalling a full vivid memory then. Did you see that he responded to the yt video? https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20430672 I feel like I'm picking up a better understanding of some of the details possibly. His explanation for why he was the only google employee interviewed sounds a bit lame to me but something else he said is taking me down the rabbit hole. He said that he doesn't want to talk about the FF bc it would take attention away from the Google Leaks he's focused on. I say why not address both but to stay on track with my point here he said that the whole FF thing was very weird. He went down that rabbit hole and everything got really really weird. And then he said "If one wants to go down that rabbit hole then listen VERY closely to my description of the person who was shot. Then read the msm reports. Then look up the pictures of the shooter Nasim and reconcile".

chan)

I'm not sure what he means just yet but I also had a comment on that video where someone said "Nasim material was posted by some one(s) regularly (on ; almost like clockwork every second or third bread for awhile, then less and less. The QR board would harass the hell out of the posts, eventually revealing/proofs that Nasim was a HE, not a SHE."

ch

So are they saying that Nasim was a he and that's why Zach described the shooter as a he? I wish I had some of those 8chan posts.

20423728? ago

Are those Mayan symbols all over his hat?

20431398? ago

I don't know but I sure would like to know what this weird thing is behind him in the redpill interview with closed eyes and pedo symbol hair curls. wtf? Why would you pose in front of such an odd piece of 'art' when we're all so sensitive to ds symbols to begin with 'unless' you were either stupid or sending a specific message? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDQ6k9B60So

20432874? ago

Had not seen that. Speechless.

20433101? ago

Seriously right? And I'm not supposed to question wtf? And he still has not answered me on what the hell it is. All he said was that the curls do not look exactly like the fbi pedo symbols. Never went into what it is and why have it behind him like that. Completely ignored the issue. Anyway, check out my latest theory https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20432930. If you need more context just scroll up to the beginning of this particular thread. His initial response to these others that this anon posted via our yt conversation is a few comments above that.

20434479? ago

Off topic, but you had me watching some of that stuff over again. That YouTube shooter (Nasime Sabz) doesn't look like a real person. Deep fake? Even the name looks like there is something hidden in it. Everything is so convoluted the truth gets more and more gray. Which, I can only assume, is the goal of all this. Mission accomplished. Torches, pitchforks and angry mobs may be the best form of investigation. Don't need answers as much as we need to get back in line with the Constitution. Took me a long time to fully appreciate the value of that document. Cease the amending process for awhile while we get our feet back under us as a country and learn how to trust again.

20434773? ago

Not off topic at all. Yes I thought the same thing about that video of Nasime. Something is definitely off with how she/he looks in that news cast video. Does not look real at all. Or at least does not look natural. I think you're on to something there.

I'm starting to gain what I feel to be better understanding re: Zach and that witness interview. If you ask me he basically admitted that yes, he 'was' acting in that interview since he told me to "listen VERY care fully to how I describe the shot person". I take that to mean he was leaving crumbs in that shooting interview. Now the question is, is he a white hat actor or black hat actor? Looking like possibly white hat given verias seems to trust him and he was giving our crumbs in the first place..?

20436610? ago

Ya, I read, what I believe to be, your comments and questions. Good stuff. I have to wonder if he was fed to Veritas with just enough damning documents to pacify and deceive. With all of the convolution it's not that hard to paint us as crazy. Kind of a specialty of theirs. I'm so ready to get some answers. Or, at least, get the revolution started. I could live without answers if the people take back the government.

20423321? ago

Did he end up sharing the video he had on his phone?

Is there a clip of the complete interview before it cuts?

20447127? ago

Not that I have found. That's one more thing that he would have that he is keeping from the rest of us. Is he controlled op or white hat inside plant? Can't figure out which yet. But I am sure he's not an innocent yt tech who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. This guy has an agenda.

20423459? ago

Here's the original Zach interview - Julzee2 had the link on her YT publisher roll down. 4m52s

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IO9m6wZc-ps

20431406? ago

The interview cuts off right when he's about to give the reporter his phone with the images. Yep.

20422944? ago

looks like bernieBros/antifa warfighters are trying discredit a whistle blower

20422722? ago

Is this to cast aspersions on Project Veritas? Makes PV looks like is a fake organization. Or what?

20433516? ago

The Koch brother(s) are among, if not the largest contributors to Project Veritas afaik.

