MadWorld ago

Great post!! I must have been very busy and didn't see this coming. Most of your snapshots I have already seen, except that crazy graph, which was too much to follow through. Thanks!

NotHereForPizza ago

That's much less than the tip of the iceberg, to be frank.

415458235641685 ago

I love how Republicans love to take credit for freeing the slaves, or passing the 14th and 15th amendment, but forget that Republicans and Democrats flipped views around the 30s..

Good job morons.

Stayedclassy ago

I am saving this post!

9.9/10 OP (sorry no tits)

Now that is how you redpill a normie!

NotHereForPizza ago

I'll let you catch up and then come back.

J20 ago

Hadn't seen either of the flowcharts before, TY OP.

NotHereForPizza ago

Beware, Kev, silence is also a response.

MrShill ago

The Titanic one undermines the narrative. Robotic subs have visited the wreck and seen the long scar up the hull consistent with iceburg impact, not a torpedo

NotHereForPizza ago

You've excluded the sabotage angle? Sabotage tends to be their specialty.

HuginnOgMuninn ago

that last sentence of the first image, "The pain was I that knew i was wrong" Rings so true.

We delude ourselves at our peril, we eat away at our soul. I can't imagine a greater pain than that, and that's why we'll win. because biologically, we're somekind of truth-creature. We find nourishment in truth, not only that but we find hell-like pain by denying truth.

I can't speak for all of us, upvote me if you agree, but I find TRUTH to be as nourishing as water in the desert, and despite the amount of fuckery on this site, there is more truth here than lies.

enginedriver13 ago

Fantastic content, and thanks for putting it all together.

Hall_of_Cost ago

This should be stickied

Herpfree93 ago

excellent! thank you! some i had missed

NotHereForPizza ago

Hey, Kev. While I have you here, what do you think of all the Jordan Peterson threads being posted on the chans, along with the chatter that just (((happens))) to take place here about him?

J_Darnley ago

Before I open a dozen tabs to read the text in some fucking images does anyone have a TL;DR?

Fagtardicus ago

ONE AT A TIME NIGGA. GET YOURSELF SOME POPPING CORN AND THEN MAKE A JOLLY LITTLE NIGHT OF IT IF YOU NEED.

ITS NOT LIKE YOU HAVE ANYTHING BETTER TO DO SINCE YOUR ON THIS SHITTY LITTLE CIABATTA ROLL FANSITE

NotHereForPizza ago

Some things take effort. This is one of them.

Eh5439NKfM ago

Maybe it'll tank my contribution points, but I think I'll comment in each thread of racist BS I see. Just to see if anyone else is checking the comments for a disgusted dissenting voice. Here I am.

Eh5439NKfM ago

All words are made up at some point, that's an interesting fact if true I'll read into it.
Regardless of that, Racism is a well defined word, describing ideologies or actions held by those in power that discriminate or oppress people based on their race, skin color, etc.

11859512? ago

describing ideologies or actions held by those in power that

lol

people based on their race, skin color, etc.

etc indeed.

BigFatDaddy ago

Well, the infographic makes one small mistake. "Racialism" was first recorded being used by Capt. Richard H. Pratt in the late 19th century. However, it WAS later popularized as "Racism" by Trotsky (jew) and Lenin (jew).

As far as definitions go, let's be honest, arguing about definitions in the dictionary is something basically only us white folks do. Most people in the world only understand common usage. Like faggot, right? How many people really know it means a bundle of sticks? But EVERYONE knows it refers to a male homosexual.

What is the common usage of "Racism" or "Racist"? Is it in line with the dictionary definition? Not at all. So what IS "Racism"? Its simply a term defining in-group/out-group bias, right? EVERY group of people on earth share this bias. Its a natural (and healthy) evolutionary trait.

So why is there such stigma attached to the word? If its natural, and everyone does it, why is it bad? Well, who popularized the word? Bolshevik jews. Who is it targeted at?

White People.

"Racism" has only EVER been a term meant to shame White People. Its not "Racist" when blacks have black-only showings of the Black Panther movie. (Not according to popular opinion, anyway). Its not "Racist" when mestizos assault White farmers in Texas and New Mexico as part of their Reconquista. But some flyers posted around college campuses that say "Its OK To Be White"?

SUPER RACIST, CALL THE POLICE!

See what I mean about common usage and popular opinion?

So what is "Racist" but a shaming word for anything Whites do that non-whites (especially jews and blacks) don't like? Nothing. That's all it has ever been, since it was first recorded 100 years ago.

