This thread is a follow-up to Julzee2's interview of Zach Vorhes Sep 2, 2019.
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3409024
I was OP on that QVR thread and attempted to update it real time with the evolving dialogue and probing questions Julzee2 asked of Zach in YT comments on her video. We had a lot of participation here and a summarization/current status of unanswered questions is in order.
Julzee2 released a new Video summarizing the events, discussions, insight and her lingering questions in detail this morning. From the beginning to 27:20 she discusses her dialog with Zach and some of the YT comments from her video where she revealed that Zach was not only the Veritas Google Whistleblower but also a San Bruno shooting Witness. Her VOAT QRV thread discussion starts at 27:20. Good unwind of details and what questions remain. I believe this is to be Part 1 of 2. length 46:25.
Https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgq1ySWRtyY
view the rest of the comments →
20466191? ago
Julzee doesnt even mention zech says the shooter was a male, heavy set. Her whole video was just harping on stupid shit that doesn't matter while leaving out vital information.
20466255? ago
She talked about that toward the end of the video where she mentions he referred to the shooter a couple times as "him", " his". When Zach talked about the "stain" on shooters shirt instead of the "blood" or "wound". She mentions the shooter was a transexual.
20466288? ago
She didn't say anything about zach saying 'heavy set' which is the most important detail. The shooter was very slender. If I were to apply to same logic she applies to zach I'd say she's a shill who's job it is to lead people astray onto things like art, symbols, and easy to remember cab phone numbers.
20468608? ago
julzee here. Maybe I heard wrong but I thought the heavy set person he was describing was the crazy guy that he 'thought' was the shooter who rambled on and on 'are you going to shoot me'. There are two ppl he mentions seeing. A body on the ground (which would be Nasim with the stain on 'his' abdomen) and the guy standing 20ft from the body (heavy set) who he assumed was the shooter. Am I wrong?
20468790? ago
2:10 "Can you give me a description of what that shooter looked like?"
https://youtu.be/IO9m6wZc-ps?t=129
He looked like he was a bit heavy set, I didn't rezognize him for youtube. I would have guess he was 5'9 but it happen so quickly that, the details are a little fuzzy still"
20468853? ago
Yes. There are two people he describes. One is the heavy set guy who was screaming 'are you gonna shoot me' who he 'thought' was the shooter who was standing 20ft from the body on the ground. He was describing what he later explains as a crazy guy who he 'mistakenly' took to be the one who shot the person on the ground. The person on the ground was Nasim who he also describes as a man but does not say she was heavy set. 5:5?
20468892? ago
Where does he say he was mistaken? So no breadcrumbs then?
20469014? ago
The NPR article. Let me find it. It was linked on another thread. https://voat.co/v/whatever/3409092 YouTube Software Engineer Describes Seeing Altercation In Building Courtyard
"When I approached the courtyard, that's when I heard a commotion. I heard a man yelling out, do you want to shoot me? And about 25 feet away from him was somebody on the ground with an apparent gunshot wound in the stomach. And he was bleeding out of his shirt. And he wasn't moving. And I didn't realize that he had been shot. I just was like, what's going on? And..."
"CORNISH: And this is on campus. So do you know if these are employees involved?
VORHIES: This is on campus, yeah. I didn't get a good look at the man other than I heard that he was yelling to somebody that I didn't hear, do you want to shoot me? And I was - I froze. And at that point, the door that separates the courtyard from the street swung open, and a police officer entered with an assault rifle. At that point, I realized this was not someplace I needed to be."
"CORNISH: Did you see the shooter?
VORHIES: I thought that I had because I thought that it was a guy that was the shooter but, you know, never saw a gun on him. And now it turns out that there was a woman who was - who's the shooter. And so what I believe that I saw was the man arguing with the shooter, who was a woman."
20469154? ago
Interesting. No idea what he's talking about then when he mentions to listen to his description of the person who was shot. Nothing really stands out.
20469857? ago
What stands out to me is that he describes the shot person (Nasim) not as bleeding but as 'a red stain on his abdomen'. I would think that were you an innocent yt employee who just saw a dead body on the ground who had just gotten shot your first words would be I saw blood, not a 'red stain'. So this tells me that he's telling us that he left crumbs during that interview meaning I think that it was a FF..? It was a red stain (fake blood..?).
He also says to listen to how msm describes it. He only told the reporter that he saw possibly gun shot in abdomen. But while he's digging in his phone for the video to give her she recaps what he had told her only she adds 'shot in the chest 'and' abdomen'. She added a detail that he never told her.
He also said 'reconcile' how he had described the shot body vs how msm describes the shooter. Vorhies describes the body as 'he'. Msm said it was a 'she'. So it tells me that he was again leaving another crumb that Vorhies was a man not a woman.