20422992? ago

The big surprise in Julzee2's video is that Zach was involved in 2018 and now a key whistleblower of the Veritas Google Exposé. Many on this board (and Julzee2) think San Bruno was a FF. If that is true Zach is either an innocent witness or participating actor. This raises a concern that Zach was an actor and the Google Exposé might some how be a set up against Veritas. The Google docs were legit, Google did retaliate against Zach for that.

I'm thinking Zach reported what he thought he saw in 2018 and was an innocent bystander whether 2018 San Bruno was a FF or real. The Google Exposé docs were real and Google did not benefit. Zach may be a hero through all of this. Or something is off and there is more truth to dig.

20422081? ago

First of all, he didn't disclose anything new. We all knew about it. That's a fact.

He is mixing some rants to appear more "hearoish". Big fat lie.

20422036? ago

saw that. crisis actor. big fat psyop.

20422015? ago

Pretty sure that shooting was real, it definitely didn't fit the FF narrative.

20431426? ago

A FF sometimes does have real shooters and injuries/deaths. FF does not mean everything is fake.

20433425? ago

Right, but that doesn't mean that every single shooting that happens is a planned FF.

20434149? ago

No but if you look into it it sure does seem that 'all' of these 'mass shootings' sure the heck are. Name ONE that doesn't look like it was manufactured by DS. Just one.

20436532? ago

The one by the crazy Muslim lady who got demonetized by YouTube.

20421964? ago

Of course he saw shooting. that was shooting in fucking YOUTUBE building where he was working for fucks sake.

20421929? ago

LOL, the media matter/share blue shills are strong with this thread. Tick tock bitches... get your shekels while you can

20421709? ago

Not much of a crisis actor if he was saying shooter was a man not the woman they claimed it was. No guys, he witnessed the false narrative being created in real time. I actually tweeted him about it weeks ago. No response.

20431432? ago

He responded on julzee2's channel in the comment section.

20421071? ago

You Tube and Google are both here in the Bay. I live here. I'm one of the few people not in the tech industry. On the surface it doesn't seem weird to me a programmer would go from YouTube to Google they're a short driving distance and same industry. What bugs me is he said to Project V that he noticed changes at Google after the election, but this shooting was in '18 and he was working at YT at the time. I wonder if he's scamming everyone, unless there's some explanation.

20421816? ago

Google has owned Youtube for over 10 years ya dufus.

20421041? ago

He talks like my doughter does when she is making shit up

20420668? ago

This submission was linked from this v/whatever comment by @Ag47.

Posted automatically (#60961) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

20420352? ago

That was Nazim shooting the Youtube cafeteria.

20420346? ago

Come on. This guy is full of shit. Google didn't let him get out with anything they didn't want him to have. The whole fucking covfefe thing should be proof enough. It was a lie, it's not a word, google didn't hide shit. Now this. He's a freaking fraud and there sure are a whole hell of a lot of people who refuse to even consider the fact that he is not genuine. Mark it, this guy is full of shit and I wouldn't doubt he was well paid to deal with Project Veritas. What better way to control the narrative than to send in your own whistle blower.

20421325? ago

I don't understand your post. Did you see the large dump of documents that came from him?

20433564? ago

Yeah, the ones google left lying around, completely unsecured, for any and all employees to read and glorify in because everyone at google is so completely off the rails that they don't even feel the need to hide it anymore? You mean that doc dump? Yeah, that sounds likely.

20422273? ago

I saw the docs, they look legit. But what are the odds that he was involved in the San Bruno 2018 shooting too? Most think it was a FF, yet Zach was a witness to it. So, is Zach an actor or innocent witness only telling what he thought he was seeing?

20429438? ago

WHAT IF: Zach is a white hat agent?

Everyone has spies, no?

20429581? ago

I think he is a white hat, an innocent, not involved in counter intelligence, just happened to be there and saw what he thought was real and was telling the reporter what he thought he saw. But, I have no proof, just a strong feeling Google surely wished he hadn't released their secret search criteria. He could be a white hat counter intelligence guy. Going to have to watch the rest of the movie to find out!

20430593? ago

I was drug physically into this movie as a direct victim despite my best efforts - I have no choice but to participate.

You are in this movie by your research - it effects the outcome and your future. Keep it up.

20421606? ago

You're replying a Google shill. He wants you to stare at covfefe so you don't see anything else Vorhies leaked.

20421938? ago

I think you are right, anon.

20421235? ago

If covfefe isn't a word, then why did Trump use it?

Where did he get it from?