TL;DR - "Racist" is nothing more than an anti-white slur, no different than "Honkey" or "Cracker".

Eh5439NKfM ago

I really appreciate the time you put into this response, but I have to say, all of the examples you give of not "Racist" stuff, perfectly conforms with the definition I gave. The definition is specifically crafted to make any claims of racism against white people nonsensical. Because it relies on the claim that white people hold institutional power that towers over any institutional power that minority groups hold. It surely is a word that is targeted at white people, though not all white people in equal degree, as you seem to overlook.

Any white person is going to be socialized into an atmosphere and ideology of racism in America, its simply the way they are raised. Just like any person in America will be socialized into a certain amount of patriotism, its so prevalent, you can't escape it during a regular childhood. Racism is a way of highlighting and shaming white people who exercise their power against minorities, because minorities obviously lead better lives when they aren't oppressed.

I hope this mostly lines up with the argument you've set up above, because I would like to make the perhaps dramatic change of explaining why this all makes Racism bad. I believe that all humans deserve certain rights, like food, shelter, and other basic necessities. These ought to be provided by the community, coming from their common labor. Given that racism is about exercising white racial power against other races and removing these basic necessities, it is against my moral views and ought to be against any person who values the quality of life of other human beings.

BigFatDaddy ago

The definition is specifically crafted to make any claims of racism against white people nonsensical.

Pretty much my whole point.

Because it relies on the claim that white people hold institutional power

Semantics used to disguise the fact that it is a shaming term targeting at a single, specific race.

though not all white people in equal degree, as you seem to overlook.

This is nonsensical for a couple of reasons. 1) That's completely ignoring all the leftists, blacks, jews, etc that constantly shriek All White People Are Racist!" 2) Its like saying "Not all black people are niggers." When every black in America knows very well that YES, they are a nigger. Its simply another attempt at hiding the true meaning of the word.

Any white person is going to be socialized into an atmosphere and ideology of racism in America, its simply the way they are raised.

All humans have a natural and instinctual in-group/out-group bias. If anything, White Americans are socialized more than any other People in the world (except maybe Western Europeans) to suppress this natural survival trait. Your pet word is a major factor in this.

Racism is a way of highlighting and shaming white people who exercise their power against minorities, because minorities obviously lead better lives when they aren't oppressed.

Racism is a term meant to shame White People into suppressing their natural HUMAN instincts, and allowing Outsiders to exploit them and their resources. Same thing you said, just a little more honest language.

I believe that all humans deserve certain rights, like food, shelter, and other basic necessities. These ought to be provided by the community, coming from their common labor.

I believe that communists should be thrown from helicopters, or shot in the head and dropped into a mass grave. Everyone has opinions.

Given that racism is about exercising white racial power against other races and removing these basic necessities, it is against my moral views and ought to be against any person who values the quality of life of other human beings.

When you say "White Racial Power" what you really mean is White Superiority in various areas such as IQ, Technological Development, Resource Exploitation, Warfare, etc. What you are saying is that White People are so much better in these areas than non-whites, that we should be ashamed into handicapping ourselves and giving away resources to those very groups that hate, shame, and insult us.

TL;DR - "Racist" is nothing more than an anti-white slur, no different than "Cracker" or Honkey".

And your "moral views" are garbage.

Eh5439NKfM ago

Its always a pleasure when people like you are forced to be more explicit about how you care nothing for human rights or the good of humanity as a whole.

BigFatDaddy ago

That's where you're mistaken, son. You didn't force me to admit anything. I tout my beliefs proudly. I don't try to hide them behind bullshit word games.

And I assure you, humanity as a whole will be a LOT better off once every last jew and commie are dead.

NotHereForPizza ago

You've got a lot to learn.

Operation Mockingbird https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

160065002 ago

Top notch shit right here boys, top NOTCH! Thank you!

DreamcastVibes ago

Wish I could up vote this 1487 more times...

englishwebster ago

Good job goat

TrueAmerican ago

The parties switched. (Dems used to call themselves republican)

Feles ago

It seems like you've got one thing in common with redditors. You assume that everyone one the internet is an amerifag.

NotHereForPizza ago

Funny you say that, there was recently a post about percentage of traffic on voat from different countries. Germany was the only country to go above (I think it was) 2% of the traffic.

Feles ago

Not suprising considering all you guys post is american politics.

RegulationHeadgear ago

Really? Really? 1. Israel is rightly criticised all the time. 2. That final bit about the US using it go to war is unsubstantiated and I've personally never seen that. 3. The Holocaust was an event where millions of innocent people were slaughtered. Remember that the next time you post this kind of bullshit. It is not an ideological weapon, it is a fact. A historical event.

