Project VERITAS' Zack Vorhes GOOGLE Whistleblower was crisis actor/witness to 2018 San Bruno Shooting Incident! (QRV)

submitted ago by 3409024?

What do you make of that?! Maybe the shooting event was a catalyst leading up to blowing the whistle?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zgcAs72e5CM&t=0s

UPDATE - adding Zach Vorhes first response to Julzee2 in Thread Header (directly below)

Zach Vorhies

Hey everyone, this is Zach Vorhies who is featured in this video.

I wanted to come here and give you my statement on everything that happened. First off, I considered doing a video response but after talking with some influencers we came to the conclusion that this story would be a distraction from the Google leaks so I'm instead going to talk about this here and maybe a few other places and hopefully this will be sufficient to answer questions. If it's not, you can find me on twitter and send me a message.

Q: Why is Zach the only one on camera?

A: Google has a strict policy on talking on camera about Google and requires employees to have a chat with PR as standard practice. Obviously this situation is out of the ordinary but the Google policy probably was the main reason employees don't want to talk to the media. Also most people don't like the camera to begin with. A group of camera people were located at Traeger Av and Bayhill Dr (94066). Employees walked by and NONE of them would talk to the reporters who were asking questions. I was likely the 200th person that the camera people saw. No joke. As I was walking by I made eye contact with one of the many reporters and they took that as a sign to ask me what happened... and unlike all other 200 people before me I responded. Also I've been on Television before (Americas Greatest Makers, and a Kickstarter) so the camera is something I'm very comfortable with. So you can imagine what happens next when someone finally is willing to talk about what happened on camera. Camera people swarm me and I become the go-to person that everyone world wide is calling.

Q: What about the false flag allegations?

A: Shots WERE fired. So the shooting did in fact happen. My co-worker Jared Gray was eating lunch at the time it happened. He realized it was a shooting situation when the bullets shattered the window near him. He ran out. As far as the shooter... yeah it's weird. Like really really weird. I've already been down the rabbit hole on this and if I make public statements about the situation then it can lead to a distraction... because it's that weird of a story! If one wants to go down that rabbit hole then listen VERY closely to my description of the person who was shot. Then read the msm reports. Then look up the pictures of the shooter Nasim and reconcile.

Please keep focus on the Google Leaks and not make this more of a story than it has to be. I gave up my 260k / year career and risked being black listed so that you can know the truth about what Google is doing to subvert democracy.

Cheers,

~Zach

21 hours ago

28

22

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments â†’

20430691? ago

He made a comment on this video addressing it. Seems extremely plausible

20432056? ago

New dialog between Julzee2 and Zach -

julzee2

Thanks for addressing this Zach. I don't think anyone believes no shots were fired. We're all pretty much aware that FF doesn't mean innocents don't get hurt, killed, or unintentionally involved for real or that the shooters aren't real. Some are, some aren't. Some believe you to be one of them unaware of what was going on at the time and working at this place you happened to get caught up in the FF. But you've got to understand given this environment we live in where we've got to question EVERYTHING that it's pretty shocking for us to find out that you were a witness like this. Yet you never once mentioned it in any of the many interviews you've done. Of course it makes us naturally question it.

We see a freeging DS symbol go by in the background (cab w/phone # 333-3333) during your witness interview, the 10 lonely comments on a year and 1/2 old abc7 video and now your interview with redpill with a weird symbol-looking creature in the background? Come on Zach seriously. You've got to at least explain what the heck is that and why have it behind you when you know all this weirdness is going on all around us. What does that art mean that you sit behind you? Do you not see how this would look to us given as you say the 'like really weird' stuff we experience?

And how in the world is addressing it on twitter any different (less distraction)?

I in now way have questioned whether the current info you release re: Google leak is valid or not. It sounds like it totally is. What really has me upset about the whole thing is the fact that we had to find out that you witnessed this FF by accident over a year later..? Imo the silence just made it worse. Now we have to question whether you were privy to this FF and part of the acting team or someone unintentionally caught up in it? Especially now that it seems you are hinting that you know more but don't want to get into it bc it will distract from the leaks part. Given that I don't know what you know that also does not make sense bc you having knowledge of a Google FF I would think would 'add' to the enlightenment of the Google corruption!