20433545? ago

Tell you what. You tell me. I looked. I wrote a whole post about it and got nothing but flack from dicks who refused to look for themselves. I could care less about Trumps motivation or lack of. I thought it was funny at the time and forgot about it. This google dude brought it back up and his story is bullshit. That means he is possibly not what or who he claims, add this information in this post and that tilts the scale a little more in that direction. Get off Trump and look at the the subject here. This dude might be feeding us false info. Make your own mind mind up, that's Q's advice, just do it after YOU look into it.

20424282? ago

The Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement Act ( COVFEFE Act) is a bill introduced into the United States House of Representatives in 2017 (on June 12).

20428347? ago

Yes, but that definition doesn't seem to fit into the context of the tweet.

20422252? ago

Covfefe is Arabian for "I will stand up".

20428134? ago

Any idea how a person can confirm that?

I tried searching for a translator online, but no luck (Google, obviously, has eliminated the word from theirs).

20431334? ago

covfefe when spoken by Arabs sounds like 'fuck you' too.

20431742? ago

Thanks, but I had already seen that one.

It has Google first saying it means, "I will stand up," then Google says it's not a word.

I guess Google is calling themselves liars.

Anyway, I'm wondering how to find out if it really is a word, and if so what it means.

(?)

20431945? ago

Google purged covfefe translations and populated covfefe searches with snopes, PolitiFact, etc as FALSE because Orange Man Bad. Then MSM used that to bludgeon Trump. Not absolutely positive that is the true meaning but ill go with it for now. He used the word right after he returned from his trip to Saudi Arabia if I remember correctly.

I found a 2nd source, a left wing Trump basher website no less. I tried to include the website but its a VOAT prohibited website ?! So FWIW, I copied the first part of the article here. It's from The Goldwater Report dot com. in 2017.

The “True Meaning of ‘Covfefe’”

by A. True Ott, PhD

Trump, our eminentTweeting POTUS recently issued a challenge of sorts (via Tweet of course) - asking “who can figure out the true meaning of “covfefe”???

For those discerning few who wish to gain in wisdom- here is the full measure of the deeper meanings inherent in the code word “covfefe” as cryptically used by The Donald.

In Arabic, Cov‘fe’fe’ literally means “I will stand” or “I will stand up”. So Trump originally tweeted to his minions: “Despite the constant negative press, I WILL STAND”.

20440978? ago

Appreciated.

20441130? ago

Added new dialog segment from YT comments, hit 10,000 character limit again, had to cut the last 3-4 messages.

Part 1 Dialog embedded in thread header

Part 2 Dialog relabeled "Part 2" at top of post for clarity

Part 3 Dialog added and labeled "Part 3" for clarity, current with YT pertinent comments up to 9-02-19 6PM EST

If there is a way to pin these posts so they are at the top of the thread, I am not aware of it. Would be a nice feature to keep things organized.

20420660? ago

Agreed. His Veritas interview was lame. He provided ZERO substance, but a lot of platitudes.

20423077? ago

I wanted to believe and I can understand that he might have been in a portrayal mode during the interview but I did not see emotional congruity as I would have expected in the interviews.

20423814? ago

On unlikely coincidences, I've been witness to ever more frequent and meaningful ones the last several years. So much so that my reaction is "there are NO COINCIDENCES". My firm belief is that only God who is eternal omnipresent omniscient is able to do this. He weaves all things together for those who Love Him and are called for His purpose.

20420657? ago

It makes zero sense to me but yet I can't deny my eyes.

20420058? ago

Here is a thought... What if the shooter was real and he was actually just a witness.

20441215? ago

here's a thought, why is it that at every shooting there's also coincidentally an "active shooter drill" going on at the exact time? Why is it every shooter has a therapist and is on anti-depressants? Expand your thinking!

20445264? ago

That's the clown posse MO.

20427476? ago

This^^^ read below it's important

I followed that shooting extremely close because I was in the area at the time and home. On Twitter @Mikecernovich retweeted a witness's group texts before the cops even got there. I was literally flipping through the local news stations waiting for someone to pick up the story. People died and there was a shooter in the lunch courtyard. The MSM said an angry female gunman with a pistol but I read varying witness accounts that the shooter wore a helmet & bullet proof vest & used a rifle, which is a whole other topic (I have sauce on that for anybody who is really digging into the San Bruno YouTube shooting. PM me). As we all know Google and YouTube are 1, and for those who don't know San Bruno is in Silicon Valley. Both have major offices in the area so he could have easily been a witness to the shooting. I don't believe he was acting in the OP video.