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

They also need to be aware of one of the most dangerous organizations in US:
ADL

Tallest_Skil ago

Posting Q-LARP hoaxes and claims that Trump isn’t a zionist aren’t going to get you anywhere, you fucking liar.

LilBrattyMkr ago

Awe, did someone put a pea under your mattress princess?

Tallest_Skil ago

Not an argument. Trump is a zionist. Q-LARP is a hoax. This is proven fact. Go suck kike cock on reddit if you want to believe in lies.

LilBrattyMkr ago

Wasn't intended to be an argument. Are you so sleep deprived that you can't tell when someone is making fun of you princess? If you'd like to make an argument though, go ahead and back that up with some facts and sources.

Tallest_Skil ago

wasn’t intended to be an argument

Thanks for admitting that you’re wrong, then.

making fun of

Great job doing that when you’re OBJECTIVELY WRONG, dipshit.

facts

  1. Literally every action that Donald Trump has performed at any point in his entire life.
  2. See below.

Nothing is happening. Nothing was ever going to happen. A cuckchan LARPer is not one of the ONLY TWENTY PEOPLE IN THE FUCKING WORLD with a specific level of security clearance and “full knowledge of this plan.” Someone that important is not posting on 4chan. Someone that important–if he actually has knowledge he wants to disseminate–is also not going to type cryptic bullshit that looks like it came from multiple people and ask questions that he doesn’t answer. Someone that important is, statistically, owned by jews, even if there are some patriots left up there. Out of 10 of the most powerful people in the entire fucking world, the redditors on 4chan expect one of them to not only be “#ourguy”, but to leak the proceedings of FUCKING NATIONWIDE MARTIAL LAW and–surprise surprise–the arrest of three quarters of the US government.

Why, that’s exactly what we would want! Happy day! All of our dreams are coming true, and we didn’t even have to put in an ounce of work ourselves! Hooray! It’s over! We’re saved! Don’t ever question the validity of these claims! Just spend MONTHS ignoring everything else that is ACTUALLY happening in the news, never mind your own wildly successful campaign of “It’s okay to be white.” Because nothing ever came from YOU doing an honest day’s work!

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A FREE LUNCH. THE ZOG WILL NOT ARREST THE ZOG. ANYONE WHO TELLS YOU TO SIT ON YOUR ASS AND DO NOTHING IS NOT ONLY LYING TO YOU, HE IS A JEWISH SHILL.

If there is something, why is nothing happening? Where’s the Emergency Broadcast System announcement? Where’s Trump using Obama’s emergency television override to speak to the people? Where’s the martial law? Where are the riots he talked about? Antifa couldn’t even get off their asses for a completely unrelated outing. Why, given the massive flight risk all globalists are, would anyone want to leak the proceedings of such an event in advance? Why would someone ostensibly leaking the proceedings not actually leak any information? Why would someone who claims to be on our side not give us a playbook for how to operate during the event? Why isn’t he telling us how to become leaders of our community to calm the terrified millions around us–who will inevitably exist once the media starts reporting on the “Trump coup”, or when they see their favorite media reporters arrested by the military live on air? Where’s the Huma arrest? Where are the Podesta arrests? They were supposed to be in custody by now; no one has any information on that beyond your continued shilling campaign. Why is he a CIVIC NATIONALIST? Nothing he said has happened.

Fuck off, redditors. Hero worship somewhere else.

  • Claims Trump is magically insulated during what will be painted internationally as a soft coup, and that he will not be addressing the nation on what is supposedly the biggest mass-arrest in national history.
  • Claims there are more patriots than traitors in the government (LOL, so why did they let the last 70 years happen).
  • Claims something is in the works to make the Democrat Party lose the nigger vote entirely.
  • Claims martial law inbound.
  • Claims mass arrests of the government are inbound.
  • Claims the EBS will be invoked.
  • Claims no one will have to lift a finger and that the government will arrest itself, with all trials dispensing actual justice.
  • Claims Obama went to North Korea and may be there right now.
  • Claims Trump would leave an important message on Twitter before leaving for Asia (proven false).
  • Claims Twitter, “My fellow Americans, the storm is upon us…”
  • Claims the CIA/alphabet agencies were responsible for the 11 minute Twitter takedown of POTUS account.
  • Claimed that martial law and the arrests will be made during Trump’s Asia trip (proven false).
  • Claims false flag attacks at right-wing gatherings (cities, sporting events).
  • Claims elections no longer matter.