Would you be willing to answer our questions here? Seems much more private than twitter.

2 hours ago (edited)

1

Truth Fairy in da house!

Zach: i just wsnt to say that i am a believer and u can see, given you work at Google, not an unlikely reason for you to be there, that you were interviewed. Was the google shooting a FF? Yes likely imo but it's not like i think you are behind it. Just there, at your job. The other crisis actors are hired by ad (listen to today's x22 btw for NY and Nevada) and have appeared at seversl FF events or even mimic each other's lines for God's sake.

But i am also incredibly intuitive. Heck one can say as a counselor, and business and financial consultant, is part of the job and i think not only is he not lying, the way he want about the google whistle-blower sutch, he was brilliant about how he went about it. But many people would do what he did. Keep in mind two questions

1. Who is he up against? Deep State and the MSM

2. What did he gain, lose? He lost a lot... And for what? Nothing. He is hanging on to money, which has other ramifications plus integrity... Who do you think is going to hire him now? Income? Friends? He just became a social pariah ... Sorry to be so glib about this Zach.

Ps, i would love to talk to you offline but i have my iwn concerns about safety and i, too, have been targeted.

1 hour ago

julzee2

Ask him what the damn image is behind him during the redpill interviews. Pretty stupid thing to have there with a bunch of anons looking at ds symbolism 24/7 the past 2 1/2 years...lol Does it not look like hair made of pedo symbols? And Egyptian-looking stone-face weirdo with eyes shut..? Wtf seriously? Look, I'm not saying that I don't believe him on the google dumps. Obviously google f#cks with us and does all that Zach says they do. And with veritas behind him it's almost silly 'to' question his authenticity. But why make things worse by interviewing in front of such an odd thing that's sure to make people uncomfortable and force paranoia that need not be there?

1 hour ago

Zach Vorhies

@julzee2

I just lost my entire comment so I'll just be brief:

I have talked about this shooting briefly in another video interview recently. I didn't talk about weird aspects of the shooting because in the grand scheme of things it doesn't matter in comparison to the leaks which affects literally everyone. The normies won't respond well to it, hence I won't state it here but I've given enough crumbs to get the sleuths started. The main lie that the msm told is staring you right in the face.

As far as the number 333-3333, have you searched for this number on the internet? It maps to YellowCabSf.

As far as the symbol you mention. Go check the FBI database and see how different their symbol is from what you think you see.

~Z~

1 hour ago

julzee2

@Zach Vorhies Ugh I hate when that happens. Could you please link me to that video where you talked about the shooting? Maybe hearing what you had to say about it will give me/us better understanding.

And yes, another sub said he looked for the number and did not find it as a valid in the US but apparently he was wrong..?

Can you please explain what the thing behind you is or is supposed to represent to you? I hope you understand why I have the attitude that I have. Given what we've all been through and have discovered these past few years it's almost as though you are inviting it! All this weird symbolism from crazy people who like to harm children and pull off FF's full of 3's, 6's, shoes etc, can you not see how positioning yourself in front of that thing would possibly produce such a response? If you want people to trust you and hear your intended message about Google then please try to be cognizant about other unintended messages that you may be sending in the future by 'not' having weird ds looking stuff in view so we can focus on your interview rather than wonder wth is behind you...lol

Look, I hope that you are a real whistleblower and 90% of me believes you are. I can't imagine how difficult it must be for you and the dramatic change to your life because of it. I do not intend to degrade your heroism AT ALL but you've got to admit things are a bit weird for all of us in these times. We can't trust ANYONE or ANYTHING anymore. It's prudent for us to question and that's what I have to do until things make sense to me.

It doesn't make sense how exposing Google's corruption is more important than alerting the public to FF's and unnecessary deaths is. Especially when Trump/Q already have Google under control for our future via EOs and IBofRights etc yet people are being harmed in FF's and policies enacted to take our guns away are in progress..? Seems like both issues could be addressed simultaneously. But I understand that you and 'influencers' have discussed this and determined that FF's are not as important to alert the public to. I get it. But it's odd how you and your influencers are now acting like Q giving crumbs instead of just coming out with it. Wow. Why not have your influencers give the info out instead of you if deviating from your focus of censorship is more important? They're already deemed conspiracy theorists anyway and them giving the info out won't interfere with your mission right? Seriously just doesn't make sense.