What is interesting about that video is:

1. Our witness/whistleblower claims he saw the shooter aiming at "HIS" victim. Machine boot feminine. MSM claims it was a skinny 5'5 to 5'7 vegan woman, which in my eyes would probably not register as a "He".

  1. MSM states the shooter used a 9mm handgun. If he saw the shooter holding a rifle and not a pistol the MSM narrative would explode.

Again more sauce available though it has to be dug up. PM me any diggers or bakers.

20429238? ago

According to NPR interview I assume 'after' his first on camera interview (weird why npr didn't get it on camera..?) Vorhes corrects his first calling the shooter a he by saying "I thought that I had because I thought that it was a guy that was the shooter but, you know, never saw a gun on him. And now it turns out that there was a woman who was - who's the shooter. And so what I believe that I saw was the man arguing with the shooter, who was a woman". http://archive.fo/0ciaT

I'd be great if you could share your sauce here.

20439497? ago

Sorry guys, longggg time lurker here and I'm limited to commenting once per 24hours.

But damn that is good info! I wasn't aware of him doing another interview.

If you like me are questioning the shooting narrative, I'm down to help piece info together. At one point I had a timeline and witness accounts that seemed to contradict the narrative, but it's been awhile and I need a little refresher.

I remember the day of there was an interesting set of interviews being conducted across the street from the shooting at a Carl's Jr. I vaguely remember a bit about a wounded victim going to Carl's Jr and receiving help from customers. Many people there were interviewed and they seemed to be some of the first interviews conducted that day, well before Vorhees spoke. That might be a good starting point.

My sauce is on an old phone and I'll try to recover it today after work. I'll update here for sure.

20440354? ago

Julzee2 here. Thank you but now I'm not so sure it'd be advantageous time-wise to re-investigate that whole debacle. I did watch a few msm clips recently. One talking about the girl who got shot in the calf and was at the Carl's Jr with some guy holding a 'clean' white cloth (zero blood) on her leg to supposedly suppressing the bleeding. Another heavy set guy who rambled on and on saying the shooter shot the one victim at least 10 times etc. And it occurred to me that if I focus my time re-visiting all that crap I'll never be able to keep up with current news.

I think I'm to the point that I said my piece re: what I think of Vorhies. Here https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20430672 and here https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20432056. There are oddities imo to his explanations that just don't sit right with me but I'm fine with just watching and waiting to see if further developments come to light to clarify for me whether he's legit or not either way. I think I've wasted enough time on that particular story. I said my piece and expect to move on. Thank you though. Please feel free to give me a shout out if you happen across something you think I might be interested in. But just doesn't seem worth spending massive time on it imo.

20428277? ago

i'll dig, give me a direction.

20421153? ago

Was the shooter real?

20428307? ago

I believe so

20420913? ago

Was that the shooting with Nazim?

20428303? ago

yes

20423158? ago

i just could not see his name coming

20422259? ago

Supposedly, yes.

20419971? ago

This whole "shit is getting better.. Shit", is just a ruse. The hammer is about to be dropped.... On us.

20420084? ago

Feels that way some times.

20419690? ago

He says in the first video, he said he was a programmer at You Tube. The shooting was at where he worked? Could be a coincidence, I don't see anything nefarious going on even If it is the same guy. I know a guy named Zach Vorhees but hes from NY and about 20 years older than these guys. I'm reserving judgement for now.

20419635? ago

Didn’t he say he works for YouTube/Google? Maybe he actually saw this happen and isn’t acting. He sounds convincing.

20421801? ago

People do some reconsideration of their lives etc when they come close to death, that shooting may have actually been the catalyst for him to decide to blow the whistle.

20428997? ago

Well then why doesn't he ever bring that up in ANY of his interviews? I would think a 'last straw' would at least be mentioned..? Seems to me that people who think that was possibly his last straw are projecting something that he himself never even says.

20441352? ago

you are assuming he has consciously connected those dots. Most are too immersed in it to see these things sometimes.

20424110? ago

I did a lot of think about this last night and I agree. This could have been the last straw.

20420071? ago

He doesn't sound convincing to me. shrug

20422096? ago

same here. he looks too cool as a person with death sentence on him... His rants are wired.

20420492? ago

Well this would be an easy way for GooG to discredit him to truthers. Claim he’s a crisis actor. I don’t know. Think of the motivation for bringing this to light.