No proof of any of his claims has come to light, and no explanation of them or what he means by them has ever been given.

Cheesebooger ago

They aren't even going to read or see any of this. They're all over there watching porn and I cant even log onto the site because of them.

NotHereForPizza ago

Here's my attempt

Cheesebooger ago

I bet they don't wanna talk about that huh? hahaha filthy kikes

NotHereForPizza ago

Well here's to hoping they have to take a break sometime.

OhRutherfordBehave ago

You want to learn more newfag? https://voat.co/v/TheMemeFiles/2356120

NotHereForPizza ago

I'll do you one better https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/

Do you even know where that term originated?

OhRutherfordBehave ago

what term

NotHereForPizza ago

You only used six words, how difficult could this be?

I0wnurface ago

Well done

dbvapor ago

Holy shit that last one.. I’d heard someone claim that Trump was trying to get the FBI back to its glory days.. Hoover didn’t like the Jews.. holy fuck this is good!

RegulationHeadgear ago

So you've just iced right over the fact that Trump made one of the most pro-Israel things you can do and moved the embassy to Jerusalem? You literally could not get any more pro-Jewish if you were wearing a skullcap and looking for spare change under your seat in the Synagogue. And you heard that Trump is trying to get the FBI back to glory days? What? What kind of a statement is that? You just heard, did you? Besides, a guy that was universally supported a year ago (RM3) making an investigation into something that I don't personally believe happened but looks REALLY shady somehow makes the FBI be not doing its job properly? Pipe the fuck down. You heard jack shit.

Firinmahlazer ago

Hey. Constructive criticism. Calling someone a faggot isn't a good way to get someone to read your post.

NotHereForPizza ago

Welcome to the world of big boy words.

Firinmahlazer ago

I've been here long enough. I understand big boy words. My point is Reddit is a soft place and they're used to soft words. So quit acting like a fucking dickhead. Have you ever heard the phrase "You'll catch more flies with honey than with vinegar"?

BigFatDaddy ago

"You'll catch more flies with honey than with vinegar"

You'll catch more flies with shit than with honey. So what's your point?

Firinmahlazer ago

The point


You. <---

Eh5439NKfM ago

I'm not sure most people here know how to talk to people without using 4chan slang.

NotHereForPizza ago

The people that think people aren't allowed to say certain words are probably the kind of people we wouldn't care to help anyway.

RegulationHeadgear ago

I think what you're arguing for is ridiculous and your arguments for it are even worse. "Wawwawawaw My friends were morons, so I decided to one-up them and become a racist moron"

Firinmahlazer ago

Holy fuck you are dense. I'M NOT INVITING THEM IN. I'm saying if you want anyone from Reddit to read your post and actually ingest some of the red pills calling them a faggot right out of the gate isn't the way to do it.

NotHereForPizza ago

Quit being a faggot

Firinmahlazer ago

A solid argument. Quit being stupid.

Skankhunt1 ago

Gimme gimme more of dem gibs

FuggBenis ago

Saved.

JoeRogan5025 ago

I hate to burst your bubble, but all of this information can be found on reddit if you know where to look.

dellcos ago

Says the guy with a username of the biggest sell out shill on the planet.

perrin ago

When I stopped listening to Rogan: "white people deserve to suffer more...." on his podcast back in November some time.

dellcos ago

I stopped way back as the amount of stuff similar to what you are saying started adding up. Plus I never listened to any of the MMA ones anyways.

But what did it for me is where he totally cucked on the moon landing. If he changed his mind fine, but he went from "No way we landed on the moon" to "anyone that doesn't think so is an idiot."

He was obviously told in no uncertain terms that he can't be questioning NASA. I am not a person that claims to know stuff like that, but there is at least a reasonable case to say they didn't and Joe knows it.

pcdude ago

You shouldn't have to know where to look, because until you know you don't know to go looking. Gee, I sure wish they were a place where it could end up on the front page. Oh wait…

JoeRogan5025 ago

At least Reddit has a search function. This place is a fucking disaster.

xenoPsychologist ago

the struggle is real.

pcdude ago

Let the door hit you on the way out

weredawg ago

Hush, faggot.

GreaseLightning ago

TIL the Titanic was in inside job

gosso920 ago

Iceberg, Goldberg - What's the difference?

MrShill ago

Meh, all cherry picked facts to support a conclusion already came to

dellcos ago

If they make movies about something. They are cementing a lie into public consciousness. How many holocaust movies are there? War movies to back up getting Bin Laden?