12 minutes ago (11:15PM EST)

20441038? ago

** DIALOG FROM YT COMMENT SECTION, PART 3 (as of Tuesday 6pm EST) **

Q Revere

Dude... KEEP DROPPING THEM CRUMBS! MIND BLOWN! Godspeed, Patriot!

17 hours ago

Q Revere

Space Reserved For Morgan Freeman.

17 hours ago

Q Revere

Space Reserved for Mic Drop

17 hours ago

julzee2

He's not going to drop any more crumbs don't you understand? He gave enough he said for the sleuths to go at it. It's now your turn to pick up the ball and dig into what he and his influencers already know but aren't willing to share with us bc it will take focus away from his censorship message. Why his influencers can't put the info out there for us leaving him personally out of the loop I'll never know. They could easily report what they know as they do with all the other non-normie-understanding stuff they already report on but nope. For some reason this ty shooting is off limits apparently. I guess they feel like being Q and dropping us a bone and then leaving....sigh

17 hours ago

Craziest Info Out There

You are so courageous Zach, idk if i would've been as strong as you! Especially making so much money & the risk of being blackballed w no more career, my fam would kill me lol. I have such respect for you, and the ceo of overstock. Not only have you both given up a shit load of money & career risk - but you are both prolly targets now?! Omg, please stay safe! Being in your position after being at Google position must be seriously dangerous buddy!! You are a hero in my book!! I'm glad you didn't get hurt - God, hope you weren't their target! If they already knew you were whistleblowing such serious allegations.... God this world is scary as FUCKashima (hehe)! God bless brave PATRIOT!!💞💞

13 hours ago

Source Awry

@julzee2 ffs, how much effort did you put in to identify the image? It is a standard buddha, with the forehead mark being a standard labyrinth.

Wisdom is like a beacon of light shining in the distant dark. Against the light of day, it gets washed out, but against the dark it lights the way. It always looks closer than it is, and the journey is what proves us worthy of knowing it. The truth has always been there beckoning to whosoever should seek it.

The forehead placement is standard third eye, and the labyrinth must be solved in order to access what is behind it. The square spiral is often depicted as both puzzle and key, a ramp on a pyramid or right angled structure. Angles allow passage between, and circles protect and contain. Open squares like a spiral square depict a charge or current, live electricity, a force applied. A round spiral is waves and pulses of a natural origin. Also tunnels across time and space, funnels, cyclones, a force that draws up.

10 hours ago

1

julzee2

Thanks for explaining it to me. My mother was into buddhas for awhile and collected them and I never saw one that looked like this one. Btw no need to begin with what looks to be insult via 'how much effort did I put into identifying the image'. Sounds like you know more about Zach's prop than he does. Why couldn't he have answered this when I asked him? He simply said the symbol does NOT look like the fbi symbol when in fact the one in the center of the forehead exactly looks like the fbi symbol. And why choose that particular buddha to showcase behind you when the third eye, the 'maze' pedo symbol are symbols found on Epstein Island etc that we've all been sensitized to? Look, if you can't seem to understand the validity of my questions then I'm sorry but to me everything I've questioned is clearly valid considering all we've been through these past few years. I happen to continue to follow Q's STAY AWAKE, be careful who you follow and see something say something advise. I do not trust anyone and will not succumb to stopping questioning bc like some here 'like' and believe Zach. It doesn't seem wise to let down our guards. I would think would actually understand this. And I would think that Zach would be a bit more aware of and careful about what might logically be taken out of context when adding props behind his interviews.

Btw, he actually does seem to be confirming that he WAS a crisis actor in that witness interview if you bother to think about it. He basically told me to listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim as he described in that witness interview. Why listen carefully to what he said unless he specifically said something to leave crumbs..? If that is what he was doing then he was not simply telling his witnessing of events. He was acting was he not? It would better explain why he chose to do the interview in the first place while others chose not to compared to the lame explanation that he was camera friendly. A whistleblower white hat giving clues as a witness is 'acting' is it not? If..that was what he was doing.