20441674? ago

Julzee2 here. Uh..sorry but I'm just an ordinary person not related to Google in any way. Sure would be an easy way for [them] to discredit him to truthers but that assumes that he's not responsible for any of these actions he's taken himself (dropping 'crumbs' during a witness interview, positioning a damn DS looking Buddha behind him, not mentioning the fact that he was a FF witness until busted 'by' my video etc and that there's zero validity in the questions I've raised re: all these inconsistancies. Do you feel my questions not relevant for a nobody to ask given the facts?

20420742? ago

What the fuck kind of logic is that?

20420801? ago

What the fuck kind of question is that? You should always always always question motives.

20421768? ago

However, it is good also to realize that people will generally travel the easiest route possible to accomplish their ends, even evil people. Which would be easier to pull off. A scheme to convincingly fake s shooting hiring actors and production staff and hope a that none of the dozens involved will talk, or just get a nutcase to go to shooting?

20424193? ago

Very true. Just because it’s a false flag, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. It just means it wasn’t organic and it was allowed to happen. Then it was most likely blamed on those who had nothing to do with it, or to push the gun control agenda.

20426064? ago

That is my take on it. according to what I like to call "Q-Theory", The Cabal already has the means to compel certain individuals to do their bidding via MKUltra-like techniques and keep these poor folk in reserve. They also are said to be mean enough to sacrifice children in Satanic rituals, so I would think they would have no problem killing a bunch of innocents to conduct a FF operation.

20419543? ago

Wow. Mindfuck.

20419540? ago

SO WHAT.. THE DATA DROP IS DEVASTATING!!! CHECK OUT POLLY AND HER REPORT

20419561? ago

I'm subscribed and saw her report. She truly is amazing!

20428833? ago

Who's Poly? Can you share the link to the report?

20429043? ago

Her channel -

https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCJkOZZrGNEJYDhzVwd24Bfg/videos

I think this is the report Anon was referring to -

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7tRfinLVNm8

20419507? ago

Maybe he's not acting.. maybe he actually saw what he says he saw ?

20420180? ago

Yeah holy fuck that poor guy, he was talking about all the stress he had with the weight on his shoulders from working with Google. And here you go, part of that was enraged people coming into the compound where he worked and opening fire. He had to skate away. The lady in the video doing the commentary calling this fishy and calling him a liar sounds super low IQ, just in the way she speaks her thoughts out loud lol.

20431312? ago

Thanks I heard that...lol Look I just call it like I see it. Do any of you 'high IQ' professionals know what this image behind Vorhes is? Looks like pedo curls for hair and eyes shut? wtf is that thing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDQ6k9B60So

20447586? ago

That's Gautama Buddha :)

20451966? ago

Thanks! Ok so why the maze in the middle of the forehead? I don't see that there any where else but on 'his' buddha. Is it normal for ppl to add symbols to their own buddhas?

20454764? ago

I didn't see that when I first looked at the clip. Do you think he added that symbol himself? Why? What is that symbol? It is almost always the case for the Buddha to have something there to denote the ajna chakra (the third eye, seeing the world with the mind instead of just the eyes/senses), usually a dot or something representing a whorl of hair.

20459178? ago

He's on TRUreporting channel with Redpill78 now. This guy is EVERYWHERE on EVERY 'influencer' channel on yt. And looks like he took my advice and got rid of the Buddha in the background..lol Still listening but he sure doesn't sound like a smart techie to me. Listen to what he says about censoring 8chan when it comes back up...ugh https://youtu.be/YikhGpyp1Pc?t=2692

20458453? ago

Yeah I see dots on the buddhas but never saw one with that maze. At first I thought it was the pedo symbol but his looks square while the fbi's version is triangle. Then I thought it looked like the maze on Epstein Island but haven't checked yet to see if it's exact match or not.

So I can see that it's possible that his buddha is innocent but..why add the maze to it? I think it's a maze to represent your travel to enlightenment..? unless this is a normal thing for ppl to add their own symbols..? ..and why have it in the background of EVERY SINGLE interview you do on every single yt channel? when he (and his 'influencers') should know that it would add creepiness and spark questions given it's so similar to these DS symbols..?

20447567? ago

That's Gautama Buddha

20419539? ago

Exactly. And I'm about spent tonight, too tired to dig anymore. Saw this tonight and thought it was worth getting in front of the Anons.

20419987? ago

Here is the transcript of Zack on NPR. He did the leftist media rounds.

http://archive.fo/0ciaT

20419492? ago

Wasn't extremely intelligent for @julzee2 to leave their username visible.