Now that I've got you...how many dinosaur movies are there?

Fagtardicus ago

how many dinosaur movies are there?

very few

dellcos ago

As many or more than holocaust movies. You didn't think very hard. I'll give you a pass.

Dinosaur Movies

Fagtardicus ago

more than half of these are sequels, some like king kong arent even about dinosaurs.

i feel like you could argue your point just a tad bit more competently

dellcos ago

I just did a google search moron. There are at least 30 to be found with 2 seconds work. My point is only there for people with brains to think outside the box. I'll leave you to your fairy tales now.

Fagtardicus ago

people with brains arent swayed by such a shit arguement

dellcos ago

People that think they have brains but don't are afraid to entertain ideas that scare them.

Aristotle said (or it has been attributed to him) "It is a sign of intelligence to be able to entertain an idea while not necessarily accepting it." You obviously are just scared to even think about something like this. Therefore, you aren't very smart.

Fagtardicus ago

really now, your post can be copied and pasted in reply and itd work just as well against you.

dellcos ago

I mean, your original response was proven wrong in two seconds by me. Go away.

dellcos ago

No, I've considered both that dinosaurs are real and that they aren't. You've only considered one side. I always say "How could the be true?" and look for data that backs up a claim before I look for data to disregard the claim.

You actually did neither, which is pathetic.

Fagtardicus ago

You've only considered one side.

wrong

I always say "How could the be true?" and look for data that backs up a claim before I look for data to disregard the claim.

You actually did neither, which is pathetic.

whats pathetic is your entire theory is based on a google search. no actual evidence and yet you wordsalad about retarded shit like its some deep weed ass epiphany.

dellcos ago

You don't know what I think. You have assumed it all. I'm not going to hand feed you. It's food for thought. Go on with your holocaust and dinosaur beliefs if you like. There is very little evidence for either was my point that you refuse to even consider.

Cheers m0

cyclops1771 ago

So, go to /pol/ then?

NotHereForPizza ago

Yes.

Be warned, you won't escape. I'll see you in a few weeks.

RegulationHeadgear ago

Yeah those Jew-haters sure are persuasive. Especially when their "reason" for being a right-wing headcase is because their young liberal friends were unable to support their own views and that the GOP used to be the progressive party (seriously? You think that is at all relevant to today? Genuinely?)

MillstoneNecklace ago

Both political parties in the US are part of a false dialectic controlled by the globalist bankers.

Just as communism and capitalism are a controlled dialectic created by the Royal Society, both systems turn the individual into just a cog in the machine: communism makes you a cog for the State and capitalism makes you a cog for the corporations. Either way, the individual loses and becomes irrelevant.

raw ago

Newfags? We having another exodus? What did Reddit do this time?

dbvapor ago

They banned r/deepfakes.

NaomiWuLiar ago

banned underage fan subs and deep fakes

SyriansAreTerrorists ago

Freeing the slaves was a mistake

Firevine ago

Bringing them here in the first place was.

library_of_stupid ago

No, not shipping them back, killing them or castrating them was the mistake.

NonyaBidness ago

It would not have been. Joining them was.

AnTi90d ago

Buying them from the Jew slave-traders was, too.

If I had a time machine, I'd blow them out of the water.. then we'd only have to deal with the Spiks and the Carib-beaners.

Gigglestick ago

Why don't we just go back to Europe??

AnTi90d ago

This area has more strategic military value.

Gigglestick ago

Yeah and much above that whole genre bro for sure.

White-Supremacist ago

Majority of slave owners were jews and blacks, not whites. There were more white slaves than black.

PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBS2 ago

Purely out of curiousity source on this?

BaneGhostiSwear ago

yeah, i mean those kikes got those niggers from other niggers in africa. it couldn't get much worse!

Bigglesworth45 ago

One things for sure when your buying from a jew your getting the worst quality at the highest price.

olinneserpona ago

Point 22 from Kaczynski is as true as it gets.

I can say the same about liberalism as well: if all that which should be liberated is nowliberated, liberalism will invent things to liberate or liberate things that should not be liberated.

AmaleksHairyAss ago

Leftist here, that diatribe doesn't even faintly resemble me or my reasoning.

RegulationHeadgear ago

Not at all like the The Republican Party, so expertly shown here as having swapped places with The Democrats around 1900, when an influential Democrat became progressive and suddenly the GOP had nothing to argue about and win votes over. What did they do? Changed views, found some more things to argue about. Is that not a perfect analogy?

NotHereForPizza ago

Like women and giving them rights.