9 hours ago

2

vedicastrol

Zach, Hi I sent a DM to you on twitter asking you to verify your birth time, as I have included you in a book I am writing "Q ANON: The Reluctant warrior" (Part 9) https:// www. amazon .com /s?k=Dr.+Bobbi+anne+White

I used 5/5/1980 West Linn, Portland 14:00 so I'm guessing. Would you be kind enough to clarify. ThanQ

9 hours ago

Truth Fairy in da house!

@vedicastrol your doing his chart for your book? Interesting. i have been into the Q movement since 2017, i am very curious as to why you would think this would be relevant to have knowledge of vedic astrology? Do you have a specific audience? What is your motivation?

Ok the more i think about this the more concerned i feel. This is personal to Zach and CAN be used against him, people can steal his identity. Google IS coming after him, yes they have the info but let's not hand it over to the world...

Plus re: Q movement.... It's impossible to even use astrology for these purposes because you don't know who Q is, 1 person? many people? If an event, you don't have an inception date/time.

If it were me, i would NIT be handing my info over to someone because they say, hey i am writing a book and adding you in it. WTH?

7 hours ago (edited)

vedicastrol

All my books are on Amazon https:// www. amazon .com/s?k=Dr.+Bobbi+anne+White

I believe that we are in the midst of the Second American Revolution, and those participating have certain roles.

For example, although I don't have Zach's specific time of birth, his Moon Nakshatra is very similar to that of George Washington's

You might remember that Washington was working for the British in the French and Indian War and that he became disenchanted with them, similar to what happened with Zach.

7 hours ago

Q Revere

@julzee2 I get a notification that you replied, not knowing if it was to me or not, and I see you saying, "what looks to be an insult" and then...THEN I see you replying to ME with a "don't you understand?".... oh the irony.

6 hours ago

1

Q Revere

@julzee2 If you've been watching ALL of his interviews, you'll see that different tidbits are discussed on occasion. THOSE tidbits are sparking my interest on topics I wouldn't have researched. To me, THEY ARE CRUMBS. Considering he'll keep doing interviews to stay alive, there's a chance I'll get more of them if I keep watching those interviews. "-sigh"

6 hours ago

1

Craziest Info Out There

@julzee2 Hey Julzee, idk about the symbolizm n stuff bc i didnt watch x22 or redpill interviews. But, it doesnt make sense zach would apply 2b a crisis actor - he was making 260k a year - which he did apparently give up to whisleblow for us. And his point to not elaborate further 2 keep focus & narrative on google papers vs possible ff makes sense.

Pppl also think the overstock ceo is acting, possibly lying, too - some1 who also gave up huge mega buxx to speak (wo involving overstock - not really bc he had a 'russian' gf thats currently in jail - he has proof he was setup to be used/including her.

Honestly dont know how i would seem to others if i just went thru [zachs] situation esp being in his position. Plus its not obvious to me the reason(s) he lie/be a crisis actor, etc. And as far as i know, he hadnt been targeted/mentioned by Q. My degrees & secret clearance & decades doing investigative research for the military and other gov contracts makes me question everything, at see things in 360 - every angle. Granted we dont a hellof a lot in this case, but with what we do know, i just cant find a reason for him to lie rn, or What benefit or advantage he'd gain by doing so. One day we will know, probably, lol. 💞

2 hours ago

julzee2

@Craziest Info Out There I didn't say he applied to be a crisis actor like someone off the streets to earn 250. But it sure is starting to look like he 'could' be part of a Q team op as possibly an 'insider' at Google turned whistleblower..? A white hat crisis actor..? Still doesn't explain wth he would place a buddha behind him during the redpill interviews. I would think that should have been an obvious no no given all this crazy symbolism we've been trained to spot which could easily be mistaken for DS signs. But imo he basically confirmed in my eyes that he 'was' an actor during that interview and not simply someone at the wrong place at the wrong time. He leads us to 'crumbs' he left during that interview by telling us to "listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim". So what was an innocent, unconnected to this stuff, normal every day guy just so happening to work at yt and getting accidentally out of the blue, caught up in the FF giving crumbs..? I thought he was just expressing what he witnessed. Turns out he actually had an agenda during that interview. Idk just what it looks like to me so far.

