No, this isn't another post where I talk down to you, tell you to fuck off, or berate you in another fun manner that some of the retards here have decided would be a good idea.
Instead I'll offer you something, something you may think you don't want, but something you'll soon return begging for more of. I'll leave links below for you to start out. Let me know when you want more.
Here's your intro: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83684.png
Here's some fun history for you: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83685.png
Here's some more history: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83687.jpg
I don't want to bore you. Let's go back to something a little simpler: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83688.jpg
Who doesn't love movies?: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83691.png
Another fun, spooky one: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83694.jpg
This one is sort of intricate, so maybe swallow this one in chunks: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83695.jpg
Long, but very intriguing: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83701.jpg
Very interesting, but may take a while: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83704.jpg
Oh, how'd that get in there?: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83706.jpg
On a more serious note though, this is the big one that you need to see: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83693.jpg
view the rest of the comments →
olinneserpona ago
Point 22 from Kaczynski is as true as it gets.
I can say the same about liberalism as well: if all that which should be liberated is nowliberated, liberalism will invent things to liberate or liberate things that should not be liberated.
NotHereForPizza ago
Like women and giving them rights.
I hope this isn't too soon for them
YouveSeenTheButcher ago
If it is to soon for them, this will help explain why they shouldn't be allowed to vote nor should they be allowed to enter the workforce: https://imgoat.com/uploads/8d30a95947/83886.png
NeoMarxistZoomDweeby ago
Let's see if I can offer a few challenge questions to this post without being called an idiot a thousand times.
So, I agree with everything this person is saying, but I disagree on their conclusions.
What if we were to say, one family one vote, but that vote is determined by the woman? If it's truly meant to pit husband vs wife, then why not let only women vote, not men?
As for working outside of the home, I get it that it follows logically for the woman to stay home and raise the children, since they do have to give birth and women are predisposed to actually wanting to stay home and raise children whereas men are more inclined not to. However, should women be arbitrarily barred from pursuing a different coarse in life? How would men feel if they were specifically told they must spend their lives doing something they don't want to do and are absolutely banned from doing what they do want to do? I get the whole wage slave idea and how that applies to anyone, male or female. But let's not pretend that ALL women should be mothers. Some very specifically should not be. Some women, as represented in history, were of far more use to humanity by pursuing their passion than being mothers. Granted, it's been fewer females than males, and I'd wager that most women would choose to be mothers. But I think you get my point.
Let us also not candy coat the past. The truth is, women working outside the home had far more to do with industrialization than feminism. The moving of society away from agricultural life and into an industrial one is what started this whole thing. I'd have to look up specific statistics, but since the industrial revolution, most mothers have worked outside the home. I think the 1950's was the decade of the most SAHM since industrialization, and even then it was only 20-25% of mothers if memory serves.
Moreover, I don't think modern men are equipped psychologically to be the head of household providers that men of the past were. Men would have to step up in a way that very few do anymore. Granted, increased wages would help with this, but it would require an entire 180 in the way men view responsibility. So, it's not JUST a woman thing.
So, ultimately, feminism wasn't entirely borne out of the minds of evil marxists or psychopathic oligarchs. There was a genuine desire to be seen as a full fledged human being on the behalf of women. It's complicated for sure. Because feminism ultimately has harmed more than it has helped, but it's erroneous to say that from a female perspective it has done ONLY harm.
Look at it this way, what if the shoe was on the other foot? The truth is, women for most of history were always in a very precarious position. If your husband chose to leave you (and let's not pretend that men always do the right thing) or he died, you were fucked. Totally fucked. You had to rely on a brother, an uncle, maybe even a grown son for your survival. If you had none of that, then a life of prostitution was basically the only way. I mean, it wasn't some fucking storybook tale. Do some actual research. Try to understand why feminism started or at the very least, why women came to support it.
How would men feel if they were wholesale treated as sub-human? How would men feel if their entire lives depended upon the actions and kindness if the women around them? How would men feel if they were told they were too stupid, childish or otherwise inferior in every way?
Well, we already know don't we. Look at the typical male response to the average feminazi who does state such things. Not that they shouldn't be rightfully angry. But maybe then you can understand why feminism started.
In fact, I'd argue that much if the rage and anger I see from men in regards to feminism is the idea that women want to dominate men. But these same men argue the point by stating that feminists are evil and wrong because it's men that should be dominating women!
As such, I disagree with both. I personally wish for a society where men and women ARE free to choose their own life path without ridicule. Modern women are ridiculed for choosing to be SAHM, which is totally fucked. But the answer to that isn't "men need to rule women lives with an iron fist".
xenoPsychologist ago
isnt that just sweden?
absolutely false. the natural response to industrialization decreasing the need for labor and manpower isnt flooding the market with more potential workers.
what a coincidence you have there. feminism takes women out of the home and turns them into narcissistic whores and suddenly children arent being raised right to head the household, in your opinion. but no, its automatically mens fault. its not like they arent already responsible for and blamed for everything else. nope, gotta make sure women never have to be responsible for anything at all. especially in an age where their jobs are easier than ever before. they have it so hard. the struggle is real.
and, as men, they took up the burden. go figure. and if you have nothing other than prostitution to offer the world, thats what you have to work with.
they are. thats something women in the western world never had to deal with. thats african and asian nonsense right there. women were practically worshiped in the west. and they didnt have to suffer and die for it.
feminism didnt come from women being oppressed. go visit an african or muslim country to get a taste of real oppression. western womens BS excuses for oppression are a joke. feminism was born from the conscious decision to destroy human civilization. its why isreal stamps that out every time it shows its face there.
your refutations are bogus at best.
Fagtardicus ago
wtf is this?
it aint showing up in source
xenoPsychologist ago
what you do is at the bottom of your comment you type *[, then all the words you want to have the mouseover text on (exactly as they appear), then ]:
follow that colon up with what you want the mouseover text to be, and thats it.
i think that markdown is meant to be used for clarifying abbreviations or making notes or something.
asterisk, open bracket, your words, close bracket, colon, secret words.
Fagtardicus ago
well neato, and i thought a crawly had snuck onto my shit without me noticing
xenoPsychologist ago
the comments here have more interesting bits, even though the op deleted his account.