I hope this isn't too soon for them

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

If it is to soon for them, this will help explain why they shouldn't be allowed to vote nor should they be allowed to enter the workforce: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83886.png

JebHasCheese ago

Would it have been better for the founding fathers to have instituted a family vote then? As in a family gets the right to vote with their marraige certificate?

NeoMarxistZoomDweeby ago

Let's see if I can offer a few challenge questions to this post without being called an idiot a thousand times.

So, I agree with everything this person is saying, but I disagree on their conclusions.

What if we were to say, one family one vote, but that vote is determined by the woman? If it's truly meant to pit husband vs wife, then why not let only women vote, not men?

As for working outside of the home, I get it that it follows logically for the woman to stay home and raise the children, since they do have to give birth and women are predisposed to actually wanting to stay home and raise children whereas men are more inclined not to. However, should women be arbitrarily barred from pursuing a different coarse in life? How would men feel if they were specifically told they must spend their lives doing something they don't want to do and are absolutely banned from doing what they do want to do? I get the whole wage slave idea and how that applies to anyone, male or female. But let's not pretend that ALL women should be mothers. Some very specifically should not be. Some women, as represented in history, were of far more use to humanity by pursuing their passion than being mothers. Granted, it's been fewer females than males, and I'd wager that most women would choose to be mothers. But I think you get my point.

Let us also not candy coat the past. The truth is, women working outside the home had far more to do with industrialization than feminism. The moving of society away from agricultural life and into an industrial one is what started this whole thing. I'd have to look up specific statistics, but since the industrial revolution, most mothers have worked outside the home. I think the 1950's was the decade of the most SAHM since industrialization, and even then it was only 20-25% of mothers if memory serves.

Moreover, I don't think modern men are equipped psychologically to be the head of household providers that men of the past were. Men would have to step up in a way that very few do anymore. Granted, increased wages would help with this, but it would require an entire 180 in the way men view responsibility. So, it's not JUST a woman thing.
So, ultimately, feminism wasn't entirely borne out of the minds of evil marxists or psychopathic oligarchs. There was a genuine desire to be seen as a full fledged human being on the behalf of women. It's complicated for sure. Because feminism ultimately has harmed more than it has helped, but it's erroneous to say that from a female perspective it has done ONLY harm.

Look at it this way, what if the shoe was on the other foot? The truth is, women for most of history were always in a very precarious position. If your husband chose to leave you (and let's not pretend that men always do the right thing) or he died, you were fucked. Totally fucked. You had to rely on a brother, an uncle, maybe even a grown son for your survival. If you had none of that, then a life of prostitution was basically the only way. I mean, it wasn't some fucking storybook tale. Do some actual research. Try to understand why feminism started or at the very least, why women came to support it.

How would men feel if they were wholesale treated as sub-human? How would men feel if their entire lives depended upon the actions and kindness if the women around them? How would men feel if they were told they were too stupid, childish or otherwise inferior in every way?

Well, we already know don't we. Look at the typical male response to the average feminazi who does state such things. Not that they shouldn't be rightfully angry. But maybe then you can understand why feminism started.

In fact, I'd argue that much if the rage and anger I see from men in regards to feminism is the idea that women want to dominate men. But these same men argue the point by stating that feminists are evil and wrong because it's men that should be dominating women!

As such, I disagree with both. I personally wish for a society where men and women ARE free to choose their own life path without ridicule. Modern women are ridiculed for choosing to be SAHM, which is totally fucked. But the answer to that isn't "men need to rule women lives with an iron fist".

xenoPsychologist ago

What if we were to say, one family one vote, but that vote is determined by the woman? If it's truly meant to pit husband vs wife, then why not let only women vote, not men?

isnt that just sweden?

women working outside the home had far more to do with industrialization than feminism

absolutely false. the natural response to industrialization decreasing the need for labor and manpower isnt flooding the market with more potential workers.

I don't think modern men are equipped psychologically to be the head of household providers

what a coincidence you have there. feminism takes women out of the home and turns them into narcissistic whores and suddenly children arent being raised right to head the household, in your opinion. but no, its automatically mens fault. its not like they arent already responsible for and blamed for everything else. nope, gotta make sure women never have to be responsible for anything at all. especially in an age where their jobs are easier than ever before. they have it so hard. the struggle is real.

You had to rely on a brother, an uncle, maybe even a grown son

and, as men, they took up the burden. go figure. and if you have nothing other than prostitution to offer the world, thats what you have to work with.