2 hours ago

1

20441573? ago

Julzee2 here...Lol thanks OP. I'm having trouble keeping up with the various comments myself. You listing them all here makes it a little easier...;) I'm about done with the subject personally unless/until something new comes to my attention. I may make a video to update my subs who are unable to access voat but other than that I believe I've probably gotten all the answers I'm going to get from Zach or his 'influencers'. He's made it clear that they're not willing to discuss or share the inside info he's got about the yt FF due to it detracting from what they feel a more important topic of Google censorship so..moving on to attempt to keep up on current news re: Hurricane Dorian, Comey FISA abuse (which looks to be ready to drop soon) and all the other stuff I'm missing out on by talking to a brick wall re: this FF. If I find any new info I'll be sure to share it and I hope visa versa with all you anons out here....;)

20442154? ago

Hi Julzee2. Great job! You got everything he would give up and have developed a relationship with him. He should remember you when he is ready to give up more info on San Bruno. If he feels it would seriously detract from the Google/Veritas exposé, it must be a pretty darned big deal! Something normies might find more outrageous than Google's shenanigans! The social media issues will resolved soon (3-6mos?), no doubt Trump has formulated a plan. I would guess that sometime around then Zach may be able to say more about San Bruno.

If you do decide to make another video on Zach this week, I'll make a new post, link your new video and can repost the running dialog captured from your last video or whatever seems most organized and effective. A 2nd iteration will create a more readable thread for anons. Zach may be the only "opening" to get inside info to understand these mass shooter productions. Great working with you! :o)

20444047? ago

I doubt he'll ever contact me again. I have a feeling he and his 'influencers' had their pow wow and said 'stay away from that witch..lol I'm really sorry if he's totally innocent and I opened this can of worms up for nothing but damn it, everything he says sticks in my craw! But it's his own fault for not coming out with the fact that he was a witness until now (he never did link me to the video where he says he mentioned it recently). But the damn influencers thing is so weird to me. Like I said, my understanding of influencer is Qtuber. Or Qtwatter. A Q follower who has big following. I can't understand why he's being handled by (taking advice from) Qtubers..when he's got Veritas and possibly FBI protecting him..? I would think he would take 'their' advice not Qtubers. Or maybe his definition of influencer is not the same as mine...? But what else could an influencer be? Just a really strange word to use imo.

And honestly? Just the fact that this whole story is bothering me makes me wonder why. I've spend my entire yt life making videos totally following my gut. I've explained this to my subs before here and there that I've been being led this entire time in determining what videos I create. Don't ask me what/who is leading me. I call it my gut. But I am drawn to the subjects that I make my videos on. It's like instinct. I leaf through multitudes of news/subjects but particular ones just grab me and it's like bam, that's the video I HAVE to do. I've tried to create videos on my own using subjects that I think people would want to see but it never works. I've learned to just go with it. And for some reason this energy or whatever it is will not let me let this one go! Why? I really do just want to move on and forget I even mentioned this darn Vorhies ya know? I'd rather be focusing on Comey Inc. But something just isn't right. Anyway, I hope to just make a final video reading of the voat posts about it and then force myself to move on. It just feels like something is not right. But I can't figure out what or explain it or shake it off!...ugh Thank you for all you've done through this...:) Btw, do I know you from my channel? Not sure who you even are..lol

20445458? ago

Your successful dialogue with Zach answered some questions and created more, to the point of his polite resistance. Thats more info than we had and the concept that he might be a white hat is exciting. If pressing on at this time might jeopardize an unknown white hat operation later, I'd put it on the shelf for a while. Like you said, doesn't feel right. Zach seems like a Patriot but the unanswered questions are concerning. The truth will be revealed in time, but not today.

I keep an ultra low profile across the web, avoiding Google as much as possible starting many years ago. I'm a news junkie that reads a lot of articles daily and comments on none. Same with YT, I never comment. In the long run it saves me a lot of time by not dealing with liberals, nuts and shills! I've opened up on VOAT though. Nice forum. More knowledgeable, fact based discussion in an anonymous format leading to real truth and insight.