20420001? ago

The DS and Google already know who you are silly

20420026? ago

You, probably.

20420116? ago

Of course - I'm super important and scary

20420258? ago

You're thinking about the problem backwards. It has nothing to do with you and everything to do with what you give away for free, for no reason.

20420408? ago

If you like it, you can buy more?

20419451? ago

Big if true

been waiting for a crisis actor to blow the whistle...is this shit legit?

20419696? ago

No, all is as you thought it was before, only change is the coincidence that he was involved in the 2018 San Bruno shooting as a witness, and now he's the GOOGLE Whistleblower too. What are the odds?

20419727? ago

This would seem to call Project Veritas credibility into question

20441368? ago

or perhaps this will give him the courage to speak out about the shooting? To double down as a discloser of truth? Enjoy the show!

20438318? ago

How much money has Project Veritas received from the Koch Brothers?

Yes, they have exposed some very relevant things, but being heavily funded by Koch brothers definitely lends credence to them being controlled opposition.

20420824? ago

Most of the alternative media has been infiltrated.

It's almost wall to wall CONTROLLED OPPOSITION - Infowars, Cernovich, Posobiec, Rebel Media, 911Truth.org , Newsmax, Steve Pieczenik, Webster Tarpley, Veterans Today, Tommy Robinson, YouTube and so many others are either Zionist controlled or Zionist influenced or Zionist blackmailed. Project Veritas might be part of that list.

20420828? ago

Notice how all these "Truth Tellers" are magically pro-Israel? Imagine that.

20421752? ago

That's because Israel isn't the enemy you think they are.

20420646? ago

It's so weird. What purpose would it serve? I do have to admit that when I watched the veritas interview originally I thought the guy came off insincere.

20420426? ago

If true, then he might be DS plant to discredit intentionally. They could fake the records for the background check. Look at what they did to phony up background for BHO.

20425914? ago

this or a limited hangout - throw the plebs a bone to distract them from something more sinister - JASON group !

20420205? ago

No it doesn't...?

20419812? ago

I'm sure Veriras did a thorough background check on him before they did the whistleblower report.Shocking that he was also a witness to the 2018 San Bruno shooting. Coincidences can't be ignored.

20419912? ago

Shocking that he was also a witness to the 2018 San Bruno shooting

Amazing that you seem to believe that there was a 2018 San Bruno shooting. These false flags are hoaxed. No one died. Crisis actors are paid to play the part of victims (vicsims) and witnesses. It's almost as if you've learned nothing and still accept the DS MSM narrative at face value regarding these contrived events

20419989? ago

I didn't say anything indicating whether I believed the shooting was real or faked. Vorhees might have innocently witnessed a part of the "production" and shared what he saw on the news - or he was an actor sharing the "script".

Shocking to me in the sense of the coincidence of Vorhees being involved in 2018, now with Veritas and the implications if he actually is an actor.

20421331? ago

Shocking to me in the sense of the coincidence of Vorhees being involved in 2018, now with Veritas

There are no conicidences

  • Q

20419496? ago

This YT channel Julzee2 video has a local TV broadcast news reporter interviewing Vorhes in 2018. Looks legit to me. He may not have been acting. I'm too tired to make much out of it tonight.

20419676? ago

She's legit. Followed her a long time. Kinda lost track of her but she was always solid

But makes me wonder about Project Veritas. If they've been scammed. Or, more darkly, that they are controlled opposition 🤔

If they have this alleged Google guy was was a crisis actor the BIGGER story to me is how they pay people to act in these fake shootings, not Google's political activities

20441384? ago

and perhaps the project veritas was the first of two disclosures? He's out of work now with nothing to lose

20420101? ago

I've often wondered if Veritas is controlled opposition because the drops they make are usually so tame and predictable. I can see how they're shocking to some people, however for many of us they're usually things we already know.

20421436? ago

Project Veritas isn’t for people like us that already know this shit. People like us get out information from various places, albeit, most of it is aggregated here and the Chan.

Look at it as nothing more than an alternative news source for the normies. I treat them no differently than fox or cnn.

20424711? ago

I’m with you on that, but always suspicious after AJ and Fox News.

20419839? ago

Julzee2 implies he might be but I don't think she is sure either, beyond what she offers up in the video. Its the coincidence part that gives everyone heartburn.

20419375? ago

https://invidio.us/watch?v=zgcAs72e5CM&t=0s :

Google Whistleblower Crisis Actor? - YouTube

This has been an automated message.