How would men feel if they were wholesale treated as sub-human

they are. thats something women in the western world never had to deal with. thats african and asian nonsense right there. women were practically worshiped in the west. and they didnt have to suffer and die for it.

feminism didnt come from women being oppressed. go visit an african or muslim country to get a taste of real oppression. western womens BS excuses for oppression are a joke. feminism was born from the conscious decision to destroy human civilization. its why isreal stamps that out every time it shows its face there.

your refutations are bogus at best.

Fagtardicus ago

wtf is this?

it aint showing up in source

xenoPsychologist ago

what you do is at the bottom of your comment you type *[, then all the words you want to have the mouseover text on (exactly as they appear), then ]:

follow that colon up with what you want the mouseover text to be, and thats it.

i think that markdown is meant to be used for clarifying abbreviations or making notes or something.

asterisk, open bracket, your words, close bracket, colon, secret words.

Fagtardicus ago

well neato, and i thought a crawly had snuck onto my shit without me noticing

xenoPsychologist ago

the comments here have more interesting bits, even though the op deleted his account.

NeoMarxistZoomDweeby ago

Not really sure why I even bothered. At least you showed me why discourse is basically impossible with you larping alt-righters.

You're "movement" will never get anywhere. Not when you denigrate half of the population of the fucking world. For the record, I'm not a feminist. I actively despise them. But guys like you, who say things like "women are overgrown children" etc. etc. are the EXACT reasons young women hate you. Not because they're brainwashed, but because they don't appreciate being called garbage or sub-human because they were born with a vagina instead of a dick.

Keep it up though. The one woman who runs the trad wives sub has got you're back.

Just treat people the way you'd want to be treated. If you would rather blow your head off than live in a world where you are required to be subservient to women, why would you expect women to be ok with this? I'm not stupid, I'm not degenerate, and I'm not sub-human.

But go ahead and think that you'll ever get anywhere with such an attitude.

No psychologically healthy man would want a subservient worm as a wife, any more than a psychologically healthy woman would want a subservient worm as a husband.

Fagtardicus ago

stopped reading @ larping alt-righters, since you obviously dont have anything important to say

xenoPsychologist ago

You're "movement

what movement? you dont know me and your assertions (insults) are incorrect.

denigrate half of the population of the fucking world

i did nothing of the kind. stop lying.

For the record, I'm not a feminist. I actively despise them

youve given me no reason to believe you.

young women hate you

again. you dont know me.

guys like you

you dont know me. i doubt you read anything i said. perhaps, women like you shouldnt act like children when they come to the adult discussion table.

called garbage or sub-human

id didnt call anyone any of those things. thats quite an accusation.

Just treat people the way you'd want to be treated. If you would rather blow your head off than live in a world where you are required to be subservient to women

again. you dont know me. try making an adult refutation instead of a flimsy, off script personal attack. are women incapable of discussion things without acting like children? the world may never know. but i do know you have a fixation on sub-humanity. hmm... very interesting indeed.

But go ahead and think that you'll ever get anywhere with such an attitude

you are so desperately insistent that ill "never get anywhere". you dont know me or where ive been.

No psychologically healthy man would want a subservient worm as a wife, any more than a psychologically healthy woman would want a subservient worm as a husband

thats quite a dramatic claim to make. and. as usual, i never even remotely implied i or anyone else wanted that. dont. be. stupid.

NeoMarxistZoomDweeby ago

Have fun with your idiotic movement, you piles of shit.

If the white man is anything like the piles of dogshit that frequent this site, I'd rather see you all die out.

You are all pathetic. You blame Jews, blacks, women, anyone but yourselves for your pathetic existence.

I was on your side, believe it or not. But the sheer idiocy, vileness and pathetic hatred of everything under the sun has fervently changed my mind.

Keep on keepin on. The liberals might drive people here, but you pathetic little worms will drive them right back out.

Oh, and Hiltler did plenty wrong. Learn a little about your weasely little man child besides "muh jeewwwwwewssss!".

xenoPsychologist ago

idiotic movement

what movement? whose movement?

You blame Jews, blacks, women, anyone but yourselves for your pathetic existence

wrong again. we made civilization. we are tired of you retards tearing it down. knock it off.

I was on your side, believe it or not

what you said before disagrees with you. its right up there in the comments. you are a liar.

pathetic hatred

the only one being hateful here is you. im just calling you out on your obvious stupidity and lies.

Hiltler did plenty wrong

well, duh. he wasnt successful. and im not even a huge fan. i just recognize evil when i see it. after all, i stopped to talk with a shrill harpy just last night. that harpy was you.

if you actually knew me, youd know how to successfully insult me instead of reading from your script. you can stop being stupid any time now. its unbecoming. how will you land a rich husband if youre just gonna flail around like an idiot and be inconsistent of logic all through the conversation?