20447007? ago

Damn, I'm conversing on two different threads on the same topic. Any way to combine us all into one?...lol

https://voat.co/v/whatever/3409092/20445456

20446872? ago

Yep. I guess it's possible but how the heck could info on that shooting mess up a white hat operation? We've been digging into and putting info re: these FF's this entire time. Don't see why this one would be different. We're all out here reporting that Dorian is being controlled by Trump for crump's sake!...lol Yet that doesn't seem to mess up that white hat op. I don't believe that there is ANYTHING that Trump/Q team deems off limits to dig into given they're the ones who initially went to 8chan anons in the first place. It doesn't have to be 'him' that puts the info out there. Could be one of his influencers or anon on here that could drop the sauce. You could be right but I don't buy it.

I see that he's really ramping up his rounds on all the main channels. Every major Qtuber seems to be interviewing him. And in every one he's got that damn buddha behind him...ugh Yet no one mentions a peep about him witnessing that FF. I just can't shake the something's not right feeling off. But..will bite the bullet and sit back and wait. Future should prove the past..;)

20440424? ago

For context maybe you could add Zach's original comment to the top of thie..? https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024/20430672

20465437? ago

Hi Julzee2! OP here again. I didn't get a YT notification though I am subscribed, but I saw your summary video p1 on Zach. Its posted in QRV now...

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3413738

20466804? ago

Thanks OP..:) This should keep things a bit more organized. I still can't find the 8chan hearing...ugh But I'm looking in between real life distractions so not on my game at the moment.

20440626? ago

Done. Its a part of the header. Thanks!

20440534? ago

I hit the 10,000 char limit per post when I tried to include it last night. I could reply to my own thread but lack of points would drive the post to the bottom. I'll work on it. Other alternative is edit the thread and embed it in the header.

20432458? ago

Julzee2 here. Thank you whoever did this recap. I'm sorry but I'm irritated by this conversation with Vorhes. Maybe I need a break or maybe I have valid reason to be irritated. All I know is that I'm irritated. The explanations I am getting are so...just don't make sense to me. It feels like he and his 'influencers' are sitting on major information that 'they' determined must be kept from us all bc 'they' are making judgements that the normies won't accept it? Seriously? Since when did accommodating normies' comfort level become part of the Qtuber montra? Have we not been reporting on all kinds of subjects that our families and other normies look at us like we're whacko nut jobs for discussing but we stride ahead anyway?

I understood in a way the first reasoning. That 'he' didn't want to take focus away from his apparently 'more important' message of getting out that Google censors and fucks with us. No shit Dick Tracy. Do we all not already know this? I guess normies still don't know..? And I'm sure the documentational proof is great as far as pushing the masses forward in supporting IBofRights. But if people really are getting hurt & killed in these FF's would saving future deaths not be as important (if not more) than alerting the masses to Google censorship? Maybe not. Maybe they know that no one really does get hurt ergo why it's so easy for them to make a judgment call like that..?

Is Trump/Q team not already on the ball to correcting the censorship problem with EO's and Internet Bill of Rights on the way? So the 'more important' thing I guess initially ticked me off bc more important to who? Probably not the people getting killed or maimed. Meanwhile the Left is in full gear making legislation deemed at taking our guns away, terrorizing the normies into supporting these measures, with you can be sure more FF's on the way. Especially with what's about to drop re: Comey and Crossfire Hurricane etc.

Is there a reason why BOTH issues cannot be addressed simultaneously? I get why Vorhes himself might not want to do it because yes, it does make sense that it would muddy his message. But do his influencers not have enough backbone to take on the challenge keeping Vorhes out of it? Could they not drop the info here on voat as anon if they're too chicken to drop a video on their channels?

I don't know. Just seems egotistical to me that they feel it righteous to sit on info shared only among themselves (whoever these influencers are) bc they have determined that sharing might take away from their overall plan? They're acting like they're Q. Drop us a few crumbs and let the sleuths go at it when they already have the answers they could easily drop either here or in a video. I get why Q does it. It's part of the process of us thinking for ourselves. It's what got us this far, so far. They have the full picture. But us little folk researchers? We now have a full picture plan that requires us to censor what info we put out there and what info we keep to ourselves bc it might ruin the bigger plan we've got going?

