https://archive.fo/1ITzQ
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2367137
Firstly let me state this is an ongoing issue I have had with Voat since my arrival here over 2 years ago and I've lost accounts for calling out the pedophiles and their enablers (/u/ Kevdude and /u/ Crensch and every user at /v/SoapBoxBanHammer protect the pedos, defending their posts under the argument of freedom of expression since it isn't showing full nudity, completely ignoring the fact it is still sexualizing underage persons)
Many others have noticed this in the past and gets attacked, harassed, and slandered for pointing it out.
The admins claim they don't want to take a moral stand and only want to deal with legality regarding banning. This makes you wonder who is he worried about upsetting by getting rid of the pedo subverses?
maybe this has something to do with it
Notice how "popular" voaters are actually encouraging the pedophilia in the top comment.
lulz guise iz jus trollin
By leaving pedophilia on Voat the admins are choosing a side and not simply remaining a neutral authority. This is of concern because pedophiles are in a hardcore campaign right now to make pedophilia a libertarian issue so they can have a clueless support base when laws are inevitably changed to apply to the internet. They know they are able to operate out in the open under temporary loopholes in old laws and want to get as many people on their side before it changes. LGBT community already supports them (and many in LGBT are pedophiles themselves) and now they are getting Libertarian goats to defend their depravity and it's working. I believe there are a lot more closeted homosexuals on this site than people admit, so many people see the pedophilia issue and jump to defend it, seemingly behaving as a Libertarian or even right-wing.
The argument is immediately diverted into a freedom issue instead of ignoring the obvious: It's sexualizing children.
view the rest of the comments →
gamepwn ago
I remember being temporarily banned for bringing this up and having a fight with the moderators. Hecho, Crensh, alot of pedophile mods and subverses. Hecho runs multiple pedophile subverses.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2079341
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2082861/10273281
oftotc ago
I do not believe that you are really so dull as to not understand a such simple voat concept, but crensch said it best:
But allying w/ freshmeat shows you're just concern-trolling. Have fun with that ;-)
gamepwn ago
Voat, the home of the Pizzagate community, should not have pedophile content on it. That includes drawings of child rape and photos being shared of little girls in bikinis and their underwear because "its technically not illegal". Fuck you pedophile
oftotc ago
I defend PG from cunts like you all the time fucktard. But you're too stupid to figure that out and just parrot your bitch-master freshmeat. You attack specifically to distract away from PG evidence and are so persistent about it, I suspect you're paid to do it. You're an intel-whore who aids those kid-fuckers by creating forum-drama. Fuck off.
freshmeat ago
PG itself100% legit, the subverse is on Voat is100% controlled by opposition. That is a distinction that needs to be made.
Pedos run that subverse. There will be no justice for PG when it is ran by the enemy.
oftotc ago
Only a muslim or jew would try to equate defending freedom of speech with being a pedophile.
freshmeat ago
Jacking off to children isnt free speech
oftotc ago
Did you figure that out on your own or did someone have to read it for you?