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

"The Modern Woman", ladies and gentlemen.

Clean yourself up!
/v/TraditionalWives

NeoMarxistZoomDweeby ago

Yep. Pretty much what I expected.

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

And the arrogance in the assumption you make thinking I give a fuck about what you expect from anything.
I'm not here to fulfill your expectations.

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

All the shit you say has been argued against a million times over. It's readily available information. If you think I'm going to waste my fucking time just to entertain you, you can go fuck yourself.
You're not special. You have questions about your own opinions? Look it up your damn self.

You better be prepared to go to war for what you believe. Men are not going to fight for women like you.
Men fight for for their wives and children. Not the "Independent woman" down the street.
Even now your unjustifiably benefiting from the men whose lives were sacrificed for the sake of their own family.

You want to live in a feminist state? Move to Sweden.

olinneserpona ago

That was a good read, but there is one thing I don't understand and I see it in American politics all the time. When the author talks about liberalism and conservatism as opposites it he must be wrong? The very thing American conservatives are trying to preserve is liberalism, is it not? I've never understood what American conservatism is all about if it isn't the preservation of liberalism(or classic liberalism).

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

Conservatism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community.

Liberalism thinks the community should be in consonance with the individual despite the individuals contribution. They think the community should contribute to the individual rather than the individual contribute to the community.

olinneserpona ago

Conservatism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community.

That is liberalism, or classic liberalism. The liberalism you describe is Marxism.

I could ask it in a better way: which or what ideology is conservatism trying to conserve? The 'conservatives' of the future will try to conserve the madness of todays liberalism. That is why I don't see conservatism as a winning option: it will always be on the defensive against forces that are built in in the ideology it is trying to preserve. Marxists/neo libs, whatever, they know this and are taking advantage of it. They are fooling conservatives into thinking conservatism can win. That is why liberalism is able to push degeneracy further and further with each generation.

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

That is liberalism, or classic liberalism.

No it isn't. It's socially conscious nationalism.

The liberalism you describe is Marxism.
Yea.That's what liberalism is all about now-a-days.

I could ask it in a better way: which or what ideology is conservatism trying to conserve? The 'conservatives' of the future will try to conserve the madness of todays liberalism. That is why I don't see conservatism as a winning option: it will always be on the defensive against forces that are built in in the ideology it is trying to preserve. Marxists/neo libs, whatever, they know this and are taking advantage of it. They are fooling conservatives into thinking conservatism can win. That is why liberalism is able to push degeneracy further and further with each generation.

No...
You want me to explain to you what Conservatism is?
Instead of guessing... Look it up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism

olinneserpona ago

The liberalism you describe is Marxism. Yea.That's what liberalism is all about now-a-days.

No you don't get to decide what liberalism is. Liberalism is not Marxism and Marxism is not liberalism. I can see how this must be the case for you to have an argument though.

No... You want me to explain to you what Conservatism is? Instead of guessing... Look it up.

Yes. it is trying to conserve the ideas of Mill and the like. You had the chance to tell me what political ideology and ides conservatism is trying to conserve. If you don't know this then that's fine, but don't give me an attitude and expect this to go anywhere, god damn brat.

YouveSeenTheButcher ago

Go have some kids you fucking freak.

I_TakeupSpace ago

Kushner is of Belarusian stock!?

Punished Trump Theory confirmed.

crazy_eyes ago

Nice skeleton.

knije_tahou ago

Wish I could upvoat this more

a100167 ago

Also... the fuckin' Jews did 9/11.

ninjajunkie ago

You somehow created the redpill version of "Bite the pillow, I'm going in dry."

Son, I am not disappoint.

wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ago

Man why overload a sheeple...red pilled them to hard. No lube and I like it. Thank you.

NotHereForPizza ago

refer to the other comment

I figured i should do it somewhat quickly

wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ago

Yeah. They don't like taking their meds. Why they had to come here.. Sad when you tell them they are being part of the jewstate, sorry i mean deepstate. It is deep.

RegulationHeadgear ago

Did a Jew touch you when you were small?

xenoPsychologist ago

probably. its what they do.

I_TakeupSpace ago

I seriously need to dedicate a wall to that shit.

Derpfroot ago

I can almost guarantee @Cheesebooger already has one completed.

NotHereForPizza ago

I didn't have anything organized for new people

At the very least, someone else now has somewhere to start.