Idk, It just doesn't make sense to me. I thought we anons all passed our sauces on to the rest of us so that whoever is able to make bread out of it, makes the bread and we all eat for the day.

20434170? ago

This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @julzee2.

Posted automatically (#61165) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

20432678? ago

Hi Julzee2! OP here. Its been incredible following along with your dialog with Zach! You've been pushing hard for a couple days, probably time to give it a break and get some rest. I agree with your concerns and frustrations. Sometimes it will come together after a good nights sleep and a large covfefe. That's my plan!

20432930? ago

Ok will do but first will you give me your opinion on this line of thinking? I'm starting to wonder if Zach really was a crisis actor except a white hat crisis actor not black hat. So... say he really is a legit whistleblower right? He says in his interviews that he became alarmed to Google shit in 2016 right after the election. Yet this shooter event happened 1 1/2 years later in 2018. So he was already aware of and not on Google's side by the time of the shooting right? Was probably already grabbing docs from Google without their knowledge..? And now in his comments to me he's basically admitting that he dropped crumbs in his witness interview...? He says listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot person. Still not exactly sure what he means by that other than instead of saying that the guy was bleeding he said that there was a red blotch on his abdomen or something similar. Then in his comment to me he said 'then listen to how msm described it' which I think the reporter said the guy was shot in the chest 'and' abdoment. And then Vorhes says to me look into the shooter and reconcile.So wtf? Is he saying that back in that 2018 interview he was dropping crumbs? You know what I mean?

Why does he go into explanation to me that his reasoning why 200 other yt employees ahead of him did not stop for the reporter bc yt policy of no interviews without pr auth first. Yet he can break protocol bc he's used to the camera? How the hell does that make sense? A policy is a policy whether you like cameras or not. And now these crumbs dropped 'during' the interview? So why 'did' he describe the shot person like that? Sounds to me like that at the time he did the witness interview he 'knew' he was describing it like that on purpose (crumbs) Starting to sound to me like he may be a white hat plant inside google..? A white hat crisis actor? Is there such a thing...lol

Ppl can hate on me bc I called him a crisis actor but I still think it's possible that my gut feeling about him being one might actually be correct...;)

20438411? ago

Is it possible he is some type of Snowden 2.0? Or reverse Snowden?

Remember back when Greenwald broke Snowden story, he seemed like a white hat? And actually did expose some things that needed to be exposed?

After following Q for nearly two years now, is/was Snowden a white hat? Gray hat at best?

So here we have Vorhies, involved in a potential FF as a crisis actor, who appears to expose damning evidence about GOOG. But all info was already publicly available? And things we already instinctively knew regardless of documentation?

20439207? ago

I think seriously possible yes. You described it perfectly. Is he a white hat or not? Who knows? Sure 'looks' like one but at the same time so did Snowden. My impression from the Q posts is that Snowden is NOT a white hat but again who knows? It's all too murky.

Q said "STAY AWAKE" right? Imo all these people who have just automatically taken sides one way or the other are allowing themselves to drop their guards. How many initially thought Corsi was a good guy. Or any of the many others who 'looked' like good guys turned out to be clowns ? I think what we are doing in questioning the facts around Vorhies is what we are 'supposed' to be doing. Thank you for this.

Also could it be that he's been a white hat implant into Google all along specifically placed 'to' whistleblow at the right time? Seriously, I don't understand why some, after all we've been taught by Q to question and to be careful who we follow, why do some seem to get offended because we do?...lol Are they emotionally attached to Vorhies? Or are they Q soldiers? Seriously people need to STAY AWAKE!

20434254? ago

Sorry, I was out like a light after my last email (was almost 1am on the East Coast!). It was a very long day and my mind was turning into a useless blob. I blundered on the taxi cab phone lookup, thought I saw 333 area code (which does not exist), not a 333 local exchange. 333-333-3333 vs 333-3333. That's how burnt I was getting. Was past time to hang it up for the night.

I follow your logic and agree. Strange that Zach gets the interview, prior familiarity in front of a camera shouldn't preempt Corporate Policy regarding interviews. Was it an impulsive act now, beg forgiveness later moment for Zach? I don't have high confidence in any one answer yet, FWIW.

I need to re-review crumbs to be familiar with all the nuanced details about Zach. You are way ahead of me in that, you are doing a great job! I'm just a novice digger, came from a geopolitical news junkie background before VOAT. I'm not a super sleuth but am pretty solid with logical thinking.

The haters gonna hate, they seldom help move the ball forward and most will just consume your energy if you try to convince them. I know the Patriots on VOAT truly appreciate the work you are doing and look forward to unearthing the Truth. Trust your instincts!

20434646? ago

Did you see the latest I got from one of who looks to be coming to his defense and answering 'for' him?

Awry 37 minutes ago

@julzee2 ffs, how much effort did you put in to identify the image? It is a standard buddha, with the forehead mark being a standard labyrinth.

Wisdom is like a beacon of light shining in the distant dark. Against the light of day, it gets washed out, but against the dark it lights the way. It always looks closer than it is, and the journey is what proves us worthy of knowing it. The truth has always been there beckoning to whosoever should seek it.

The forehead placement is standard third eye, and the labyrinth must be solved in order to access what is behind it. The square spiral is often depicted as both puzzle and key, a ramp on a pyramid or right angled structure. Angles allow passage between, and circles protect and contain. Open squares like a spiral square depict a charge or current, live electricity, a force applied. A round spiral is waves and pulses of a natural origin. Also tunnels across time and space, funnels, cyclones, a force that draws up.

â–¼

julzee2 1 second ago

Thanks for explaining it to me. My mother was into buddhas for awhile and collected them and I never saw one that looked like this one. Btw no need to begin with what looks to be insult via 'how much effort did I put into identifying the image'. Sounds like you know more about Zach's prop than he does. Why couldn't he have answered this when I asked him? He simply said the symbol does NOT look like the fbi symbol when in fact the one in the center of the forehead exactly looks like the fbi symbol. And why choose that particular buddha to showcase behind you when the third eye, the 'maze' pedo symbol are symbols found on Epstein Island etc that we've all been sensitized to? Look, if you can't seem to understand the validity of my questions then I'm sorry but to me everything I've questioned is clearly valid considering all we've been through these past few years. I happen to continue to follow Q's STAY AWAKE, be careful who you follow and see something say something advise. I do not trust anyone and will not succumb to stopping questioning bc like some here 'like' and believe Zach. It doesn't seem wise to let down our guards. I would think would actually understand this. And I would think that Zach would be a bit more aware of and careful about what might logically be taken out of context when adding props behind his interviews.

Btw, he actually does seem to be confirming that he WAS a crisis actor in that witness interview if you bother to think about it. He basically told me to listen VERY carefully to how he described the shot victim as he described in that witness interview. Why listen carefully to what he said unless he specifically said something to leave crumbs..? If that is what he was doing then he was not simply telling his witnessing of events. He was acting was he not? It would better explain why he chose to do the interview in the first place while others chose not to compared to the lame explanation that he was camera friendly. A whistleblower white hat giving clues as a witness is 'acting' is it not? If..that was what he was doing.

20434816? ago

Awry response seems to be a brain twister. If he's Zach's handler, is he laying smoke and chaff to confound and delay or is he providing insight to help us get to the truth without simply spelling it out? Seems like the former to me but then again the symbols, dark arts, Buddhism, are not my forte. FYI - I'll occasionally be off line today but will monitor this thread when I return. Trust your intuition, it brought you this far, apparently at a point of increased resistance. You must be getting closer to the truth!

20434869? ago

Thank you for your feedback. I really do appreciate it bc you sound like someone interested in like I feel I am doing. Questioning and thinking logically about what we are hearing/seeing regardless of who's feet we might step on. Too many I think are being lazy and letting their guards down bc they seem to 'like' the guy. But we've been there, done that already with known clowns already (Corsi, AntiSchool, etc). There are many I have trusted just to find out I was wrong to do so. I will not let that happen again. I'm just trying to make sense out of it all. And I can't let go of the fact of how stupid it seems to me to use that buddha for a back drop. Stupid bc you'd HAVE to know that we'd misinterpret it given the dark symbols it's got. So now I'm to be ridiculed bc I'm not an expert on buddhas?...lol How about Zach being ridiculed for using one of the worst props he could find as a back drop which imo 'invites' my type of response...ugh